- sr-users - kamailio.org

RE: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
by Matt Schulte 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Ok, here's a kind of OT question for everyone out there. Is there any point to using db_mode 1 or 2 since t_replicate exists? Seems kind of pointless, unless I'm just missing something.. :) Matt -----Original Message----- From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists@ohlmeier.org] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:04 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication Please check with serctl if the contacts in memory already have non-zero rep values. I think the db-mode should have no effect on your problem. But I#m not up-to-date with the code any more. Nils On Monday 28 March 2005 16:32, Matt Schulte wrote: > Would db_mode 2 vs. 1 have any effect on this? My rep fields are still > non-zero, would posting my config even help? > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists@ohlmeier.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:49 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Cc: Matt Schulte; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru > Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > The module was named replicator and the code was never public > available because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it > can be found in my diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history. > If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication > values in > your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these > > values were changed by SER at any time. > > Nils > > On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote: > > I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would > > that > > > > be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you > > suggesting > > > > a config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? > > What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any > > versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can > > tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much.. > > > > Matt > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] > > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM > > To: Marian Dumitru > > Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > > > > There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that > > replicated the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept > > the replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the > > replication flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate > > flag to non-zero value which is not correct. > > > > Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that > > would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location > > database forever. > > > > The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned > > some time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related > > code to make the usr location simpler. > > > > Jan. > > > > On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote: > > > Matt, > > > > > > You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* > > > if the contact is marked for replication. You can check this > > > either in DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul > > > show". > > > > > > As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I > > > would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication > > > value > > > > > > != 0. > > > > Or ??? > > > > > If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the > > > replication flag is still set. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Marian > > > > > > Matt Schulte wrote: > > > >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how > > > >long > > > > > > > >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's > > > >still there :-) > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] > > > >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM > > > >To: Matt Schulte > > > >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Matt, > > > > > > > >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still > > > >kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes. > > > > > > > >Best regards, > > > >Marian > > > > > > > >Matt Schulte wrote: > > > >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks > > > >>every 60 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I > > > >>don't > > > >> > > > >>understand is why I keep getting these messages: > > > >> > > > >>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for > > > >>replication > > > >> > > > >>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there > > > >>something I'm missing? > > > >> > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>----+ > > > >> > > > >>| username | contact | expires > > > >> > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>----+ > > > >> > > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 > > > >> > > > >>00:42:35 | > > > >> > > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 > > > >> > > > >>01:24:58 | > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > > >>----+ > > > > > > -- > > > Voice System > > > http://www.voice-system.ro > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

[Serusers] rtpproxy usage??
by szj 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

It's greate that rtpproxy support multiple stream. Thanks Maxim for his great work. Now I want to test the rtpprxy+SER, But after starting the rtpproxy, I can't find which ports the rtpproxy listens. I don't understand the arguments of rtpproxy all well. Is it a must the rtpproxy runs on machine with multiple network adapters?? How to start it with the appropriate arguments? Thanks for your kind help and advance. Best Regards. Sun Zongjun

4 5

[Serusers] When will SER send Stop message to Radius Server
by matt morris 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hello List, First, many thanks to those who replied my previous dumb questions. My SER 0.9.0 with mysql auth and radius accounting with mysql is seemingly working ok. I have a question about SER's Radius accounting, but not sure how to ask, here is my situation: I'm testing out calls between XLite (caller) and a hardware phone (callee), but for some reason the call duration is always 30 seconds longer than actual (For both cases, it's the callee who does the hang up). I tried calls between XLite and XLite and the duration would be accurate. So I ngrep-d the traffic for both scenairos, for XLite-XLite's case, the flow is the side who hangs up (say, UA1) will send the BYE to SER then SER relays the BYE to UA2. Then UA2 sends an ACK to SER and SER relays the ACK to UA1. For the XLite to HW phone's case, the phone will still send the BYE to SER and SER will relay it to XLite. However, XLite will not send an ACK to SER. And the phone sends another BYE to SER and then SER relays it to XLite -this is repeated for 5 - 6 times until finally SER will just send a 408 Request Timeout to the HW Phone. And it seems this is the time when SER sends the Stop message to the Radius server, and hence the extra 30-sec call duration. So I'm wondering if SER indeed needs the ACK for the BYE message before sending the accounting stop message to Radius? Or is my situation caused by some other reasons? Thank you in advance. _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

2 2

RE: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
by Matt Schulte 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Would db_mode 2 vs. 1 have any effect on this? My rep fields are still non-zero, would posting my config even help? Matt -----Original Message----- From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists@ohlmeier.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:49 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Cc: Matt Schulte; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication The module was named replicator and the code was never public available because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it can be found in my diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history. If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication values in your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these values were changed by SER at any time. Nils On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote: > I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would that > be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting > a config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? > What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any > versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can > tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much.. > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM > To: Marian Dumitru > Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated > the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the > replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication > flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to > non-zero value which is not correct. > > Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that > would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location > database forever. > > The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some > time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to > make the usr location simpler. > > Jan. > > On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote: > > Matt, > > > > You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if > > the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in > > DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show". > > > > As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I > > would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value > > != 0. > > Or ??? > > > If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the > > replication flag is still set. > > > > Best regards, > > Marian > > > > Matt Schulte wrote: > > >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how > > >long > > > > > >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's > > >still there :-) > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] > > >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM > > >To: Matt Schulte > > >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > > > > > > >Hi Matt, > > > > > >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still > > >kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes. > > > > > >Best regards, > > >Marian > > > > > >Matt Schulte wrote: > > >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks > > >>every 60 > > >> > > >> > > >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't > > >>understand is why I keep getting these messages: > > >> > > >>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for > > >>replication > > >> > > >>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there > > >>something I'm missing? > > >> > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > >> > > >>| username | contact | expires > > >> > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > >> > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 > > >> > > >>00:42:35 | > > >> > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 > > >> > > >>01:24:58 | > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > > > -- > > Voice System > > http://www.voice-system.ro > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

[Serusers] uac_auth module??
by Java Rockx 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Have either of you seen that post in the forum asking where to find something called the "uac_auth" module? If so can you reply to that post dated 2005/3/14 ? I did some Google searching and cannot find any mention of the module. I don't think the poster is referring to the new uac module in CVS head for altering the <From> header. Regards, Paul

3 6

[Serusers] Can´t CANCEL PSTN calls when using credentials
by Rafael J. Risco G.V. 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

HI I have this problem when I made a call from a registered endpoint to a PSTN number through a GW AS5350 I can´t cancel this call and destination keeps ringing until timeout occur; this happen only when I use "is_user_in" function before to forward the call. some idea??? ser.cfg<::: .... if (uri==myself) { if (method == "REGISTER") { log(1, "ANALYZING REGISTER REQUEST\n"); # to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("mydomain.com.pe", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("mydomain.com.pe", "0"); break; }; if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; break; }; if (method == "INVITE" && src_ip!=GW_AS5350_IP) { log(1, "ANALYZING INVITE REQUEST\n"); if (!proxy_authorize("mydomain.com.pe", "subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("mydomain.com.pe", "0"); break; } else if (is_user_in("credentials", "deactivated")) { sl_send_reply("402", "Su cuenta fue desactivada"); break; }; }; /* ***************** Dial out to Local and PSTN logic ****************** */ # forward n digit requests to gateway AS5350 (Celulares) if(uri=~"^sip:9"){ log(1," digit expression match - Celulares"); if (!is_user_in("credentials", "mobile")) { sl_send_reply("403", "No permission for mobile calls"); break; }; rewritehostport("GW_AS5350_IP:5060"); route(1); ## to NatHelper l... break; }; # Forward calls to 6607+ to Asterisk OH323 Module gk´s if(uri=~"^sip:6607[0-9][0-9][0-9]*@(mydomain\.com\.pe)"){ rewritehostport("Asterisk-IP:5060"); log(1,"digit expression match - Local (oH323)"); route(2); break; }; ..... . . . -- rrgv

2 4

[Serusers] rtpproxy logs
by SER Users 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

hello, how can I access/enable/find logs from rtpproxy ? I see in rtpproxy sources that logs are being generated with "rtpp_log_write", but where are there or how can I "enable" them. I am interested to see when a session is "active", when a packet from both caller/callee are received in order to track down a problem I have with 2 UAs. something else: when everything is OK how many ports should be opened for s single proxy session ? 2 (1 RTP+1 RTCP) or 4 (2RTP + 2RTCP) ? when two UAs can not come to an agreement regarding a codec, is there any RTP traffic between the two, or media negotiation is based solely on SDP messages contained within INVITE/OK SIP messages ? thanks, razvan radu

2 1

[Serusers] Re: isdngw connecting to PSTN
by Nicky 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hi, I am facing another error. Please advice when I tried to dial from SIP to PSTN. There is connection already but disconnected. Please Help. I have attached my sems and ser configuration file for your reference. Thanks in advance. Configuration: configuration file: /usr/local/etc/sems/sems.conf Ser's FIFO: /tmp/vm_ser_fifo our FIFO: /tmp/am_fifo plug-in path: /usr/local/lib/sems/plug-in/ daemon mode: 0 local IP: ***** (5968) ERROR: open_device (IsdnDevice.cpp:251): could not open special file /dev/ttyI10, reason: No such device (5968) ERROR: IsdnGatewayFactory (IsdnGatewayFactory.cpp:90): could not initialize /dev/ttyI10, removing from list (5968) ERROR: open_device (IsdnDevice.cpp:251): could not open special file /dev/ttyI11, reason: No such device (5968) ERROR: IsdnGatewayFactory (IsdnGatewayFactory.cpp:90): could not initialize /dev/ttyI11, removing from list (5968) ERROR: open_device (IsdnDevice.cpp:251): could not open special file /dev/ttyI12, reason: No such device (5968) ERROR: IsdnGatewayFactory (IsdnGatewayFactory.cpp:90): could not initialize /dev/ttyI12, removing from list (5968) ERROR: open_device (IsdnDevice.cpp:251): could not open special file /dev/ttyI13, reason: No such device (5968) ERROR: IsdnGatewayFactory (IsdnGatewayFactory.cpp:112): could not initialize /dev/ttyI13, removing from list (5968) ERROR: open_device (IsdnDevice.cpp:251): could not open special file /dev/ttyI14, reason: No such device (5968) ERROR: IsdnGatewayFactory (IsdnGatewayFactory.cpp:112): could not initialize /dev/ttyI14, removing from list (5968) ERROR: reassignIncomingDevices (IsdnDeviceIncoming.cpp:163): could not get locked incoming device, number * unhandled! (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 0 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 2 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 3 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 4 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 5 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 6 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 7 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: getLongestMatch (IsdnConfiguration.cpp:753): configured device 8 would be responsible for this call, but it is unavailable (ignoring) (5968) ERROR: reply (AmRequest.cpp:335): AmRequestUAS::reply: 500 command 't_reply' not available(5968) ERROR: reply (AmRequest.cpp:335): AmRequestUAS::reply: 500 command 't_reply' not available(5968) ERROR: run (AmSession.cpp:193): 500 could not send response. (5968) ERROR: reply (AmRequest.cpp:335): AmRequestUAS::reply: 500 command 't_reply' not available(5968) ERROR: cb_disconnect_ind (IsdnCapiConnection.cpp:360): unknown capi error, received DISCONNECT_IND with info 0 (unknwon CAPI error! (please report as a bug!)) Regards, Nicky ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicky" <nicky(a)caliber.com.sg> To: "Ulrich Abend" <uli(a)iptel.org> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>; <sems(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:55 PM Subject: isdngw connecting to PSTN > Hi, > > I have encountered the problem when I tried to connect SIP to PSTN using the > isdngw. Please advice what can be the problem and is there any guidelines > for connecting to PSTN beside using the isdn.conf file, is there anything to > take note. I keep getting a engaged tone. Please help....thank you. > > Mar 24 18:08:02 /usr/local/sbin/ser[9301]: ERROR: vm: db_query() failed. > Mar 24 18:08:02 /usr/local/sbin/ser[9301]: ERROR: vm: vm_get_user_info > failed > Mar 24 18:08:02 /usr/local/sbin/ser[9301]: could not contact isdngw > > regards, > nicky >

1 0

[Serusers] pstn + accoounting
by Wojciech Ziniewicz 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hello, I used the example from doc/examples/pstn.cfg in Debian Sarge but when SER connects to mysql it says that therare "too many connecitons"... maybe it's a bug or maybe my conf is not correct. If so, could you please point me how to forward calls to a hardware E1/IP Gateway ? (like Multitech Multivoip 3010) . My gateway works fine for h323. With SIP it registers in SER (but there are logs that "binding has expired") Any help appreciated and thanks in advance.. -- Pozdrawiam, Wojciech Ziniewicz Optocomp sp.z.o.o, www.optocomp.pl mailto: wojtekz(a)optocomp.pl +48(0)691031535

3 2

[Serusers] why mus use force_rport()??
by "孙宗君" <zjsun＠biigroup.com> 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hi, All: I just tested the SER+RTPProxy. My ser and rtpproxy are located on the same machine with public ip address. my SIP UA is behind the NAT device(Symmetric NAT). When UA registered to SER, the SER send the response to the port specified in the Via head parameters, not the real port receiving the Registration request. After I put the force_rport() in the ser.cfg, all will works well. I wonder why the SER doesn't send the response back to the receiving port. Whether that conflicts the RFC3261 chapter 19. I am glad to hear your advice and help Best Regards Sun Zongjun

2 1

[Serusers] SER + RTPProxy don't seem to work together??
by szj 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hi, My testing environment is as follows. SER+RTPProxy's ip: 111.122.133.100 NAT device's ip: 111.122.133.4 SIP UA A's IP: 192.168.0.62:9000 SIP UA B's IP: 111.122.133.100:5000 If I use the SiP UA A to call UA B outside the NAT clouds, I think the SER should communicate with RTPProxy and modify the INVITE message's SDP message's media IP and Port. But I checked the UA B's log and found that the ser only changed the SDP''s IP, not the media port. Here is the UA B's log: INVITE sip:861111@111.122.133.100:5000 SIP/2.0^M Record-Route: <sip:111.122.133.100;ftag=1509219066;lr>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.122.133.100;branch=z9hG4bKb6f1.9cf45a65.0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.62:9000;rport=12072;received=111.122.133.4;branch=z9hG4bK1145650245^M From: <sip:862222@sip.suntest.com>;tag=1509219066^M To: <sip:861111@sip.suntest.com>^M Call-ID: 638544678(a)192.168.0.62^M CSeq: 20 INVITE^M Contact: <sip:862222@111.122.133.4:12072>^M Max-Forwards: ^M User-Agent: User Agent0.1^M Subject: This is my first SIP call^M Expires: 120^M P-Info: VQem2WySucv0oaiOqT7HAmtlPhMYPd3Kn58o4xX9o5tL^M P-Need-Security: Yes^M Require: P-Need-Security^M Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, MESSAGE^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M P-Security-Nobody: abnPtllQ4gF5deL2u5UfUnfzUcJhomFI+yj1mYR374s=^M Content-Length: 310^M P-hint: usrloc applied^M ^M v=0^M o=nobody 20041028 20000001 IN IP4 192.168.0.62^M s=A call^M c=IN IP4 111.122.133.4^M t=1112000912 1112004512^M m=audio 9500 RTP/AVP 0 8^M a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000^M a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000^M m=video 10000 RTP/AVP 98 31^M a=rtpmap:98 H263/90000^M a=rtpmap:31 vf=4/CIF/1/768^M a=direction:active^M a=oldmediaip:192.168.0.62^M the UA A's original audio port is 9500, you see it is unmodified through the SER. Next is the part of my SER.cfg config: if(method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("3"); }; I thinks the SER should relaced the SDP media IP and port with the return valued by RTPProxy. That is, media ip is not the NAT device's IP, but RTPProxy's IP, 111.122.133.100, and the audio port is the port returned by RTPProxy. Now I can't see the modification of the media port by RTPPProxy. Am I right?? Thanks for your help! Best Regards. Sun Zongjun

2 1

[Serusers] Prepaid Application
by Ritesh Jalan 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Do anybody know any open sorce of a prepaid or calling card application for ser?? Thanks & Regards Ritesh Jalan Senior Engineer - Test & Audit Net4india Ltd. 703, Bhikaji Cama Bhawan 11, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110066 Tel: 91 (011) (26160129 - 131) (Extn 131) URL: http://www.net4india.com

2 1

Re: [Serusers] how to use accounting with ser_radius
by Kamran Ahmad 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

hello Now it is doing loging of accounting under /usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct/. i have to add the following to my ser.cfg loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" modparam("acc", "radius_config", "/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf") modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "log_flag" , 1) modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1) route{ setflag(1); if (method=="INVITE") record_route(); } thanks Kamran >hello Bruno Lopes F. Cabral > >where are those logs. >i have followed this doc >http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/ser_radius/ser_radius.html >how to setflag >are you talking about > >"4.2. Accounting Configuration > To enable RADIUS accounting simply use >radius_log_flag and radius_log_missed_flag parameters >instead of log_flag and log_missed_flag. Mark >transactions that should be logged with flags >configured in the parameters." > >from this document >i cant find radius_log_flag in SER >ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile > >i have changed ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile and >recompile this SER but still not getting any response >at RADIUS side > >---------------------------------------------- >#ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile >include ../../Makefile.defs >auto_gen= >NAME=acc.so >LIBS= > ># uncomment the next line if you wish to enable SQL >accounting >#DEFS+=-DSQL_ACC > ># uncomment the next two lines if you wish to enable >RADIUS accounting >DEFS+=-DRAD_ACC -I$(LOCALBASE)/include >LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lradiusclient > >include ../../Makefile.modules >---------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>These logs you'll have to look onto RADIUS server, >>not SER config. you'll need to check if you >setflag'ed >>correctly SER so it would actually generate the >RADIUS >>start and stop records >> >>>Kamran Ahmad wrote: >>> i have done this >>> >>>http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/ser_radius/ser_radius.html. >>> one thing i cant find any log under >>> /usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct >>> or >>> /var/log/radius/radacct >>> i dont know how to invoke accounting __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

1 0

[Serusers] RTP Nat Issues
by J.J. Toet 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hi Stephen, The same issue over here. I think I've located the problem; RTP traffic on the way back from clients behind NAT have no predictable portnumbers. I think they hit the firewall and never arrive. I'm going to be looking at a solution to direct the traffic to a specific destination port. I'll keep you up to date; let me know if you find a solution! Cheers, Joeri

2 1

Re: [Serusers] how to use accounting with ser_radius
by Kamran Ahmad 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

hello Bruno Lopes F. Cabral where are those logs. i have followed this doc http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/ser_radius/ser_radius.html how to setflag are you talking about "4.2. Accounting Configuration To enable RADIUS accounting simply use radius_log_flag and radius_log_missed_flag parameters instead of log_flag and log_missed_flag. Mark transactions that should be logged with flags configured in the parameters." from this document i cant find radius_log_flag in SER ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile i have changed ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile and recompile this SER but still not getting any response at RADIUS side ---------------------------------------------- #ser-0.8.14/modules/acc/Makefile include ../../Makefile.defs auto_gen= NAME=acc.so LIBS= # uncomment the next line if you wish to enable SQL accounting #DEFS+=-DSQL_ACC # uncomment the next two lines if you wish to enable RADIUS accounting DEFS+=-DRAD_ACC -I$(LOCALBASE)/include LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lradiusclient include ../../Makefile.modules ---------------------------------------------------- >These logs you'll have to look onto RADIUS server, >not SER config. you'll need to check if you setflag'ed >correctly SER so it would actually generate the RADIUS >start and stop records > >Kamran Ahmad wrote: >> i have done this >> >http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/ser_radius/ser_radius.html. >> one thing i cant find any log under >> /usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct >> or >> /var/log/radius/radacct >> i dont know how to invoke accounting __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

1 0

Re: [Serusers] unable to execute my script
by Andr�s Parra L. 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

It could be an error in the condition of the if sentence that cause the logic no to execute the commands inside of it. Maybe, try logging something in the if sentence before the exec command and see if something happens. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

1 0

[Serusers] SER and rtpproxy for IPv4/IPv6 gateway
by Bernhard Schmidt 28 Mar '05

28 Mar '05

Hi, I'm currently trying to setup a SER with rtpproxy as a full SIP router with IPv4 and IPv6 clients. After some hours of work I think I've understood the basics and I've hit my first problem. According to the examples floating around (and also according to my own tests) you need to give force_rtp_proxy different arguments depending on the AFI of both sides of the RTP stream. IPv4 -> IPv4 force_rtp_proxy("FAII") (or omit for direct media) IPv4 -> IPv6 force_rtp_proxy("FAIE") IPv6 -> IPv4 force_rtp_proxy("FAEI") IPv6 -> IPv6 force_rtp_proxy("FAEE") (or omit for direct media) while it is pretty easy to tell the AFI of the caller with if (af == inet6) as written in the examples, it seems to be impossible to tell the AFI of the called side in the route block (since DNS lookups appear to be done after t_relay(), and there might even be a fallback, haven't tested that). In static configurations you might be able to create a list of v4/v6 peers, but with ENUM or similar games you're seriously screwed. Anyone having an idea how to solve that? Thanks Bernhard

1 0

[Serusers] first question about project - call forwarding
by Andrea Riela 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I've n.3 SIP accounts on external servers, and I would that my ser will connect with those and redirect all calls from those to an internal SIP account. In this case, my ser is a client for the external accounts, and a server for the internal, isn't it? It's possible to do that? I hope this is clear. Any advice will be appreciated. Regards Andrea -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCQ1J8MakHrsrHP9wRAgaXAJ4nGOI41aYhEeox+Yq29aekUPzEQACfYD14 e665rD+oXs256o8or5EQAxE= =scBb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 6

[Serusers] SER --> RADIUS + MYSQL
by a cairo 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

Dear list, i have installed SER with radiusclient on a server and RADIUS (freeradius) with MYSQL DataBase on another server. SerRadius HOWTO is referred to a configuration on the same machine and with digest authentication. In my situation user are into mysql database and not in a digest file. At this point i followed instructions disabling "digest" word in authorize() and autenticathed() section in freeradius.conf. Tested with a simple client my server radius with mysql, response are fast and correct but when i try with SER i note that password is note received from radius! Is radiusclient the problem? Work radiusclient with "local" password or only with digest authentication? If digest authentication is request, it's impossible create a digest file for each user !!! Can anyone help me? Thanks Arcibald

1 0

RE: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
by Matt Schulte 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

Ah k, then I'm *not* using your module :-).. Regardless I did what you said and upon registrations the rep field is still getting set to non-zero. :( I'm still stuck on this.. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists@ohlmeier.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:49 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Cc: Matt Schulte; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication The module was named replicator and the code was never public available because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it can be found in my diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history. If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication values in your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these values were changed by SER at any time. Nils On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote: > I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would that > be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting > a config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? > What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any > versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can > tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much.. > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM > To: Marian Dumitru > Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated > the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the > replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication > flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to > non-zero value which is not correct. > > Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that > would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location > database forever. > > The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some > time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to > make the usr location simpler. > > Jan. > > On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote: > > Matt, > > > > You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if > > the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in > > DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show". > > > > As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I > > would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value > > != 0. > > Or ??? > > > If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the > > replication flag is still set. > > > > Best regards, > > Marian > > > > Matt Schulte wrote: > > >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how > > >long > > > > > >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's > > >still there :-) > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] > > >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM > > >To: Matt Schulte > > >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > > > > > > >Hi Matt, > > > > > >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still > > >kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes. > > > > > >Best regards, > > >Marian > > > > > >Matt Schulte wrote: > > >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks > > >>every 60 > > >> > > >> > > >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't > > >>understand is why I keep getting these messages: > > >> > > >>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for > > >>replication > > >> > > >>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there > > >>something I'm missing? > > >> > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > >> > > >>| username | contact | expires > > >> > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > >> > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 > > >> > > >>00:42:35 | > > >> > > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 > > >> > > >>01:24:58 | > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > > >>----+ > > > > -- > > Voice System > > http://www.voice-system.ro > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[Serusers] (no subject)
by Lan 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

This is the content of SER's syslog, Mar 27 19:41:43 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[25747]: ERROR: mk_proxy: could not resolve hostname: "telestar.bj.cn" Mar 27 19:41:43 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[25747]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad host name in URI <sip:telestar.bj.cn> Mar 27 19:41:43 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[25747]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches Can you tell me what is wrong with it? Thank you!

1 0

[Serusers] SIP to PSTN / PSTN to SIP with doalogic D/41ESC
by karim Oumalou 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

hi everybody need help please i am trying to use my dialogic card D/41ESC ( like a gateway ) to perform communication betwen SIP and PSTP, PSTN to SIP. What software i can use for this operation Thanks you excuse my english

1 0

[Serusers] Routing
by Roger Thomas 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

I am planning to have 3 SER servers to handle North, Central and South regions. 1) in this scenario, do I maintain ONE database in the Central region or otherwise ? 2) How do I configure SER so that it knows where to route PSTN calls to which server ? -- Roger --------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for free Email at http://ureg.home.net.my/ ---------------------------------------------------

3 2

RE: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
by Matt Schulte 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would that be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting a config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much.. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM To: Marian Dumitru Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to non-zero value which is not correct. Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location database forever. The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to make the usr location simpler. Jan. On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote: > Matt, > > You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if > the > contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB > column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show". > > As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would > say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0. Or ??? > > If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the > replication flag is still set. > > Best regards, > Marian > > Matt Schulte wrote: > >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long > >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's > >still there :-) > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] > >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM > >To: Matt Schulte > >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication > > > > > >Hi Matt, > > > >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept > >in > >ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes. > > > >Best regards, > >Marian > > > >Matt Schulte wrote: > > > >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks every > >>60 > > > > > >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't > >>understand is why I keep getting these messages: > >> > >>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for > >>replication > >> > >>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there > >>something I'm missing? > >> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+------------- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>----+ > >>| username | contact | expires > >>| > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+------------- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>----+ > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 > >>00:42:35 | > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 > >>01:24:58 | > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+------------- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-- > >>----+ > > > > > > > > > -- > Voice System > http://www.voice-system.ro > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

RE: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions
by Matt Schulte 27 Mar '05

27 Mar '05

I wonder if its caused from a process hanging even, do you do any external scripts, usrloc, or any kind of live db lookups? I do, we're in the process of nuking most of our external scripts because some just plain take too long and tend to hang up SER on a heavy day.. I would be more-so intertested in a module to deal with these 'slow' or runaway processes, just as a precautionary statement even. Of course that may be unneccesary in the eyes of the beholder :-) Matt -----Original Message----- From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:03 PM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions Yes, that is what I'm afraid of. I do all stateful stuff with rr also. I'm real concerned about this. I just thought that SER would kill off any pending transactions if when the delete_timer expires - so now I assume this is not what the delete_timer does. I guess I just don't understand what could keep this alive. I've been watching my SER all day it the transaction is still there. Regards, Paul On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:54:50 -0600, Matt Schulte <mschulte(a)netlogic.net> wrote: > Hmm, I get these too after long periods of time. I wonder if there was > a 487 or 408 that never got caught (or never replied to..??). I use > all stateful too with rr, if that helps. > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:07 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] "serctl moni" shows waiting stateful transactions > > Hi All. > > Occasionally I see a waiting transaction in "serctl moni". These > waiting transactions never seem to get processed because they never > disappear. > > Can anyone give a hint as to why I might see such a thing? > > Regards, > Paul > > [cycle #: 1773; if constant make sure server lives and fifo is on] > Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.1 (i386/linux)) > Now: Sat Mar 26 14:03:06 2005 > Up Since: Fri Mar 25 21:14:41 2005 > Up time: 60505 [sec] > > Transaction Statistics > Current: 0 (1 waiting) Total: 955 (0 local) > Replied localy: 1066 > Completion status 6xx: 0, 5xx: 0, 4xx: 301, 3xx: 0,2xx: 656 > > Stateless Server Statistics > 200: 11568 202: 0 2xx: 0 > 300: 0 301: 0 302: 0 3xx: 0 > 400: 0 401: 2376 403: 8 404: 464 407: 31 408: 0 483: 0 4xx: 0 > 500: 0 5xx: 0 > 6xx: 0 > xxx: 4707 > failures: 0 > > UsrLoc Stats > Domain Registered Expired > 'location' 28 10 > 'aliases' 4 0 > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

3 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users