Hi,
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html (text copied below) says that the rport functionality in ser-cvs-version at that time was not correct.
I have a simple question related to that: - Is the rport functionality correct in ser-0.8.10, or is the same problem present there ?
(The "ISSUES" file does not mention any problems related to rport for any ser release, but I want to be sure)
/Lasse
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html follows: [Serdev] Re: received-rport in SER ?
Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:57:34 +0200
Previous message: [Serdev] Re: Accounting module mods with MySQL and SERWEB Next message: [Serdev] RE: [Serusers] Accounting Script Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hopefuly, it is now fixed on CVS. We haven't tested too much yet, though.
-Jiri
At 12:37 AM 4/2/2003, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:28:30PM +0200, Sergio Miguel Garcia wrote:
Hello,
I have been looking for symmetric-reponse ( receiver-rport pair ) in the
mailing lists of SER, and I found some interesting mails about the same issue from you
I've been trying with the CVS version and got these results: ... when I
append an empty "rport" in the Via header, the server fills the Via header with the correct values of "rport" and "received", but the packet is sent back to the "received" IP BUT to the port scpecified in the Via header instead of the "rport" port.
This means that the response of the request never reaches the original UA
using a symmetric NAT ( althought the return IP address is correct), because SER sents the UDP packet to a internal port.
I've tried with the Vovida SIP server v1.4 and works fine. Have you tried
to fix it or know someone that have tried to solve this issue ?
Thanks in advance for your help and best regards.
Sergio.
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/