- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] Mediaproxy error
by Terry Mac Millan 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Good day, I have a very interesting error coming back with my attempts to use the mediaproxy module. This is what is appearing in the syslog file: Mar 3 13:26:37 hostthe3rd /usr/local/sbin/ser[30021]: error: mediaproxy/sendMediaproxyCommand(): can't connect to MediaProxy Mar 3 13:26:37 hostthe3rd /usr/local/sbin/ser[30020]: error: mediaproxy/sendMediaproxyCommand(): can't connect to MediaProxy The phones do ring, but no voice channel is established. 2 phones are located behind a nat firewall on the same subnet, and the ser server is on the internet with internet ip's. I can send a full copy of my cfg file if needed, but will attach small snippits of it that have the sections on the mediaproxy parts. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Terry --- Snippets from ser.cfg file --- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mediaproxy.so" ... modparam("mediaproxy", "natping_interval", 60) modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 2) ... route { ... if (method=="REGISTER") { # Nat Info - Hopefully if (client_nat_test("3")) { setflag(2); force_rport(); fix_contact(); }; ... route[2] { if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_failure("1"); } else if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { end_media_session(); }; if (loose_route()) { if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { use_media_proxy(); }; t_relay(); break; } if (method=="INVITE") { record_route(); }; if (client_nat_test("3") && !search("^Recored-Route:")) { force_rport(); fix_contact(); }; if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_reply("1"); }; if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { use_media_proxy(); }; # outbound requests are allowed only for registered BigU users if (!(src_ip==216.94.106.12) & !(proxy_authorize("hostthe3rd.rivernet.net", "subscriber"))) { # ACK and CANCEL have no security mechanisms so they are just # noted if (method=="ACK" | method=="BYE") { log(1, "LOG: failed outbound authentication for ACK granted\n"); } else if (method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "LOG: failed outbound authentication for CANCEL granted\n"); } else if (method=="INVITE") { setflag(1); } else { proxy_challenge("hostthe3rd.rivernet.net", "0"); break; }; setflag(1); }; # to maintain credibility of our proxy, we check From in INVITEs # if (!src_ip==216.94.106.12 & method=="INVITE" & !check_from()) { # log(1, "LOG: Spoofed from attempt\n"); # sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=id next time"); # break; # }; append_hf("P-hint: OUTBOUND ON INTERNET\r\n"); setflag(1); if (!t_relay()) { if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { end_media_session(); }; sl_reply_error(); break; }; } ... failure_route[1] { end_media_session(); } onreply_route[1] { if (status=~"(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])") { if(client_nat_test("1")) { fix_contact(); } use_media_proxy(); }; }

2 1

[Serusers] enum parse problem
by Toni Barata 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hello Everybody, Why enum module is not capable of parsing a response to a naptr query if this response don´t have any Authority and Additional RRs? When it receives some response like this one, it work well: Domain Name System (response) Transaction ID: 0xbe8b Flags: 0x8580 (Standard query response, No error) 1... .... .... .... = Response: Message is a response .000 0... .... .... = Opcode: Standard query (0) .... .1.. .... .... = Authoritative: Server is an authority for domain .... ..0. .... .... = Truncated: Message is not truncated .... ...1 .... .... = Recursion desired: Do query recursively .... .... 1... .... = Recursion available: Server can do recursive queries .... .... ..0. .... = Answer authenticated: Answer/authority portion was not authenticated by the server .... .... .... 0000 = Reply code: No error (0) Questions: 1 Answer RRs: 1 Authority RRs: 1 Additional RRs: 1 Queries 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa: type NAPTR, class inet Name: 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa Type: Naming authority pointer Class: inet Answers 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa: type NAPTR, class inet Name: 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa Type: Naming authority pointer Class: inet Time to live: 0 time Data length: 69 Data: u e2u+sip !^\+351215079290(.*)$!sip:\celso@sip.sapo.pt! Authoritative nameservers e164.arpa: type NS, class inet, ns dasilva.cet.pt Name: e164.arpa Type: Authoritative name server Class: inet Time to live: 0 time Data length: 16 Name server: dasilva.cet.pt Additional records dasilva.cet.pt: type A, class inet, addr 10.112.128.6 Name: dasilva.cet.pt Type: Host address Class: inet Time to live: 1 day Data length: 4 Addr: 10.112.128.6 But when it receives a response like this one, it get a parsing error: Domain Name System (response) Transaction ID: 0xbe8b Flags: 0x8580 (Standard query response, No error) 1... .... .... .... = Response: Message is a response .000 0... .... .... = Opcode: Standard query (0) .... .1.. .... .... = Authoritative: Server is an authority for domain .... ..0. .... .... = Truncated: Message is not truncated .... ...1 .... .... = Recursion desired: Do query recursively .... .... 1... .... = Recursion available: Server can do recursive queries .... .... ..0. .... = Answer authenticated: Answer/authority portion was not authenticated by the server .... .... .... 0000 = Reply code: No error (0) Questions: 1 Answer RRs: 1 Authority RRs: 0 Additional RRs: 0 Queries 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa: type NAPTR, class inet Name: 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa Type: Naming authority pointer Class: inet Answers 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa: type NAPTR, class inet Name: 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa Type: Naming authority pointer Class: inet Time to live: 0 time Data length: 69 Data: u e2u+sip !^\+351215079290(.*)$!sip:\celso@sip.sapo.pt! The reported error on ser debug is: 9(24255) ERROR: get_record: rdata parse error 9(24255) ERROR: get_record 9(24255) enum_query(): No NAPTR record found for 0.9.2.9.7.0.5.1.2.1.5.3.e164.arpa.. Can somebody point us a solution to this problem? Many Thanks, Toni

2 1

[Serusers] Mediaproxy errors
by RiverNet Support 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Good day, I have a very interesting error coming back with my attempts to use the mediaproxy module. This is what is appearing in the syslog file: Mar 3 13:26:37 hostthe3rd /usr/local/sbin/ser[30021]: error: mediaproxy/sendMediaproxyCommand(): can't connect to MediaProxy Mar 3 13:26:37 hostthe3rd /usr/local/sbin/ser[30020]: error: mediaproxy/sendMediaproxyCommand(): can't connect to MediaProxy I can send a full copy of my cfg file if needed, but will attach small snippits of it that have the sections on the mediaproxy parts. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Terry --- Snippets from ser.cfg file --- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mediaproxy.so" ... modparam("mediaproxy", "natping_interval", 60) modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 2) ... route { ... if (method=="REGISTER") { # Nat Info - Hopefully if (client_nat_test("3")) { setflag(2); force_rport(); fix_contact(); }; ... route[2] { if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_failure("1"); } else if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { end_media_session(); }; if (loose_route()) { if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { use_media_proxy(); }; t_relay(); break; } if (method=="INVITE") { record_route(); }; if (client_nat_test("3") && !search("^Recored-Route:")) { force_rport(); fix_contact(); }; if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_reply("1"); }; if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { use_media_proxy(); }; # outbound requests are allowed only for registered BigU users if (!(src_ip==216.94.106.12) & !(proxy_authorize("hostthe3rd.rivernet.net", "subscriber"))) { # ACK and CANCEL have no security mechanisms so they are just # noted if (method=="ACK" | method=="BYE") { log(1, "LOG: failed outbound authentication for ACK granted\n"); } else if (method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "LOG: failed outbound authentication for CANCEL granted\n"); } else if (method=="INVITE") { setflag(1); } else { proxy_challenge("hostthe3rd.rivernet.net", "0"); break; }; setflag(1); }; # to maintain credibility of our proxy, we check From in INVITEs # if (!src_ip==216.94.106.12 & method=="INVITE" & !check_from()) { # log(1, "LOG: Spoofed from attempt\n"); # sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=id next time"); # break; # }; append_hf("P-hint: OUTBOUND ON INTERNET\r\n"); setflag(1); if (!t_relay()) { if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") { end_media_session(); }; sl_reply_error(); break; }; } ... failure_route[1] { end_media_session(); } onreply_route[1] { if (status=~"(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])") { if(client_nat_test("1")) { fix_contact(); } use_media_proxy(); }; }

1 0

[Serusers] pike module question
by Java Rockx 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi All. Does anyone have a ser.cfg example for using the pike module to block SIP registration attempts when 20 failures per minute have been exceeded? Is this even possible wike pike? Regards, Paul

2 3

[Serusers] help:serweb: message store, missed call + polycom phones
by harry gaillac 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

hi all, I set up ser + serweb + asterisk with 2 ip300 Polycom. ip300 Polycom supporting SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY/MESSAGE methods. When i set one phone offline (phone is powered and registered in location table) i can't store IM in msilo table.IM is sent to phone if i switch off phone IM is stored in msilo table but when I switch on the phone IM is not dumped to phone. Can I use presence instead of location in order to store IM ? Harry Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

2 1

[Serusers] rewriting from ID using asterisk and sending back to ser
by Iqbal 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi I am looking to send inbound calls (selectively) into asterisk to rewrite the calledID and then send back to ser to complete the call onto a IP phone, can anyone provide any input to this. The callerID needs to be replaced for a pbx functionality, however from previous posts its seems as if SER is not the best place to do it, hence the aim is to lookup th inbound number , see if its field is set to pbx, route to asterisk replace callerID, and then send back to SER for completion...if possible :-) Iqbal

2 1

[Serusers] How Do I Handle <Contact: *> REGISTER messages?
by Java Rockx 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi All. RFC3261 section 10.2.2 Removing Bindings says that when a registrar server receives a Contact header with a value of "*" and expires=0 it should remove all bindings for the AOR. Do I just send back a 200OK? How do I handle this in ser.cfg? Regards, Paul

3 3

[Serusers] hi all, newbie problem probably
by Olivier.taylor 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

I installed ser on a linux box centos 3.4 I use mysql 4.10 Furthermore I am noob on Linux and Ser :( I get this messages at boot in the messages file Impossible the for an UA to connect to ser... Help is welcome, regards, Olivier Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 82.146.123.252 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Listening on Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 82.146.123.252 [82.146.123.252]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 82.146.123.252:* linux.finalcut.be:* finalcut.be:* Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Listening on Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 82.146.123.252 [82.146.123.252]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 82.146.123.252:* linux.finalcut.be:* finalcut.be:* Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Listening on Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: 82.146.123.252 [82.146.123.252]:5060 Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 82.146.123.252:* linux.finalcut.be:* finalcut.be:* Mar 3 17:12:19 linux ser: ser startup succeeded Mar 3 17:12:19 linux /usr/sbin/ser[2649]: connect_db(): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2) Mar 3 17:12:19 linux /usr/sbin/ser[2649]: db_init(): Error while trying to connect database Mar 3 17:12:19 linux /usr/sbin/ser[2649]: mod_init(): Error while connecting database Mar 3 17:12:19 linux /usr/sbin/ser[2649]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module usrloc

2 1

[Serusers] Please help...
by Mohammad Khan 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove(a)iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove(a)projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone(a)projuktee.com (Windows Messenger) These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT. I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3 I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too. Would anybody please help me? Thanks, MOhammad here is my ser.cfg # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") # -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b") # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5) # -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) # -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }

6 12

[Serusers] which ser + serweb works?
by Tan, Chiang Kang 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi all, I have downloaded the CVS version of ser 0.8.14 and I also got a serweb-2004-07. But the 'perms' column is dropped in ser, hence when I login using serweb it complains about the 'perms' field that's not there. I try to tweak the ser_mysql.sh so that when I do a ser_mysql.sh reinstall it does not drop the perms column. However then I am unable to start ser instead. Is anyone out there kind enough to point me to which version of ser and serweb will work together? I even tried a later version of serweb (0.8.12), but complains about "error in SQL query, line 30" when i try to login. Any pointers will be of great help. cheers Chiang

1 0

[Serusers] :-((
by Mohammad Khan 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

What is wrong here? beeplove(a)projukee.com -> behind NAT outside ser using Kphone mahfuz(a)projuktee.com -> behind another NAT outside ser using Windows Messenger Could anybody show me where I am doing wrong? SipClient: Sending: 14:39:54.899 -------------------------------- MESSAGE sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.51.0.161;branch=z9hG4bK5FEAA78B;alias CSeq: 7658 MESSAGE To: <sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 From: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@projuktee.com>;tag=5208EA62 Call-ID: 1457236851(a)10.51.0.161 Content-Length: 9 User-Agent: kphone/4.1.0 Contact: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@10.51.0.161;transport=tcp> helloooo SipClient: Sending to 'sip.projuktee.com:5060' (TCP) SipClient: Receiving message... SipClient: Received: 14:40:05.024 --------------------------------- SIP/2.0 477 Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/TM) Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.51.0.161;branch=z9hG4bK5FEAA78B;alias;rport=38973;received=66.105.xxx.yyy CSeq: 7658 MESSAGE To: <sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com>;tag=76b43a3b01465a3cbddc081c4176c4c9-3a18 From: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@projuktee.com>;tag=5208EA62 Call-ID: 1457236851(a)10.51.0.161 Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.0 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 192.168.71.2:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=9204 req_src_ip=66.105.xxx.yyy req_src_port=38973 in_uri=sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com out_uri=sip:192.168.1.54:10745;transport=tcp via_cnt==1" ser.cfg if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { xlog("L_DBG", "LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many ofhem and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE" || method == 'NOTIFY') { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "1"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (method=="PUBLISH") { if (!t_newtran()) { xlog("L_DBG", "newtran error\n"); sl_reply_error(); }; handle_publish("registrar"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ # sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP > >addresses"); # break; #}; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; ################## # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies #t_on_reply("1"); if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; ################ # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }

3 4

Re: [Serusers] Problem with SER and RADIUS on the different machine
by Alex Jeon 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Sorry for my late reply. 1. /usr/local/etc/radiusclient/servers 83.137.80.50 rad_test 2. /usr/local/etc/raddb/client.conf client 83.137.80.59 { secret = rad_test shortname = HS_SIP nastype = other } Best regards, Alex.

1 0

[Serusers] Re: Hi Steve
by Steve Blair 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Ravi: It would be helpful to send the list the output from the ngrep command so we can see exactly what is happening when the registration fails. Sending this to the list will get your question answered quicker especially since I am headed out of town for a week. Thanks,Steve ravi kuru wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I am Ravi and I did configure SER with Mysql. > I created user in subscriber table then I did try to register with > that user using xlite, but registration is failling. > > Can you please help me find solution for this. > > this is my ser.cfg file > > > debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) > fork=yes > log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) > > check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) > dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) > rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) > port=5060 > #children=4 > fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" > > # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" > modparam("usrloc", "db_url","sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") > modparam("auth_db", "db_url","sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") > modparam("auth_db", "user_column", "username") > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) > > modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") > > modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) > > > route{ > > log (1, "in the routing\n"); > # initial sanity checks -- messages with > # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); > break; > }; > if ( msg:len > max_len ) { > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); > break; > }; > > # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that > # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's > # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities > # use different transport protocol > log (1, "Trying to record_route\n"); > record_route(); > # loose-route processing > if (loose_route()) { > t_relay(); > break; > }; > > # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc > # (in case, it does not work, use the following command > # with proper names and addressres in it) > log (1, "Trying to myself************************\n"); > if (uri == myself) { > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > log (1, "Trying to > register******************************\n"); > # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication > if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { > log (1, "Trying to > challenge***************\n"); > www_challenge("", "0"); > break; > }; > log (1, "Trying to location\n"); > > save("location"); > break; > }; > > # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB > if (!lookup("location")) { > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); > break; > }; > }; > # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that > # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > }; > > } > > > Thanks for your help > Ravi -- ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104 voice: 215-573-8396 215-746-8001 fax: 215-898-9348 sip:blairs@upenn.edu

1 0

[Serusers] lcr and ser 0.9.0
by Iqbal 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi I read a post sometime back about it being possible to use lcr with 0.9.0, but cant seem to locate it (so much for google :-)), if neone has it working give me a shout, works a treat with 0.10-dev, never tried it with 0.9 Iqbal

1 0

[Serusers] SIP_DOMAIN Impossible to change
by Jim Campbell 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Had SER running on Fedora Core 3. Moved unit to a different LAN. "SIP_DOMAIN" EXPORT environmental variable refuses to change although changed in /etc/profile, ser.cfg, /etc/bashrc, MySQL table, etc. Searched every file on the drive using grep to locate the IP address with no luck. Every time I reboot, the SIP_DOMAIN variable reflects old IP address. I pulled most of my hair out and enough curse words to make a sailor blush. Can anyone help me out??? Jim Campbell

3 2

[Serusers] Server does not see the REGISTER message
by Sandra 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hello, I have a problem with SER. The server starts successfully: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 159.199.75.160 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Listening on Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 159.199.75.160 [159.199.75.160]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Listening on Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 159.199.75.160 [159.199.75.160]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Listening on Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: 159.199.75.160 [159.199.75.160]:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 Mar 3 12:14:11 localhost ser: Iniciación de ser succeeded +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ But when I send him a REGISTER message, the server do nothing. My SIP_DOMAIN=localhost, and the REGISTER message arrives to the PC where the server is running. I have not changed the ser.cfg which becomes with the installation. Can anybody help me?

1 0

[Serusers] missed calls
by harry gaillac 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

hi all, I set up ser + serweb + asterisk with 2 ip300 Polycom. ip300 Polycom supporting SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY/MESSAGE methods. When i set one phone offline (phone is powered and registered in location table) i can't store IM in msilo table.IM is sent to phone if i switch off phone IM is stored in msilo table but when I switch on the phone IM is not dumped to phone. Can I use presence instead of location in order to store IM ? Harry Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

1 0

[Serusers] PSTN GW - No NAT
by support 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Hi, I have tested ser with a T1 trunk GW not behind NAT, but using fixed IP. I then disable the use of rtpproxy and nathelper. However, when I use PSTN call to a SIP UA, only ringtones could be heard but no voice passing through it. Does it mean that rtpproxy + nathelper must be used even in the case when UA and PSTN GW are not behind NAT/Firewall? Thomas

2 1

[Serusers] nathelper problem
by Ozan Blotter 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

Conditions as follows : * SER runs on a Public IP * SER works without auth & database modules, * Nearly all user behind NAT (but routers configured to do port forwarding for TCP/UDP 5060) to help SER in some cases, * Users numbers in format of 833XXXXXXX 834XXXXXXX and they should call each P2P-SIP-Calls (if not behind NAT), * If a user need to call PSTN end point (SIP Gateway located at 212.154.32.154) the call traffic should flow over SER to SIP Gateway via T1 connection already located between that systems so SER handles all voice traffic by help of RTP Proxy. * UA's registers on SER (Zyxel Prestige 2000, Zyxel Prestige 200W, Cisco ATA186 etc.) Problem is users cannot call each other (if i comment lines for nathelper they can call) It's clear i think, and below is my ser.cfg, what do i need extra or erase. <-<-<-<-< MY SER.CFG STARTS HERE >->->->-> # # $Id nathelper.cfg,v 1.1.2.1 20050301 by Ozan Blotter Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script including nathelper support # This default script includes nathelper support. To make it work # you will also have to install Maxim's RTP proxy. The proxy is enforced # if one of the parties is behind a NAT. # # If you have an endpoing in the public internet which is known to # support symmetric RTP (Cisco PSTN gateway or voicemail, for example), # then you don't have to force RTP proxy. If you don't want to enforce # RTP proxy for some destinations than simply use t_relay() instead of # route(1) # # Sections marked with !! Nathelper contain modifications for nathelper # # NOTE !! This config is EXPERIMENTAL ! # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ # debug=3 # debug level (cmd line -dddddddddd) # fork=yes # log_stderror=no # (cmd line -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line -v) dns=no # (cmd. line -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) # Ping interval 10 seconds modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message Too Big"); break; }; # if ((method=="NOTIFY")&& search("^Event: Keep-Alive")) { # ls_send_reply("200","OK"); # break; # }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method=="REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { # log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\$ # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it $ # called symmetric media and symmetric signalling. fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!(uri=~"sip:(833)|(834)")) { t_relay_to_udp("212.154.32.154","5060"); save("location"); break; }; # lookup(aliases); # if (!uri==myself) { # append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); # route(1); # break; # }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !searc$ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); if (!search("^Content-Length:\0")){ force_rtp_proxy(); }; # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); if (!search("^Content-Length:\0")){ force_rtp_proxy(); }; # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } <-<-<-<-< MY SER.CFG ENDS HERE >->->->->

1 0

[Serusers] Re: Serusers Digest, Vol 23, Issue 4
by inda imoet 03 Mar '05

03 Mar '05

hi list.. i am winda i make SER and it work well in local network. when i establish SER server in public network. it cannot run. i have read the milist and the solution are nethelper and mediaproxy/rtp proxy. i want ask how to start to make nathelper+rtp proxy? please explain me step by step?... oh ya.. i also read about rtp proxy, maxim's rtp proxy and media proxy. can you explain me what is the different? Thanks for help....:-) serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org wrote: Send Serusers mailing list submissions to serusers(a)lists.iptel.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org You can reach the person managing the list at serusers-owner(a)lists.iptel.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Serusers digest..." Today's Topics: 1. FREEBSD ser cvs adn 0.90 ERROR ( ) 2. Re: http / https in Userloc db (Jan Janak) 3. Re: http / https in Userloc db (Martin Koenig) 4. Re: RTP Wiretapping (Java Rockx) 5. Re: http / https in Userloc db (Jan Janak) 6. Re: http / https in Userloc db (Marian Dumitru) 7. compiling LCR into 0.10-dev (Iqbal) 8. Re: http / https in Userloc db (Jan Janak) 9. serweb question (johnny Laura) 10. Problem with SER and RADIUS on the different machine (Alex Jeon) 11. Re: serweb question (Alistair Cunningham) 12. Re: RTP Wiretapping (Steve Blair) 13. Got Error in Nathelper "extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP" (Markus Monka) 14. Re: username of from with avp_check (Marian Dumitru) 15. RE: Outbound proxy definition (Vitaly Nikolaev) 16. problem (soft phoe is onfigured with SIP Express Router) (anil pal) 17. Re: rtpproxy must be located on the same machine with SIP server?? (Mohammad Khan) 18. Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Java Rockx) 19. RE: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Vitaly Nikolaev) 20. Re: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Java Rockx) 21. Mediaproxy error (Terry Mac Millan) 22. Re: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Klaus Darilion) 23. RE: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Linda Xiao) 24. SER+SERWEB+MSILO (harry gaillac) 25. log question (Mohammad Khan) 26. RE: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Vitaly Nikolaev) 27. RE: log question (Vitaly Nikolaev) 28. Re: Mediaproxy error (Terry Mac Millan) 29. RE: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Jain, Rajnish) 30. Re: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Java Rockx) 31. Re: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Java Rockx) 32. compiling LCR into 0.10-dev (Juha Heinanen) 33. Re: compiling LCR into 0.10-dev (Iqbal) 34. Re: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Java Rockx) 35. RE: Claims of ser-0.9 RFC3261 Violation (Vitaly Nikolaev) 36. :-(( (Mohammad Khan) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:03:08 +0800 From: " " Subject: [Serusers] FREEBSD ser cvs adn 0.90 ERROR To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <20050302060308.CCE8F13D(a)mail.fivewall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset= Hi! all FreeBSD 5.3,latest cvs and 0.90 have problem when /usr/local/sbin/serctl get ser# ps -ax PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 0 ?? DLs 0:00.01 [swapper] 1 ?? SLs 0:00.07 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:00.03 [g_event] 3 ?? DL 0:00.12 [g_up] 4 ?? DL 0:00.30 [g_down] 5 ?? DL 0:00.00 [thread taskq] 6 ?? DL 0:00.00 [kqueue taskq] 7 ?? IL 0:00.00 [acpi_task0] 8 ?? IL 0:00.00 [acpi_task1] 9 ?? IL 0:00.00 [acpi_task2] 10 ?? DL 0:00.00 [ktrace] 11 ?? RL 6:47.97 [idle] 12 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq1: atkbd0] 13 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq3: sio1] 14 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq4: sio0] 15 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq5:] 16 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq6: fdc0] 17 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq7: ppc0] 18 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq8: rtc] 19 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq9: acpi0] 20 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq10:] 21 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq11:] 22 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq12: psm0] 23 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq13:] 24 ?? WL 0:00.06 [irq14: ata0] 25 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq15: ata1] 26 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq16:] 27 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq17: bt0] 28 ?? WL 0:00.04 [irq18: lnc0] 29 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq19: uhci0] 30 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq20:] 31 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq21:] 32 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq22:] 33 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq23:] 34 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq0: clk] 35 ?? WL 0:00.63 [swi5: clock sio] 36 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi4: vm] 37 ?? WL 0:00.03 [swi1: net] 38 ?? DL 0:00.04 [yarrow] 39 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6:+] 40 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi2: camnet] 41 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi3: cambio] 42 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: acpitaskq] 43 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: task queue] 44 ?? WL 0:00.06 [swi6:+] 45 ?? DL 0:00.00 [usb0] 46 ?? DL 0:00.00 [usbtask] 47 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi0: sio] 48 ?? DL 0:00.00 [fdc0] 49 ?? DL 0:00.00 [pagedaemon] 50 ?? DL 0:00.00 [vmdaemon] 51 ?? DL 0:00.59 [pagezero] 52 ?? DL 0:00.00 [bufdaemon] 53 ?? DL 0:00.03 [syncer] 54 ?? DL 0:00.00 [vnlru] 55 ?? DL 0:00.01 [hpt_wt] 56 ?? IL 0:00.00 [nfsiod 0] 57 ?? IL 0:00.00 [nfsiod 1] 58 ?? IL 0:00.00 [nfsiod 2] 59 ?? IL 0:00.00 [nfsiod 3] 60 ?? DL 0:00.07 [schedcpu] 179 ?? Is 0:00.00 adjkerntz -i 245 ?? Ss 0:00.03 /sbin/dhclient lnc0 272 ?? Is 0:00.00 /sbin/devd 292 ?? Ss 0:00.04 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s 367 ?? Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/usbd 403 ?? Ss 0:00.03 /usr/sbin/sshd 409 ?? Ss 0:00.04 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) 413 ?? Is 0:00.01 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/client 425 ?? Ss 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/cron -s 439 ?? Ss 0:00.18 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 471 ?? I 0:00.07 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 472 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 473 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 474 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 475 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 476 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 477 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 478 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 479 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 480 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 481 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 482 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 483 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 484 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 485 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 486 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 487 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 488 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 489 ?? S 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 490 ?? S 0:00.04 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 491 ?? S 0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 492 ?? S 0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 493 ?? S 0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 494 ?? S 0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 495 ?? S 0:00.04 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 496 ?? S 0:00.02 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 497 ?? S 0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 498 ?? S 0:00.02 /usr/local/sbin/ser -P /var/run/ser.pid 499 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 500 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 501 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 502 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 503 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd 524 ?? Is 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/inetd -wW -C 60 583 ?? Ss 0:00.08 sshd: lynx [priv] (sshd) 586 ?? S 0:00.09 sshd: lynx@ttyp0 (sshd) 587 p0 Ss 0:00.04 -sh (sh) 588 p0 S 0:00.05 su 589 p0 S 0:00.08 _su (csh) 595 p0 R+ 0:00.03 ps -ax 536 v0 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 537 v1 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 538 v2 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 539 v3 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 540 v4 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 541 v5 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 542 v6 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 543 v7 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 443 con- I 0:00.04 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --user=mysql --dat 468 con- S 0:01.00 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --basedir=/usr/local --data ser# serctl moni [: unexpected operator [: -ne: unexpected operator ser# ---- ZhongShan Ether Network Security Inc --------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:39:16 +0100 From: Jan Janak Subject: Re: [Serusers] http / https in Userloc db To: Marian Dumitru Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, Martin Koenig Message-ID: <20050302113916.GF3487(a)localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 On 02-03 10:32, Marian Dumitru wrote: > Hi Martin, > > As far as I know it could be one of the new SNOM specific feature - it > advertise the http location of the web configuration page. But if recall > correctly, the header name should by WWW-Contact, not Contact. > > Anyhow, it will be a good idea for register to check the contact > validity before inserting into usrloc. That's one interesting question. What is a valid contact ? A regular proxy would not be able to contact URI with http scheme, that's clear. But that does not mean yet that the contact is not valid, because RFC3261 allows any sort of URI to appear there. On the other hand, a redirect server would just take this URI, put it into a 3xx response and send it back the the calling UA. If the calling UA is unable to reach the called party, it might display the contents of the HTTP URL or do some other magic. For that reason I think that there should be no limitation of what gets into the user location database. Jan. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:08:39 +0100 From: Martin Koenig Subject: Re: [Serusers] http / https in Userloc db To: Jan Janak Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <4225ACC7.8060500(a)toplink-plannet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Jan, if any uri (according to RFC) is allowed in URI, then ser should not issue an error message on lookup("location"): Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 parsed: (4) / (23) Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: http://192.168.0.206:80 Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 parsed: (4) / (25) Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: https://192.168.0.206:443 Especially not a "bad_uri" error message, because it is not a bad uri indeed. Some debug-warning about ignoring this or that contact because it was not SIP/SIPS will do. What do you think? Either way, I think there is need for some cleanup. Regards, Martin Jan Janak schrieb: >On 02-03 10:32, Marian Dumitru wrote: > > >>Hi Martin, >> >>As far as I know it could be one of the new SNOM specific feature - it >>advertise the http location of the web configuration page. But if recall >>correctly, the header name should by WWW-Contact, not Contact. >> >>Anyhow, it will be a good idea for register to check the contact >>validity before inserting into usrloc. >> >> > > That's one interesting question. What is a valid contact ? A regular > proxy would not be able to contact URI with http scheme, that's clear. > But that does not mean yet that the contact is not valid, because > RFC3261 allows any sort of URI to appear there. > > On the other hand, a redirect server would just take this URI, put it > into a 3xx response and send it back the the calling UA. If the calling > UA is unable to reach the called party, it might display the contents > of the HTTP URL or do some other magic. > > For that reason I think that there should be no limitation of what > gets into the user location database. > > Jan. > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:16:59 -0500 From: Java Rockx Subject: Re: [Serusers] RTP Wiretapping To: ser(a)cannes.f9.co.uk Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <359a65820503020416142a33c(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I was thinking about having a group called "spy" in the grp table and anyone with this ACL would be sent to a modified mediaproxy that would capture the RTP. User that don't have the "spy" ACL would be handled normally and if NAT traversal is needed then use an unmodified media proxy. Regards, Paul On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:00:24 -0000, Chris wrote: > Why not use a from/to etc detection in .cfg (using database...) > to trigger a remote proxy through the requesting agency > They then have the capture issue > and you have no monitor or delivery issues? > Might require conditions of their placement of a proxy? > (but is their problem) > Regards > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On > Behalf Of Java Rockx > Sent: 26 February 2005 14:29 > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] RTP Wiretapping > > Hi All. > > I'm located in the US and would like to comply with the Communications > Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) that Congress passed which > basically says that VoIP providers should have the ability to wiretap > conversations for the FBI upon request. > > I use mediaproxy for NAT traversal. So my question is how can I be > CALEA compliant? I assume I should be able to modify mediaproxy to > write RTP streams to disk, but I'm unclear on how to "mix" both sides > of the conversation. > > Can anyone help with a suggestion? > > Regards, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.0 - Release Date: 25/02/2005 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 28/02/2005 > > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:42:03 +0100 From: Jan Janak Subject: Re: [Serusers] http / https in Userloc db To: Martin Koenig Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <20050302124203.GG3487(a)localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 The error message is not issued by lookup("location"), it is issued by t_relay() when you try to forward the message to the HTTP URI. It should be easy to write a function that would be called before t_relay (or after lookup) and that would filter out URI schemes unsupported by SER. For the Request-URI you can do that from the script: if (uri =~ "^http") { do something }; But that would not check additional branches used for parallel forking. Jan. On 02-03 13:08, Martin Koenig wrote: > Jan, > > if any uri (according to RFC) is allowed in URI, then ser should not > issue an error message on lookup("location"): > > Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 > parsed: (4) / (23) > Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: > http://192.168.0.206:80 > Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 > parsed: (4) / (25) > Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: > https://192.168.0.206:443 > > Especially not a "bad_uri" error message, because it is not a bad uri > indeed. Some debug-warning about ignoring this or that contact because > it was not SIP/SIPS will do. What do you think? > > Either way, I think there is need for some cleanup. > > Regards, > Martin > > Jan Janak schrieb: > > >On 02-03 10:32, Marian Dumitru wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Martin, > >> > >>As far as I know it could be one of the new SNOM specific feature - it > >>advertise the http location of the web configuration page. But if recall > >>correctly, the header name should by WWW-Contact, not Contact. > >> > >>Anyhow, it will be a good idea for register to check the contact > >>validity before inserting into usrloc. > >> > >> > > > > That's one interesting question. What is a valid contact ? A regular > > proxy would not be able to contact URI with http scheme, that's clear. > > But that does not mean yet that the contact is not valid, because > > RFC3261 allows any sort of URI to appear there. > > > > On the other hand, a redirect server would just take this URI, put it > > into a 3xx response and send it back the the calling UA. If the calling > > UA is unable to reach the called party, it might display the contents > > of the HTTP URL or do some other magic. > > > > For that reason I think that there should be no limitation of what > > gets into the user location database. > > > > Jan. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Serusers mailing list > >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:04:12 +0100 From: Marian Dumitru Subject: Re: [Serusers] http / https in Userloc db To: Jan Janak Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, Martin Koenig Message-ID: <4225B9CC.304(a)voice-sistem.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Hi Jan, So some URI checking is required and indeed, if you want to allow clients to perform that magic you mentioned, the checking should be done after extracting the URIs from usrloc. But should be very clear if a contact URI can or cannot be involved in SIP signaling - used for forwarding. One note here - it's interesting what will be the impact on nathelper when it will start doing NAT ping to non-SIP URIs :-). Anyhow, the best place to do the checking is before t_relay(). If you do th filtering immediately after lookup(), you will loose the Redirect Server functionality. Best regards, Marian Jan Janak wrote: > The error message is not issued by lookup("location"), it is issued by > t_relay() when you try to forward the message to the HTTP URI. > > It should be easy to write a function that would be called before > t_relay (or after lookup) and that would filter out URI schemes > unsupported by SER. > > For the Request-URI you can do that from the script: > > if (uri =~ "^http") { > do something > }; > > But that would not check additional branches used for parallel forking. > > Jan. > > On 02-03 13:08, Martin Koenig wrote: > >>Jan, >> >>if any uri (according to RFC) is allowed in URI, then ser should not >>issue an error message on lookup("location"): >> >>Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 >>parsed: (4) / (23) >>Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: >>http://192.168.0.206:80 >>Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 >>parsed: (4) / (25) >>Mar 2 12:58:17 s-p1 ser[1711]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad_uri: >>https://192.168.0.206:443 >> >>Especially not a "bad_uri" error message, because it is not a bad uri >>indeed. Some debug-warning about ignoring this or that contact because >>it was not SIP/SIPS will do. What do you think? >> >>Either way, I think there is need for some cleanup. >> >>Regards, >>Martin >> >>Jan Janak schrieb: >> >> >>>On 02-03 10:32, Marian Dumitru wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi Martin, >>>> >>>>As far as I know it could be one of the new SNOM specific feature - it === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

[Serusers] SER Call Forking with Cisco Routers as SIP endpoints
by Psyber 02 Mar '05

02 Mar '05

I'm presently working on a SIP setup whereby there are 3 Cisco routers which each have analog phones connected to them via FXS ports. All 3 of these routers are connected via an underlying network. I have a machine hanging off from one of these routers running ser. For ease of labelling, I'll call these routers: router1, router2, and router3 (SIP server directly connected to this router via ethernet). I'm attempting to setup call forking using the UsrLoc database (this will eventually be SQL, but for the sake of the short-term I'm just storing UsrLoc in memory). The desired call forking setup looks something like this: router1 --> router2 --> router 3 router 2 --> router 1 --> router 3 router 3 --> router 1 --> router 2 I am able to complete calls between router1 and router3 (and vice-versa) and carry on a conversation, but when calling between router1 and router2 the call completes, but neither party can hear the other. Ironically, router1 and router2 are sitting right next to each other (though, connected via another router). However, The SIP proxy is directly connected to router3. Doing a 'debug voip rtp' I see RTP messages travel bidirectionally in a constant stream with correct IP addresses and ports until the call ends, but at no point during the conversation can either party hear the other. This would lead me to believe that something other than SIP was at play, but when I bypass the proxy (point the two routers directly at each other via the dial-peer) call completion works and both parties can hear each other (I set these up as SIP, not the default H.323). Below is my ser.cfg file and the output of 'serctl ul show' for the static UsrLoc entries that I've created. The routers are setup with simple dial-peers and a sip-ua. I've verified that there isn't any type of ACL or firewall to obstruct the conversation. Every router is able to reach each other router as well as the proxy server. I'm using private address space at present, but NAT isn't being done at any point. I've pondered trying rtp_proxy and forcing the bearer (RTP) traffic through the proxy, but that isn't a particularly good solution for my environment. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm hoping that it's just a case of broken logic in my ser.cfg. Please CC: this address in your reply as I'm not currently on the mailing list. Most of the configuration is derived from the sample configurations that I ran into. ---ser.cfg start--- # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=7 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode #debug=7 #fork=no #log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.1.2 port=5060 mhomed=1 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic alias="ser" route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (method=="INVITE") record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # }; save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } ---end ser.cfg--- ---start static UsrLoc entries--- ser# ../../sbin/serctl ul show 222 200 OK <sip:222@<router2 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 <sip:222@<router3 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 ser# ../../sbin/serctl ul show 111 200 OK <sip:111@<router1 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 <sip:111@<router3 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 ser# ../../sbin/serctl ul show 333 200 OK <sip:111@<router1 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 <sip:222@<router2 IP>:5060>;q=1.00;expires=1003718231 ---end static UsrLoc entries--- Thank you.

2 4

[Serusers] lcr module and column type in DB
by Iqbal 02 Mar '05

02 Mar '05

Hi When using the lcr module, the DB that is created namely gw, has a int type for the ip_addr field, which means that I cant insert a IP address, if I change the column type to say varchar (so I can enter in '.'), then the data which is returned is a random IP address, (or what seems to be a random one). Any ideas iqbal

2 3

Re: [Serusers] :-((
by Mohammad Khan 02 Mar '05

02 Mar '05

Right, I dont have anything for 'MESSAGE' in my routes. Would you please suggest me, what I should have in my ser.cfg to handle 'MESSAGE' Also, if possible, would you or anybody tell me: How can I learn more about methods What each methods do and what are their purpose. Any documentation out there without RFC? Thank AJ, really appreciate your help. MOhammad AJ Grinnell wrote: >Looks to me that the method is MESSAGE, but you dont have a way to >handle MESSAGE in your routes > > >On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:48:44 -0500, Mohammad Khan <info(a)beeplove.com> wrote: > > >>What is wrong here? >> >>beeplove(a)projukee.com -> behind NAT outside ser using Kphone >>mahfuz(a)projuktee.com -> behind another NAT outside ser using Windows >>Messenger >> >>Could anybody show me where I am doing wrong? >> >>SipClient: Sending: 14:39:54.899 >>-------------------------------- >>MESSAGE sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com SIP/2.0 >>Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.51.0.161;branch=z9hG4bK5FEAA78B;alias >>CSeq: 7658 MESSAGE >>To: <sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com> >>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 >>From: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@projuktee.com>;tag=5208EA62 >>Call-ID: 1457236851(a)10.51.0.161 >>Content-Length: 9 >>User-Agent: kphone/4.1.0 >>Contact: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@10.51.0.161;transport=tcp> >> >>helloooo >> >>SipClient: Sending to 'sip.projuktee.com:5060' (TCP) >>SipClient: Receiving message... >> >>SipClient: Received: 14:40:05.024 >>--------------------------------- >>SIP/2.0 477 Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/TM) >>Via: SIP/2.0/TCP >>10.51.0.161;branch=z9hG4bK5FEAA78B;alias;rport=38973;received=66.105.xxx.yyy >>CSeq: 7658 MESSAGE >>To: <sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com>;tag=76b43a3b01465a3cbddc081c4176c4c9-3a18 >>From: "Mohammad Khan" <sip:beeplove@projuktee.com>;tag=5208EA62 >>Call-ID: 1457236851(a)10.51.0.161 >>Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.0 (i386/linux)) >>Content-Length: 0 >>Warning: 392 192.168.71.2:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=9204 >>req_src_ip=66.105.xxx.yyy req_src_port=38973 >>in_uri=sip:mahfuz@projuktee.com >>out_uri=sip:192.168.1.54:10745;transport=tcp via_cnt==1" >> >>ser.cfg >> if (nat_uac_test("3")) { >> # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that >> # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is >> # a REGISTER >> if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { >> xlog("L_DBG", "LOG: Someone trying to register >>from private IP, rewriting\n"); >> # This will work only for user agents that >>support symmetric >> # communication. We tested quite many ofhem and >>majority is >> # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones >>it takes a configuration >> # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called >>NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is >> # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric >>signalling". >> fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with >>source IP of signalling >> if (method == "INVITE" || method == 'NOTIFY') { >> fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add >>direction=active to SDP >> }; >> force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via >> setflag(6); # Mark as NATed >> }; >> }; >> >> # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc >> # (in case, it does not work, use the following command >> # with proper names and addresses in it) >> if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { >> >> if (method=="REGISTER") { >> >> if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { >> www_challenge("projuktee.com", "1"); >> break; >> }; >> >> save("location"); >> break; >> }; >> >> if (method=="PUBLISH") { >> if (!t_newtran()) { >> xlog("L_DBG", "newtran error\n"); >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> handle_publish("registrar"); >> break; >> }; >> >> lookup("aliases"); >> if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { >> append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); >> route(1); >> break; >> }; >> >> # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB >> if (!lookup("location")) { >> sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); >> break; >> }; >> }; >> append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); >> route(1); >>} >> >>route[1] >>{ >> >> # !! Nathelper >> #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" >>&& !search("^Route:")){ >> # sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP > >> >addresses"); >> # break; >> #}; >> >> # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay >> if (isflagset(6)) { >> force_rtp_proxy(); >> }; >> >> ################## >> # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, >> # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as >> # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies >> #t_on_reply("1"); >> >> if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { >> fix_nated_contact(); >> force_rtp_proxy(); >> # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not >> # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) >> } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { >> fix_nated_contact(); >> }; >> ################ >> >> # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably >> # even for UDP2TCP >> if (!t_relay()) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >>} >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >>

2 1

[Serusers] How to get ser-0.8.99-devXX
by Kevin Zhao 02 Mar '05

02 Mar '05

I want to test someone's post about NATHELPER/RTPPROXY setting. He tested with 0.8.99-devXX. How do I get it? I tried to use cvs to get by tag without success. Thank you!

1 0

[Serusers] compiling LCR into 0.10-dev
by Iqbal 02 Mar '05

02 Mar '05

Hi i was looking at the LCR module, and have tried to cmpile it later into my running ser, using make modules. however I get the following errors: lcr_mod.c: In function `load_gws': lcr_mod.c:570: error: `HDR_FROM_F' undeclared (first use in this function) lcr_mod.c:570: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once lcr_mod.c:570: error: for each function it appears in.) lcr_mod.c: In function `next_gw': lcr_mod.c:671: error: structure has no member named `route_mode' lcr_mod.c: In function `load_contacts': lcr_mod.c:817: error: `nr_branches' undeclared (first use in this function) lcr_mod.c:830: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch' lcr_mod.c:852: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch' lcr_mod.c: In function `next_contacts': lcr_mod.c:934: error: structure has no member named `route_mode' make[1]: *** [lcr_mod.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sip/srcfiles/sip_router/modules/lcr' Has anyone come across this tks Iqbal

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users