- sr-users - kamailio.org

Re: [Serusers] Implicit Registration Set
by Jiri Kuthan 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address" and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases. -jiri At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote: >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4" > >Hi, > >How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set? >If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered. > >Thanks, > /Magnus Sorman >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

2 1

[Serusers] November 79% OFF
by Canadian Doctor Damon Herrera 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Best Price for VIAGRA & CIALIS ONLINE, All Credit Cards Accepted, FREE DELIVERY http://www.foodenter.com [...] Content analysis details: (18.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.7 DRUG_ED_ONLINE BODY: Fast Viagra Delivery 0.5 DRUG_ED_CAPS BODY: Mentions an E.D. drug 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 0.9999] 1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 4.1 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 2.1 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 3.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 0.5 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug

1 0

[Serusers] Another alternative for handling RTP packets
by Carlos Loarca 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi everyone: I have been working with NATHELPER or MEDIAPROXY to handle audio and video calls. However I have got into the point that there should be another way to work Firewalls and NAT transversal rather than mediaproxies and rtp-proxies. I have heard about STUN servers with ICE support but never seen it working and I wonder if this works. And I dont know any server like this, and I know that the softphones or IPphones need to support it. If I dont want to force the audio or video to come to my server, what kind of solution is the most recommendable? Best regards, /Carlos ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] CPL serial call attempt
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

El Martes, 20 de Noviembre de 2007, Daniel Grotti escribió: > Hi Inaki, > Thank you for your help. > I've a question, does Serial Forking (with LCR) work well with NAT ? Sure, there is not difference. Just force RtpProxy (or MediaProxy) in each branch (when neccesary). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3 trunk: unix_sock
by Helmut Kuper 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, after upgrading from openser 1.2 to 1.3 trunk the core commands unix_sock, sock_mode, sock_user, sock_group are missing. Does anybody know what happend to this commands ? regards helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQuo/4tZeNddg3dwRAkx9AKCPRZKGfyOxbox73Asf+aaIgAWLnACfc/Uu IepPGsTGfNwJt2p1frTRSwM= =VFPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] Natping & register
by Stanisław Pitucha 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hey Is it possible to do with openser/nathelper what some other sip/nat gateways do? - for initial register, keep location, but pass registration packets upstream -> save("location", 0x02) - when there's a nat flag set, rewrite response to client with very low "Expire:" header - accept frequent register packets from client, but register on real server, when original expire time is reached It's basically natping done the other way - should be more stable, because when one natping doesn't reach the client, it's lost till next register / invite from that phone. With registers, phone tries to sent packets itself, so when one is lost, next one will reactivate nat anyway. Is there any module that does it now? Or does it need some avp & database hacking?

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] cpl-c module problems
by Aki Rehn 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi, Im having some cpl-c module problems.. Both are related to time-switch. What it seems to me like is that bymonth parameter is parsed somehow wrong which then causes overflow. I added bit more debug and attr_name and attr_len seem to be completely off-the-track. (The actual line number of the overflow in cpl_switches.h is 763 because of the one line added.) Input: <time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20"> Output: openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111240> openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki" openser[5160]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:20:40 2007 openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [19], attr_len: [12592] openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c: overflow detected ip=0xb5a3c8ec ptr=0xb5a3fa6e in func. cpl_switches.h, line 764 openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=" openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error Second problem is the byhour attribute, which doesnt seem to be supported at all. Input: <time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20"> Output: openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111623> openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki" openser[5162]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:27:03 2007 openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [9], attr_len: [39] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [9] found :[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:run_time_switch: unsupported attribute [9] found in TIME node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=" openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error Br, Aki Rehn

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] Error using openser
by Marcio Ribeiro 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi, I'm trying to set up openser with TLS support with mysql database, on Debian. In fact, i could not even start openser with succes. When using "openserctl start": Starting OpenSER: ERROR: PID file /var/run/openser.pid does not exist -- OpenSER start failed when using "openser": Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 164.41.14.213 [164.41.14.213]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 164.41.14.213 [164.41.14.213]:5060 Aliases: tcp: unbvoip3.cic.unb.br:5060 tcp: localhost:5060 tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060 udp: unbvoip3.cic.unb.br:5060 udp: localhost:5060 udp: localhost.localdomain:5060 *: voip.unb.br:* but it's not running, since my "ps aux | grep openser" cannot find it. Sugestions??? Thanks, Marcio

4 6

[Serusers] Can SER support 3-way Conference
by roayu 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi there, Can SER alone support 3-way Conference w/o integrate with other applications? Thanks. Roa Yu :-)

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6
by roayu 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Thanks Stefan! I will try on it. Roa Yu =) -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Sayer [mailto:stefan.sayer@iptego.de] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:41 PM To: roayu Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6 roayu wrote: > Thanks Stefan! > > I need to confirm that after the installation, I will be having 2 SERs + 1 > SEMS, rite? ( 1 SER for normal sip, 1 SER as SIP stack, 1 SEMS) yes. this is the easiest way to do it. Regards Stefan > > Thanks. > > Roa Yu > -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services stefan.sayer(a)iptego.de www.iptego.de iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann

1 0

[Serusers] from uri???
by Roderick 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi list, I'm looking how to forward a call to a PBX if it comes from a certain number. Just to illustrate, this would call forward to a pbx if you're dialing 123: if (uri=~"^sip:123@") { #Forward to PBX if calling 123 } What I want is something like if (from=~"^sip:123@") { #Forward to PBX if calling FROM 123 } Is there something like this??? Thanks for your help, Roderick

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] check_from() and calls from a PBX
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi, I've a PBX (Asterisk) registered in OpenSer as user "pbx@domain". When Asterisk receives a call from PSTN it calls to OpenSer users with From: From: <sip:PSTN_number@domain> But of course, this can't validate "check_from()" since From username (PSTN_number) and auth username (pbx) are differents. As I solution I don't do "check_from()" if From username is "pbx" but of course, it can create security problems. Other solution is to force "From" username in PBX outgoing calls, but with this the callerid number will be "PBX" (that is not very cool for end users xD). Another solution is using "trusted" ips, but this is not valid for me since Asterisk is behind a NAT and dynamic IP, and because there can be multiples PBX for each domain of OpenSer and I don't want they to have privileges. Is there any other approach for this? Thanks for any suggestion. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] lookup("location") and CPL locations set
by Daniel 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi all, I have a question: in this scenario route(1) { ..... ...... lookup ("location"); cpl_run_script("incoming", "force_stateful"); .... ... } is the location (R-URI address), re-writed by the "lookup" function, part of the CPL locations set ? Or CPL doesn't care about this and it see the locations set empty? Regards daniel -- Daniel Grotti ________________________ e-mail : d.grotti(a)gmail.com

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Openser performance with rtpproxy
by Stanisław Pitucha 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hey I've got a simple openser configuration working with rtpproxy. It's mostly copied from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+And+RTPProxy but I don't handle registration and do only nat helping (for current testing I don't even save location - Contact / URI headers are enough). I've tried setting up sipp (no authorization, just invite, send 7 secs rtp, bye) and standard UAS scenario on the other end. I start to get retransmissions / timeouts when I use 2 hosts and ~70 simultaneous connections (total). Typical delay is ~250ms (not network delay - it's on gigabit LAN). I've used the same sipp scenarios for asterisk before and got up to 700 sessions running correctly, so I believe the problem is with openser config here. How can I check what causes the problems exactly? Is there any typical performance problem? I've tried googling already - couldn't find anything obvious. I'm running svn version. Thanks for ideas.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] [CPL] ERROR:cpl-c:run_priority_switch: error parsing attr [0][9]
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi, I'm just starting with CPL and I don't know if this mail should go to devel list or users list. I load a very simple CPL script sucessfully: $ openserctl fifo LOAD_CPL sip:ibc@domain /etc/openser/cpl/ibc(a)domain.xml 200 OK The XML is this one: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <cpl> <incoming> <time-switch> <time dtstart="9" dtend="5" wkst="MO|TU|WE|TH|FR"> <lookup source="registration"> <success> <proxy /> </success> </lookup> </time> <otherwise> <location url="sip:angel@domain"> <proxy /> </location> </otherwise> </time-switch> </incoming> </cpl> But when OpenSer runs: cpl_run_script("incoming","force_stateful"); I get in the logs: ERROR:cpl-c:run_priority_switch: error parsing attr [0][9] ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error I can't understand. I suppose that that XML check is done when loading the file with FIFO command. Why then I get a "error parsing" during OpenSer script? is it normal? Thanks for any explanation. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] CPL serial call attempt
by Daniel 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi all, I have this problem. I have 2 contacts for one user subscriber, so in LOCATION tables, after REGISTER session I have: ID user contact q 12 A A@IP_X 1 13 A A@IP_Y 1 14 B B@IP_Z 1 so, B calls A and A has an incoming CPL script. In this script I'd like to call the 2 A's contacts in sequential order: The script is after looup("location"), so the R-URI is just A@IP_X (because it has lowest ID) SRIPT user A: <cpl> <incoming> <location url="sip:A@IP_Y" priority="0.3"> <proxy timeout="10" ordering="sequential" /> </location> </incoming> </cpl> Whit this script I hoped to add A@IP_Y to location set (that already included A@IP_X) with priority 0.3, and then call A@IP_X as first (it has priority=q=1) and then, if I no aswer after 10sec, call A@IP_Y (that it has lowest priority). CPL don't add A@IP_Y to the location set, but it rewrites the location (it removes the old R-URI, A@IP_X) with A@IP_Y and it call only this contact. Is there a sense in what I've write? if yes, where is the problem? regards, daniel -- Daniel Grotti ________________________ e-mail : d.grotti(a)gmail.com

4 4

[OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses
by Klaus Darilion 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi! I just was thinking about the follwing scenario_ client a--->proxy--->client b the proxy does record routing a calls b b send back 200 OK, but does NOT mirror the Record-route headers. in-dialog requests sent from a to b will bypass the proxy, thus bypass proxy security features (e.g. removing the credentials). Thus IMO we should have some settings which allow the proxy to add RR header also for relayed response if during request processing record-route was called and the proxy misses itself as the top RR header. what do you think? regards klaus

7 15

[OpenSER-Users] Record-Route: "did" - parameter
by Franz Edler 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hi, can anyone explain what the "did" parameter in Record-Route header does? Record-Route: <sip:192.168.0.5;lr=on;ftag=e45c4b13;did=c92.09e2afc1> I suppose it is inserted in case of a "routing spiral", because it is inserted when the INVITE request is routed through the proxy a second time. Cheers Franz

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + Remote Database scalability issue
by John Barry 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

Hello, I have notice that when I configure http-digest authentication for INVITE messages in OpenSER 1.2.2, there is a big difference in the call throughput when you use a database in a remote machine. For example, when using a Mysql database in a remote machine with a RTT= 0.187 ms, the total call throughput decreases by almost 60% in comparison when using the database in the same machine where OpenSER is installed. Why is this happening? How can improve this behavior? I would like to have the database in a separate machine. Thanks, JB74 _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] openxcap - GET a document
by Reinhold Buchinger 18 Nov '07

18 Nov '07

Hi, I'm trying to fetch a document from the openxcap server with a normal browser. My openxcap configuration uses the database backend and I created a db table equal to the xcap table used in OpenSER. For testing I inserted some data but I'm not sure what the fields "source" and "doc-uri" should contain. Because whenever I try to fetch a document with my webbrowser I receive a 404 Not Found. OpenXCAP doesn't show any logs... Thanks a lot for your help! Best regards, Reinhold

2 4

[OpenSER-Users] openser SBC and upper registration.
by rohail khan 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

Hi I am trying to configure openser for uppser registration, so far I am relaying the registration after modifying contact in the registration of openser IP address but I want to save the contact only if the registration is sucessfull from upper registration server. If I use "save_noreply" its save the location no matter if the UA is registered with upper registration server any idea thanks in advance --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] save("location") not saving in openser 1.3
by Dave Singer 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

Any one interested in helping with OpenSER 1.3? Compiled openser 1.3 from svn, installed new test db from 1.3 svn db scripts (tables should have right structure). when a phone tries to register it hits this script section. if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { xlog("L_INFO", "user didn't send credentials: f-uri <$fu> r-uri <$ru>\n"); www_challenge("", "0"); exit; }; xlog("L_INFO", "user registered: f-uri <$fu>\n"); save("location"); exit; nothing is actually saving in location table. I sometimes get extra messages in the log file: core:db_print_set: Error in snprintf usrloc:db_update_ucontact: updating database failed usrloc:wb_timer: updating contact in db failed I am able to use openserctl, from the openser server with all the same db setting as the openser.cfg file has, to make changes so It "can't" be permissions. It is able to verify with the www_authorize that we should save it. just not able to do the actual save. I'm using mysql 5.x (which is also serving up the production openser 1.2-svnserver with a diff db) and openser -V renders: version: openser 1.3.0-pre1-notls (i386/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. svnrevision: unknown @(#) $Id: main.c 3015 2007-11-05 13:08:50Z henningw $ main.c compiled on 14:57:42 Nov 5 2007 with gcc 4.1.1 Thanks Dave

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] cancel going to 127.0.0.1
by Richard Bennett 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

Hi, I seem to remember reading about this problem before, but couldn't find any pointers by searching... On the following setup with Openser 1.1: UA -> Openser/Mediaproxy -> PSTN-Gateway most calls pass just fine and cancel fine, but some don't stop properly. If the UA cancels the call the cancel goes: gateway ip= 1.2.3.204 proxy ip= 1.2.3.201 ua ip = 81.1.2.223 U 81.1.2.223:5071 -> 1.2.3.201:5060 CANCEL sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:5071;branch=z9hG4bK-2f6ae216. From: 002 <sip:101211111@sipc.example.com>;tag=a27b4fe18ca60f4ao0. To: <sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com>. U 1.2.3.201:5060 -> 127.0.0.1:5060 CANCEL sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:1.2.3.201;lr=on;ftag=a27b4fe18ca60f4ao0>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.201;branch=z9hG4bK7f9f.b68d8185.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:5071;received=81.1.2.223;branch=z9hG4bK-2f6ae216. From: 002 <sip:101211111@sipc.example.com>;tag=a27b4fe18ca60f4ao0. To: <sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com>. I 127.0.0.1 -> 1.2.3.201 3:3 ....E..o..@.@...Y............[h.CANCEL sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:1.2.3.201;lr=on;ftag=a27b4fe18ca60f4ao0>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.201;branch=z9hG4bK7f9f.b68d8185.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.11:5071;received=81.1.2.223;branch=z9hG4bK-2f6ae216. From: 002 <sip:101211111@sipc.example.com>;tag=a27b4fe18ca60f4ao0. To: <sip:0475711111@sipc.example.com>. And then it keeps looping between 127.0.0.1 and 1.2.3.201. For some reason openser sends the CANCEL to the loopback interface instead of on to the gateway. Is this a recognizable problem or should I post a full trace and config file? Thanks for looking, Richard.

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] Newbie issue: Cannot exec HelloWorldServlet on WeSIP
by Alvaro Mari Diego 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

Hi everyone, I'm new to WeSIP, so I've got stuck pretty fast, as expected :) I got WeSIP running on OpenSER 1.2.0. I'm trying to run a HelloWorld sip servlet to test WeSIP, which responses a 200 OK and a MESSAGE request saying "Hello, World", to any incoming request to a sip:greetings@amd-openims.test URI. I mounted my sar file, and installed it in wesip webapps with the web manager application, and got WeSIP properly connected to OpenSER' seas. Openser is configured to route any MESSAGE request to WeSIP AS. But when I try to send a message to sip:greetings@amd-openims.test from a client logged as alice(a)amd-openims.test, WeSIP console displays this: ******************************************************************** SeasMessageEvent [SeasRouter] - New message received, from 138.4.7.163:6060 to 138.4.7.163:5080 over UDP SeasTransactionEvent [SeasRouter] - hash_index = 54974,label=620758046 flags=0 ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[0]] - peerAddress = 138.4.7.163/6060 ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[0]] - About to process MESSAGE sip:greetings@amd-openims.test SIP/2.0 SipConnector [ExpressMChannel[0]] - createProcessor: Reusing existing processor SipProcessor [ExpressMChannel[0]] - An incoming message is being assigned SipProcessor [SipProcessor[4]] - <<<<<<<<< Request Received <<<<<<<<< MESSAGE sip:greetings@amd-openims.test SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:138.4.7.163:5080;lr=on>,<sip:iscmark@scscf.amd-openims.test:6060;lr=on;s=1;h=0;d=0> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.163:6060;branch=z9hG4bKeb6d.ff7360e1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.163:4060;branch=z9hG4bKeb6d.000ef08.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.149:63926;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-b370c6252d6ad226-1--d87543-;rport=63926 Max-Forwards: 14 To: "Servicio HelloWorld" <sip:greetings@amd-openims.test> From: "alice" <sip:alice@amd-openims.test>;tag=737cbe08 Call-ID: Y2FiYmY0MmM2NjFhYzU5NWUzNTE2MmM5MWY2ZjdhMGI. CSeq: 2 MESSAGE Allow: INVITE,CANCEL,ACK,BYE,INFO,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,REFER Content-Type: application/unknown? User-Agent: X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41150 P-Charging-Vector: icid-value="P-CSCFabcd4739818c00000007";icid-generated-at=138.4.7.163;orig-ioi="amd-openims.test" Content-Length: 262 SeasHashTable [SipProcessor[4]] - Inserting hashIdx:54974 label:620758046 into hashTable SipProcessor [SipProcessor[4]] - Transaction [z9hG4bKeb6d.ff7360e1.0] is new Transaction?? --> true EngineSipMapper [SipProcessor[4]] - Request from 138.4.7.163 mapped to: ConvergedEngine[WeSIP_engine].StandardHttpHost[localhost] ConvergedEngineValve [SipProcessor[4]] - Invoking Host:localhost ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[4]] - SipSession not found for requestMESSAGE, trying match against Rules ConvergedHostValve [SipProcessor[4]] - No servlet-mapping matched this Request. SipResponse [SipProcessor[4]] - >>>>>>>>> Sending Response >>>>>>>>> SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.163:6060;branch=z9hG4bKeb6d.ff7360e1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.163:4060;branch=z9hG4bKeb6d.000ef08.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 138.4.7.149:63926;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-b370c6252d6ad226-1--d87543-;rport=63926 Max-Forwards: 14 To: "Servicio HelloWorld" <sip:greetings@amd-openims.test> From: "alice" <sip:alice@amd-openims.test>;tag=737cbe08 Call-ID: Y2FiYmY0MmM2NjFhYzU5NWUzNTE2MmM5MWY2ZjdhMGI. CSeq: 2 MESSAGE Content-Length: 0 LingerList [SipProcessor[4]] - scheduled transaction z9hG4bKeb6d.ff7360e1.0 for deletion ExpressMessageChannel [SipProcessor[4]] - sending with spiral=false SipConnector [SipProcessor[4]] - recycle: Recycling processor SipProcessor[4] ActionRouter$ActionSender [ActionSender] - Writing 509 bytes into Action Socket SeasHashTable [ExpressMChannel[0]] - Removing hashIdx:54974 label:620758046 from hashTable SeasHashTable [ExpressMChannel[0]] - Transaction with id:z9hG4bKeb6d.ff7360e1.0, hash_idx:54974, label:620758046 removed from the Seas Hash Table ExpressMessageChannel [ExpressMChannel[0]] - Done processing MESSAGE sip:greetings@amd-openims.test SIP/2.0 ******************************************************************** And, as I feared, got a 481 response in my client. I don't know what I'm doing wrong. I wonder it could be a misconfiguration in the WeSIP server.xml, or maybe something wrong in my servlet. I attach you in a zip my HelloWorld Servlet, openser.cfg file, and wesip server.xml file. Thanks in advance, Cheers, -- Alvaro

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] ERROR: init_io_wait: could not alloc epoll array
by Ariadne Ramos 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

I have Openser 1.1.1 installed and working fine for long time. But now when I restart the service openser with no changes made in configuration this doesn't start. I have to restart many times to get the service up again. The error that appear in logs is the following: Nov 15 11:32:06 prxc /usr/local/sbin/openser[22658]: ERROR: init_io_wait: could not alloc epoll array Nov 15 11:32:06 prxc /usr/local/sbin/openser[22658]: ERROR: tcp_receive_loop: exiting... Do you know why this is happening? I appreciate your help Thanks in advanced Ariadne

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users