- sr-users - kamailio.org

Re: [Serusers] SER CVS Head Version
by Samuel Osorio Calvo 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

If it would be possible, removing the required registration would be great. Samuel. Unclassified. >>> Java Rockx <javarockx(a)gmail.com> 03/25/05 02:16PM >>> Samuel, I don't think you have to worry about onsip.org stepping on the toes of serusers for two reasons. 1) Onsip.org is not meant to be a near real-time community like the mailing lists are. I've posted questions to serusers and have gotten responses in minutes. This likely won't happen with onsip.org. 2) The simple reason is that SER is such a complex product that it would be impossible for us to cover everything. Anyhow, do you have any suggestions that we could implement on the onsip.org community site to mitigate your concerns? Regards, Paul On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:45:07 +0100, Samuel Osorio Calvo <samuel.osorio(a)nl.thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just one minor remark: although the document is pretty useful, I though > it wasn't meant to replace this mailing list, so I hope this reference > to the getting-started document do not stop people from getting answers > here.... > > Samuel. > > Unclassified. > >>> Java Rockx <javarockx(a)gmail.com> 03/24/05 05:14PM >>> > We have this fully documented at http://www.onsip.org > > Just download the Getting Started Issue 02 document. > > Regards, > Paul > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:28:26 -0000, Aisling O'Driscoll > <ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone let me know how to build SER from the cvs head i.e. > the > > commands? Im trying to get CPL working with SER but when I run > "patch > > -p0 <modules/cpl-c/tm.patch" in the sip_router directory, The patch > > doesnt apply properly. Since I cant apply this patch my only > > alternative is to use SER cvs head version. > > > > Thanks, > > Aisling > > > > -------------------Legal > Disclaimer--------------------------------------- > > > > The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended > only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be > protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received > by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email > address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is > strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of > any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the > information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete > record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in > its receipt. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

[Serusers] Anyone using Bayonne?
by Steve Blair 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

If anyone is using GNU Bayonne? If so can you email me I'd like to ask some questions. Thanks.

1 0

[Serusers] How can I solve the proble that I can not register SER somewhere?
by zhaomin 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

hello! I meet a strange circs in configure and build SER .My SER server have a public IP at internet. I can register SER in my office, My office has LAN+CISCO router and NAT with 10.1.0.0 network .but I can not register at my home ,My home is ADSL with router and NAT include 192.169.0.0 network, when I used a sipphone to register the proxy,show me : login fail.waiting server respond overtime! Some place was happen this kind of circs when I register into SER. Under list is debug of SER output section.Where is problem happen?. anyones can tell me what's wrong I should to solve it? Thankx ZhaoMin 2(18465) SIP Request: 2(18465) method: <REGISTER> 2(18465) uri: <sip:221.202.129.165> 2(18465) version: <SIP/2.0> 2(18465) parse_headers: flags=1 2(18465) end of header reached, state=5 2(18465) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 2(18465) parse_headers: this is the first via 2(18465) After parse_msg... 2(18465) preparing to run routing scripts... 2(18465) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 2(18465) parse_headers: flags=128 2(18465) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 2(18465) parse_headers: flags=8 2(18465) DEBUG: add_param: tag=cd24dfb7f7f349a6ac20a11f8f9e3756 2(18465) DEBUG: add_param: epid=474cc9ad8f 2(18465) end of header reached, state=29 2(18465) parse_headers: flags=256 2(18465) end of header reached, state=9 2(18465) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [28]; uri=[sip:test@221.202.129.165] 2(18465) DEBUG: to body [<sip:test@221.202.129.165>] 2(18465) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <REGISTER> 2(18465) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 2(18465) found end of header 2(18465) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 2(18465) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 2(18465) check_self - checking if host==us: 15==15 && [221.202.129.165] == [221.202.129.165] 2(18465) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 2(18465) parse_headers: flags=4096 2(18465) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 2(18465) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="jzmv.com", once="424409513d6e5a7fd39521d4a44978d1cc99df8a" '

2 1

Re: [Serusers] SER CVS Head Version
by Java Rockx 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

Samuel, I don't think you have to worry about onsip.org stepping on the toes of serusers for two reasons. 1) Onsip.org is not meant to be a near real-time community like the mailing lists are. I've posted questions to serusers and have gotten responses in minutes. This likely won't happen with onsip.org. 2) The simple reason is that SER is such a complex product that it would be impossible for us to cover everything. Anyhow, do you have any suggestions that we could implement on the onsip.org community site to mitigate your concerns? Regards, Paul On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:45:07 +0100, Samuel Osorio Calvo <samuel.osorio(a)nl.thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just one minor remark: although the document is pretty useful, I though > it wasn't meant to replace this mailing list, so I hope this reference > to the getting-started document do not stop people from getting answers > here.... > > Samuel. > > Unclassified. > >>> Java Rockx <javarockx(a)gmail.com> 03/24/05 05:14PM >>> > We have this fully documented at http://www.onsip.org > > Just download the Getting Started Issue 02 document. > > Regards, > Paul > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:28:26 -0000, Aisling O'Driscoll > <ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone let me know how to build SER from the cvs head i.e. > the > > commands? Im trying to get CPL working with SER but when I run > "patch > > -p0 <modules/cpl-c/tm.patch" in the sip_router directory, The patch > > doesnt apply properly. Since I cant apply this patch my only > > alternative is to use SER cvs head version. > > > > Thanks, > > Aisling > > > > -------------------Legal > Disclaimer--------------------------------------- > > > > The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended > only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be > protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received > by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email > address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is > strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of > any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the > information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete > record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in > its receipt. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER CVS Head Version
by Aisling O'Driscoll 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

Hi, I followed the instructions in this guide however I still have errors. When I run "make all", I keep getting erros telling me a file or directory is missing. See an example of this below: DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -c group_mod.c -o group_mod.o gcc -shared -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E group.o group_mod.o -o group.so make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/sip_router/modules/group' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/sip_router/modules/mangler' ../../Makefile.rules:77: contact_ops.d: No such file or directory ../../Makefile.rules:77: ip_helper.d: No such file or directory ../../Makefile.rules:77: mangler.d: No such file or directory ../../Makefile.rules:77: sdp_mangler.d: No such file or directory ../../Makefile.rules:77: utils.d: No such file or directory make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/sip_router/modules/mangler' When I run "ser -V" I am still running the stable version 8.0.14. Any other ideas? Thanks, Aisling. ---- Original Message ---- From: javarockx(a)gmail.com To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER CVS Head Version Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:14:00 -0500 >We have this fully documented at http://www.onsip.org > >Just download the Getting Started Issue 02 document. > >Regards, >Paul > > >On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:28:26 -0000, Aisling O'Driscoll ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could someone let me know how to build SER from the cvs head i.e. >the >> commands? Im trying to get CPL working with SER but when I run >"patch >> -p0 <modules/cpl-c/tm.patch" in the sip_router directory, The patch >> doesnt apply properly. Since I cant apply this patch my only >> alternative is to use SER cvs head version. >> >> Thanks, >> Aisling >> >> -------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)iptel.org >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > >-------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- > >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

2 1

[Serusers] SER crashed with DBG_QM_MALLOC on
by szj 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

I tested SER which have beed mofified by me. The SER crahed with DBG_QM_MALLOC on, it report >qm_*: prev. fragm. tail overwritten(c0003433, abcdefed)[0x814f284:0x814f29c]! this happened in one of my function which called pkg_malloc(). this function is located in the tm module. But if comment the DBG_QM_MALLOC in the Makefile.defs , then compile SER, it never crashes. Who can tell me what that mean?? Thanks for your help. Best Regards. Sun Zongjun

2 1

Re: [Serusers] SER CVS Head Version
by Samuel Osorio Calvo 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

Hi, Just one minor remark: although the document is pretty useful, I though it wasn't meant to replace this mailing list, so I hope this reference to the getting-started document do not stop people from getting answers here.... Samuel. Unclassified. >>> Java Rockx <javarockx(a)gmail.com> 03/24/05 05:14PM >>> We have this fully documented at http://www.onsip.org Just download the Getting Started Issue 02 document. Regards, Paul On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:28:26 -0000, Aisling O'Driscoll <ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone let me know how to build SER from the cvs head i.e. the > commands? Im trying to get CPL working with SER but when I run "patch > -p0 <modules/cpl-c/tm.patch" in the sip_router directory, The patch > doesnt apply properly. Since I cant apply this patch my only > alternative is to use SER cvs head version. > > Thanks, > Aisling > > -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- > > The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt. > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Kerberos + SER?
by Samuel Osorio Calvo 25 Mar '05

25 Mar '05

I think I saw somebody posting some patches to use TLS under GPL with SER....just dig into the archives and you'll get a surprise. Samuel. Unclassified. >>> "Justin Pearce" <Justin(a)PriceVideo.com> 03/24/05 11:36PM >>> Hello all, I am wondering if it is possible to use Kerberos with SER to get secure user Authentication? I know that TLS would be best, however SER does not yet impliment TLS in freely available releases. Any thoughts on the matter? Anyone have this working in the field? Thanks, Justin

1 0

[Serusers] Kerberos + SER?
by Justin Pearce 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hello all, I am wondering if it is possible to use Kerberos with SER to get secure user Authentication? I know that TLS would be best, however SER does not yet impliment TLS in freely available releases. Any thoughts on the matter? Anyone have this working in the field? Thanks, Justin

1 0

[Serusers] CDRTool with SER
by Jed Stafford 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

I have been working with CDRTool now for a couple of days trying to get it setup. I've finnaly got SER writing to Freeradius, etc. Now, when I try to get in to CDRTool I get past the login screen and am stuck with this error. Fatal error: Cannot instantiate non-existent class: cdrs_ser_radius in /CDRTool/callsearch.phtml on line 58 In my global.inc file I do have this class to my knowledge. I trimmed out all of the options in the array to the bare bones as below and still get the error. Any ideas? The documentation is fairly light for the tool. You would think it would be the opposite since this is supposed to convince you to purchase a license and get hooked. $DATASOURCES=array( "ser_radius" =>array( "name" => "SIP Express Router (Radius Accounting) ", "class" => "CDRS_ser_radius" ), Thanks! -J

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER x Nextone problem
by Java Rockx 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Maybe ACKs aren't being record-routed. Regards, Paul On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:36:02 -0300, Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel-it.com.br> wrote: > Hi, > > Java Rockx escreveu: > > It kind of sounds like you're not sending an ACK for a 200OK response > > from the Nextone box. > > Hummm, but SER should send this ACK from 200OK for everyone or is it only for > Nextone? > I never had this problem with other equipments. > > > > > Can you send an ngrep dump of the sip call? > > Yes I can, I will do that. > Thanks for your answer. > > > > > > Regards, > > Paul > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:22:04 -0300, Rodrigo P. Telles > > <telles(a)devel-it.com.br> wrote: > > > >>Hi guys, > >> > >>I've been experiencing some troubles with carrier's that are using > >>Nextone (www.nextone.com). > >>I could place calls through Nextone but no longer then 1 minute, between 48 and > >>53 seconds the call is dropped with a BYE sent by Nextone. > >>I've been using another carriers using Cisco and Quintum without problems. > >>Does some one experimenting this problem? > >> > >>I'm using SER 0.8.14. > >> > >>Thanks in advance. > >> > >>-- > >>============================================ > >>Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel.it> > >>IVOZ # 1009 > >>Project Manager > >>Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it > >>Bestcom Group > >>============================================ > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Serusers mailing list > >>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >> > > > > > > > > -- > ============================================ > Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel.it> > IVOZ # 1009 > Gerente de Projetos > Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it > Grupo Bestcom > ============================================ >

2 2

[Serusers] SEMS conferencing - use GSM codec
by Steven Langley 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi there SEMS seems to use one of the g.711 codecs by default, which uses quite a bit of bandwidth. I believe that SEMS also ships with GSM, which uses a lot less bandwidth. I am wondering where I would specify that I want to use this codec instead of the default one? Many thanks Steven

2 1

[Serusers] NAT and forward to PSTN
by John Dante 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi! SER is running in my Fedora Core 3 box. I've registered in my SER two IP phones located behind NAT, used the example nathelper.cfg script. How could I manage to forward calls to a PSTN gateway, example all calls beginning by "0..." ? What are the script modifications? Thanks john

3 2

[Serusers] SEMS conference monitoring
by Steven Langley 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi I am wondering if there is some utility (either with SEMS or third party) that can be used to monitor conferences and the users in those conferences? Otherwise is there an alternative if want to do this? Many thanks Steven

1 0

[Serusers] BYE, nat, Xlite
by Giovanni Balasso 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi serusers! After setting up an almost working ser with nat, rtpproxy and asterisk ivr, I'm stuck on an hangup problem call if from behind nat. I can't get xlite BYEs to hit ser (ngrep on ser machine gets nothing on hangup pressed on client). The address in SEND>> is ser nat internal address and I'm calling from another nat. This is xlite log on BYE SEND TIME: 735130 SEND >> 192.168.1.100:5060 BYE sip:asterisk@192.168.1.100:5061 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.5:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKE406E7BA9C6E11D98395000272430644 From: gio <sip:gio@SER_PUBLIC_IP>;tag=1837372280 To: <sip:gio@SER_PUBLIC_IP>;tag=as0d4fbf68 Contact: <sip:gio@192.168.1.5:5060> Route: <sip:192.168.1.100;ftag=1837372280;lr=on> Call-ID: D6C66B0C-9C6E-11D9-8395-000272430644(a)192.168.1.5 CSeq: 8745 BYE Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m Content-Length: 0 where 192.168.1.100 is private ip address of ser and asterisk server and 192.168.1.5 is xlite private address from another private network. I'm pretty sure the problem is SEND >> 192.168.1.100 shoul be SEND >> SER_PUBLIC_IP. Reading past issues I tried fiddling with fix_rport, fix_nated_contact, but no way. Can anyone please explain the correct way to route BYEs thru NAT? Other things work: i can hear sounds, talk to other people and record messages in asterisk boxes. Please, advice Thanx everyone In my ser.cfg commands involved in BYE and nat are the following: if (nat_uac_test("1")) { if (method == "REGISTER" || !search("^Record-Route:")) { fix_nated_contact(); if (method == "INVITE" || method == "BYE" || method == "CANCEL") { # I think I could remove method == BYE and CANCEL with no harm... fix_nated_sdp("1"); }; force_rport(); setflag(6); }; }; record_route(); if (loose_route()) { route(1); }; if (method=="INVITE") { if (lookup("location")) { setflag(1); route(1); break; }; }; route[1] { if (isflagset(6)){ force_rtp_proxy(); t_on_reply("1"); }; if (method == "BYE" || method == "CANCEL"){ setflag(1); }; if (!t_relay()){ sl_reply_error(); }; break; } ciao -- Giovanni Balasso giaso(a)yahoo.it

1 0

[Serusers] Do Call but Can't Receive Calls (NAT & Port Forwarding)
by Ozan Blotter 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

I'm using SER on a Public IP, do IPv4 and IPv6 Conversion, Nathelper Module and RTPProxy. Both parties are behind NAT and gateways/routers arranged to forward 5060 UDP and TCP ports to LAN IP's of the ATA's on both side. There are 3 Registered Users, 8334454556 can call 8334843600, everything is okay, each party talks, the quality of voice is great. But when 8334843600 calls 8334454556, there's no ringing tone, nothing happens. When i check wih serctl util, i realized one thing like ; Contact : 'sip:8334454556@81.215.239.231:5060' Call-ID : '13491B1111341212(a)81.215.239.231' <<< This is Public IP Contact : 'sip:8334843600@85.96.192.140:5060' Call-ID : '1360D1B911761212(a)192.168.0.101' <<< This is LAN IP What may be wrong with SER or ATA's. root@sipproxy~> serctl ul show Dumping all contacts may take long: are you sure you want to proceed? [Y|N] y ===Domain list=== ---Domain--- name : 'location_inet6' size : 512 table: 0x422b80f8 d_ll { n : 0 first: (nil) last : (nil) } ---/Domain--- ---Domain--- name : 'location_inet4' size : 512 table: 0x422b6090 d_ll { n : 3 first: 0x422ba1f8 last : 0x422ba100 } ...Record(0x422ba1f8)... domain: 'location_inet4' aor : '103201' ~~~Contact(0x422ba328)~~~ domain : 'location_inet4' aor : '103201' Contact : 'sip:103201@212.156.169.125:5060' Expires : 1491 q : 0.00 Call-ID : '7320E5ADBA8E1526(a)212.156.169.125' CSeq : 70 replic : 0 User-Agent: 'Unknown' State : CS_NEW Flags : 0 next : (nil) prev : (nil) ~~~/Contact~~~~ .../Record... ...Record(0x422ba2e0)... domain: 'location_inet4' aor : '8334454556' ~~~Contact(0x422ba238)~~~ domain : 'location_inet4' aor : '8334454556' Contact : 'sip:8334454556@81.215.239.231:5060' Expires : 56 q : 0.00 Call-ID : '13491B1111341212(a)81.215.239.231' CSeq : 128 replic : 0 User-Agent: 'Unknown' State : CS_NEW Flags : 0 next : (nil) prev : (nil) ~~~/Contact~~~~ .../Record... ...Record(0x422ba100)... domain: 'location_inet4' aor : '8334843600' ~~~Contact(0x422ba148)~~~ domain : 'location_inet4' aor : '8334843600' Contact : 'sip:8334843600@85.96.192.140:5060' Expires : 32 q : 0.00 Call-ID : '1360D1B911761212(a)192.168.0.101' CSeq : 8 replic : 0 User-Agent: 'Unknown' State : CS_NEW Flags : 0 next : (nil) prev : (nil) ~~~/Contact~~~~ .../Record... ---/Domain--- ===/Domain list=== root@sipproxy~> -- >>> please do not use >>> l.s.d(a)dnaofdesign.com >>> above account is stand by >>> use same account as >>> cosmocid(a)ispro.net.tr

1 0

[Serusers] Restrict registration to one user per login
by Jffdsaklj dsjk 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

How can we restrict the registration to only one user per login?. Currently, you can register with the same login/password in different machines at the same time. But what we require is that only the first registration is valid and the rest ones are invalidated by the SER. Thanks

9 21

[Serusers] is ther any way to debug ser
by Kamran Ahmad 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

hi all i want to check that if my ser is calling radius for authentication. is this posible in ser Kamran __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/

4 3

[Serusers] terminating to nufone or other providers
by Barry Murphy 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Ok, so i'm tryin to get ser to work with Long distance calling, however I dont know how to authenticate to nufone... # send out 00 prefix to wholesale voip.brujula.net termination if (uri=~"^sip:00[0-9].*@.*") { if (!is_user_in("From", "ld")) { sl_send_reply("403", "Payment required"); break; }; setflag(1); rewritehostport("voip.nufone.net:5060"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; break; }; Should this be: rewritehostport("user:pass@voip.nufone.net:5060"); ?? Barry

4 3

[Serusers] route logic - exec_dset
by Vyom A 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

I added this code into the ser.cfg to execute my script when a mail comes from 10.232.2.225 if (uri =~ "sip:[a-zA-Z]*@10\.232\.2\.225") { exec_dset (<path to the script>); } I have not made any changes except for adding this in the example config file. The script has proper permissions The script is never executed!. What can be the problem? --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

1 0

[Serusers] SER and Microsoft LCS problems
by Jared Cluff 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Does anybody know if SER can be used to interact with Microsoft LCS Clients by exchanging instant messages? If so, is there a sample config somewhere that I can use to work off of. We utilize the Microsoft LCS server for a majority of our companies IM traffic. We also have a Jabber server and I would like to try and use SER as a SIP/SIMPLE gateway to the LCS users.

1 0

Re: [Serusers] newbie asking username and sip account
by Zon Hisham Zainal Abidin 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Dear Klaus, Could you briefly explain how to use "normal" usernames and make numerical aliases for these users (like iptel.org does) ? TIA. -- Zon ________________ Original message ________________ Subject: Re: [Serusers] newbie asking username and sip account Author: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> Date: 10th March 2005 11:14:54 AM Hi! Of ocurse, using numbers as usernames (like freeworlddialup) will ease dialing on hardphones. You can also use "normal" usernames and make numerical aliases for these users (like iptel.org does). regards, klaus Zon Hisham Bin Zainal Abidin wrote: > Hi all, > I am about 3 hours old with SER and I have my server running on one our our development server. > > I added a user with: > serctl add zon abc123 zon(a)home.net.my > > I added a second user and started making calls. All worked perfectly. > > QUESTION: > When I added my user account above, my SIP account will be > sip:zon@arl.net.my since I configured SER to take arl.net.my as the domain > 1) Would it be better to create username like 'zon' or with numbers like 511345 ? > 2) If my sip uri is sip:zon@arl.net.my, how does someone using a normal phone that is hooked to an ATA called me :) ? > > Please advise. > > -- > Zon > > > --------------------------------------------------- > Sign Up for free Email at http://ureg.home.net.my/ > --------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >

3 2

[Serusers] Re: Another Question ! Help a young man
by Java Rockx 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Nicolas, The answer if that you __must__ use a SIP UA that supports the Session-Expires header. If you SIP UA supports this header then it will initiate re-INVITEs. So you basically really need one or more parties in the call to support this header. I know the Sipura 3000 supports it. Regards, Paul On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:08:34 +0100, Nicolas Ruiz <nruiz(a)vivaction.com> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > I have read your post, do you have succeed it ??? > > I want the same thing !!!!!!!!!!!! how can I do it !!!! please give me the > answerrrrrrrrrrrr !! :0) > > Best Regards > > Nicolas RUIZ > France, Paris > > ############################################################"" > Hi All. > > Can ser-0.9 be used to force re-INVITEs during established call > sessions? I know of the Session-Expires and Min-SE headers, but I'm > very unclear on how to get re-INVITE messages to start being sent to > all SIP clients during a call. > > I am trying to come up with a way to handle accounting when we don't > recieve a BYE for a call. > > Regards, > Paul > > > > > > Vos Solutions Voix-Data ! > > > Nicolas Ruiz > Service Technique > Ligne directe : + 33 (0) 1 56 38 39 71 > Fax :+ 33 (0) 1 47 24 74 77 > nruiz(a)vivaction.com > > Immeuble Plein Ouest > 177 av. Georges Clemenceau > 92024 Nanterre - France > Tel : 0 811 02 6000 > www.vivaction.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential and legally > protected by law. Only access by the intended recipient is authorized. > Review, distribution,reproduction, publication or other use of this e-mail > is prohibited. > Cet e-mail et les informations qu'il contient sont confidentiels et protégés > par la loi. L'accès à ce message n'est autorisé qu'au destinataire de > celui-ci. Toute modification,distribution, reproduction, publication, ou > autre utilisation de cet e-mail est formellement interdite. > > > > > > > > > > >

5 6

[Serusers] FW: cpl module with 8.0.14
by Aisling O'Driscoll 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi all, Just to confirm the cpl module should be compatible with stable ser version 0.8.14,shouldnt it?? I have installed the cpl module according to the following howto: http://www.kom.tu-darmstadt.de/~jschmitt/HowToSER_CPL.htm However when i try ot load the cpl-c module in ser.cfg,I get the following error. Any ideas??: ERROR: module version mismatch for /usr/lib/ser/modules/cpl-c.so; core: 0.8.14; module: 0.8.14-5 If I need to get an unstable version of SER from CVS wouldnt this overwrite my current work? Thanks, Aisling. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

1 0

[Serusers] how to call forward command !!!
by Zhang Wei 24 Mar '05

24 Mar '05

Hi,all I have a forward problem: I want to use ser as an stateless proxy. After some operation SER forward the request stateless according to Request-URI. Can I use the forward action? I know forward command has two parameters such as "forward(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,xxx)". If can, how to use? wei

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users