- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] TCP sessions
by Stefan Ljung (TN/EAB) 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Is it possible to make the SER 0.9 (or 2.0) to reuse the listening TCP port , usually 5060, when it relays requests to the next SIP element in the network.

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER and SIPPY b2bua
by TCB 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Anyone out there managed to use sippy b2bua with openser . Any pointers would be most welcome. -- TC

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Group and directed call pickup
by Zahid Mehmood 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Hi All, I am working on implementing group/directed call pickup and it is my understanding that this requires dialog state information. Can someone describe the best approach to implement this when using multiple proxies? We have multiple proxies that replicate registration information to each other. Is there a way to share the dialog information among multiple proxies? or should all calls be routed through one proxy? Also, does this require presence server? Thanks in advance. -- Zahid

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory
by laurent schweizer 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Hello, I have 2 openser working on 2 diffrents server. The first is doing the full job, Registration, authentifications .... And the second is only used for SEMS so a very simple config file. the first is working perfectly but the second create me this night a memory error. He was working correcly more that 1 month and I don't think that the problem is a overload usage because during the night I have low traffic. ./openser[5429]: ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed ./openser[5435]: ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory ./openser[5435]: ERROR: new_t: out of mem: mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "avpops.so" modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 15000) modparam("tm", "pass_provisional_replies", 1) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) children=60 disable_tcp=yes disable_dns_blacklist=yes disable_dns_failover=yes disable_dns_blacklist=true # modparam( "tm", "tw_append", "info_append:hdr[Content-Length];hdr[Content-Type];msg[body]") #modparam( "tm", "tw_append", "info_append:Content-Length=$avp(i:70);Content-Type=$avp(i:71);body=$avp(i:72)") modparam("tm", "tw_append", "billing:billingid=$avp(i:67);accountid=$avp(i:68);Remote-Party-ID=$avp(i:69);Pays=$avp(i:70)") avp_aliases="bid=i:67;acid=i:68;rp=i:69;pays=i:70" # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- route{ # xlog("L_ERR","BEGIN: call [$rm] ru[$ru] fu[$fu] tu[$tu] si[$si] ct[$ct]\n"); if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("5")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); return; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); return; }; sl_send_reply("100","---- trining"); record_route(); # if (loose_route()) { # xlog("L_ERR","LOOSE_ROUTE: [$rm] ru[$ru] fu[$fu] tu[$tu] si[$si] ct[$ct]\n"); # } if (!t_newtran()){ sl_send_reply("500","could not create transaction"); return; }; if (method=="INVITE"){ $avp(i:67) = $hdr(x-billingId); $avp(i:68) = $hdr(x-accountcode); $avp(i:69) = $hdr(Remote-Party-ID); $avp(i:70) = $hdr(Pays); if (uri =~ "sip:.*@") { if (!t_write_unix("/tmp/sems_sock","billing/billing")){ log("could not contact media server\n"); t_reply("500","could not contact media server"); return; } return; } # if (method=="INFO") { # $avp(i:70) = $cT; # $avp(i:71) = $cl; # $avp(i:72) = $rb; # # if(!t_write_unix("/tmp/sems_sock","sems/info_append")){ # log("could not contact sems\n"); # t_reply("500","could not contact media server"); # } # } } if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL"){ if(!t_write_unix("/tmp/sems_sock","bye")) t_reply("500","error contacting bye"); } return; }

3 3

[OpenSER-Users] Bug in CPL module
by Helmut Kuper 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, currently I update openser 1.2.0 to 1.2.2. I found that cpl_run.c has an error arounf line 553: case REASON_ATTR: <<<<<<< .mine reason.len=n; ======= reason.len = n; >>>>>>> .r2629 should be: case REASON_ATTR: reason.len = n; regards Helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGzYHh4tZeNddg3dwRAlCFAKCqgvyB2laQR2zusGt2ux02dAzNRQCdGBST DCAzgAopkYtVxhKS5rqr/DM= =O9Ck -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Serusers] SIP-based multipoint video conferecing?
by SIP 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Is anyone aware of, or does anyone have any experience with any SIP-based multipoint (i.e. more than 2 users) video conferencing server software? Ideally, of course, I'd like an H263 codec module for SEMS, but barring that, another SIP server that I can easily mesh with SER, forwarding video requests as need be to the video conferencing server to handle just the video mixing. Anyone use anything like that in their environments? N.

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] AVP Iteration
by Brandon Armstead 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Hello, I'm trying to setup some kind of iteration through an AVP list using recursive routing, and use an AVP to create an "index" incrementing counter, i.e. if(is_avp_set("$avp(counter)")){ $avp(counter) = $avp(counter) + 1; } else { $avp(counter) = 0; } then I wish to apply to an avp index likewise: if($avp(some_avp[$avp(counter)]) == null){ # this avp list index does not exist, stop recursive routing } else { # keep doing operations } However this is trivial, there seems not to be any easy way of going about this, also openser.cfg errors out when I try to nest AVP's and use an AVP value as an index value. xl_parse_index: error parsing format [$avp(counter)])] expecting ']' parse error (410,59-89): unknown script variable Any thoughts? All Appreciated, thank you! -- Brandon Armstead

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream
by Dan-Cristian Bogos 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Yin, here you have a proper configuration: http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/branches/1.2/examples/nat… Just make sure you install rtpproxy and start it on the same host with your openser. If properly installed, openser should recognize it in the logs (found RTP proxy, support for it activated) Cheers, DanB On 8/28/07, zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN <yin.wu(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > In fact, I have two telephones VOIP and Openser as a SIP Proxy (in the same local network,there's no NAT.), they can register and call each other with no probleme. Now I just need the stream RTP pass by Openser, but no directely between two telephone. I have installed the rtpproxy, but I don't understand how it works exactely. And I don't know if it is nessary to install mediaproxy? This is my openser.cfg, can you give me some advice? > Thank you very much! > > Yin > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Dan-Cristian Bogos [mailto:dan.bogos@gmail.com] > Envoyé : mardi 28 août 2007 10:29 > À : zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN > Cc : users openser.org > Objet : Re: [OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream > > Yin, > > It all depends on what do u want to use it for. Can u explain a bit your scenario? > > DanB > > On 8/28/07, zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN <yin.wu(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you for your help. I don't need NAT, it's just a local network. What I have to use? The Rtpproxy or Mediaproxy? And what diffrence between them? > > > > Yin > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Dan-Cristian Bogos [mailto:dan.bogos@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 27 > > août 2007 18:01 À : zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN Cc : users(a)openser.org > > Objet : Re: [OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream > > > > Hello Yin, > > > > openser by itself has no RTP capability. If you want NAT bypass solutions, check out the following softwares: > > 1. RTPProxy - http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/rtpproxy/ > > 2. Mediaproxy: - http://ag-projects.com/MediaProxy.html > > > > If you are looking for some RTP related applications, you can check SEMS: > > http://www.iptel.org/sems > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > DanB > > > > On 8/27/07, zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN <yin.wu(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Now my openser is just a Sip proxy which manage the sip > > > requests and I want to manage RTP streams by the openser, that means > > > openser recieve RTP streams and retransmit them. How can I do? > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: [OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream
by Dan-Cristian Bogos 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Yin, It all depends on what do u want to use it for. Can u explain a bit your scenario? DanB On 8/28/07, zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN <yin.wu(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > > Thank you for your help. I don't need NAT, it's just a local network. What I have to use? The Rtpproxy or Mediaproxy? And what diffrence between them? > > Yin > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Dan-Cristian Bogos [mailto:dan.bogos@gmail.com] > Envoyé : lundi 27 août 2007 18:01 > À : zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN > Cc : users(a)openser.org > Objet : Re: [OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream > > Hello Yin, > > openser by itself has no RTP capability. If you want NAT bypass solutions, check out the following softwares: > 1. RTPProxy - http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/rtpproxy/ > 2. Mediaproxy: - http://ag-projects.com/MediaProxy.html > > If you are looking for some RTP related applications, you can check SEMS: > http://www.iptel.org/sems > > Hope this helps. > > DanB > > On 8/27/07, zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN <yin.wu(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Now my openser is just a Sip proxy which manage the sip > > requests and I want to manage RTP streams by the openser, that means > > openser recieve RTP streams and retransmit them. How can I do? > > > > Thank you very much! > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > >

1 0

[Serusers] ser + radius/mysql
by Nhadie 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Hi, i'm testing ser with radius using mysql. at first without inserting the Sip-Group on radgroupcheck, my x-lite can register. but when i add it i always get unauthorized. is there something wrong on the values i inserted? on my ser.cfg REGISTER part i only have this if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!radius_www_authorize("mydomain.com")) { if (isflagset(8)) {xlog("L_INFO", "Authenticating\n");}; www_challenge("mydomain.com", "0"); break; }; if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; break; }; mysql> select * from radcheck; +----+------------------------+-----------+----+---------+ | id | UserName | Attribute | op | Value | +----+------------------------+-----------+----+---------+ | 1 | 1001(a)mydomain.com | Password | == | TEST1001 | +----+------------------------+-----------+----+---------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from radgroupcheck; +----+-----------+-----------+----+----------------------+ | id | GroupName | Attribute | op | Value | +----+-----------+-----------+----+----------------------+ | 1 | intl-pstn | Sip-Group | == | world-pstn | +----+-----------+-----------+----+----------------------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from usergroup; +----+------------------------+-----------+ | id | UserName | GroupName | +----+------------------------+-----------+ | 1 | 1001(a)mydomain.com | intl-pstn | +----+------------------------+-----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER as Asterisk/CallWeaver frontend
by Eugene Prokopiev 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Hi, Can anybody tell some success story about using OpenSER as Asterisk/CallWeaver frontend? I tried to googling first but where are no detailed useful stories :( Now I have CallWeaver (Asterisk fork) installed on Linux server which connected to 2 different providers via one wan interface but 2 ip addresses from one network, for example: eth0 - 10.0.0.2/24 -> provider1(10.0.2.1) - 10.0.0.3/24 -> provider1(10.0.3.1) So, I need send SIP requests to provider1 from address 10.0.0.2/24 and to provider2 from 10.0.0.3/24. This must be done because my internet provider must account trafic on router 10.0.0.1 for 2 VoIP providers separately and it's billing system can do it only by different source ip addresses and can't do it by destination ip addresses. I can separate SIP requests between 2 ip addresses with linux kernel 2.6.18 or higher by using ip_nat_sip iptables module and MARK/SNAT. But this approach can't be used in OpenVZ virtial environment in which CallWeaver must be used. Is it possible to send SIP requests from CallWeaver via OpenSER and modify them with OpenSER to replace source addresses in UDP headers and SIP headers? How can I say CallWeaver to send SIP requests via OpenSER? How can I implement this routing logic in OpenSER? Can anybody give me a simple example? -- Thanks, Eugene Prokopiev

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Unauthorized Calls - [Openser - X-lite]
by Jeferson Prevedello 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Hello, I implemented an environment using to openser + mysql. The enviroment functions perfectly, however I perceived that users (branches) not registered in mysql are generating called. I installed the X-lite softphone in my computer trying to reproduce the situation. In the properties of configuration of the X-lite, "field Password" I type "trash" as password (wrong password). The display of X-lite showed the following message: "Registration error: 401 - Unauthorized". In the contacts drawer I add a contact (double click on the new contact), and the call was generate without restriction (very bad). Some idea of as I solve this problem? Thanks Regards Jeferson

3 10

Fw: [OpenSER-Users] Unauthorized Calls - [Openser - X-lite]
by Simone Torri 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Hi Guys, Here in my company I have the same problem. The solution that I adopted was apply the proxy_authorize function and restrict all incoming calls. I use openser only for originate calls. Some tip ? Cheers, Torri ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeferson Prevedello" <jprevedello(a)terra.com.br> To: "Dan-Cristian Bogos" <dan.bogos(a)gmail.com> Cc: <users(a)openser.org> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:26 PM Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Unauthorized Calls - [Openser - X-lite] Hello DanB, More a problem ! :-( I apply the following configuration in my openser.cfg: if (method=="INVITE") { if (!proxy_authorize("", "subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("","0"); exit; } }; I perceived that with the configuration above 'only' registered users can generate called, however I not receive more called originated through of PSTN or of any branch of PBX. I believe these calls are deny because the source (PSTN - Branches) not are registering in the openser server. Is possible to apply the configuration above only for calls 'originated' from openser ? Thanks ! Regards Jeferson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan-Cristian Bogos" <dan.bogos(a)gmail.com> To: "Jeferson Prevedello" <jprevedello(a)terra.com.br> Cc: <users(a)openser.org> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:35 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Unauthorized Calls - [Openser - X-lite] Hello Jeferson, Your configuration looks a bit messy, if I were OpenSER I would also refuse it. :). I would suggest taking a more standard configuration (u can find many examples on this location: http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/branches/1.2/examples/) and use 1.2 branch of software for start, and experiment with it into some lab environment. It is a bit difficult as a beginner to start directly experimenting on a production configuration, perhaps written by somebody else without understanding it. You will end up having big issues when troubleshooting in production environment. The tip I gave you would be really easy to implement it with a block of few lines, eg: if (is_method("INVITE")){ if (!proxy_authorize("", "subscriber)) { proxy_challenge("","0"); exit; } else if (!check_from()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=ID"); exit; }; }; Documentation for you to understand those lines here: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/auth_db.html#AEN192 Usually, there is a loot of documentation and howtos in openser wiki, so I would suggest you having a glance on some titles which look close to your needs as a beginner. http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php Cheers, DanB On 8/27/07, Jeferson Prevedello <jprevedello(a)terra.com.br> wrote: > Hello DanB, > > Thanks! > > As DanB´s suggestion, I tried to implement a mechanism that only allowed > authenticated members make calls, but my configuration didn´t function. > > This is my first project with openser, therefore I do not have much > experience. If someone know how to help me to implement this verification, > I > will be very thankful. > > Below, my openser.cfg file: > > -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x > > > # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ > > debug=3 > fork=yes > log_stderror=no > log_facility=LOG_LOCAL7 > > # hostname matching an alias will satisfy the condition uri==myself". > alias=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > listen=udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 > > # check_via - Turn on or off Via host checking when forwarding replies. > # Default is no. arcane. looks for discrepancy between name and > # ip address when forwarding replies. > check_via=yes > > # syn_branch - Shall the server use stateful synonym branches? It is > # faster but not reboot-safe. Default is yes. > syn_branch=yes > > # dns - Uses dns to check if it is necessary to add a "received=" field > # to a via. Default is no. > # rev_dns - Same as dns but use reverse DNS. > dns=no > rev_dns=no > port=5060 > children=4 > > # memlog - Debugging level for final memory statistics report. Default > # is L_DBG -- memory statistics are dumped only if debug is set high. > memlog=3 > > # sip_warning - Should replies include extensive warnings? By default > # yes, it is good for trouble-shooting. > sip_warning=yes > > # fifo - FIFO special file pathname > fifo="/tmp/openser_fifo" > > # reply_to_via - A hint to reply modules whether they should send reply > # to IP advertised in Via. Turned off by default, which means that > # replies are sent to IP address from which requests came. > reply_to_via=no > > # mhomed -- enable calculation of outbound interface; useful on > # multihomed servers. > mhomed=0 > > # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- > > # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/sl.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/tm.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/rr.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/maxfwd.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/usrloc.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/registrar.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/textops.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/nathelper.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/acc.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/xlog.so" > > # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication > # mysql.so must be loaded ! > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/auth.so" > loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/auth_db.so" > > # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- > > # ------------- usrloc parameters > > # 2 enables write-back to persistent mysql storage for speed > # disable=0, write-through=1 > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) > > # minimize write back window - default is 60 seconds > modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 30) > > # ------------- auth parameters > > # Uncomment if you are using auth module > modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) > > # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), > # uncomment also the following parameter) > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") > > # ------------- rr parameters > > # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy > modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) > > # ------------- !! Nathelper > > modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) > modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s > modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind > NAT > modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock") # > Nathelper with RTPproxy > > # ------------- tm parameters > > modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 12) > modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 24) > > # ------------- acc parameters > > modparam("acc", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") > modparam("acc", "db_flag", 2) > modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 2) > modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) > modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) > modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) # Set log_level to 2 > > # Allow no more than 1 contacts per AOR > modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 3) > > # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- > > # main routing logic > > route{ > > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) > { > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); > exit; > }; > > if (msg:len >= 2048 ) > { > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); > exit; > }; > > # < Acconting > > if (method=="INVITE") > { > log(1, "Generate call - START\n"); > setflag(1); /* set for accounting (the same value as in > log_flag!) */ > setflag(2); > }; > > if (method=="BYE") > { > log (1, "Hung-up \n"); > setflag(1); > }; > > if (method=="CANCEL") > { > log (1, "Lost call \n"); > setflag(1); > } > > if (!method=="REGISTER") > record_route(); > > if (nat_uac_test("3")) > { > # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that > # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is > # a REGISTER > > if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) > { > log(1,"LOG: Someone trying to register from private > IP, > rewriting\n"); > > # This will work only for user agents that support > symmetric > # communication. We tested quite many of them and > majority is > # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it > takes > a configuration > # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called > NAT_Enable=Yes, > with kphone it is > # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". > > fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP > of > signalling > force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost > Via > setflag(6); # Mark as NATed > }; > }; > # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the > # path determined by record-routing > > if (loose_route()) > { > # mark routing logic in request > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); > route(1); > }; > > if (!uri==myself) > { > # mark routing logic in request > append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); > route(1); > }; > > # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc > # (in case, it does not work, use the following command > # with proper names and addresses in it) > if (uri==myself) > { > > if (method=="REGISTER") > { > # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication > if (!www_authorize("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "subscriber")) > { > www_challenge("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "0"); > return; > }; > save("location"); > return; > }; > > lookup("aliases"); > if (!uri==myself) > { > append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); > route(1); > return; > }; > > # Router Cisco if not sip branche > log(1,"LOG: testando se destino-sip e' 418x ...\n"); > > if ( ! ( uri =~ "^sip:418[1-9].*" ) && > ! ( uri =~ "^sip:4397")) > { > log(1,"LOG: destino-sip not is 418x .\n"); > route(2); > > log(1,"LOG: rewriting hostport yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060...\n"); > rewritehostport("yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060"); > log(1,"LOG: t_relay...\n"); > t_relay(); > > log(1,"LOG: break...\n"); > return; > } > log(1,"LOG: destino-sip 418x, continue .\n"); > > # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB > if (!lookup("location")) > { > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); > return; > }; > }; > append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); > route(1); > } > > ####################################### > > route[1] > { > # !! Nathelper > if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && > !search("^Route:")) > { > sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP > addresses"); > return; > }; > > # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay > if (isflagset(6)) > { > force_rtp_proxy(); > t_on_reply("1"); > append_hf("P-Behind-NAT: Yes\r\n"); > }; > > if (!t_relay()) > { > sl_reply_error(); > return; > }; > } > # !! Nathelper > onreply_route[1] > { > # NATed transaction ? > if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") > { > fix_nated_contact(); > force_rtp_proxy(); > } > else if (nat_uac_test("1")) > { > fix_nated_contact(); > }; > } > > ####################################### > > route[2] { > > ### Dial Plan for gateway VoIP ### > > # Sao Paulo 11 > if ( uri =~ "^sip:9911.*" ) > { > log(1,"LOG: destination is 9911x, change prefix..."); > strip(4); > prefix("011"); > return; > } > > # Error (Number inexistent) > sl_reply_error(); > > } > > -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x > > Regards > Jeferson > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan-Cristian Bogos" <dan.bogos(a)gmail.com> > To: "Jeferson Prevedello" <jprevedello(a)terra.com.br> > Cc: <users(a)openser.org> > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 3:06 PM > Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Unauthorized Calls - [Openser - X-lite] > > > > Hello Jeferson, > > > > it all depends on your openser.cfg. > > If you put in there that all the INVITE-s should be authenticated, your > > users will not be able anymore to call without having a valid user and > > password for your server. Note that by default openser will not do any > > check for you, in order to keep the flexibility of be used in > > different environment setups. > > > > Cheers, > > DanB > > > > On 8/25/07, Jeferson Prevedello <jprevedello(a)terra.com.br> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I implemented an environment using to openser + mysql. The enviroment > >> functions perfectly, however I perceived that users (branches) not > >> registered in mysql are generating called. > >> > >> I installed the X-lite softphone in my computer trying to reproduce the > >> situation. > > >> In the properties of configuration of the X-lite, "field Password" I > >> type > >> "trash" as password (wrong password). > >> > >> The display of X-lite showed the following message: "Registration > >> error: > >> 401 > >> - Unauthorized". > >> > >> In the contacts drawer I add a contact (double click on the new > >> contact), > >> and the call was generate without restriction (very bad). > >> > >> Some idea of as I solve this problem? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Regards > >> Jeferson > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Users mailing list > >> Users(a)openser.org > >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Flickr agora em português. Você clica, todo mundo vê. http://www.flickr.com.br/

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] About RTP stream
by zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Hello everyone, Now my openser is just a Sip proxy which manage the sip requests and I want to manage RTP streams by the openser, that means openser recieve RTP streams and retransmit them. How can I do? Thank you very much!

2 1

[Users] understanding SEMS
by Victor Gamov 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

hi guys! can somebody explain me how SEMS works with SER/OpenSER. As I conceive proxy sends requests to SEMS via unix socket. Then SEMS needs constructs reply or new request and ask proxy to send it. But where reply come to proxy? into onreply_route[0] block? is it possible to use t_on_reply() function when initial request writing to SEMS to ask proxy to use specific onreply_route[] block? Thanks for advise! -- CU, Victor Gamov

4 5

[OpenSER-Users] Upload to XCAP Server - 405 Method Not Allowed error.
by Kriti Wadhwa 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Hi, I am testing Presence service using Openser, XCAP server... After firing up the UCT IMS Client in the final step, everything goes well except the "Upload to XCAP Server" part... On clicking that I get: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>405 Method Not Allowed</title> </head><body> <h1>Method Not Allowed</h1> <p>The requested method PUT is not allowed for the URL /xcap-root/pres-rules/user/alice/presence_rules.xml.</p> <hr> <address>Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at xcap Port 80</address> </body></html> Tried changing permissions to the presence_rules.xml file and also made all necessary changes in httpd.conf file but in vain... Hope someone can help me in this. Thanks, - Kriti Mailo: kriti.wadhwa(a)tcs.com =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Openser + Asterisk
by CLEMENT Frédéric 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

3 4

[Serusers] acc_db_request milliseconds
by Sho Aihara 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Hello. Please teach me about acc_db_request for the call charge. For example, when call starts (ACK), my ser.cfg acc_db_request will executed to insert a new row for db. timestamp ------------------- 2007-08-24 23:50:00 And when call ends (BYE), acc_db_request executed. timestamp ------------------- 2007-08-24 23:50:03 These values were considered about milliseconds? For example... timestamp ------------------- 2007-08-24 23:50:00(.000) timestamp ------------------- 2007-08-24 23:50:03(.525) In this case, I think that the interval of these time becomes 4 seconds If I use these values for the call charge (round-up millisecond). Or, has the time recorded with BYE already been rounded up? Thanks, Sahria

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] en.wikipedia
by kgfleischmann＠t-online.de 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

The Wikipedia article of OpenSER is subject of a deletion request. The reasons can be found in this text on the discussion page of "Miconda" "Notability of OpenSER A tag has been placed on OpenSER, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calltech 11:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC) " If someone could take care of the article and possibly join the deletion discussion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OpenSER) ? /Klaus

3 2

Re: [Serusers] why combine ser with asterisk
by SIP 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

Michael Grigoni wrote: > SIP wrote: > > <snip> > >> Take Cray Supercomputers as a prime example. Seymour Cray built this >> fantastic supercomputer architecture, but didn't build any >> peripherals for it or even an operating system, assuming that, if >> people had the raw speed and power available, they'd be eager to use >> it even if they had to build their own hardware/software. > > Yes, Seymour liked to code in machine language right from the console > and the O/Ses for his machines developed 'organically' from the bottom up > in general, but wouldn't you consider SCOPE, KRONOS, NOS etc. operating > systems? And as for hardware, the CDC peripherals and Hyperchannel > offerings seemed to be the best in the industry on Cray CPUs... > > Regards, > > Michael Right, but Cray himself was TOTALLY against their creation. This was one of the reasons he left CDC to form Cray Research (which, mind you, CDC was very much in support of, as they had much faith in Cray's abilities). He argued vehemently that the peripherals were unnecessary products, and eventually, this disagreement caused him to leave and form Cray Research, where he could be free from 'management failures' as he liked to call them. The CDC, however, was extremely supportive of Cray Research, and put money and development time into it, much to Cray's chagrin. Then, again, when Cray Research was faced with the decision of whether to build computers that people would buy or computers for the sake of building computers, they understood that they needed to stay in business, and decided on the path that would lead them to solvency. This caused Cray to leave his own company and form Cray Computers. He vowed that CCC would make fast and powerful computers and that nothing else would be a priority. He assumed that speed and power were the ultimate goal and that everything would fall into place if he achieved that goal. Of course, his shortsightedness caused bankruptcy. Incidentally, having had to use NOS on a regular basis back in the day, I would scarcely call it an operating system. Anything that lets you manually change the bits in memory of a running program isn't an OS, it's just a GUI for the hardware. ;) N.

2 2

[Serusers] xlog module prefix text feature
by Tomasz Zieleniewski 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

Hi, I am using xlog module for my ser.cfg debuging. I though that it would be very helpful to have a feature which would prefix each log with a module-parameter defined text. It is useful for instance when there are more then one instances of ser on the same host. Cheers Waiting for your feedback Tomasz

2 1

[Serusers] Host three way conference
by inge 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

Hi all, I've some questions about it. First of all, when I use a SPA-941 with SER, I can do a three way conference with two incoming calls. Why I can't if I use an other product like SPA2100 ? I can deduce that this service depends on the functionalities of the product, but I'm not sure. But if I want nevertheless to use this service independently of the product used, how can I do ? Using SEMS ? In this case, can we install it without reinstallating SER ? Moreover, with SEMS I think I will have to determine a trigger ? (ie. something like a prefix in the URI ?) Thank for your answers and your support. Regards, Adrien .L

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] rpm packaging
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 24 Aug '07

24 Aug '07

Hello, I would like to welcome two new members: Jan Ondrej and Peter Nixon. So far, they did a lot of work to package openser for Fedora and Suse distributions, becoming now the maintainers of the spec files for those distributions in OpenSER repository. Many thanks for the commitment and effort that will lead in installing and maintaining easier OpenSER in these distributions. Cheers, Daniel

3 3

[OpenSER-Users] call forking
by bernard.le＠orange-ftgroup.com 24 Aug '07

24 Aug '07

********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ********************************

3 3

[OpenSER-Users] How to avoid the Apple tax?
by Richard Bennett 24 Aug '07

24 Aug '07

Hi, I've been looking for an ultraportable laptop to run Ubuntu Linux on, as a more portable alternative to my current Dell that breaks my back each time I take it with me. Seeings as I don't need Windows I was hoping to avoid the Microsoft tax by buying a barebones laptop that doesn't come preloaded with Windows, i found something good here: http://www.rkcomputer.net/store/index.php/action/item/id/181/ (System76 have the same one, but they don't ship to Europe) But by the time I loaded the options I need, and shipped it to Belgium, paying the VAT and postage it all adds up and takes weeks. It turns out I can get a Macbook 13" delivered free in 3 days with a US keyboard (requirement), and it looks a lot nicer too. But of course, even though I just want to run Ubuntu on it, it comes preloaded with OSX. Has anyone heard of a way of avoiding the Mac tax, like the way people request a Microsoft rebate by not accepting the Ms License? I don't want to migrate to OSX because I run all my servers on Linux and by using it daily I learn a lot about the OS, and I have become addicted to the Opens source way of helping and getting helped. I'm not really worried about the financial cost of a bundeled Mac OSX, but am looking for a way to show Apple that the fact that they bundle OSX on all their hardware is no better than the way MS get Windows preloaded on all consumer PCs. I'll start by sending this question to their customer service and see what they say... Richard

1 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users