- sr-users - kamailio.org

Issue starting with kamctl
by Ruben Lezama 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hi, I am having issues to start Kamailio using kamctl. root@kamailio2:/etc/systemd/system# kamctl restart INFO: Stopping Kamailio : ERROR: No PID file found (/var/run/kamailio.pid)! Kamailio probably not running INFO: check with 'ps axw | /bin/egrep kamailio' Using #Kamailio starts works. I can register peers and make calls between them. But I cannot update configuration. root@kamailio2:/var/log# kamailio Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1:5060 udp: 192.168.1.100:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.100:5060 Aliases: tcp: kamailio2:5060 tcp: localhost:5060 udp: kamailio2:5060 udp: localhost:5060 I would appreciate any help provided. Attached the syslog output Ruben

2 1

KeepAlive Module
by Social Boh 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hello, I'm using keepalive module with drouting module... the event route works fine: NOTICE: <script>: Gateway up: OPTIONS sip:1.2.3.4 NOTICE: <script>: Gateway up: OPTIONS sip:5.6.7.8 but kamcmd command not: *kamcmd keepalive.list* foobar 42 foobar 42 { text: foobar number: 42 } { list: { nn: 17 nn: 22 } } { uri: sip:1.2.3.4 owner: drouting last checked: Wed Feb 21 11:20:12 2018 *last up: Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969* *last down: Wed Feb 21 11:20:13 2018* } { uri: sip:5.6.7.8 owner: drouting last checked: Wed Feb 21 11:20:12 2018 *last up: Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969* *last down: Wed Feb 21 11:20:12 2018* Thank you Regards... -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe

2 1

Strongswan on same Server in EC2 as kamailio 4.4
by Jonathan Hunter 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hi Guys, I have an issue with sending a BYE message back down a strongswan VPN tunnel on a server in the Amazon EC2 environment. To get the configuration working correctly I have the Public IP address bound to a loopback virtual interface, and I also have kamailio listening to it. Calls establish without issue, but when the called party send a BYE, I cant seem to force the SIP message down the correct interface. Due to client confidentiality I need to be careful what information I send but does anyone have a similar configuration set up, and working, I am just looking for reasons as to why force_socket and mhomed=1 doesnt appear to force the BYE message via the Public Interface but the private IP address on the server as its a NAT'd environment. So essentially call establishes; CLIENT---------(VIA IPSEC)-INVITE----->(UDP)KAMAILIO PUBLIC IP-------->(UDP)KAMAILIO PRIVATE IP(TCP)------------------------->CLIENT B | | | | |<---------(VIA IPSEC)-100 TRYING----|<----------100 TRYING---------------|<----------100 TRYING----------------------------| | | | | |<---------(VIA IPSEC)-180 RINGING---|<----------180 RINGING--------------|<----------180 RINGING---------------------------| | | | | |<---------(VIA IPSEC)-200OK --------|<----------200OK -------------------|<----------200OK --------------------------------| | | | | |----------(VIA IPSEC)-ACk---------> |-----------ACk--------------------->|-----------ACk---------------------------------->| How can I ensure the BYE is forced out via the PUBLIC IP? So I do this; CLIENT---------(VIA IPSEC)-INVITE----->(UDP)KAMAILIO PUBLIC IP-------->(UDP)KAMAILIO PRIVATE IP(TCP)------------------------->CLIENT B |<---------BYE (VIA IPSEC)----------------------|<----------BYE ----------------------------|<----------BYE -------------------| As it appears to be going from Private IP and not being pushed down the IPSEC tunnel CLIENT---------(VIA IPSEC)-INVITE----->KAMAILIO PUBLIC IP-------->KAMAILIO PRIVATE IP------------------------->CLIENT B |<---------BYE ----------------------<----------BYE ----------------------------|<----------BYE -------------------| on the BYE I have tried; force_send_socket(KAMAILIO PUBLIC IP); However doesnt appear to work, is this an issue for ip routing on the server to push the BYE correctly down the IPSEC tunnel? or is it configuration related? Any comments welcome if people have had this issue before. Many thanks Jon

2 1

Question about t_branch_timeout behavior.
by José Seabra 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hi there, I have some situations where Kamailio receives replies (100 and then 180) from the other end and after 2 seconds (timer defined on function t_set_fr(0,2000)) after receive the last reply(180) the INVITE transaction enters on the failure route with variable $T_reply_code=408. What can be wrong here to kamailio generates a 408 internally after receive 1xx replies? Best Regards José Seabra

2 1

SIP header when 911 called
by Abdul Basit 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hi Team, Does kamailio has compatibility with E911, i.e. through location in SIP header when 911 called? Is there any reference document? -- regards, abdul basit

2 1

Choosing a Testing and Validation Tool
by Duarte Rocha 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hey I need to create several testing and validation processes for the deploy of an SBC and i would like to know your opinion on the best tools to use. I need to create an automated group of testing scenarios and validation of the packets sanity and SIP compliance. I also would like to validate the packets according to some parameters of mine (ex. All numbers in E164, etc). I'm looking at Star Trinity's SIP Tester right now but i'm not sure it can fulfill all my needs. I've also looked into SIPp and considered creating a Kamailio to do the validation, but i'm not sure it's worth the work if i can find a tool prepared to do this. Cheers :)

2 1

Disable non-existent user warning
by Stefan Rüetschli 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hello sr-users! I'm using Kamailio 5.1.2. If I execute the command "serctl acl grant 1234 mygrant" I get a warning which I have to accept with "Y": Non-existent user '1234'. Still proceeding? [Y|N] Is it possible to deactivate this warning? I know why this warning is there (it's not a user, it's an alias), so I think I know what I'm doing ;-) Regards Stefan

3 4

Kamailio not send NOTIFY for the state of the subscription when using Event: dialog (BLF)
by Borislav Gergov 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

Hello, The initial NOTIFY that shows the server accepts our subscription is not sent: SUBSCRIBE sip:002@10.7.2.22;transport=TCP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.2.4.38:63718 ;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---837a95d50bef81d4;rport. Max-Forwards: 70. Contact: <sip:444@10.2.4.38:63718;transport=TCP>. To: <sip:002@10.7.2.22;transport=TCP>. From: <sip:444@10.7.2.22;transport=TCP>;tag=810bbd39. Call-ID: 8fMhJ4GnMrkSu8qxez70aw... CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. Expires: 120. Accept: application/dialog-info+xml. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE. User-Agent: Z. Event: dialog. Allow-Events: presence, kpml, talk. Content-Length: 0. . SIP/2.0 202 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.2.4.38:63718 ;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---837a95d50bef81d4;rport=63718;received=10.2.4.38. To: <sip:002@10.7.2.22 ;transport=TCP>;tag=339c21513a585618341888f199c2a0f6-c10d. From: <sip:444@10.7.2.22;transport=TCP>;tag=810bbd39. Call-ID: 8fMhJ4GnMrkSu8qxez70aw... CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. Expires: 120. Contact: <sip:10.7.2.22:5060;transport=tcp>. Server: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.2.4.38:63718 ;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---5b9c08901116e843;rport=63718;received=10.2.4.38. To: <sip:444@10.7.2.22 ;transport=TCP>;tag=75017b5d51cabe3de4b519c896167ee7.88a9. From: <sip:444@10.7.2.22;transport=TCP>;tag=d831f844. Call-ID: p-vce2LWcasOPThxdFZP6A... CSeq: 3 REGISTER. Contact: <sip:444@10.2.4.38:63718 ;transport=TCP;rinstance=045d4a61cf8385dc>;expires=120. Server: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . NOTIFY sip:444@10.2.4.38:63718;transport=TCP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.7.2.22;branch=z9hG4bK94d5.046c6940000000000000000000000000.0. To: <sip:444@10.7.2.22>;tag=810bbd39. From: <sip:002@10.7.2.22>;tag=339c21513a585618341888f199c2a0f6-c10d. CSeq: 2 NOTIFY. Call-ID: 8fMhJ4GnMrkSu8qxez70aw... Content-Length: 0. User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux)). Max-Forwards: 70. Event: dialog. Contact: <sip:10.7.2.22:5060;transport=tcp>. Subscription-State: terminated;reason=timeout. . SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.7.2.22;branch=z9hG4bK94d5.046c6940000000000000000000000000.0. Contact: <sip:444@10.2.4.38:63718;transport=TCP>. To: <sip:444@10.7.2.22>;tag=810bbd39. From: <sip:002@10.7.2.22>;tag=339c21513a585618341888f199c2a0f6-c10d. Call-ID: 8fMhJ4GnMrkSu8qxez70aw... CSeq: 2 NOTIFY. User-Agent: Z. Content-Length: 0.

2 1

consume_credentials question
by Aymeric Moizard 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

Hi list! I'm trying to remove Proxy-Authorization dedicated to local subscriber without -and not the other ones dedicated to other server- I realized that "consume_credentials" doesn't work because it requires that a call to "www_authorize, proxy_authorize, www_authenticate or proxy_authenticate" has been made before. I have a use-case where this isn't called. I don't want to use such code: if (is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) { remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization"); } Because this may remove a "Proxy-Authorization" for another service. I have seen this: has_credentials but it doesn't help to know which header is the one containing the header... Any good way to find the header and index? And then remove it with remove _hf_value2? Regards Aymeric -- Antisip - http://www.antisip.com

2 2

SIP RFC behaviour for 180/200 to_tag mismatch
by Mititelu Stefan 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

Hi people, I am trying to search for the RFC behavior in case of 180/200 to tag mismatch of an INVITE. From my readings so far, I'm not 100% convinced of the correct behavior. However, there may be a scenario, where this might be plausible: 1. parallel forked two calls 2. 180 ringing comes for first one, but not for second one(various reasons) 3. 200 ok comes for second one Any opinions about this? Do you have some references that will make this 100% clear? Thank you, Stefan

2 2

sqlops module error
by Fabian Borot 06 Mar '18

06 Mar '18

I am using the sqlops module with odbc to INSERT,UPDATE only and as the documentation says I can omit result parameter in "sql_query". However I always see these ERRORS when processing the call: This is an example of a query: sql_query("c04", "insert into SIPInfo302CDR (SIPCallID,SessionID) values('$ci',$var(SessionID))"); And these are the error lines in the log: ERROR: db_unixodbc [res.c:60]: db_unixodbc_get_columns(): no columns returned from the query ERROR: db_unixodbc [res.c:261]: db_unixodbc_convert_result(): getting column names failed ERROR: db_unixodbc [dbase.c:216]: db_unixodbc_store_result(): failed to convert result ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:188]: db_do_raw_query(): error while storing result ERROR: sqlops [sql_api.c:265]: sql_do_query(): cannot do the query [insert into SIPInfo302CDR (SIPCa] I have also tried using the parameter like shown below but the ERROR events happen anyways. sql_query("c04", "insert into SIPInfo302CDR (SIPCallID,SessionID) values('$ci',$var(SessionID))", "ra"); sql_result_free("ra"); Even though the errors line show up and say that " cannot do the query .." the query does work and the records are inserted/updated accordingly. I tried using the "sql_query_async" function that does not need the result parameter but I can't use it with unixODBC, I see these lines in the log when trying to use it: "the db driver module doesn't support async query" and the record is not inserted/updated. I also added the "async_workers" core parameter as well just in case. I also tried declaring them in the module sqlops initialization section even though in my case there is no need: "modparam("sqlops", "sqlres", "ra")" but the errors show up anyways. When I test with SEELCT query the result parameter can be used, I can count rows etc. But I am only doing INSERT/UPDATE. Am I am missing something here or this is something that can be safely used like that and I just need to ignore them. I am using " Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v5.0" Thank you Fabian

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] cnxcc module - make auth for redis connection
by Donat Zenichev 06 Mar '18

06 Mar '18

Hi Daniel, first of all thanks for your attention. Perhaps I missed something. I read documentation about cnxcc and ndb_redis again, but I haven't found information that can help me with my goal. ndb_redis is separate module that implements connections to redis databases (and also is able to perform authentication), has it's own functions like redis_cmd() to interact directly with redis. But cnxcc stores real-time amounts in redis hash keys using it's own parameter - modparam("cnxcc", "redis", "addr=127.0.0.1;port=6379;db=1") And I can't see possibility to use ndb_redis to perform authentication for cnxcc module, correct me if I'm wrong. Do you offer me to read ndb_redis code sources to use them to edit cnxcc code sources? Thanks in advance for your advice. 2018-03-01 9:28 GMT+02:00 Donat Zenichev <donat.zenichev(a)gmail.com>: > Hi Daniel, first of all thanks for your attention. > > Perhaps I missed something. I read documentation about cnxcc and ndb_redis > again, but I haven't found information that can help me with my goal. > ndb_redis is separate module that implements connections to redis > databases (and also is able to perform authentication), has it's own > functions like redis_cmd() to interact directly with redis. > > But cnxcc stores real-time amounts in redis hash keys using it's own > parameter - modparam("cnxcc", "redis", "addr=127.0.0.1;port=6379;db=1") > And I can't see possibility to use ndb_redis to perform authentication for > cnxcc module, correct me if I'm wrong. > > Do you offer me to read ndb_redis code sources to use them to edit cnxcc > code sources? > Thanks in advance for your advice. > > > > 2018-02-28 14:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> maybe authentication support was not implemented in cnxcc. Eventually it >> can be extracted from the ndb_redis, that module has it implemented already. >> >> * https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/ndb_red >> is.html#ndb_redis.p.server >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 27.02.18 14:39, Donat Zenichev wrote: >> >> Nevertheless, I want to find the needed solution. >> In my opinion - If module is able to connect to redis databases, it'd >> better to perform it with authentication. >> >> Because, there are cases when db located on localhost is improper >> solution or other users mustn't see hkeys, amounts inside hkeys it etc. >> So I think no one will be mind, to have whole possibility - real-time >> billing (cnxcc) working with redis securely. >> >> So please don't be apathetic to my request. >> >> 2018-02-26 9:44 GMT+02:00 Donat Zenichev <donat.zenichev(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi community. >>> This message is specially dedicated to developers of the kamailio >>> project. >>> >>> I need to find solution how to make authentication for connections of >>> cnxcc with redis. >>> For that moment, cnxcc module is able to connect to redis only without >>> password (Carlos Ruiz Díaz will add this possibility later?). >>> So that, this makes database vulnerable. >>> >>> Well, furthermore I don't want to use local redis database, cuz I think >>> machine that contains kamailio daemon, must perform just this kind of >>> actions - SIP proxying (kamailio server is not to be a database server or >>> anything else). >>> >>> For that moment we use separate redis db for cases like that, but this >>> is not best practice I think. >>> I already tried to find solution (for e.g. connections via another >>> module like db_redis: >>> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1432) but I got advice - >>> achieving my goal by sr-users mailing list. >>> >>> Please pay attention for my request. I think this will be very helpfull >>> for others. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> BR, Donat Zenichev >>> Wnet VoIP team >>> Tel Ukraine: +380(44) 5-900-800 >>> Tel USA: +164(67) 8-174-17 (ext 1320) >>> https://w-net.us/ <http://wnet.ua> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> BR, Donat Zenichev >> Wnet VoIP team >> Tel Ukraine: +380(44) 5-900-800 >> Tel USA: +164(67) 8-174-17 (ext 1320) >> https://w-net.us/ <http://wnet.ua> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com >> Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com >> >> > > > -- > -- > BR, Donat Zenichev > Wnet VoIP team > Tel Ukraine: +380(44) 5-900-800 > Tel USA: +164(67) 8-174-17 (ext 1320) > https://w-net.us/ <http://wnet.ua> > -- -- BR, Donat Zenichev Wnet VoIP team Tel Ukraine: +380(44) 5-900-800 Tel USA: +164(67) 8-174-17 (ext 1320) https://w-net.us/ <http://wnet.ua>

2 1

Setup timeout for in function jsonrpc_request
by Marco Capetta 06 Mar '18

06 Mar '18

Hi All, I'm currently in the process of upgrading a kamailio instance from 4.4.6 to 5.1.2. Since"janssonrpc-c" has been renamed in "jsonrpcc" I have to adapt my configuration. In version 4.4.6, the function "janssonrpc_request" allowed me to setup a specific timeout for the request. Is it possible to do the same in version 5.1.2 with the function "jsonrpc_request"? Because the documentation doesn't mention it. Thank you Best regards Marco

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Not documented parameter server_id_filter inside usrloc module
by Konstantin Polyakov 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Victor, We are going to use this parameter, but we found that cleanup process should use such filter too. Otherwise different instances of proxy delete records of each other and it leads to the problems when db_mode 1 or 2 (cached) is used. Soon I am going to propose a pull request with filter in cleanup procedure. Could you tell me please, if it is necessary to add a new parameter for cleanup process or I can use this server_id_filter? Is there some case when we need to use this filter on startup but we don't it during cleanup? Thank you. Best regards, Konstantin

2 1

Not documented parameter server_id_filter inside usrloc module
by Konstantin Polyakov 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Hello everybody, Could somebody clarify why server_id_filter parameter is not listed in the usrloc module article? It is not ready for usage? Or it was forgotten to be added into description? Thank you Best regrads Konstantin

2 1

Error using newest Siremis and kamailio 5.0.3
by Olli Attila 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Hello, I installed Siremis today from master branch alongside with Kamailio 5.0.3 and entering "XMLRPC Commands" menu gives me this error: [2018-03-01 12:28:34 (GMT)] An exception occurred while executing this script: Error message: #256, Unable to location template file system_internal_error.tpl. Script name and line number of error: /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/Resource.php:283 function: errorHandler ( 256, "Unable to location template file system_internal_error.tpl.", "/var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/Resource.php", 283, Array(11) ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/sysheader.inc 117 function: userErrorHandler ( 256, "Unable to location template file system_internal_error.tpl.", "/var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/Resource.php", 283, Array(11) ) @ function: trigger_error ( "Unable to location template file system_internal_error.tpl.", 256 ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/Resource.php 283 function: getTplFileWithPath ( "system_internal_error.tpl", "email" ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/BizSystem.php 560 function: getTplFileWithPath ( "system_internal_error.tpl", "email" ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/siremis/modules/service/userEmailService.php 108 function: SystemInternalErrorEmail ( Array(2), Null ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/siremis/modules/common/form/ErrorForm.php 34 function: Report ( ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 310 function: invoke ( ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 110 function: dispatchRequest ( ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 32 function: include_once ( "/var/www/html/https/siremis/openbiz/bin/BizController.php" ) @ /var/www/html/https/siremis/siremis/bin/controller.php 6 (I'm running PHP 7.0.27-0+deb9u1 and MariaDb Server version: 5.1.73 Source distribution) What is going wrong here? I found this online but I think this is already fixed on the Siremis master branch? https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-December/095373.html Cheers, Olli

2 7

Invoking RPC commands over HTTP
by Ben Hood 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Hi, What is the idiomatic way to call an RPC from a remote HTTP client in the 5.1.x series? I'd like to invoke mtree.reload from a remote HTTP client. My goal is to avoid a dependency on kamcmd on the remote client system - it would be nice to be able to issue a HTTP RPC which could be implemented in any environment. Or should I be looking to implement a BINRPC client on the remote system? TIA, Ben

3 8

Kamailio iOS Push Notifications
by Amine Mensori 04 Mar '18

04 Mar '18

Hello, We need help implementing push notifications within Kamailio. I have found a module relating to this: https://github.com/tvntsr/push <https://github.com/tvntsr/push> However, the developer did not provide any examples of the cfg file, only parts of certain functions. We need some help implementing the functions in our config file or a full example of another method to get push notifications to work when the application is closed on the device. Please note we are not very proficient in C programming so a clear example would help a lot. Many Thanks, Amine

4 3

Non-standard SIP-over-TLS port
by Steve 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Hello sr-users, How does one assign a non-standard SIP-over-TLS port rather than the usual port 5061 for client registration? Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

2 2

dialplan module reload fail
by Paulo Ferreira 02 Mar '18

02 Mar '18

Hi list, I'm using several modules, including dialplan. I can reload modules data from database to kamailio with kamctl reload, except the dialplan module. kamctl dialplan reload { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Method Not Found" }, "id": 21705 } looking at the error, it seems that this method was not implemented. This isn't making sense, so any idea in what can be wrong? thanks,and regards, Paulo -- ------------------------------------------- Paulo Ferreira VoIP@RCTS - Área de Infraestruturas Aplicacionaisz FCCN http://www.fccn.pt/ Av. do Brasil, n.º 101 1700-066 Lisboa - Portugal Telefone|Phone: +351 218440100; Fax: +351 218472167 Aviso de Confidencialidade/Disclaimer Esta mensagem é exclusivamente destinada ao seu destinatário, podendo conter informação CONFIDENCIAL, cuja divulgação está expressamente vedada nos termos da lei. Caso tenha rececionado indevidamente esta mensagem,solicitamos-lhe que nos comunique esse mesmo facto por esta via ou para o telefone +351 218440100 devendo apagar o seu conteúdo de imediato. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. It may contain CONFIDENTIAL information protected by law. If this message has been received by error, please notify us via e-mail or by telephone +351 218440100 and delete it immediately.

2 2

question
by Syrine Riahi 02 Mar '18

02 Mar '18

bonjour je suis une étudiante en mastère professionnel des systèmes des réseaux et télécommunication j'ai choisie comme un sujet de mémoire mise en oeuvre de solution des VoIP et après des grands recherches j'ai choisie comme solution kamailio alors comme je suis débutante dans le domaine j'ai besoin des étapes exacte de l'instalation et la configuration de kamailio v 5.1.2 et j'utilise la distribution ubuntu v 16.04 merci énormément de me voir aider

3 2

5.1.2 rtpengine regressions - broke working setup?
by Anthony Alba 02 Mar '18

02 Mar '18

Hi list, upgrade to 5.1.2 broke my setup due to some different behaviour in rtpengine.so. I use: rtpengine_manage("DTLS=off ICE=remove"); 1. I don't send any rtpengine_manage flags (RTP UDP SAVP). UAC sends RTP/SAVP in SDP, rtpengine changes to UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVP. Reverted to 5.1.1, and see that rtpengine sends RTP/SAVP 2. To SDP body, rtpengine is adding: a=setup:actpass a=fingerprint:sha-1 D6:D7:DA:AA:2D:DB:AD:94:29:46:FA:C4:D8:AE:0F:03:96:6F:8A:4F For some reason this broke FreeSWITCH which does not like this. Anthony

2 6

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine transcoding benchmarks?
by Jeff Brower 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

Andreas- > We've seen around 400 concurrent calls for G711<->Opus on a rather > slow 12-core E5-2420(a)1.90GHz for some first preliminary benchmarks. Was that using narrowband (8 kHz) for Opus ? Otherwise sampling rate conversion is needed. Also I assume Opus DTX was disabled. Also at what Opus bitrate ? Thanks. -Jeff > On 2018-02-26 21:27, Brooks Bridges wrote: >> I realize the transcoding support is rather new, however has anyone run any real world tests on it yet?Â Trying to get a sense of what the performance will be. >> >> Â >> >> Iâm aware that itâs forced into userspace for transcoding so itâs not **nearly** as efficient as the iptables module, however even if I have to throw a rack full of whiteboxes at it to get anywhere close to decent numbers thatâs still going to be comparable to a lot of the commercial options out there right now. >> >> Â >> >> *Brooks Bridges | *Engineering Manager >> >> *O^1 Communications* >> >> 4359 Town Center Boulevard, Suite 217 >> >> El Dorado Hills, California 95762 >> >> *office:*916.235.2097 |*main:*888.444.1111, Option 2 >> >> *email:*bbridges@o1.com <mailto:bbridges@o1.com> |Â *web:*www.o1.com <http://www.o1.com/> >> >> Â

2 2

Kamailio v5.1.2 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.1.2 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.1, that includes fixes since the release of v5.1.1. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.1.x. Deployments running previous v5.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.1.2. For more details about version 5.1.2 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2018/03/kamailio-v5-1-2-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Planing next Kamailio releases - v4.4.7 v5.0.6 and v5.1.2
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

Hello, I am considering to do releases from last three stable branches during next week. v4.4.7 is going to be released out of latest code in branch 4.4 to mark the end of official maintenance for series v4.4.x. The version 4.4.0 was released in March 2016, so it had more or less two years of maintenance. Commits can still go in 4.4 branch if developers wants to push there, end of official maintenance means that there is no plan to do packaging and release another version from the branch in the future, so you will have to build it from sources or generate packages yourself. v5.0.6 and v5.1.2 are the usual minor releases we do from the last two stable branches. If there are any issues you are aware of and not reported on bug tracker, create the items as soon as possible to get a better chance to review and eventually fix. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users