1 Dec
2005
1 Dec
'05
9:50 p.m.
Couterpath (www.counterpath.com) (formerly known as Xten) has this Xtunnel (
www.xtunnels.org) which sort of solves the NAT traversal problem. I haven't
used it but I think it does. Correct me if I'm wrong. Btw... does anyone
have experience using Xtunnel in their system?
Of course only clients supporting this are their own.. x-lite & eyebeam, but
they aren't the worst clients around. Eyebeam has even sort of "ICE
support". Meaning no TURN protocol, but STUN and Xtunnel.
- Teemu
2005/12/1, Cesc <cesc.santa(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 11/30/05, Nils Ohlmeier <lists(a)ohlmeier.org> wrote:
--
Teemu Harju
http://www.teemuharju.net
What you are probably thinking of is, that an UA
with ICE support could
also
advertise its IP address and port of the RTP
proxy, but this is then
called
TURN. And I think that is even more far away from
becoming a standard,
besides that their are AFAIK no UA's or TURN servers available yet.
Hope this helps
Nils
I think that the MiniSIP project is developing one client and
server... www.minisip.org, in the "branches" of the SVN repository. No
idea how far is it from being usable at all.
Cesc
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers