- sr-users - kamailio.org

modifying via header from public IP to private IP
by Narasimhaiah, Vinod Maralenahalli 09 Apr '19

09 Apr '19

Hi , I have a cloud server, when I make call from a sip phone (registered with kamailio), in the INVITE header I am seeing the via header with public IP, is there any way that I can modify via header to send only the private IP. The calls are landing on another sip gateway, they will allow only the private IP. Please let me know, is it possible to replace. I tried all the replace functions but it is not working. Thank you vinod.M.N -- ***This transmission contains information that is confidential and proprietary of Kirusa Inc.,its affiliates and/or its partners and customers. This information is intended to be shared only with the recipient of this e-mail who is bound by confidentiality. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete the e-mail and notify the sender by return e-mail.***

1 0

modifying via header from public IP to private IP
by vinod mn 08 Apr '19

08 Apr '19

Hi , I have a cloud server, when I make call from a sip phone (registered with kamailio), in the INVITE header I am seeing the via header with public IP, is there any way that I can modify via header to send only the private IP. The calls are landing on another sip gateway, they will allow only the private IP. Please let me know, is it possible to replace. I tried all the replace functions but it is not working. -- Thanks and regards Vinod.M.N

3 2

How to Register sip trunk in kamailio without username and password?
by Mostafa Moradi 08 Apr '19

08 Apr '19

Hi, I'm mostafa moradi from iran, I Have installed kamailio, and I have a sip trunk without username and password, I want to register the sip trunk in kamailio with UAC Module, but this module only accepts sip trunk with user and password, How Can I Register sip trunk in kamailio without username and password? Thank you in advance Best regards,

4 3

Re: [SR-Users] Timeout between 100 & 183
by Alex Balashov 05 Apr '19

05 Apr '19

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > route { > ... > > # Initial INVITE handling: > > if(is_method("INVITE")) { > # Set fr_inv_timer initially to 5 seconds, so that > # if we do not receive an answer or at least one non-100 1xx > # response, trigger a failure_route and try the next gateway > # or whatever. > > t_set_fr(50000); Sorry, this would have been a lot more pedagogically useful if it had read: t_set_fr(5000); -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

1 0

UAC authentication challenge response using KEMI/app_ruby
by Andrew White 05 Apr '19

05 Apr '19

Hi all, I’m continuing on my quest to use app_ruby for my logic - it’s working very well so far! The last major hurdle I’ve come across is UAC response to WWW challenge. On my outbound path, the correct URIs for From and To are set based on provider requirements, and the INVITE is sent using t_relay(): def ksr_route_to_trunk() KSR.info("Route to trunk") if KSR::TM.t_is_set("failure_route") < 0 then KSR::TM.t_on_failure("ksr_failure_manage_trunk") end # Relay KSR::PV.sets("$fu", "sip:#{$uacs[trunk]['r_username']}@#{$uacs[trunk]['r_domain']}") KSR::PV.sets("$fn", '') new_uri = "sip:61400123123@#{uacs[trunk]['r_domain']}" KSR.info("New URI is #{new_uri}") KSR.seturi(uri) KSR::UAC.uac_replace_to('', uri) KSR::TM.t_relay() exit end I’ve stripped it back, but this function is great and works perfectly. An INVITE is sent to the correct place, and the trunk receives the INVITE. It then responds with a 401/WWW-Authenticate. My failure route is called fine. Below is the stripped down code: def ksr_failure_manage_trunk() exit if KSR::TM.t_is_canceled() > 0 KSR.info("Hit trunk failure manage route") KSR::PV.sets("$avp(auser)", 'user') KSR::PV.sets("$avp(apass)", 'pass') KSR::PV.sets("$avp(arealm)", 'test.local') KSR.info("AVPs: #{KSR::PV.gete("$avp(auser)")} #{KSR::PV.gete("$avp(apass)")} #{KSR::PV.gete("$avp(arealm)")}") if KSR::UAC.uac_auth() then KSR.info("UAC authed, relaying") KSR::TM.t_relay() else KSR.info("UAC NOT authed, no relay") end exit end Also the AVP values are set (I believe) correctly: modparam("uac", "auth_username_avp", "$avp(auser)") modparam("uac", "auth_password_avp", "$avp(apass)") modparam("uac", "auth_realm_avp", "$avp(arealm)") This throws the following complaint, and doesn’t send a new response back to the trunk: Apr 5 02:55:22 ip-10-0-0-2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[26870]: ERROR: {1 102 INVITE 3a84da15272da66e527a79144c48516c@10.0.0.20:5060} tm [t_fwd.c:1728]: t_forward_nonack(): no branches for forwarding Apr 5 02:55:22 ip-10-0-0-2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[26870]: ERROR: {1 102 INVITE 3a84da15272da66e527a79144c48516c@10.0.0.20:5060} tm [tm.c:1619]: _w_t_relay_to(): t_forward_noack failed I don’t understand branches very well, however after some digging around, I appended KSR::COREX.append_branch() in before the t_relay() in the failure. This stops the error and now we send an ACK and a new INVITE, but still without the expected authorisation header. I feel like my lack of understanding about branches is the issue here - I seem to be sending an INVITE, but not adding the auth header that I suspect is being generated somewhere! Thanks for your help. ________________________________ Andrew White - Director uConnected Email: andrew(a)uconnected.com.au Web: www.uConnected.com.au

2 2

Statistics of received replies
by Duarte Rocha 04 Apr '19

04 Apr '19

Greetings, Does Kamailio have statistics like the sl.stats but for received replies instead of locally generated ones? I want to be able to look at how many "491" replies i'm receiving, for example. Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

2 1

Kamailio v5.0.8 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Apr '19

04 Apr '19

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.0.8 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the old stable branch 5.0, that includes fixes since the release of v5.0.7. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.0.x. Deployments running previous v5.0.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.0.8 or even better directly to v5.1.x or v5.2.x because v5.0.x is getting out of the official maintenance time frame. Important note: this is the last planned release from branch5.0. For more details about version 5.0.8 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2019/04/kamailio-v5-0-8-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Note: the latest stable branch is 5.2, at this moment with its latest release v5.2.2. See more details about it at: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v5-2-0-release-notes/ Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Kamailio-error reading: Connection reset by peer
by Mangesh Kharade 04 Apr '19

04 Apr '19

Hi Team, We are facing issue with kamailio application , we are not able to communicate to kamailio application getting below error. Can you please suggestion us how to resolved this issue issue, it production servers and we did not get any clue to resolve it. Error1:- Apr 2 06:53:54 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2240]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) Apr 2 06:53:54 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2240]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading Apr 2 06:54:12 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2244]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) Apr 2 06:54:12 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2244]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading Apr 2 06:54:17 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2244]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) Apr 2 06:54:17 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2244]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading Error1:- Apr 2 06:54:26 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2179]: INFO: <script>: WebSocket connection from ###################:3008 has closed Apr 2 06:54:26 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2179]: INFO: <script>: WebSocket connection from ###################:3009 has closed Apr 2 06:54:26 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2179]: INFO: <script>: WebSocket connection from ###################:3010 has closed Apr 2 06:54:26 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2179]: INFO: <script>: WebSocket connection from ###################:3011 has closed Apr 2 06:54:26 urcmcs /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2179]: INFO: <script>: WebSocket connection from ###################:3012 has closed Please let us know if you need more help from our end. Thanks and Regards, Mangesh Kharade Consultant - Microsoft Azure | Managed Services [cid:image003.png@01D15FFB.27B1AA80] Pune IT Park, 34 Aundh Road Bhau Patil Marg, Pune 411020 Tel: +91.20.30204000 | Extn. 9694 VOIP: +1.713.353.7464 Mobile: +91.9168181166 Mangesh.kharade(a)silicus.com<mailto:Mangesh.kharade@silicus.com>| www.silicus.com<http://www.silicus.com/> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and access to it by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

2 2

Releasing Kamailio v5.0.8
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Apr '19

04 Apr '19

Hello, I am considering to release v5.0.8 to mark the end of official maintenance for branch 5.0 on Thursday, April 4. If no major regression will be introduced, this will be the last release from branch 5.0. Afterwards, the stable branches maintained will be 5.1 and 5.2. In case you have in mind some specific commits that should get into 5.0 branch, then reply and list them to be sure they are not missed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com

2 2

Kamailio & asterisk integration
by ayoub krari 04 Apr '19

04 Apr '19

Good morning, I want to Loadbalance calls equally to asterisk servers, i have already tried with opensips but didnt work for me, i want to try kamailio now, i have tried with the tutorial of " Kamailio 4.0.x and Asterisk 11.3.0 Realtime Integration using Asterisk Database" but i got some errors and packages missing during the installation and the configuration, my Linux distro is Debian 8.7.0 and i’m using Asterisk v 13, i want really to implement Kamailio , any one can help me with steps or anything , Thanks in advance !

2 1

dispatcher "failover feature disabled"
by David Villasmil 03 Apr '19

03 Apr '19

Hello guys, In my config i have: # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "dstid_avp", "$avp(dsdstid)") modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_avp", "$avp(dsattrs)") # PVs for hashing modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$fU@$ci") # PVs to store results when calling ds_is_from_list modparam("dispatcher", "setid_pvname", "$var(setid)") modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_pvname", "$var(attrs)") # method to probe the gateways modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", " sip:dispatcher@proxy.voice-proxy.singlecommand.com") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes","class=2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) # size of hash table storing data for call load dispatching, power of two modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 10) # expiration time in seconds to remove the load on a destination if no BYE was received modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_expire", 3600) # expiration time in seconds to remove the load on a destination if no 200 OK for INVITE was received # and state updated with ds_load_update modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_check_interval", 30) But i'm getting on startup: ds_warn_fixup(): failover functions used, but required AVP parameters are NULL -- feature disabled What avp am I missing? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] Adding presentity_uri prefix for multi-tenanted presence/dialoginfo configuration
by Rhys Hanrahan 03 Apr '19

03 Apr '19

Hi All, I managed to solve my need to re-write NOTIFY packets with help from this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/sr-users@lists.kamailio.org/msg08088.html This seems to work well. I am re-writing the packets as shown below… I guess my only question is, is this relatively safe/smart to do? I basically copied what our standalone Asterisk PBXes are doing in my captures, so I guess so? But I’m not confident enough to say it won’t cause some weird edge case issues. I can only say it works fine with the Snom and Yealink handsets I am testing with. I’m just concerned because it feels a bit like a hack. For SUBSCRIBE I re-write: * Request URI and To header from 101@ sent by the handset to tenant101@ (to match the SIP username of the handset - tenant101@) For NOTIFY I re-write: * From and Contact header to remove the tenant prefix, to go back to 101@ to match the BLF key configuration on the handsets. Any advice would be appreciated on if this is a bad idea, and there’s a better way. Thanks! Rhys Hanrahan Chief Information Officer Nexus One Pty Ltd E: support(a)nexusone.com.au<mailto:support@nexusone.com.au> P: +61 2 9191 0606 W: http://www.nexusone.com.au/ M: PO Box 127, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 A: Level 12 227 Elizabeth St, Sydney NSW 2000 From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Rhys Hanrahan <rhys(a)nexusone.com.au> Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Date: Tuesday, 26 March 2019 at 8:56 pm To: "sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] Adding presentity_uri prefix for multi-tenanted presence/dialoginfo configuration Hi Everyone, I’ve recently just started working with Kamailio – thanks everyone for this amazing software. Like many people, I’m in the process of trying to put Kamailio in-front of Asterisk to allow it to scale out, and my plan is for Kamailio to take over registrations, usrloc and presence/dialoginfo, as we’ve had issues where handsets are failing to get BLF updates/notifys, so I am hoping a couple of Kamailio boxes can scale better in this regard. DMQ is particularly exciting in how it will allow me to build a truly distributed platform. But I’m struggling to get presence to work the way I need it to. Our environment is multi-tenanted, but we do not (and can’t really) use multi-domains. Instead, we prefix the SIP usernames with the “tenant name” such as tenanta101 and tenantb101. My problem is that all the BLFs are configured for 101@PBX with no tenant name in the User part of the URI so that internal dialing and call pickup will work. Because in Asterisk we use “subscribecontext” this hasn’t been a problem in the past – Asterisk knows for subscriptions coming from that handset that it belongs to that tenant’s context in the dialplan and they are “isolated”, so having handsets subscribe as 101@ in their request URI was never a problem. Of course, with Kamailio I don’t have subscribecontext, and my main issue is that the “presentity_uri” being stored is 101@ while each of the SIP accounts of the handsets are registered as tenenata101@, and as such, no NOTIFYs are sent by Kamailio because it thinks that there are no watchers for the presentity_uri. If I change the SIP account username to 101 to match the BLF key, NOTIFYs are sent as expected. But then this breaks call pickup and internal dialing using the BLF keys. I would rather handle this in Kamailio than in Asterisk and having to re-configure the BLF keys for hundreds of handsets. I need to do something like: * When a SUBSCRIBE comes in, I need to prefix presentity_uri with the tenant name so the subscription changes from 101@ to tenanta101@ in the active_watchers table. * When Kamailio generates a NOTIFY, the notify would be built based on presentity_uri and would come out as tenanta101@, but the phone’s BLFs are configured for 101@ so I would need to *remove* the tenant prefix before sending out the notify. Is there a good, or recommended way to handle this scenario? Maybe something entirely different to changing the presentity_uri? I’ve written the following config to re-write the request URI and To field in any incoming subscribe requests, and successfully got the active_watchers table to store a presentity_uri containing my tenant prefix. But the problem I am having is that I can’t figure out how to modify the NOTIFY packets before they are sent – and looking at cfgtrace, it seems I might not be able to? My “standard” presence + dialoginfo configuration was taken from here as a starting point: https://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf Here is what I have so far in terms of trying to make my modifications – any guidance would be greatly appreciated. It feels like there’s probably a better way to do this than re-writing critical headers like To and Request URI? @@ -466,6 +467,8 @@ request_route { # authentication route(AUTH); + route(REWRITE_PRESENCE); + # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); # Presence server processing route[PRESENCE] { if(!is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) return; if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && $hdr(Event)=="message-summary") { # Asterisk is our voicemail route(TOASTERISK); # returns here if no voicemail server is configured sl_send_reply("404", "No voicemail service"); exit; } #!ifdef WITH_PRESENCE if (!t_newtran()) { sl_reply_error(); exit; } if(is_method("PUBLISH")) { handle_publish(); t_release(); } else if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { # See REWRITE_PRESENCE - this should have been executed before we get here. handle_subscribe(); t_release(); } exit; #!endif +route[REWRITE_PRESENCE] { + if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { + xlog("Re-writing subscribe to include tenant prefix\n"); + # The default presentity_uri needs to be prefixed with + # the tenant name + # So re-write the To header + route(TENANTINFO); + # Now grab the tenant name. + $var(subscribe_ru) = "sip:" + $var(tenant_name) + $rU + "@" + $rd; + xlog("Re-writing SUBSCRIBE To header as: $var(subscribe_ru)\n"); + insert_hf("To: $var(subscribe_ru)\r\n", "From"); + $ru = $var(subscribe_ru); + # Force change immediately: + # http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers… + msg_apply_changes(); + } else if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { + xlog("Re-writing NOTIFY to remove tenant prefix\n"); # This code block does not get executed right now. + # We are storing the presentity_uri with a tenant prefix + # handsets do not expect this, only 101@, 102@ etc... In their BLF configs + # So this tenant prefix must be removed when building the reply. + route(TENANTINFO); + $var(notify_ru) = "sip:" + $(rU{s.substr,$(var(tenant_name){s.len}),0}) + "@" + $rd; + xlog("Re-writng NOTIFY to use: $var(notify_ru)\n"); + insert_hf("To: $var(notify_ru)\r\n", "From"); + $ru = $var(notify_ru); + # Force change immediately: + # http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers… + msg_apply_changes(); + } +} Thanks for your time. Rhys Hanrahan Chief Information Officer Nexus One Pty Ltd E: support(a)nexusone.com.au<mailto:support@nexusone.com.au> P: +61 2 9191 0606 W: http://www.nexusone.com.au/ M: PO Box 127, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 A: Level 12 227 Elizabeth St, Sydney NSW 2000 [ttp://quintus.nexusone.com.au/~rhys/nexus1-email-sig.jpg]

1 0

uac_replace_from/to, msg_apply_changes and Re-INVITE
by Henning Westerholt 03 Apr '19

03 Apr '19

Hello, I am currently debugging a strange issue related to the usage of uac_replace_from/to() after msg_apply_changes(). It works all fine, but in a Re-INVITE case it inserts the wrong headers for the 100 - Trying case. The calle side gets then a reply with wrong From/To. This happens all the time with this particular cfg. I already checked for the usual issues: - msg_apply_changes() called several times - msg_apply_changes() called after transactions created/async processing etc.. Any ideas what else could be the problem? The msg_apply_changes() is needed for some SDP filtering logic in the cfg. Thanks and regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services

3 8

TOPOS Call-ID masking
by Cinthia Leung 02 Apr '19

02 Apr '19

Greetings, Call-ID masking is not available, although the modparam is there. Just wondering if there are any plans to get that in soon. Thanks. Cindy

2 2

ENUM for CNAM dips
by Spencer Thomason 02 Apr '19

02 Apr '19

Hi all, I’m interested in extending the ENUM module to add support for draft-ietf-enum-cnam-08 CNAM queries using ENUM. I’m looking for high level guidance as to the best way to implement this and any feedback on naming of exported functions and parameters. Maybe something like enum_cnam_query("pvar", "destination", [,"suffix" [,"service"]]) ? Best regards, Spencer

2 1

Info: Kamailio World 2019 – Participation Grants
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Apr '19

02 Apr '19

Hello, we continue our tradition to give away 3 free passes to students and underrepresented people at Kamailio World Conference (www.kamailioworld.com) – thanks to the sponsors, we are able to offer them in 2019 as well. The passes cover the entire registration fee for all three days and the social networking events – costs with travel and accommodation have to be covered by the participants. Anyone enrolled in an academic activity (including master and PhD programs) as well as underrepresented people can apply for one of the passes via email to me or to: * conference [at] kamailioworld.com or by contacting us via web form at: * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k07/contact-us/ Applications done until April 15, 2019, will be selected by April 18, 2019. Afterwards, if there are still available passes, they will be allocated in the first come first served policy. The details for most of the presentations were published, the full agenda is expected to be ready in a matter of a few days. You can see more details at: * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k07/schedule/ Looking forward to meeting many of you in Berlin, at Kamailio World 2019! It’s going to be another great event about open source real time communications! * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k07/registration/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Port 5060 omitted in Record-Route
by Lợi Đặng 02 Apr '19

02 Apr '19

Hi all, i was using kamailio 4.2.1 located in 2 networks > listen = tcp:MY_ADDR:5060 advertise MY_ADDR:5060 > listen = tls:MY_ADDR:5061 advertise PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061 when the call made from the inside network to out side, running `record_route()` resulted in 2 Record-Route headers added (enable_double_rr=1) Record-Route: PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls;lr > Record-Route: MY_ADDR;transport=tcp;lr That was totally fine omitting the port in the first Record-Route when using tcp (or udp) on the first realm, but when i start switching to tls, it caused trouble Record-Route: PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls;lr > Record-Route: MY_ADDR;transport=tls;lr The client is then told to send ACK/BYE to `MY_ADDR;transport=tls` located at `MY_ADDR:5061` as per rfc3263, then the call would failed. I had another try with `record_route_preset("PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls", "MY_ADDR:5060;transport=tls");`, it really did add what i want with explicit 5060 port on RR, `ACK/BYE` travel on the correct path, but `loose_route()` only consumes the local `Route` header (it should consume 2). So my assumption is to stick with `record_route()` function to make `loose_route()` work properly. I tried using another port on the local realm, e.g: 5062 and the port is explicitly added to the Record-Route header `MY_ADDR:5062;transport=tls;lr` So is `5060` couldn't be explicitly added to the inbound Record-Route, or i just missed something? Any help will be appreciated. P/S: I also tried 4.4.7 and it still omit my 5060 port in the RR. rgds, Loi Dang Thanh Phone : +84. 774.735.448 Email : loi.dangthanh(a)gmail.com

3 5

Compressing SIP messages
by Igor Olhovskiy 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hi! Was looking on some way to compress SIP signalling between internal servers. But found out, there are no some pre-defined or recommended mechanism of doing this. Yes, I found gzcompress module, but it will help only in case of big body, but not whole message itself. Like in some cases you can have 4-5 RR headers, which is already a lot of info. What I googled is SigComp Compact Header form As I found, SigComp is really not widely-used method and it support along opensource SIP servers/PBXes is not documented. For Compact Header form - is there any way of using Kamailio to compress message this way? Maybe also there is a way of having some intermediate proxy-layer software, that will gzip/gunzip SIP signalling in realtime? All of this actually cause info in SIP/SDP grows rapidly, unfortunately MTU size is not.

8 11

presence_dialoginfo module not sending publish on dialogue change
by Richard Nunley 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

To whom can be of assistance, I’m am working towards enabling presence on my Kamailio proxy but have hit a bit of a brick wall. I’m seeing dialogues being created and persisted to the database, subscriptions are being handled and rows are being written to the active_watchers table but no PUBLISH is ever being received by the server to kickoff the sending of NOTIFY to the active watchers. Further, I’m never seeing a row in the watchers table though I don’t know that this isn’t expect behavior. I’ve attached my current config for review. Any help will be greatly appreciated! Thank in advance!

3 2

Use Kamailio as forward proxy between two networks
by Lauritz 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hello, I am trying to implement the following network setup using Kamailio and RTPProxy, but was not able to find any recent documentation or blog posts with hints: > local_net1 : local_net2 > 10.250.10.* : 10.250.11.* > : > (1) (2) : > +-------------+ +--------------+ +--------------+ > ! !.11 .12 ! Proxy !.21 ! Debian Host !.22 > ! Starface !---------------! + Kamailio !<<--------------! + Linphone !.23 > ! ! ! + RTPProxy ! ! ! > +-------------+ +--------------+ +--------------+ > eth0 : eth1 > : > : > As you can see, the proxy has two interfaces and its purpose is to forward traffic from the client's network to the Starface's network. Has anyone experience to share or got any other hints where to start? Thank you very much for your help :) Kind regards, Lauritz

2 1

Kamailio Managed Cloud
by Alex Balashov 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

For immediate release: ATLANTA, GA (1 April 2019)--Following its long tradition of forward-thinking innovation in open-source Real-Time Communications (RTC), the leadership of the Kamailio SIP server project (formerly known as OpenSER) has launched the Kamailio Managed Cloud (KMC). Alex Balashov of Evariste Systems and Fred Posner of The Palner Group were among several key North American stakeholders on hand to discuss it further. As Posner told us, "Kamailio Managed Cloud is a new, best-of-breed managed Kamailio hosting environment. We provide elasticity by leveraging human capital. Using our patent-pending Orchestration Turk system, our managed cloud technicians will purchase your SuperMicro bare-metal server, known as a KamBox, drive to the data centre, and rack-and-stack it on demand -- all in response to a SOAP API call! And when you want to remove your on-demand KamBox, just issue a 'delete' operation and we will decommission the hardware -- live!" "Dedicated KamBox colocation really puts the Management in Managed Cloud," emphasised Balashov. "But that doesn't mean we keep the customer out of the loop. We are using the most modern XMLHttpRequest and 'AJAX' techniques to provide a real-time dashboard with KamBox status to all users, though it will not work with Internet Explorer 6 -- we're addressing that." "Anyway, there are numerous other cloud platforms out there, many of which rely on virtualisation and automated orchestration and the like. It really takes the human touch out of the equation and gives the short shrift to quality, while also taking away jobs. And besides, how can a so-called 'virtual' machine be truly carrier-grade?" Kamailio Managed Cloud launched in two principal regions today -- US-EAST-1, located in Jacksonville, Florida, USA, and EU-CENTRAL-1, based in the booming tech hub of central Europe and birthplace of OpenSER: Berlin, Germany. Unnamed sources tell us that strategic expansion is planned for several other regions, including Flint, Michigan, USA. The mechanics of Kamailio Managed Cloud have invited questions about how other elastic cloud resources are managed, more especially elastic storage. According to KMC senior management, storage is provided via a mechanism developed by ASIPTO StorageWorks. ASIPTO chief Daniel-Constantin Mierla was on hand at the KMC launch to explain: "It's very easy. When a customer requests more space with a simple and lightweight SOAP call with just a little custom XML namespaces, then depending on the region, Fred or I receive an SMS on our smartphones from our advanced PHP backend and drive to the data centre to insert another hard drive into one of the KamBox's several drive bays. We are using the latest in advanced mobile communications, SMS, to ensure fastest response time. Of course our service level is comprehensive and includes Managed Partition Table Labelling and Managed LVM Insertion. Also there is optional Managed Filesystem Formatting for a complete portfolio of managed services. ASIPTO StorageWorks moves at the speed of global e-business. Just text us your desired filesystem layout and partitioning scheme. It is really that easy!" When asked about business focus, marketing turnaround veteran Henning Westerholt, Executive Vice President of Business Development for KMC responded: "Our target customer is a socially conscious Millennial-run corporation or start-up who see value in the unique blend of managed services and an artisanal, hand-crafted, organic approach that is compatible with social justice and takes a people-centric view." Asked to elaborate upon his vision of social justice, Westerholt added: "Virtualisation, orchestration and auto-scaling take the people out of the equation, and Kamailio is, in the end, about people, as communication in general is about people. What would it be without the people? Moreover, these mechanisms take away gainful opportunities from hard-working university graduates. Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, VMWare, and KVM contravene the social policy objective of full employment." At press time, Posner, who also heads up KMC Labs North America, was said to be lending his pioneering business vision and knack for seeing around technology trend corners to intensive work on next-generation, bleeding-edge functionality for KMC. While Posner was tight-lipped about the specifics, he did state that the 'dispatcher' module is slated to be deprecated in favour of a "human load-balancing approach to SIP requests that is both cloud-native and eco-conscious". Industry analysts agree that protocol-aware load-balancing strategies are complicated and that the application of human judgment to the problem represents a fertile field for dynamic innovation and investment. Reports from regional press confirm that KMC Labs are in the process of building a fullfilment centre for this innovative offering, said to be branded "Central Switchboard", at an undisclosed site in Bangladesh, where thousands of "Load Balance Operator" jobs have been advertised in and around the Dhaka market. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

1 0

db_redis and user
by Joan Salvatella 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hello, We are working on a project that's using two active-active Kamailio 5.2 instances that redirect traffic to several Asterisk 15.4 instances. Kamailio is acting as a registrar and should store the location information of the registered terminals. The backend database is db_redis. Phone terminals get registered and the information gets looked up from the subscriber schema in redis (That's cool) but we are having problems with the locations. This is the related code: modparam("db_redis", "keys", "location=entry:ruid&usrdom:username,domain&timer:partition,keepalive") if(ds_is_from_list("1", "2", "sip:$fd:5080")) { record_route(); route(INVITE_ASTERISK); exit; } route[INVITE_ASTERISK] { xlog("L_INFO", "[R-INVITE-RESOLVER:$ci] Entering ASTERISK INVITE resolver\n"); if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); return; } route(INVITE_POSTROUTE); } route[INVITE_POSTROUTE] { rtpproxy_manage(); t_on_reply("MAIN_REPLY"); if(!t_relay()) sl_reply_error(); } When looking up the location schema this errors appear: 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1098]: db_redis_perform_query(): performing full table scan on table 'location' while performing query 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1101]: db_redis_perform_query(): scan key 0 is 'expires' 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1101]: db_redis_perform_query(): scan key 1 is 'expires' 9(39) ERROR: <core> [db_ut.c:92]: db_str2int(): Unexpected characters: [-03-29 18:16:36] 9(39) ERROR: <core> [db_val.c:76]: db_str2val(): error while converting integer value from string 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1062]: db_redis_convert_row(): Failed to convert redis column 'expires' to db value 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1231]: db_redis_perform_query(): Failed to convert redis reply for row 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1243]: db_redis_perform_query(): failed to perform the query 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1829]: db_redis_query(): failed to do the query 9(39) ERROR: usrloc [udomain.c:981]: udomain_contact_expired_cb(): db_query failed Any hints? Thanks and regards,

3 2

Kamailio v5.2 kamctl alias add problem
by Igor Potjevlesch 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hi kamailios, I meet a problem with the " kamctl alias add" command in the 5.2 version, I saw that the module used to add an alias had changed, and now the command result with an error : [kamailio]# kamctl alias add XXXX@XXXX sip:XXXXX@XXXX { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Not enough parameters or wrong format" }, "id": XXXXX } I read the function who return this message " static void ul_rpc_add(rpc_t* rpc, void* ctx)" in the ul_rpc.c in the usr_loc module. I tried to pass the command with two more parameters : # kamctl alias add 0175951068(a)trunk7.bornsip.fr sip:0175951068@trunk7.bornsip.fr NULL NULL { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { }, "id": 29200 } And this time it works correctly, but I saw thaht the test prameters was in the field "path" , do you know why we have to indicate a path ? Are we obliged to indicate this two more parameters ? What is the utility of this field ? Thank you in advance, Igor

2 2

where to find the cfg languaje for program on it?
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

recently i wrote a portion of my cfg file but i found that i based my code in other sources and results of try/tach experiments i cannot found the documents for the languaje of the core i only found the link: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core but in that link there's no references about languaje per see only about how to write portions of the file and sections.. maybe i wrong or the document are wrote in different way? by example how to evaluate the output of a custom function/section? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2 1

drop before exit and send ok reply first can be done?
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

h have this for a custom rule agains spoecific messages: sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); drop(); exit; my question are if that rules are correct: i want to drop but send firts to client a ok response.. i mean client receive "all are ok dont worry" and then drop the rest packets.. that's correct? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

3 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users