- sr-users - kamailio.org

kamailio wiht PJSIP IOS client
by Gaurav Bmotra 01 Jul '19

01 Jul '19

hi i na using kamailio 5.1.2 and i m developing ios client with PJSIP audio is working fine ..but on video it work one side but not showing other side it is working fine on other client like zoiper for audio/video both can anyone help me -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 1

IMS strange behaviour
by Amar Tinawi 01 Jul '19

01 Jul '19

Hello list i'm facing strange behavior in my lap which consists of p-cscf, i-cscf, s-cscsf, FHoSS for HSS Registration is ok and ICSCF is performing well but when it comes to calls, INVITE Call between two ims users is not passing from scscf to icscf the flow should be : P-->S-->I-->hss i can see invite massage is going out scscf to icscf with all monitoring tools, but no incoming Invite massage to icscf not on sip level and nor on networking level (tcpdump) Actually i don't know where the INVITE packets are going Any advice Regards

1 1

install mongoDB module with kamailio-cli doker image
by Gaurav Bmotra 01 Jul '19

01 Jul '19

hi i wan to install mongodb module in kamailio/kamailio-ci image pl help me thnaks -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 3

Late offer ACKs not passing through branch_route
by Bandiera, Enrico 01 Jul '19

01 Jul '19

Hi, I'm encountering an issue when relaying late offer ACKs, before relaying I set the branch_route with t_on_branch() but kamailio never enters that route after calling t_relay I'm keeping the rtpengine module calls inside branch_routes to avoid issues when re-routing in failure routes I suppose it's something related to ACK packets but I'm not sure what the issue is. Any hints? Thanks, Enrico.

3 2

ATCF/ATGW functionality
by Maryam Baghdadi 01 Jul '19

01 Jul '19

Hello, Is it possible to add ATCF/ATGW functionality in kamailio as P-cscf ? I have IMS network with kamailio as P-cscf, icscf, scscf and FHoss . ATCF/ATGW is necessary for handovers between 2G/3G and LTE networks.

2 3

Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module
by Efelin Novak 30 Jun '19

30 Jun '19

Hi Folks, I'm migrating to Kamailio 5.2.x from 4.4.x. Everything seems to be fine, however I have came to an issue with call_control module as this one is still using old MI interface. Standard situations work nice (maximum debit, prepaid, "CDRs") however when call_control needs to kill a call (credit is gone), it tries to send dlg_end_dlg over MI and it fails. Question are: Is call_control still supported? I haven't found any note about it. Is there any workaround from Kamailio point of view? I'm running last versions of both applications. I'm also rising a ticket at ag-projects side. Thanks Efelin

3 7

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 169, Issue 27
by ali mahfouz 29 Jun '19

29 Jun '19

if I send my kamailio.cfg file can you edit it to me please because it is so urgent On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:06 PM <sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: TOPOS uid in contact param instead of username > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 2. Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak) > 3. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 4. Statistics for locally generated replies (Duarte Rocha) > 5. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 6. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak) > 7. Re: kamailio as UAC and NAPTR / sendsocket question > (Karsten Horsmann) > 8. MongoDB for Kamailio (Gaurav Bmotra) > 9. Presence publish manipulation (Gertjan Wolzak) > 10. Re: Question about registrar behavior > (Володимир Іванець) > 11. Re: MongoDB for Kamailio (Henning Westerholt) > 12. Re: DMQ: dmq_t_replicate() (Henning Westerholt) > 13. Re: does kamailio support graph database ?? (Henning Westerholt) > 14. Re: Question about registrar behavior (Henning Westerholt) > 15. Need help with "no branches for forwarding" message (Andrew Chen) > 16. Topos / Remove HF_re (Nicolas Breuer) > 17. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak) > 18. Re: Question about registrar behavior > (Володимир Іванець) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:52:05 +0200 > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS uid in contact param instead of username > Message-ID: > < > CAFRry4VMJd9aaJ_teWd3E-CYg-O9K+qutW699n9GDc9is7wAxQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello, > ok, feel free to ask question if something is not clear ... and I think > topoh might help looking at its code, iirc, it uses uri param for contact > masking ... > > Anyhow, there is no better fun that C coding ;-) ... > Cheers, > Daniel > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:12 AM Thomas Weber <thomas.weber(a)pascom.net> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > thank you for your opinions. > > > > So i will give it a try throughout the next weeks because we have some > > customer pressure here. > > Didn't do a C project since some 10 years, so it could be fun to "learn > it > > again". > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio next_state_dlg(): bogus event
by Olli Attila 29 Jun '19

29 Jun '19

Hello, The prack is for the initial INVITE establishing the call. No re-INVITE messages are generated in the dialog. --Olli Message: 11 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:35:09 +0200 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio next_state_dlg(): bogus event Message-ID: <CAFRry4XAF5qYqRxgJA4tzsuUt-56ON1KnzzwvJnxeKOdTUaxSA(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello, is the PRACK following a re-INVITE or is for the initial INVITE establishing the call? Cheers, Daniel On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:13 AM Olli Attila <attiolli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting this error in Kamailio log every now and then. Can anyone > suggest methods to debug this further for root cause? > > Jun 27 10:04:09 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26341]: CRITICAL: dialog > [dlg_hash.c:1098]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 5 in state 4 for dlg > 0x7fceeabf8d38 [749:3185] with clid > 'SDceked01-e4d2e93d7f9ffe88907206a25ccdbcc2-v300g00030' and tags > 'SDceked01-ecd4281b' '14001358846426' > > Behaviour in the call: > When I look at the SIP flow from this call I can see that a PRACK > message which is routed to Kamailio gets discarded (=the proxy does > not route the PRACK onwards to the UA that requested the usage of the > 100rel in 183 session progress message.) The PRACK message itself > seems valid and when compared to a PRACK from a working call, there is > no difference in the content. > > Cheers, > Olli

2 1

Htable not reloading from db on expiry
by Daniel Greenwald 28 Jun '19

28 Jun '19

I have an htable that loads from mysql. The data loads fine on startup but disappears on expiry. If I issue kamcmd htable.reload it loads again until expiry. It seems as if db_expires is not taking affect. I see them expiring in the debug log but not an errors. Mysql general log does not show any attempt to connect on expiry. Another odd thing is that if I set the expires column in db to anything other than 0 the data doesn't load at all. Any ideas would be appreciated. modparam("htable", "timer_interval", 10) modparam("htable", "htable", "h=>size=20;autoexpire=20;dbtable=validdomains;updateexpire=0;") modparam("htable", "db_url", AUTHDBURL) modparam("htable", "db_expires", 1) create or replace view validdomains as select distinct subscriber.domain as key_name, 1 as key_value, 0 as key_type, 0 as value_type, 0 as expires from subscriber;

2 1

Kamailio next_state_dlg(): bogus event
by Olli Attila 28 Jun '19

28 Jun '19

Hello, I'm getting this error in Kamailio log every now and then. Can anyone suggest methods to debug this further for root cause? Jun 27 10:04:09 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26341]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:1098]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 5 in state 4 for dlg 0x7fceeabf8d38 [749:3185] with clid 'SDceked01-e4d2e93d7f9ffe88907206a25ccdbcc2-v300g00030' and tags 'SDceked01-ecd4281b' '14001358846426' Behaviour in the call: When I look at the SIP flow from this call I can see that a PRACK message which is routed to Kamailio gets discarded (=the proxy does not route the PRACK onwards to the UA that requested the usage of the 100rel in 183 session progress message.) The PRACK message itself seems valid and when compared to a PRACK from a working call, there is no difference in the content. Cheers, Olli

2 1

Statistics for locally generated replies
by Duarte Rocha 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Greetings, Does the statistics command "kamcmd tm.stats" has an argument or a way to only list locally generated replies? As far as i know, sl.stats only lists local generated replies. Can tm work the same way? Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

2 1

Need help with "no branches for forwarding" message
by Andrew Chen 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Hey guys, I need help to identify the cause of this is error: Jun 26 12:03:53 ashintgtpsg51 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1651]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1728]: t_forward_nonack(): no branches for forwarding This message was shortly printed after I xlog a message in onsend_route[] block. What else is strange is that the dialog continued on with that same SIP Call-ID. This is what it looks like in the wireshark flow diagram: [image: image.png] The dispatcher entry is an SRV record which lists available hosts. Any thoughts on how I can identify the cause of this? Thanks. -- Andy Chen Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer 415 516 5535 (M) achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com -- *Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. Thank you.*

1 1

Topos / Remove HF_re
by Nicolas Breuer 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Hello, When using TOPOS module, Kamailio add this header : P-SR-XBranch before executing the topos module. Doing this "remove_hf_re("P-")" in the scripting seems to bypass the addition of the P-SR-XBranch in the sip message. In my mind, remove header function just remove the headers based on the incoming message. What do you think ?

2 1

Question about registrar behavior
by Lars Olsson 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Hi, I have found a behavior in the registrar module that I do have a question about. Is the current behavior correct and wanted? Using the save() method in the script I see the following: * Processing a register request for a user gives return code 1 ( or 2 ) * Processing a unregister request (expires=0) for registered user gives return code 3 * Processing a unregister request (expires=0) for a user which is NOT registered gives return code 1. Why? What is the reason behind this? No database entry is added which is expected. Test performed on 5.1.4, using DB mode 3. For handling a late unregister request ( where registration has already expired) return code does not reflect the the action. I assume that manually checking $expires(max) is the option to go then if I want to detect the unregister request or? Cheers, Lars

3 3

does kamailio support graph database ??
by Gaurav Bmotra 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

hi i m using kamailio 5.1 , does kamailio support graph database ?? thank you -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 1

MongoDB for Kamailio
by Gaurav Bmotra 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

hi i m using kamailio 5.1 , on Ubuntu 18.4 and right now i m using Maria DB for kamailio , but i want to migrate my Maria data to MingoDB ,, plz help me how can i use MOngoDB with kamailio thanks -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 1

Presence publish manipulation
by Gertjan Wolzak 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Hello Kamailions, I'm running into the following challenge. A kamailio setup where phones register with their mac address as uid and a password. Users have to login to the system by dialing a special number where they have to enter their internal extension and a pin code. Now the system knows which extension(number) is logged in on which phone(macaddress). This is done with from updates, just a type of hotdesking. Now I want to use presence.... When a phone makes a phone call, kamailio generates a publish message where the "local" part of the xml code contains the mac address. How can I manipulate the Publish xml information? I mean the manipulation can be done with textops, but which variables to use and where in the configuration? Im asking because when I disable the presence route and do not call it in my configuration, but with presence enabled, I still get Publish messages.... I have tried adding a Sender header which contains the "extension" of the phone and then call the publish in the PRESENCE route like this: handle_publish("$hdr(Sender)"); But this does not change the xml information. Am I doing things wrong? Below the first publish message that is send, where 10.88.77.172 is the kamailio server. U 2019/06/26 14:54:37.233345 10.88.77.172:5060 -> 10.88.77.172:5060 #7 PUBLISH sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.88.77.172;branch=z9hG4bK1a87.5510d093000000000000000000000000.0. To: <sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060>. From: <sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060>;tag=a2652bb825a097f3b7285d4c70edd51a-5c5d. CSeq: 10 PUBLISH. Call-ID: 173009c21f4e3c77-94480(a)10.88.77.172. Content-Length: 579. User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.8 (x86_64/linux)). Max-Forwards: 70. Event: dialog. Expires: 125. Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml. . <?xml version="1.0"?> <dialog-info xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info" version="0" state="full" entity="sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060"> <dialog id="0_2285997339(a)10.88.77.184" call-id="0_2285997339(a)10.88.77.184" direction="initiator"> <state>Trying</state> <remote> <identity>sip:604113@10.88.77.172:5060</identity> <target uri="sip:604113@10.88.77.172:5060"/> </remote> <local> <identity>sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060</identity> <target uri="sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060"/> </local> </dialog> </dialog-info> I would like to change the local identity and target uri into the extension assigned to that phone, for example 604114.... So that subscribers to the extension 604114 get informed about the state of the phone with the used uid 0015659a9931. Feedback would be appricated. Pointers to where I am going wrong as well, ... that's feedback too. Rgds, Gertjan

1 0

TOPOS uid in contact param instead of username
by Thomas Weber 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Hello, we're using topos/redis since some time and it's working quite well for most situations. It's used to route asterisk traffic to sip providers. Some providers, however, are validating the contact header strictly against i.e. the accounts username and so we have to disable topos by using event_route[topos:msg-sending]. Now i'm wondering if it would be useful to other people to add a mode to topos where the topos uid is not forwarded as contact username but instead added as a contact uri param. So instead of e.g. Contact: <sip:btpsh-5abcdef5-374-1@x.x.x.x:5060;transport=tcp> it would use Contact: <sip:+49......@x.x.x.x:5060;transport=tcp;line=btpsh-5abcdef5-374-1>. What do you think? Would it make sense? Is it a lot of effort? Cheers, Thomas

4 4

Apache version for FHoSS
by Woscek, Martin W. 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Hello all, What is the version of Apache that FHoSS was built to? Thanks, Martin

2 1

Info: ClueCon Weekly - Kamailio Project Updates
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 25 Jun '19

25 Jun '19

Hello, later today I will join ClueCon Weekly for a discussion about what is new for Kamailio project and the plans for the future. ClueCon Weekly is a web video conference organized by the FreeSwitch project team. They announced recently a revamp of the format, however, I expect that other people can still join live if they want to listen and ask questions, couple of ways to connect being listed at: * https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/ClueCon+Weekly+Confere… If joining live is no longer possible, I will post a link to the recording and if someone has any questions following my presentation, I can answer here. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 4

Carrier Route installation Failed
by Amar Tinawi 24 Jun '19

24 Jun '19

Hello i'm facing a dependency error when trying to install kamailio 5.2.3+xenial with carrier route module using apt package installer The following packages have unmet dependencies: kamailio-carrierroute-modules : Depends: kamailio (= 4.3.4-1.1ubuntu2) but 5.2.3+xenial is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. all other modules installed fine any suggestions? thanks in advance

4 5

Kamailio routing BYE back to originator
by Andrew White 24 Jun '19

24 Jun '19

Hi team! I’ve recently found an issue in my Kamailio setup. It appears when the trunk replies to call in progress with a BYE, we relay it immediately back to them: https://i.imgur.com/h5fusau.png <https://i.imgur.com/h5fusau.png> The only differences in the second BYE is the Route header is removed and replaced with a Via header referencing the Kamailio machine, and the From URI is rewritten to show the Kamailio hostname. I’m unsure what steps I can take here, as all of my out of dialog messages (180, 200, ACK) are forwarded along with no issue. It seems only the in dialog are having this issue. Here’s my WITHINDLG and RELAY: def ksr_route_relay() if KSR.is_method_in("IBSU") then if KSR::TM.t_is_set("branch_route") < 0 then KSR::TM.t_on_branch("ksr_branch_manage") end end if KSR.is_method_in("ISU") then if KSR::TM.t_is_set("onreply_route") < 0 then KSR::TM.t_on_reply("ksr_onreply_manage") end #KSR.info("Onreply route: #{KSR::TM.t_is_set("onreply_route")}") end if KSR.is_INVITE() then if KSR::TM.t_is_set("failure_route") < 0 then KSR::TM.t_on_failure("ksr_failure_manage") end end if KSR::TM.t_relay() < 0 then KSR::SL.sl_reply_error() end exit end def ksr_route_withindlg() return if KSR::SIPUTILS.has_totag() < 0 if KSR::RR.loose_route() > 0 then ksr_route_dlguri() if KSR.is_BYE() then #KSR.setflag($myenv['FLT_ACC'].to_i) #KSR.setflag($myenv['FLT_ACCFAILED'].to_i) elsif KSR.is_ACK() then ksr_route_natmanage() elsif KSR.is_NOTIFY() then KSR::RR.record_route() end ksr_route_relay() exit end if KSR.is_ACK() then #KSR.info("Handling an ACK within dialog") if KSR::TM.t_check_trans() > 0 then ksr_route_relay() exit else exit end end #KSR.info("404ing within dialog") KSR::SL.sl_send_reply(404, "Not here"); exit end I suspect I must be sending this to the wrong branch somehow, but I’m unsure how to correct this. The call gets originally initiated from Kamailio writing a custom RURI and To header before calling t_relay(). I’m wondering if I’m somehow initiating the dialog incorrectly and as such the BYE doesn’t know where to go. Thanks! Andrew

2 3

Kamailio config file flow chart
by Gaurav Bmotra 22 Jun '19

22 Jun '19

hi i m looking for kamailio config file flow chart ,,, if any one have plz provide thanks -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 1

5.2.3 - dispatcher module looses setid
by Andrew Chen 21 Jun '19

21 Jun '19

Hi all, For a few times now I've noticed Kamailio 5.2.3 dispatcher module looses view of setid destination and this system been up and running for 13 days: root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.list | grep ash.tpgw.service To work around it, we have to reload the module again: root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.reload root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.list | grep ash.tpgw.service URI: sip:<some host>:5062 URI: sip:<some host>:5060 root:~# Process been running for several days: root:~# ps -elf | grep kam 0 S root 8484 6520 0 80 0 - 3714 pipe_w 16:04 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto kam 5 S kamailio 32086 1 0 80 0 - 214845 pause Jun17 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32164 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32165 32086 0 80 0 - 233342 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32166 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32167 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32168 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32169 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio 1 S kamailio 32170 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio Anyone seen this? Thanks -- Andy Chen Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com -- *Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. Thank you.*

2 3

Kamailio doesn't start with TLS
by Олег Подгуйко 21 Jun '19

21 Jun '19

Im trying to use kamailio with websocket and tls. It will be use as registrar for websocket clients. I'm using default config with additional websocket, https and tls modules. I created some certs for it and everething looks like good. But when I started kamailio via (systemctl start kamailio) I get some errors июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:205]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2753]: tcp_init(): added 37.143.9.210:443 июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2855]: tcp_init(): bind(9, 0x7fb6ef026f84, 16) on 37.143.9.210:443 : Permission denied июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) ERROR: tls [tls_init.c:342]: tls_h_init_si(): Error while initializing TCP part of TLS socket 37.143.9.210:443 июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) DEBUG: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1986]: mod_destroy(): rtpengine_hash_table_destroy() success! If I start it via /usr/sbin/kamailio - all work. What I do wrong? -- Олег Подгуйко

5 8

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users