- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] ser 2_0_0 lookup_user($tu.uid, @ruri) and handling of user names with unescaped semicolon.
by Tomasz Zieleniewski 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

Hi, According to rfc 3261: 19.1.3 Example SIP and SIPS URI sip:alice;day=tuesday@atlanta.com The last sample URI above has a user field value of "alice;day=tuesday". The escaping rules defined above allow a semicolon to appear unescaped in this field. For the purposes of this protocol, the field is opaque. The structure of that value is only useful to the SIP element responsible for the resource. in such case shouldn't the lookup_user($tu.uid, @ruri) method analyze only the username part before semicolon for the lookup?? Waiting for Your Feedback Bests Tomasz

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status
by Jiri Kuthan 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

At 04:59 18/10/2007, roayu wrote: >Hi Jiri! > >Actually, I'm using Sjphone and SPA942 to do the call transfer. I'm calling >using Sjphone A to SPA942, then use the SPA942 to transfer the call to >Sjphone B. > > SJPhone A --> SPA942 --> SJPhone B > >After a short conversation with SJPhone B, then I press the 'xfer' button on >the 2nd time so that both SJPhone A and SJPhone B can talk to each other. >But the call couldn't be transferred to SJPhone B whereas when I used >Asterisk, it's able to do so. > >I've tried to disable the Digest-qop but it still couldn't perform the >transfer properly. What other settings that I need to configure on SER? I'm afraid you've gotta analyze SIP message dumps to figure out what's gone wrong. -jiri >Thanks and really appreciate on your reply. > >Cheers, >Roa Yu > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:16 AM >To: roayu >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status > >At 10:37 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: >>Oh, I got it! Thanks Jiri! >> >>Btw, I have another questions. >>1) I would like to know can call transfer being done when the >>connection is P2P? > >you mean without a proxy? sure it can. > >> When I tried to use relay (mediaproxy) to do the call transfer, >it's >>able to transfer the call to the other party whereas when the condition >is >>P2P, it just can't pass the correct signal. > >that's apparently unrelated to use of media proxy. you would have to >check the SIP dumps what's going wrong. Unfortunately I can't promise >I would help to review those -- my to-do-list is endless these days. >Perhaps someone else on the list will. > > >>2) Can SER support SPA942 ? Or is there some settings that I need to >>configure on SER ? > >yes. >well for some SPAs you may need to disable digest-qop since they have a bug. >(don't ask me which though). > >-jiri > > > >>Thanks. >> >>Cheers, >>Roa Yu >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:56 PM >>To: roayu; SIP >>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status >> >>yes, set usrloc's database mode to 1. -jiri >> >>At 03:32 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: >> >>>Thanks for your reply. I found that it's only update after around 30 >>>seconds. Is there anyway that I can fasten the update on the database? >>> >>>Thanks. >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Roa Yu >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:14 PM >>>To: roayu >>>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status >>> >>>roayu wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there! >>>> >>>> Can anyone tell me how to get the RealTime Online user status other >>>> than using command '*serctl ul show*'? Or how can I store the realtime >>>> online user status to the MySQL db? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Roa Yu J >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Serusers mailing list >>>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>> >>>The location table in the MySQL database stores what are, in effect, >>>currently online users. It is, however, only an approximation. When a UA >>>registers, it sends an expiration time on its registration and that gets >>>stored in the location table. If the user disconnects without cancelling >>>his registration (some UAs send am expire register message to 'log out' >>>and some don't), then the data may still be in the table until the >>>expire time occurs. Realistically, though, you can get a good idea of >>>currenly online users using the location table and while it may not be >>>100% accurate, it's close enough for government work, as it were. >>> >>>N. >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Serusers mailing list >>>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> >>-- >>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >-- >Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenXcap fails to start the HTTP on port
by Cesar Troncoso 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

Hi, try telnet to be sure if no one is listening on that port. [root@XXXXX]# telnet yourhost 8000 if you are not running openxcap in debug mode, check out the messages to see if your xcap server is really not listening. Later on just set up the Root URI properly on both, the server and your client. Cheers, Cesar ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:11:47 +0200 From: "Gregorio" <goyo.villalba(a)dialcom.com> Subject: [OpenSER-Users] OpenXcap fails to start the HTTP on port To: <users(a)openser.org> Message-ID: <003e01c810ae$825c4c60$8714e520$@villalba@dialcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all. Finally (buff!!) I could configure openXcap, after executing openxcap start the log says: [-] Log opened. [-] Starting Open XCAP 0.9.4 [-] Supported Root URIs: http://192.168.1.206 [-] twisted.web2.channel.http.HTTPFactory starting on 8000 And nothing else, no more logs displayed. OpenXcap process is running in the machine: [root@XXXXX]# ps -ef|grep xcap root 926 1 0 18:02 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/python /etc/rc.d/init.d/openxcap start But no one is listening in port 8000, neither before executing xcap nor after. I havent found any error in any log so I dont know what is going on. Anyone can help me? Thanks. Gregorio

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status
by roayu 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

Hi Jiri! Actually, I'm using Sjphone and SPA942 to do the call transfer. I'm calling using Sjphone A to SPA942, then use the SPA942 to transfer the call to Sjphone B. SJPhone A --> SPA942 --> SJPhone B After a short conversation with SJPhone B, then I press the 'xfer' button on the 2nd time so that both SJPhone A and SJPhone B can talk to each other. But the call couldn't be transferred to SJPhone B whereas when I used Asterisk, it's able to do so. I've tried to disable the Digest-qop but it still couldn't perform the transfer properly. What other settings that I need to configure on SER? Thanks and really appreciate on your reply. Cheers, Roa Yu -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:16 AM To: roayu Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status At 10:37 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: >Oh, I got it! Thanks Jiri! > >Btw, I have another questions. >1) I would like to know can call transfer being done when the >connection is P2P? you mean without a proxy? sure it can. > When I tried to use relay (mediaproxy) to do the call transfer, it's >able to transfer the call to the other party whereas when the condition is >P2P, it just can't pass the correct signal. that's apparently unrelated to use of media proxy. you would have to check the SIP dumps what's going wrong. Unfortunately I can't promise I would help to review those -- my to-do-list is endless these days. Perhaps someone else on the list will. >2) Can SER support SPA942 ? Or is there some settings that I need to >configure on SER ? yes. well for some SPAs you may need to disable digest-qop since they have a bug. (don't ask me which though). -jiri >Thanks. > >Cheers, >Roa Yu > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:56 PM >To: roayu; SIP >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status > >yes, set usrloc's database mode to 1. -jiri > >At 03:32 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: > >>Thanks for your reply. I found that it's only update after around 30 >>seconds. Is there anyway that I can fasten the update on the database? >> >>Thanks. >> >>Cheers, >>Roa Yu >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:14 PM >>To: roayu >>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status >> >>roayu wrote: >>> >>> Hi there! >>> >>> Can anyone tell me how to get the RealTime Online user status other >>> than using command '*serctl ul show*'? Or how can I store the realtime >>> online user status to the MySQL db? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Roa Yu J >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>The location table in the MySQL database stores what are, in effect, >>currently online users. It is, however, only an approximation. When a UA >>registers, it sends an expiration time on its registration and that gets >>stored in the location table. If the user disconnects without cancelling >>his registration (some UAs send am expire register message to 'log out' >>and some don't), then the data may still be in the table until the >>expire time occurs. Realistically, though, you can get a good idea of >>currenly online users using the location table and while it may not be >>100% accurate, it's close enough for government work, as it were. >> >>N. >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >-- >Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status
by Jiri Kuthan 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

At 10:37 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: >Oh, I got it! Thanks Jiri! > >Btw, I have another questions. >1) I would like to know can call transfer being done when the >connection is P2P? you mean without a proxy? sure it can. > When I tried to use relay (mediaproxy) to do the call transfer, it's >able to transfer the call to the other party whereas when the condition is >P2P, it just can't pass the correct signal. that's apparently unrelated to use of media proxy. you would have to check the SIP dumps what's going wrong. Unfortunately I can't promise I would help to review those -- my to-do-list is endless these days. Perhaps someone else on the list will. >2) Can SER support SPA942 ? Or is there some settings that I need to >configure on SER ? yes. well for some SPAs you may need to disable digest-qop since they have a bug. (don't ask me which though). -jiri >Thanks. > >Cheers, >Roa Yu > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:56 PM >To: roayu; SIP >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status > >yes, set usrloc's database mode to 1. -jiri > >At 03:32 10/10/2007, roayu wrote: > >>Thanks for your reply. I found that it's only update after around 30 >>seconds. Is there anyway that I can fasten the update on the database? >> >>Thanks. >> >>Cheers, >>Roa Yu >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:14 PM >>To: roayu >>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Get RealTime Online Users status >> >>roayu wrote: >>> >>> Hi there! >>> >>> Can anyone tell me how to get the RealTime Online user status other >>> than using command '*serctl ul show*'? Or how can I store the realtime >>> online user status to the MySQL db? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Roa Yu J >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>The location table in the MySQL database stores what are, in effect, >>currently online users. It is, however, only an approximation. When a UA >>registers, it sends an expiration time on its registration and that gets >>stored in the location table. If the user disconnects without cancelling >>his registration (some UAs send am expire register message to 'log out' >>and some don't), then the data may still be in the table until the >>expire time occurs. Realistically, though, you can get a good idea of >>currenly online users using the location table and while it may not be >>100% accurate, it's close enough for government work, as it were. >> >>N. >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >-- >Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] avp_load_radius('callee') returns 'caller' AVPs... and with 'rc_auth failure'
by Edson 18 Oct '07

18 Oct '07

Hi, guys... I'm starting to move my config from a MySQL based one to a Radius one. The AVP are the challenge. Authentication works fine but 'callee' AVP recovery don't. I'm getting "rc_auth failure" and 'caller' AVPs instead of 'callee' AVPs. Bellow are the detailed informations... openser 1.3.0-dev21-tls (i386/linux) svnrevision: 2:2921M running in a VMWare, guested on an OpenSUSE 10.2, on a P4 machine. Why this behavior? Bug? Radius mis-configuration? Or what am I doing something wrong on the scripts? Edson. =============================================================== INVITE message: INVITE sip:1234@domain.test SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.27.248.6;branch=z9hG4bKac1....00000018;rport. From: "unknown" <sip:8999@domain.test>;tag=2bf01d7afd4. To: <sip:1234@domain.test>. Contact: <sip:8999@172.27.248.6>. This scripts lines: ... avp_load_radius('callee'); avp_printf(); ... Gives this LOGs: ***on /var/log/messages:*** avpops:ops_print_avp: p=0xb59c78e0, flags=0x0003 avpops:ops_print_avp: name=<caller_cli> avpops:ops_print_avp: val_str=<"010101(a)domain.test" / 19> avpops:ops_print_avp: p=0xb59c74d0, flags=0x0003 avpops:ops_print_avp: name=<acc_state> avpops:ops_print_avp: val_str=<call / 4> avpops:ops_print_avp: p=0xb59c7870, flags=0x0003 avpops:ops_print_avp: name=<acc_caller_domain> avpops:ops_print_avp: val_str=<domain.test / 10> avpops:ops_print_avp: p=0xb59c7598, flags=0x0003 avpops:ops_print_avp: name=<acc_caller_user> avpops:ops_print_avp: val_str=<8999 / 4> ***on Radius console ("radius -X"):*** rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 127.0.0.1:1024, id=31, length=55 User-Name = "1234(a)domain.test" Service-Type = SIP-Callee-AVPs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 Processing the authorize section of radiusd.conf modcall: entering group authorize for request 250 modcall[authorize]: module "preprocess" returns ok for request 250 radius_xlat: '/var/log/radius/radacct/127.0.0.1/auth-detail-20071017' rlm_detail: /var/log/radius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/auth-detail-%Y%m%d expands to /var/log/radius/radacct/127.0.0.1/auth-detail-20071017 modcall[authorize]: module "auth_log" returns ok for request 250 rlm_realm: Looking up realm "domain.test" for User-Name = "1234(a)domain.test" rlm_realm: No such realm "domain.test" modcall[authorize]: module "suffix" returns noop for request 250 modcall[authorize]: module "digest" returns noop for request 250 radius_xlat: '1234(a)domain.test' rlm_sql (sql): sql_set_user escaped user --> '1234(a)domain.test' radius_xlat: 'SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value,op FROM radcheck WHERE Username = '1234(a)domain.test' ORDER BY id' rlm_sql (sql): Reserving sql socket id: 4 rlm_sql_mysql: query: SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value,op FROM radcheck WHERE Username = '1234(a)domain.test' ORDER BY id radius_xlat: 'SELECT radgroupcheck.id,radgroupcheck.GroupName,radgroupcheck.Attribute,radgroupche ck.Value,radgroupcheck.op FROM radgroupcheck,usergroup WHERE usergroup.Username = '1234(a)domain.test' AND usergroup.GroupName = radgroupcheck.GroupName ORDER BY radgroupcheck.id' rlm_sql_mysql: query: SELECT radgroupcheck.id,radgroupcheck.GroupName,radgroupcheck.Attribute,radgroupche ck.Value,radgroupcheck.op FROM radgroupcheck,usergroup WHERE usergroup.Username = '1234(a)domain.test' AND usergroup.GroupName = radgroupcheck.GroupName ORDER BY radgroupcheck.id rlm_sql: Failed to create the pair: Unknown attribute "Simultaneus-Access" rlm_sql (sql): Error getting data from database radius_xlat: 'SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value,op FROM radreply WHERE Username = '1234(a)domain.test' ORDER BY id' rlm_sql_mysql: query: SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value,op FROM radreply WHERE Username = '1234(a)domain.test' ORDER BY id radius_xlat: 'SELECT radgroupreply.id,radgroupreply.GroupName,radgroupreply.Attribute,radgrouprep ly.Value,radgroupreply.op FROM radgroupreply,usergroup WHERE usergroup.Username = '1234(a)domain.test' AND usergroup.GroupName = radgroupreply.GroupName ORDER BY radgroupreply.id' rlm_sql_mysql: query: SELECT radgroupreply.id,radgroupreply.GroupName,radgroupreply.Attribute,radgrouprep ly.Value,radgroupreply.op FROM radgroupreply,usergroup WHERE usergroup.Username = '1234(a)domain.test' AND usergroup.GroupName = radgroupreply.GroupName ORDER BY radgroupreply.id rlm_sql (sql): Released sql socket id: 4 modcall[authorize]: module "sql" returns ok for request 250 modcall: leaving group authorize (returns ok) for request 250 auth: type Local auth: No User-Password or CHAP-Password attribute in the request auth: Failed to validate the user. Login incorrect: [1234(a)domain.test] (from client localhost port 0) Delaying request 250 for 1 seconds

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] radius_is_user_in and avps
by Morten Isaksen 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi! I have some problems with avps in the radius_is_user_in function. if (radius_is_user_in("Request-URI", "$avp(s:test)")) { xlog("test"); } On the radius server I can see that the string "$avp(s:test)" is passed and not the value of the avp. Does the function not supports avps or am I missing something? -- Morten Isaksen http://www.misak.dk/blog/

1 1

[OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi, I use "branch_route[1]" for common branches and want to use "branch_route[3]" just for initial INVITE's. But I'd like "branch_route[1]" is runned after "branch_route[3]" but think is not possible, so I must copy&paste the "branch_route[1]" code at the end of "branch_route[3]". Is it? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

3 7

RE: [OpenSER-Users] openxcap Problem
by Gregorio 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi. I am not getting the exception now, my libraries related to this problem are: openxcap-0.9.4 libxml2-2.6.30 lxml-1.3.4 lxml-1.3.4 I hope it helps. Gregorio. -----Mensaje original----- De: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] En nombre de Gregorio Enviado el: martes, 16 de octubre de 2007 13:03 Para: 'KevinKinnan'; users(a)openser.org Asunto: RE: [OpenSER-Users] openxcap Problem Hi all. I am also facing the same problem, I use a Centos 5, so it is not a Debian specific problem, my libraries: openxcap-0.9.3 libxml2-2.6.29 lxml-1.3.3 Latest version of Twisted Core, Twisted Web and Twisted Web 2. Anyone could help? Cheers. Gregorio. -----Mensaje original----- De: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] En nombre de KevinKinnan Enviado el: jueves, 11 de octubre de 2007 16:33 Para: users(a)openser.org Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] openxcap Problem Hi, Sebastian. I met the same problem as yours. I am using Ubuntu 7.04 at the moment. Have you fixed that problem? I dont if the problem comes from xml schema checking via http with proxy. Can you give me some help? THANK U Regards, Kevin Schumann Sebastian wrote: > > Dear all > > I have a big problem with openxcap. I don't get it work :( As I saw on > their webpage, this mailing list can be posted for this concern as well. > > I am using version 0.9.3 and acc. the installation file on > http://www.openxcap.org all current dependencies from the Debian > unstable distribution. > > When I start /usr/bin/openxcap, the following error occurs in the > syslog: > > Sep 25 17:01:21 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] Log opened. > > Sep 25 17:01:21 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] Starting Open XCAP 0.9.3 > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] Traceback (most recent > call last): > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File > "/usr/bin/openxcap", line 56, in ? > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] from xcap.server > import XCAPServer > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xcap/server.py", line 21, in ? > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] from xcap import > authentication > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xcap/authentication.py", line 21, in ? > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] from xcap.appusage > import getApplicationForURI > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xcap/appusage/__init__.py", line 466, > in ? > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] applications = > {'xcap-caps': XCAPCapabilitiesApplication(), > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xcap/appusage/__init__.py", line 64, > in __init__ > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] self.xml_schema = > etree.XMLSchema(xml_schema_doc) > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] File "xmlschema.pxi", > line 67, in etree.XMLSchema.__init__ > > Sep 25 17:01:27 openxcap openxcap[11876]: [-] etree.XMLSchemaParseError: > Document is not valid XML Schema > > > > As I wrote, I followed all instructions from the openxcap webpage but > didn't find any hints how to make it work. > > > > Any help on that would be appreciated. > > > > Best regards > > Sebastian > > > -- > Sebastian Schumann > Diploma Student Architecture and Design Department > > Slovak Telekom, a. s. > T-Com, Operations Unit > Production and Service Division > Innovations and Enterprise Solution Subunit > > Address: Namestie Slobody 6, 817 62 Bratislava, Slovakia > Office: Room 449, Jarabinkova 1, 821 09 Bratislava, Slovakia > > +421 2 588 13332 (tel) > +421 910 643010 (mobile) > +49 175 1925928 (mobile) > > sebastian.schumann(a)t-com.sk > http://www.t-com.sk <http://www.t-com.sk/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/openxcap-Problem-tf4515559.html#a13157095 Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] OpenXcap fails to start the HTTP on port
by Gregorio 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi all. Finally (buff!!) I could configure openXcap, after executing openxcap start the log says: [-] Log opened. [-] Starting Open XCAP 0.9.4 [-] Supported Root URIs: http://192.168.1.206 [-] twisted.web2.channel.http.HTTPFactory starting on 8000 And nothing else, no more logs displayed. OpenXcap process is running in the machine: [root@XXXXX]# ps -ef|grep xcap root 926 1 0 18:02 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/python /etc/rc.d/init.d/openxcap start But no one is listening in port 8000, neither before executing xcap nor after. I haven´t found any error in any log so I dont know what is going on. Anyone can help me? Thanks. Gregorio

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] RE: Users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 54
by Papadopoulos Georgios 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hello Inaki, I wasn't aware of this parameter and I am using the deault (matching contact only). However this does not aswer my question. Sipsak has a default expires of 15 sec for the registration. I run sipsak every 2 minutes. So every time that sipsak runs, Openser should not find any valid entries in usrloc. Also note that I am using the default cseq_delay which is 20 sec. Any other ideas? thank you George > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:09:51 +0200 > From: I?aki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)in.ilimit.es> > Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] using sipsak to check openser > To: users(a)openser.org > Message-ID: <200710171009.51575.ibc(a)in.ilimit.es> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > El Wednesday 17 October 2007 09:51:43 Papadopoulos Georgios escribiσ: > > > sipsak is running on the same server with Openser. Since > the CSeq is 2 > > it means that Openser has received the first REGISTER, has > asked for > > authentication, sipsak replied, but then Openser says "Invalid CSeq > > number". Has anyone seen this happen before and/or has a reasonable > > explanation? > > Not sure, but maybe this can help you: > > > http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/usrloc.html#CONTACT- > MATCHING-ALGS > > > > > -- > Iρaki Baz Castillo > ibc(a)in.ilimit.es > > > Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] SRV records
by Antonio Reale 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi all, I tried to implement redundancy with SRV records configured with different priority and same weight. If I register the client on the first proxy and then I stop OpenSER on it, the client continues to send requests to the first proxy. Only after sending about ten requests to first proxy it switches on the second proxy. Is it normal? Thanks. Regards, Antonio.

3 5

[Serusers] Rewriting "To" uri
by geethanjali.csg＠wipro.com 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi, Can some one tell me if its possible to rewrite the To uri in ser. I am forwarding the request from SER to openSBC which is expecting the same Request URI and To URI fields. So the SBC is looping back the call to SER. Can some give me some pointers to solve this issue. Regards, Geethanjali The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com

2 2

Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer
by roayu 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hi there! Can anyone tell me is there anyway to control the client(UA) to send the INVITE signal before sending the NOTIFY signal to the SER ? Or probably configure SER to accept the INVITE then only accept the NOTIFY signal? Thanks. Cheers, Roa Yu :) -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of roayu Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:41 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer Hi there! I'm using ser0.9.6 to do the call transfer, which part of the configuration that I need to configure in ser.cfg? Do I need to create a new route? Thanks. Cheers, Roa Yu :) -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of roayu Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:45 PM To: kgfleischmann(a)t-online.de Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer Hi Klaus! The UA does not received the REFER sent by SPA942. What should I need to configure to ensure that the UA receive the REFER from the transfer agent(SPA942)? Thanks. Cheers, Roa Yu -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of kgfleischmann(a)t-online.de Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:22 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer The NOTIFY is always sent from the UA, which received the REFER. SER only relays it. Did you check this? Cheers Klaus roayu wrote: > Hi there! > > After SPA942(transfer agent) sent REFER to SER, SER does not send a NOTIFY > to SPA942(transfer agent). What's causes this? Can anyone tell me. > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Roa Yu :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org > [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of roayu > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:34 PM > To: Atle Samuelsen > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer > > > Hi Atle, > > Let me make my scenario clear on you. > > I have 2 softphone and 1 IP phone(SPA942). I would like to call from > Softphone A to SPA942, then use SPA942 transfer the call to Softphone B. > But, when I do so, the connection still remained on between SPA942 and > Softphone B. > > I managed to get Softphone A onHold and the SPA942 managed to call to > Softphone B. Once I press on the 'xfer' button after calling Softphone B, A > still onHold and no SIP signal to unHold A and to terminate B. > > If I would like to configure the ser.cfg file, which part that I need to > configure? And how do I do that? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Roa Yu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Atle Samuelsen [mailto:clona@cyberhouse.no] > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 3:19 PM > To: roayu > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer > > > Hi Roa,i > * roayu <roayu(a)ctisys.net> [071011 04:01]: >> Hi, there! >> >> I have some questions and help. >> 1) I would like to know can call transfer being done when the >> connection is P2P? When I tried to use relay (mediaproxy) to do the call >> transfer, it's able to transfer the call to the other party whereas when > the >> condition is P2P, it just can't pass the correct signal. > > I'm proberbly only tierd (9:15 am here) but P2P? Can you provide the > signalling and ser.cfg so we can understand what you are trying to > establish? > > I personally think you are trying to do a call transfer from one ua to a > other, where the original call went true mediaproxy, but you do not want > the "new" transferd call to go true it. > >> 2) Can SER support SPA942 ? Or is there some other settings that I need >> to configure on SER ? > > SPA942, SPA962, SPA2102, yea.. all Linksys SPA products work like a > charm with SER (Who has a 942 as his primary phone these days) > > > Best Regards > > ATle >> Thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Roa Yu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] using sipsak to check openser
by Papadopoulos Georgios 17 Oct '07

17 Oct '07

Hello all, In order to check that our Openser is running properly I use sipsak periodically. The command is : sipsak -v -N -U -I -s sip:sipsak@213.5.xxx.xxx:5060 -a xxxxxxx This works fine 99% of the time, however sometimes I get the following from sipsak : warning: ignoring -i option when in usrloc mode received: SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:54393;branch=z9hG4bK.4d383307;rport=54393;alias;received=213.5 .43.131 From: sip:sipsak@213.5.43.131:5060;tag=44d4f5ef To: sip:sipsak@213.5.43.131:5060;tag=97e44c910458bd56beb40ca4028d7cc8.91db Call-ID: 1154807279(a)127.0.0.1 CSeq: 2 REGISTER P-Registrar-Error: Invalid CSeq number Server: Altec Telecoms SIP Proxy Content-Length: 0 error: didn't received '200 OK' on register (see above). aborting SIP failure sipsak is running on the same server with Openser. Since the CSeq is 2 it means that Openser has received the first REGISTER, has asked for authentication, sipsak replied, but then Openser says "Invalid CSeq number". Has anyone seen this happen before and/or has a reasonable explanation? thank you George Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Reply vs. failure events.
by Alex Balashov 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

If I am not using a failure_route to catch failed responses to transactional events, but have an onreply_route, does that guarantee that *all* failures will be caught by the onreply_route without being diverted and muffled somewhere? Based on the behaviour I am witnessing, it seems that is correct, but I wanted to verify. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : +1-678-954-0670 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] How to visualice a flag in easy way?
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hi, for now, the only way to test flags is by $bf (not useful if there are enabled some bflags) or doing something as: if (isbflagset(6)) { $var(bflag6) = 1; } xlog("L_INFO","--- $var(bflag6) ----\n"); As a suggestion, couldn't be a way to access to the value of a flag like: xlog("L_INFO","--- $bf[6] ----\n"); This could be useful to when matching flgas with table fields and so. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] About efficiency in conditionals
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hi, I'm wondering which solution (A or B) is more efficient in case method is NOT an INVITE: A) if ( (method=="INVITE") && (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) ) B) if ( mehtod=="INVITE" ) My question is: Is faster B because does less comparasions? or does OpenSer break A conditional during first condition (method=="INVITE") because it's false so then A and B are equally efficient? And which is more efficient (C or D) when all the conditions are true? C) if ( (method=="INVITE") && (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) ) { .... D) if ( method=="INVITE" ) { if ( (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) ) { ... Thanks for any explanation. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

4 6

[OpenSER-Users] 500 Server error occurred (1/SL)
by Cseke Tamas 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hello, I get a similar problem like this: http://www.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2007-February/005984.html I get the following error log, and packets: http://pastebin.com/f112f652a <http://pastebin.com/f112f652a> Thanks any help, Tamas

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Multidomain and in-dialog REFER auth issue
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hi, I've a multidomain OpenSer and I want to allow REFER (with authenticacion before) just in calls between users of same domain, but it's quite complex: - userA(a)domainA.com INVITE's userB(a)domainB.com. - During the call userA(a)domainA.com does an in-dialog REFER. Because the REFER is in-dialog the message is like: -------------------- REFER sip:userB@80.98.123.23:5060 SIP/2.0 From: sip:userA@domainA.com To: userB(a)domainB.com Refer-To: ... ... -------------------- How can my OpenSer know which domain this REFER goes? of course the "To" header is not valid at all. Could be a solution a SQL query to "location" table looking for the URI (sip:userB@80.98.123.23:5060) and getting the username and domain of this? Any other option? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

4 24

[OpenSER-Users] Do AVP's really exist in entire transaction?
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hi, in order to not apply RtpPrxy if the called is an Asterisk (that supports "comedia") I load "usr_preferences" table looking for "pbx_comedia" attribute for called domain. If it's, then it's created a avp: avp(s:pbx_comedia)="yes". But when I try to test this AVP in the "on_reply_route" (to not apply RtpProxy) this AVP has null value. In fact it's easy to see: ------------------------------------------------------ route[3] { ; INVITE route $avp(s:test)="hello"; ... route(1); } onreply_route[1] { xlog("L_INFO","----- avp(s:test) = $avp(s:test) ------\n"); } ------------------------------------------------------ The xlog of onreply_route shows: ----- avp(s_test) = null ----- is it normal? aren't AVP's transaction aware? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

4 9

Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer
by roayu 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

Hi there! I'm using ser0.9.6 to do the call transfer, which part of the configuration that I need to configure in ser.cfg? Do I need to create a new route? Thanks. Cheers, Roa Yu :) -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of roayu Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:45 PM To: kgfleischmann(a)t-online.de Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer Hi Klaus! The UA does not received the REFER sent by SPA942. What should I need to configure to ensure that the UA receive the REFER from the transfer agent(SPA942)? Thanks. Cheers, Roa Yu -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of kgfleischmann(a)t-online.de Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:22 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer The NOTIFY is always sent from the UA, which received the REFER. SER only relays it. Did you check this? Cheers Klaus roayu wrote: > Hi there! > > After SPA942(transfer agent) sent REFER to SER, SER does not send a NOTIFY > to SPA942(transfer agent). What's causes this? Can anyone tell me. > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Roa Yu :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org > [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of roayu > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:34 PM > To: Atle Samuelsen > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer > > > Hi Atle, > > Let me make my scenario clear on you. > > I have 2 softphone and 1 IP phone(SPA942). I would like to call from > Softphone A to SPA942, then use SPA942 transfer the call to Softphone B. > But, when I do so, the connection still remained on between SPA942 and > Softphone B. > > I managed to get Softphone A onHold and the SPA942 managed to call to > Softphone B. Once I press on the 'xfer' button after calling Softphone B, A > still onHold and no SIP signal to unHold A and to terminate B. > > If I would like to configure the ser.cfg file, which part that I need to > configure? And how do I do that? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Roa Yu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Atle Samuelsen [mailto:clona@cyberhouse.no] > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 3:19 PM > To: roayu > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Linksys SPA942 + Call transfer > > > Hi Roa,i > * roayu <roayu(a)ctisys.net> [071011 04:01]: >> Hi, there! >> >> I have some questions and help. >> 1) I would like to know can call transfer being done when the >> connection is P2P? When I tried to use relay (mediaproxy) to do the call >> transfer, it's able to transfer the call to the other party whereas when > the >> condition is P2P, it just can't pass the correct signal. > > I'm proberbly only tierd (9:15 am here) but P2P? Can you provide the > signalling and ser.cfg so we can understand what you are trying to > establish? > > I personally think you are trying to do a call transfer from one ua to a > other, where the original call went true mediaproxy, but you do not want > the "new" transferd call to go true it. > >> 2) Can SER support SPA942 ? Or is there some other settings that I need >> to configure on SER ? > > SPA942, SPA962, SPA2102, yea.. all Linksys SPA products work like a > charm with SER (Who has a 942 as his primary phone these days) > > > Best Regards > > ATle >> Thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Roa Yu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Insert in location table very slow
by Ovidiu Sas 15 Oct '07

15 Oct '07

That's normal. Set the db_mode to 1 if you want instant updates: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/usrloc.html#AEN285 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On 10/15/07, Gregorio <goyo.villalba(a)dialcom.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Up to 60 seconds in mode 2: 'modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)' > > Gregorio. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com] > Enviado el: lunes, 15 de octubre de 2007 18:48 > Para: Gregorio > CC: users(a)openser.org > Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Insert in location table very slow > > > Gregorio, > > How long does it take? > > -- Alex > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Gregorio wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > I am using openSer 1.3 with mySQL. My problem is that although > registration > > is fast in SIP protocol terms, the contact binding is written in the > > 'location' table long time after this contact has received a 200 OK to his > > registration. So a user could think that he is registered before he is in > > the data base. > > > > > > > > Could it be a configuration issue? > > > > Can I solve this? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > This is my config: > > > > > > > > > > > > # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ > > > > > > > > debug=2 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) > > > > log_facility=LOG_LOCAL7 > > > > fork=yes > > > > log_stderror=no children=4 > > > > port=5060 > > > > > > > > listen=udp:192.168.1.206:5060 > > > > listen=tcp:192.168.1.206:5060 > > > > > > > > # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- > > > > > > > > #set module path > > > > mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/" > > > > > > > > loadmodule "mysql.so" > > > > loadmodule "xlog.so" > > > > loadmodule "sl.so" > > > > loadmodule "tm.so" > > > > loadmodule "rr.so" > > > > loadmodule "maxfwd.so" > > > > loadmodule "usrloc.so" > > > > loadmodule "registrar.so" > > > > loadmodule "textops.so" > > > > loadmodule "auth.so" > > > > loadmodule "auth_db.so" > > > > > > > > loadmodule "presence.so" > > > > > > > > loadmodule "presence_xml.so" > > > > > > > > loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" > > > > > > > > loadmodule "mi_xmlrpc.so" > > > > > > > > # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") > > > > > > > > # -- usrloc params -- > > > > > > > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) > > > > > > > > # -- auth params -- > > > > modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) > > > > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") > > > > > > > > # -- rr params -- > > > > # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy > > > > modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) > > > > > > > > > > > > #Agnadido para la Presencia > > > > modparam("presence|usrloc|pua", > > "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") > > > > modparam("presence", "presentity_table", "presentity") > > > > modparam("presence", "active_watchers_table", "active_watchers") > > > > modparam("presence", "watchers_table", "watchers") > > > > modparam("presence", "clean_period", 100) > > > > modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) > > > > modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:192.168.1.206:5060" ) > > > > > > > > #Presence_XML > > > > modparam("presence_xml", > > "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") > > > > modparam("presence_xml", "xcap_table", "xcap") > > > > modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) > > > > modparam("presence_xml", "integrated_xcap_server", 1) > > > > modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) > > > > modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) > > > > > > > > #Mi FIFO > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_mode", 0600) > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", 0) > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", "root") > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", 0) > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", "root") > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "reply_dir", "/home/openser/tmp/") > > > > > > > > #Mi XMLRPC > > > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "port", 8080) > > > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "log_file", "/var/log/openser-xmlrpc.log") > > > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "reply_option", 0) > > > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "buffer_size", 8192) > > > > > > > > > > > > # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- > > > > > > > > # main routing logic > > > > > > > > route{ > > > > > > > > # initial sanity checks -- messages with > > > > # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests > > > > > > > > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > > > > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops. Route filter"); > > > > exit; > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (msg:len >= max_len ) { > > > > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big. Route filter"); > > > > exit; > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (!method=="REGISTER") > > > > record_route(); > > > > > > > > # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the > > > > # path determined by record-routing > > > > if (loose_route()) { > > > > # mark routing logic in request > > > > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); > > > > route(1); > > > > }; > > > > if (uri==myself) { > > > > route(1); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > if (uri==myself) { > > > > # presence handling > > > > if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")){ > > > > route(2); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > if (is_present_hf("MyHeader")) > > > > { > > > > t_relay("192.168.1.111"); > > > > exit; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > > > > # Uncomment this if you want to use digest > > authentication > > > > if (!www_authorize("openserDialcom", "subscriber")) > > { > > > > www_challenge("openserDialcom", "0"); > > > > exit; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > save("location"); > > > > exit; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > lookup("aliases"); > > > > if (!uri==myself) { > > > > append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); > > > > route(1); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB > > > > if (!lookup("location")) { > > > > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found in openSer"); > > > > exit; > > > > }; > > > > append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > route(1); > > > > } > > > > > > > > route[1] { > > > > # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably > > > > # even for UDP2TCP > > > > if (!t_relay()) { > > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > > }; > > > > exit; > > > > } > > > > route[2] > > > > { > > > > # absorb retransmissions > > > > if (! t_newtran()) > > > > { > > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > > exit; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > if(is_method("PUBLISH")) > > > > { > > > > handle_publish(); > > > > t_release(); > > > > } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { > > > > handle_subscribe(); > > > > t_release(); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > exit; > > > > } > > > > > > -- > Alex Balashov > Evariste Systems > Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ > Tel : +1-678-954-0670 > Direct : +1-678-954-0671 > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Insert in location table very slow
by Alex Balashov 15 Oct '07

15 Oct '07

Gregorio, How long does it take? -- Alex On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Gregorio wrote: > Hi all. > > > > I am using openSer 1.3 with mySQL. My problem is that although registration > is fast in SIP protocol terms, the contact binding is written in the > 'location' table long time after this contact has received a 200 OK to his > registration. So a user could think that he is registered before he is in > the data base. > > > > Could it be a configuration issue? > > Can I solve this? > > > > Thanks! > > > > This is my config: > > > > > > # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ > > > > debug=2 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) > > log_facility=LOG_LOCAL7 > > fork=yes > > log_stderror=no children=4 > > port=5060 > > > > listen=udp:192.168.1.206:5060 > > listen=tcp:192.168.1.206:5060 > > > > # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- > > > > #set module path > > mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/" > > > > loadmodule "mysql.so" > > loadmodule "xlog.so" > > loadmodule "sl.so" > > loadmodule "tm.so" > > loadmodule "rr.so" > > loadmodule "maxfwd.so" > > loadmodule "usrloc.so" > > loadmodule "registrar.so" > > loadmodule "textops.so" > > loadmodule "auth.so" > > loadmodule "auth_db.so" > > > > loadmodule "presence.so" > > > > loadmodule "presence_xml.so" > > > > loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" > > > > loadmodule "mi_xmlrpc.so" > > > > # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- > > > > > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") > > > > # -- usrloc params -- > > > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) > > > > # -- auth params -- > > modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) > > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") > > > > # -- rr params -- > > # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy > > modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) > > > > > > #Agnadido para la Presencia > > modparam("presence|usrloc|pua", > "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") > > modparam("presence", "presentity_table", "presentity") > > modparam("presence", "active_watchers_table", "active_watchers") > > modparam("presence", "watchers_table", "watchers") > > modparam("presence", "clean_period", 100) > > modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) > > modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:192.168.1.206:5060" ) > > > > #Presence_XML > > modparam("presence_xml", > "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") > > modparam("presence_xml", "xcap_table", "xcap") > > modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) > > modparam("presence_xml", "integrated_xcap_server", 1) > > modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) > > modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) > > > > #Mi FIFO > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_mode", 0600) > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", 0) > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", "root") > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", 0) > > modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", "root") > > modparam("mi_fifo", "reply_dir", "/home/openser/tmp/") > > > > #Mi XMLRPC > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "port", 8080) > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "log_file", "/var/log/openser-xmlrpc.log") > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "reply_option", 0) > > modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "buffer_size", 8192) > > > > > > # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- > > > > # main routing logic > > > > route{ > > > > # initial sanity checks -- messages with > > # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests > > > > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops. Route filter"); > > exit; > > } > > > > if (msg:len >= max_len ) { > > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big. Route filter"); > > exit; > > } > > > > if (!method=="REGISTER") > > record_route(); > > > > # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the > > # path determined by record-routing > > if (loose_route()) { > > # mark routing logic in request > > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); > > route(1); > > }; > > if (uri==myself) { > > route(1); > > }; > > > > if (uri==myself) { > > # presence handling > > if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")){ > > route(2); > > }; > > > > if (is_present_hf("MyHeader")) > > { > > t_relay("192.168.1.111"); > > exit; > > }; > > > > > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > > # Uncomment this if you want to use digest > authentication > > if (!www_authorize("openserDialcom", "subscriber")) > { > > www_challenge("openserDialcom", "0"); > > exit; > > }; > > > > save("location"); > > exit; > > }; > > > > lookup("aliases"); > > if (!uri==myself) { > > append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); > > route(1); > > }; > > > > # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB > > if (!lookup("location")) { > > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found in openSer"); > > exit; > > }; > > append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); > > }; > > > > route(1); > > } > > > > route[1] { > > # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably > > # even for UDP2TCP > > if (!t_relay()) { > > sl_reply_error(); > > }; > > exit; > > } > > route[2] > > { > > # absorb retransmissions > > if (! t_newtran()) > > { > > sl_reply_error(); > > exit; > > }; > > > > if(is_method("PUBLISH")) > > { > > handle_publish(); > > t_release(); > > } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { > > handle_subscribe(); > > t_release(); > > }; > > > > exit; > > } > > -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : +1-678-954-0670 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Insert in location table very slow
by Gregorio 15 Oct '07

15 Oct '07

Hi all. I am using openSer 1.3 with mySQL. My problem is that although registration is fast in SIP protocol terms, the contact binding is written in the 'location' table long time after this contact has received a 200 OK to his registration. So a user could think that he is registered before he is in the data base. Could it be a configuration issue? Can I solve this? Thanks! This is my config: # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=2 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) log_facility=LOG_LOCAL7 fork=yes log_stderror=no children=4 port=5060 listen=udp:192.168.1.206:5060 listen=tcp:192.168.1.206:5060 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- #set module path mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/" loadmodule "mysql.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "presence_xml.so" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "mi_xmlrpc.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) #Agnadido para la Presencia modparam("presence|usrloc|pua", "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") modparam("presence", "presentity_table", "presentity") modparam("presence", "active_watchers_table", "active_watchers") modparam("presence", "watchers_table", "watchers") modparam("presence", "clean_period", 100) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:192.168.1.206:5060" ) #Presence_XML modparam("presence_xml", "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@127.0.0.1/openser") modparam("presence_xml", "xcap_table", "xcap") modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "integrated_xcap_server", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "pidf_manipulation", 1) #Mi FIFO modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_mode", 0600) modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", 0) modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_group", "root") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", 0) modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", "root") modparam("mi_fifo", "reply_dir", "/home/openser/tmp/") #Mi XMLRPC modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "port", 8080) modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "log_file", "/var/log/openser-xmlrpc.log") modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "reply_option", 0) modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "buffer_size", 8192) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops. Route filter"); exit; } if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big. Route filter"); exit; } if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); }; if (uri==myself) { route(1); }; if (uri==myself) { # presence handling if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")){ route(2); }; if (is_present_hf("MyHeader")) { t_relay("192.168.1.111"); exit; }; if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("openserDialcom", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("openserDialcom", "0"); exit; }; save("location"); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found in openSer"); exit; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); }; route(1); } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } route[2] { # absorb retransmissions if (! t_newtran()) { sl_reply_error(); exit; }; if(is_method("PUBLISH")) { handle_publish(); t_release(); } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { handle_subscribe(); t_release(); }; exit; }

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users