- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] openser & asterisk, Proxy Authentication Required problem
by Max Lock 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

Hi Folks, I hope someone can help. I'm using openser 1.1.1-notls with mediaproxy, an asterisk PSTN gateway, an asterisk voicemail/features server and a trixbox (asterisk) client. I'm also very new to openser which doesn't help :) I've setup the openser database with subscribers,domains,aliases, and gateways etc. mysql> select * from dbaliases; | alias_username | alias_domain | username | domain | nnnnnn2099 | lhc-asterisk-pstn.yyy.com | lhc-trixbox1 | lhc-openser.yyy.com then I generated an openser.cfg file using the sip:wise sipwizard tool a copy is here http://pastebin.com/m46ba88d2 My asterisk PSTN gateway (nnn.nnn.nnn.190) is able to pass inbound calls to openser (nnn.nnn.nnn.189), which should then pass them onto trixbox(nnn.nnn.nnn.187). however the calls are failing. On the PSTN gateway I get the following... -- Accepting call from 'nnnnnnn1275' to 'nnnnnnn2099' on channel 0/1, span 1 -- Executing Dial("Zap/1-1", "SIP/nnnnnnn2099(a)lhc-openser.isrighthere.com|30|tTr") in new stack -- Called nnnnnnn2099(a)lhc-openser.isrighthere.com Oct 26 15:22:05 NOTICE[10325]: chan_sip.c:9822 handle_response_invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to '"nnnnnnn1275" <sip:nnnnnnn1275@nnn.nnn.nnn.190>;tag=as37c13b61' -- SIP/lhc-openser.isrighthere.com-0074cce0 is circuit-busy == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0) -- Executing Hangup("Zap/1-1", "") in new stack == Spawn extension (from-pstn, nnnnnnn2099, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' lhc-asterisk-pstn*CLI> in the Openser log I get the following (full log in http://pastebin.com/m46ba88d2): Oct 26 15:22:05 lhc-openser /usr/sbin/openser[24693]: route[12] Request leaving server, D-URI='' - M=INVITE RURI=sip:s@nnn.nnn.nnn.187 F=sip:nnnnnnn1275@nnn.nnn.nnn.190 T=sip:nnnnnnn2099@lhc-openser.yyy.com IP=nnn.nnn.nnn.190 ID=182fb36c7aa5a14f5d31406b63671897(a)nnn.nnn.nnn.190 Oct 26 15:22:05 lhc-openser /usr/sbin/openser[24692]: onreply_route[1] Reply - S=407 D=Proxy Authentication Required F=sip:nnnnnnn1275@nnn.nnn.nnn.190 T=sip:nnnnnnn2099@lhc-openser.yyy.com IP=nnn.nnn.nnn.187 ID=182fb36c7aa5a14f5d31406b63671897(a)nnn.nnn.nnn.190 So is this is authentication error from openser or my trixbox client? and if so whereabouts should I be looking? -Thanks in advance Max.

2 5

[OpenSER-Users] reminder: openser admin training and bof sessions at VoN Boston
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

Hello, just wanted to send the last reminder, for those that missed the announcement, now are the last days you can register (free of charge) to the OpenSER Admin Training session, at VoN Boston, Nov 1. More details are available at: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-Admin-Course---Boston-2007/ If you are in Boston, at VoN, but cannot attend the sessions on the 1st of November, but you like to have a short face-to-face meeting, I will be available on the 31st, just send me an email. Cheers, Daniel

1 0

Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] SER Release 2 Query..
by Jiri Kuthan 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

At 06:38 29/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal(a)relianceada.com wrote: >Hi jiri, > >As per your suggestion, we tried to use release 2-0.0-rc1 for our usage. As far as the scripts are concerned to create database schema, the problem remains the same i.e. in the script there is No Provision For Creating subscriber and uri_db Table. In which script? What subscriber table -- that's no longer in use. >And my second problem still remains the same with release 2-0.0-rc1 that the auth module doesn't contain the exported function which were there for challenging the Registering party (www_challenge, etc) at the time of Registration. Plz tell me if there is any other way to challenge the registering party in the new release or we're missing something?????? I suppose you are confusing yourself with a variety of versions, and suggest that you install clean ser, use the config makefile, play with ser_ctl and get some initial confidence with SER. Using multiple versions on the same system will for sure not work! -jiri >plz reply asap.... > >regds, > >[] > > > >Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> >Sent by: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org > >10/26/2007 10:20 AM >To >Piyush.Bansal(a)relianceada.com, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, serdev(a)lists.iptel.org >cc >Subject >Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] SER Release 2 Query.. > > > > >At 14:49 26/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal(a)relianceada.com wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>I want to use SER which works with TLS and MySql - 5.0.*+ both. I think that is there in Release 2.* of SER. >> >>While testing with the CVS Release of SER dated 22/10/2007, we faced lot of problems, as there was no provision for sending challenge to the Calling Party at the time of Registration.. And there is no Provision to make subscriber and uri_db table at the time of creation of Data Base schema... >> >>Has anybody used this release???? > >Which -- CVS/HEAD? That's work in massive progress, I would be surprised if someone was using it >for other purposes than development. (heavy DB overhaul) > >Otherwise 2.0 should be fine with respect to the points you are raising. > >-jiri > >>Plz tell me if there is anything to do with the configuration or what???? >> >>plz reply me ASAP..... >> >>thanx in advance.. >> >>regds, >> >>--Piyush Bansal >>_______________________________________________ >>Serdev mailing list >>Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev > > > >-- >Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] SER Release 2 Query..
by Jiri Kuthan 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

At 14:49 26/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal(a)relianceada.com wrote: >Hi All, > >I want to use SER which works with TLS and MySql - 5.0.*+ both. I think that is there in Release 2.* of SER. > >While testing with the CVS Release of SER dated 22/10/2007, we faced lot of problems, as there was no provision for sending challenge to the Calling Party at the time of Registration.. And there is no Provision to make subscriber and uri_db table at the time of creation of Data Base schema... > >Has anybody used this release???? Which -- CVS/HEAD? That's work in massive progress, I would be surprised if someone was using it for other purposes than development. (heavy DB overhaul) Otherwise 2.0 should be fine with respect to the points you are raising. -jiri >Plz tell me if there is anything to do with the configuration or what???? > >plz reply me ASAP..... > >thanx in advance.. > >regds, > >--Piyush Bansal >_______________________________________________ >Serdev mailing list >Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] Bug in 200 to CANCEL (wrong To_tag)
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

Hi, If Asterisk CANCEL a call to OpenSer then Asterisk resends the CANCEL many times because it ignores the 200 OK from OpenSer. I think this is an OpenSer bug because the 200 OK to the CANCEL contains a To_tag different of the To_tag in the 180 (RFC 3261 in 9.2 says they SHOULD be the same To tag). I've reported the bug but sincerely I'd like you to read it since I'm sure many people work with Asterisk and OpenSer and could know something about this CANCEL issue: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1818469&group_id=1… Thanks for any comment. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

4 11

[OpenSER-Users] LCR module allows "q" value > 1.00
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 27 Oct '07

27 Oct '07

Hi, using LCR module and modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3) I can insert manually entries in "location" table with q value greater than 1.00 (as 2.00 or 50.00). LCR next_contacts() function allows these "extrange" values and respect them (contact with "q" = 50.00 is called before contact with "q" = 2.00). This is not exactly a bug since it's an human error to set an entry in "location" table with "q" value greater than 1.00, but maybe LCR module could ignore values grater than 1.00 and assume 1.00 in these cases? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

2 3

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Error creating MySql database
by Henning Westerholt 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

On Friday 26 October 2007, Gregorio wrote: > Hi. > > I am afraid I lost my previous version because the machine broke and I > don't know the revision number. I am using a CentOS 5, the same system that > worked for me previously, my bash version is: GNU bash, version > 3.1.17(1)-release (i686-redhat-linux-gnu). Hi, i've did some tests with the svn trunk from today, either from debian packages and installed in a tmp directory too. The "openserdbctl create" command works just fine for mysql for me. My bash version is: GNU bash, version 3.2.13(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Did you installed from source? Did you specify the prefix in all commands? E.g.: make all --prefix=/$prefix make --prefix=/$prefix install Cheers, Henning

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Error creating MySql database
by Henning Westerholt 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

On Thursday 25 October 2007, Gregorio wrote: > Hi. > > I am trying to install HEAD svn version of OpenSer. After 'make install' > including some modules , I tried to create the Data Base with > '/usr/local/sbin/openserdbctl create' Hello Gregorio, > But this is not working, that is the log: > : command not foundser/openserctl/openserdbctl.mysql: line 33: contains the error message really "ser/openserctl/openserdbctl.mysql: line 33:"? That is strange. > 'usr/local/lib/openser/openserctl/openserdbctl.mysql: line 57: syntax error > near unexpected token ` > > 'usr/local/lib/openser/openserctl/openserdbctl.mysql: line 57: `prompt_pw() > > /usr/local/sbin/openserdbctl: line 239: openser_create: command not found > > > I have read the script and I don't see anything wrong, It is strange > because I tried with former versions of OpenSer and I had no problem. It works for you with svn trunk before? Can you give me the time or revision when its worked? Cheers, Henning

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] ALG error workarounds
by Richard Bennett 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi, I have a number of users behind cisco ADSL routers which have ALG on by default, and are causing problems. If I ask the broadband company to add: no ip nat service sip udp port 5060 no ip nat service H225 to the general config on their Ciscos everything works ok, but getting them to change each one individually is a pain, and I know some SIP carriers are working fine even with the ALG on. There are a few errors that happen, one is a 19 second call cut. The invite is sent, authenticated and connected to the PSTN, but when the cisco-gateway sends the 200-OK to say the call is connected things go wrong: 1.2.3.201 = Openser proxy 1.2.3.204 = Cisco gateway 81.1.2.218 = User agent IP. U 1.2.3.204:51431 -> 1.2.3.201:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.201;branch=z9hG4bKf233.b0309086.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 81.1.2.218:2020;branch=z9hG4bK-13d1535f. From: %5 <sip:101000000@sip.example.com>;tag=32750c901739579ao0. To: <sip:00243999049102@sip.example.com>;tag=F48836B0-608. U 1.2.3.201:5060 -> 81.1.2.218:2020 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.1.2.218:2020;branch=z9hG4bK-13d1535f. From: %5 <sip:101000000@sip.example.com>;tag=32750c901739579ao0. To: <sip:00243999049102@sip.example.com>;tag=F48836B0-608. U 81.1.2.218:2020 -> 1.2.3.201:5060 ACK sip:202000243999049102@81.1.2.218:2021 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.1.2.218:2020;branch=z9hG4bK-a8d9ae6f. From: %5 <sip:101000000@sip.example.com>;tag=32750c901739579ao0. To: <sip:00243999049102@sip.example.com>;tag=F48836B0-608. U 1.2.3.201:5060 -> 81.1.2.218:2021 ACK sip:202000243999049102@81.1.2.218:2021 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:1.2.3.201;lr=on;ftag=32750c901739579ao0>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.201;branch=z9hG4bKf233.b0309086.2. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.1.2.218:2020;branch=z9hG4bK-a8d9ae6f. From: %5 <sip:101000000@sip.example.com>;tag=32750c901739579ao0. To: <sip:00243999049102@sip.example.com>;tag=F48836B0-608. So for some reason the ACK sent by the useragent is: ACK sip:202000243999049102@81.1.2.218:2021 SIP/2.0. instead of: ACK sip:202000243999049102@89.202.141.204:5060 SIP/2.0. so openser sends the ACK back to the useragent instead of to the cisco gateway. The cisco gateway then keeps sending the 200 OKs because it is not getting the reply, and finally the call times out after 19 seconds and the cisco send a BYE. The full trace is attached. Sometimes this problem does not occur, but the same thing happens with the final BYE, so the useragent sends: BYE sip:202000243999174148@81.241.251.218:2022 SIP/2.0. instead of: BYE sip:202000243999174148@89.202.141.204:5060 SIP/2.0. So openser sends the BYE back to the useragent instead of to the gateway. Sorry for the long mail, and thanks for any pointers. Richard

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] multidomain support
by satish patel 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Dear all I have issuse of multidomain support with openser anybody have example configuration file or doucment for setup Regards satish patel ----PGP Signature-- Satish Patel mobile:- +91-9818875535 http://www.linuxbug.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] new domain for mailing list
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hello, the migration of mailing lists to new server is completed. With this change the default domain for mailing lists is "lists.openser.org". However, "openser.org" should still work. If you encounter problems you should address the questions to sysadmin(a)openser.org (you will get bounced because the anti-spam is not in place, but your email will get through once a moderator will check it) -- just for the next two days, to speed things up, you can address the issues to me. Cheers, Daniel

1 0

Re: [OpenSER-Users] mailing lists down
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hello, On 10/26/07 15:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > the mailing lists will be stopped in 15min to migrate the archives and > the users to the new server. Hope won't take longer than 30min. all should be back online. If you have sent messages in last 15min and you do not see it on the web archive, please resent. It is useless to say "if you subscribed in the last 15min and you don't get, subscribe again" :-) Please report any problem with the mailing list to me for today. Cheers, Daniel > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >

1 0

[Serusers] SER Release 2 Query..
by Piyush.Bansal＠relianceada.com 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi All, I want to use SER which works with TLS and MySql - 5.0.*+ both. I think that is there in Release 2.* of SER. While testing with the CVS Release of SER dated 22/10/2007, we faced lot of problems, as there was no provision for sending challenge to the Calling Party at the time of Registration.. And there is no Provision to make subscriber and uri_db table at the time of creation of Data Base schema... Has anybody used this release???? Plz tell me if there is anything to do with the configuration or what???? plz reply me ASAP..... thanx in advance.. regds, --Piyush Bansal

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Openser SVN trunk and RtpProxy 0.3-2
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi, after upgrading to OpenSer SVN trunk the conexion with RtpProxy (0.3-2 in Debian Sid) gives an error: ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: can't send command to a RTP proxy ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy <udp:localhost:22222> does not respond, disable it WARNING:nathelper:rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy WARNING:nathelper:rtpp_test: support for RTP proxy <udp:localhost:22222> has been disabled temporarily Do I need a latest version of RtpProxy? which version exactly? PD: It's funny to read that nathelper module needs no external applicationto run XDD: ----------- 1.4.2. External Libraries or Applications The following libraries or applications must be installed before running OpenSER with this module loaded: **None.** ----------- ¿and RtpPrpxy? XD -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

4 5

[Serusers] SER 0.9.6 with mysql 5.0.* and TLS..
by Piyush.Bansal＠relianceada.com 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi all, Can anybody tell me how can I integrate TLS with SER Release 0.9.6 and how to use mysql-standard-5.0.27-solaris9-sparc-64bit (or any MySql 5.0.* release) with it. The fix which is given in iptel FAQ's to update the my_con.c file, doesn't work. We are stuck very badly in it... Plz respond ASAP.. Thanx in advance.... regards,

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] Help Required - OpenSer+Asterisk Integration
by srinivas Antarvedi 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hello all, i am currently working on integration of asterisk and openser with the following call flow UAC1,UAC2 Single WAN connection OPENSER ASTERISK | | | --------------REGISTER-2 ------>|----------REGISTER-2 ----------->| | |<-------------------200-2---------------|<------------200-2----------------------| | | | | | |-----------------INVITE-1----------->|---------------INVITE-1------------->| | |<--------------------407-1------------- |<----------------407-1------------------| | |--------------------ACK-1------------>|-----------------ACK-1--------------->| | | | | | |-----------------INVITE-2----------->|------------INVITE-2---------------->|-------INVITE-2---------->| |<------------INVITE-102------------|<------------INVITE-102-------------|<-----INVITE-102---------| | | | | | | | | |---------------180-102--------------->|---------------180-102--------------->|-------180-102------------->| |<-----------------180-2----------------|-----------------180-2-------------------|<------180-2------------------| | | | | | | | | |---------------200-102--------------->|---------------200-102---------------->|-------200-102------------->| |<-----------------200-2----------------|-----------------200-2--------------------|<----200-2--------------------| | | | | | | | | |--------------ACK-2----------------->|---------------ACK-2------------------->|--------ACK-2-------------->| |<-----------------ACK-102-----------|-----------------ACK-102---------------|<-----ACK-102--------------| 1)users REGISTERED at openser 2)INVITE goes through openser to asterisk and back again to openser then from openser to the respective user agent 3)actually there are 2 call-leg situation at asterisk( no: 2 and no:102) 4)both openser and asterisk running behind single WAN connection and both are running with private IPs and in the gateway router inbound packets are forwarded to openser is it feasible architecture as i described above because i want to put total setup behind NAT suggestions required Thanks in advance Srinivas Antarvedi

1 0

RE: [OpenSER-Users] Re: Problem While Running OpenXCAP
by Schumann Sebastian 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi Kirti I had the same AttributeError when I did not use the Twisted from SVN but from the download page as tarball. Using the SVN trunk, adding web2 into the setup.py I could avoid that error. Although, I still face my good old error etree.XMLSchemaParseError: Document not valid XML Schema. With all the libraries proposed by Adrian. Strange... Wonder what else it could be...?! Regards Sebastian ________________________________ On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Kirti Dhingra wrote: Hi, I am facing a problem while running OpenXCAP on RHEL 4. I referred to the OpenXCAP installation page and the following is my setup. 1. I installed python 2.4 from the rpm's listed on www.python.org 2. zope-interface-3.3.0 from http://www.zope.org/Products/ZopeInterface 3. Twisted-2.5.0, TwistedCore-2.5.0, TwistedWeb-0.7.0 and TwistedWeb2-0.2.0 from http://twistedmatrix.com 4.lxml-1.3.5 from http://codespeak.net/lxml 5. python-application-1.0.9 from from OpenXCAP 6. openxcap-0.9.7 after installing all these, when I run /etc/init.d/openxcap or /usr/bin/openxcap I get the following traces in the syslog localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] Log opened. localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] Starting Open XCAP 0.9.7 localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] Traceback (most recent call last): localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/bin/openxcap", line 56, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] from xcap.server import XCAPServer localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xcap/server.py", line 16, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] from twisted.web2 import channel, resource, http, responsecode, server localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/web2/channel/__init__.py", line 7, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] from twisted.web2.channel.cgi import startCGI localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/web2/channel/cgi.py", line 8, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] from twisted.web2 import http, http_headers, server, responsecode localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/web2/http.py", line 27, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] from twisted.web2 import iweb localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/web2/iweb.py", line 58, in ? localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] class IOldNevowResource(components.Interface): localhost openxcap[5313]: [-] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Interface' I suppose the AttributeError is a critical error cause openxcap seems to shut down after this and I cannot see it run if i do ps -ef|grep xcap. Before OpenXCAP i was working with XCAP-Lite on another system with RHEL 4 itself and that worked fine. Would be great if someone could help resolve this issue. Thanks & Regards, Kirti Dhingra*****Aricent-Unclassified ***** "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Error creating MySql database
by Henning Westerholt 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

On Thursday 25 October 2007, Gregorio wrote: > Hi. > > Yes that is exactly what it says, I know that line 33 is empty in > openserdbctl.mysql but the file is unique in my system, and in line 57 of > that file there is a "prompt_pw()" as told in the log. I find it strange > but it is what happens. Hi, can you send me (with private mail) the unique openserdbctl.mysql file present on your system? Cheers, Henning

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Formation of ACKs?
by Tobias Lindgren 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hello all, I'm having problems with ACKs not beeing matched to an ongoing call, thus OpenSER resends a 487 many times. My question is, would OpenSER deny an ACK depending on how the headers are sorted in the packet? Eg. if the VIA-header is found at the end of the packet? How does it actually match the 487 and the ACK? Packet from proxy that OpenSER doesn't seem to match: User-Agent: hotsip-transactron Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 To: <sip:123456@domain2.se>;tag=1499854882 From: "PBX" <sip:654321@domain1.se>;tag=as2fa86da4 Call-ID: 22079ed445536bea109aefc410164bb5(a)domain1.se CSeq: 103 ACK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-81056ef2a1e003b87474dfaa6a5e7959;rport=5060 Br, /Tobias

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] openser 1.3 HEAD patch
by Helmut Kuper 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I extended openser 1.3 HEAD to parse 3 new pvars for P-Asserted-Identity, namely: $aiU = User name part $aid = Domain part $ain = Display name part regards Helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHIJNM4tZeNddg3dwRAsxKAJ9OBHZK4xd/g+1VmF+hgrkPeKzr5QCaAsSH JfUaKGJdEQCjN8U3W3Gj8tw= =C/0g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

[Fwd: Re: Re: [OpenSER-Users] two questions about openser 1.3.0]
by Anca Vamanu 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

please address your questions to the list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Re: [OpenSER-Users] two questions about openser 1.3.0 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:46:00 +0800 From: 程千 <cheng_qian008(a)163.com> To: Anca Vamanu <anca(a)voice-system.ro> References: <200710241936550462885(a)163.com>, <471F3695.4050608(a)voice-system.ro>, <200710242028320153715(a)163.com>, <471F3C3B.1070109(a)voice-system.ro>, <200710250935325157903(a)163.com>, <47205AEA.8040007(a)voice-system.ro> hello: I want to get the user glangei's friend list and there status. I organize the SUBSCRIBE like this. But the openser like to bee get the user glangei-list's status. Is the openser not support simple draft? Thanks! SUBSCRIBE sip:glangei-list@example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.7.33:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj8e950f13948f405b86703efd54adef7c Max-Forwards: 70 From: sip:glangei@example.com;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 To: sip:glangei-list@example.com Contact: <sip:glangei@192.168.7.33:5060;transport=UDP> Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 CSeq: 1852922390 SUBSCRIBE Event: presence Expires: 600 Accept: application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml, application/rmi+xml, mutipart/related Allow-Events: presence, refer Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 202 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.30:5060;rport=51100;branch=z9hG4bKPj8e950f13948f405b86703efd54adef7c;received=125.88.197.71 From: sip:glangei@example.com;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 To: sip:glangei-list@example.com;tag=10.2288.1193362628.5 Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 CSeq: 1852922390 SUBSCRIBE Expires: 600 Contact: <sip:192.168.7.33:5060> Server: OpenSER (1.3.0-pre1-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 NOTIFY sip:glangei@125.88.197.71:51100;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.7.33;branch=z9hG4bK1ba2.f32bb917.0 To: sip:glangei@example.com;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 From: sip:glangei-list@example.com;tag=10.2288.1193362628.5 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.0-pre1-notls (i386/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:192.168.7.33:5060> Subscription-State: pending;expires=600 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.7.33;received=110.8.25.107;branch=z9hG4bK1ba2.f32bb917.0 Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 From: <sip:glangei-list@example.com>;tag=10.2288.1193362628.5 To: <sip:glangei@example.com>;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Contact: <sip:glangei@192.168.7.33:5060;transport=UDP> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, norefersub Content-Length: 0 NOTIFY sip:glangei@125.88.197.71:51100;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.7.33;branch=z9hG4bK1ba2.f32bb917.0 To: sip:glangei@example.com;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 From: sip:glangei-list@example.com;tag=10.2288.1193362628.5 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.0-pre1-notls (i386/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:192.168.7.33:5060> Subscription-State: pending;expires=600 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.7.33;received=110.8.25.107;branch=z9hG4bK1ba2.f32bb917.0 Call-ID: a716378011434b72b918b5169db1a956 From: <sip:glangei-list@example.com>;tag=10.2288.1193362628.5 To: <sip:glangei@example.com>;tag=c8710a65195c4f7097984cd250898955 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Contact: <sip:glangei@192.168.7.33:5060;transport=UDP> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, norefersub Content-Length: 0 2007-10-26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 程千

1 1

[Serusers] findme followme with SER
by Umer Waqar 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi SER users, Has anyone implemented find-me, follow-me with SER? What I mean is, let's say a user 1111 is dialed but he is not available so would SER be able to dial out N numbers, sequentially or in parallel, stored in a 'profile' of 1111. If the 'profile' of 1111 has following: 1: 2221 2: 2222 3: 2223 4: 2224 5: 2225 SER would start with the 1st and and keep going until the call is answered or all 5 have been tried. Wondering if such a call control function would need a B2BUA, and which one would come with such a call control function? Thanks so much, Umer

4 3

[OpenSER-Users] An almost-stable revision in svn?
by Gregorio 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi all. I am installing openSer Head revision (24-10-2007) with openXcap and I am facing some strange problems I didn´t had before with some previous versions. One possibility is that those problems (already posted here) are related to the revision of svn I downloaded. Can somebody tell me a recent revision of openSer code that is more or less stable? It would be very appreciated If someone using a Red Hat, Centos and using openSer with mi_xmlrpc module could help me. Thanks a lot! Regards. Gregorio.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Regarding Openser+Asterisk Architecture
by srinivas Antarvedi 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hello users, Actually i want to implement voicemail feature with openser as sip router with following pre-requisites 1) Users are running both on GLOBAL ip , behind NAT 2)OpenSET, Asterisk,RADIUSServer in same LAN with Single WAN connection pointing to OperSER Server i wanted to know the possible architecture for this setup thanks in advance for the suggestions -- Srinivas Antarvedi

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Problem with OpenXCAP, Please Help
by Kirti Dhingra 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

Hi, I am having problems using OpenXCAP and somehow need to make it work. I set it up on a RHEL 4 machine, and followed all the steps listed on the openxcap installation page. Now when I run the openxcap process, It shows that the process has started and the twisted framework is listening on port 8000, but whenever I add a contact on Eyebeam where remote storage is enabled to XCAP, I get a message that Eyebeam could not add the contact due to failed authentication. I have enabled Use SIP credentials in the storage settings on XCAP. My XCAP Root URi in the config file for OpenXCAP is http://10.203.144.172/xcap-root/ while in Eyebeam it is http://10.203.144.172:8000/xcap-root/. There are no traces shown in syslog for OpenXCAP when it receives a message. Is there anyway to get detailed traces for openXCAP. Also it may be possible that Eyebeam supports only https, but I do not wish to use https. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Kirti Dhingra *********************** Aricent-Unclassified *********************** "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users