sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

1 participants
37563 discussions

/tmp/kamailio_fifo is missing
by Patrik Kristel 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello all, I trying to debug Errorwith mi_fifo an d I found out that file kamailio_fifo is missing from the directory /tmp, also I not found it in my Debian by locate command. I have correctly following lines in my conf files: in kamailio.cfg: loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") in kamctlrc: OSER_FIFO="/tmp/kamailio_fifo" So, I dont know, it maybe my mysql crashed? Thank you for you help! Patrik

2 2

kamailio load balancer despatch to asterisk12 plus PJSIP Stack Mediagateways
by Rainer Piper 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hi, I'm using kamailio as a load balancer to dispatch to 5 asterisk Media gateways with pjsip Stack The old asterisk sip Stack is turned off. hier my asterisk pjsip.conf to trust kamailios IP Addr. pjsip.conf [transport-udp] type=transport protocol=udp bind=0.0.0.0:5060 tos=cs3 cos=3 [kamailio] type=endpoint context=outgoing-kamailio disallow=all allow=g722,alaw,ulaw transport=transport-udp direct_media=no disable_direct_media_on_nat=yes aors=kamailio [kamailio] type=aor qualify_frequency=60 [kamailio] type=identify endpoint=kamailio match=[IP-Addr-of-your-kamailio] extensions.conf exten => _XXXX.,1,Dial(PJSIP/${EXTEN}@trunkprofil) od exten => _XXXX.,1,Dial(PJSIP/trunkprofil/${EXTEN}) works great and pjsip is very fast !!! love it !!! Regards Rainer -- *Rainer Piper* Integration engineer Koeslinstr. 56 53123 BONN GERMANY Phone: +49 228 97167161 <callto:004922897167161>

1 0

Starting Kamailio with init script
by VOIP Tests 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello, can someone let me know how I can start Kamailio with the init script? In the /etc/default/kamailio file I have commented out RUN_KAMAILIO=yes, this starts Kamailio but my phones do not register. If I stop the init script and start kamailio with kamctl then my phones register, what am I doing wrong here? Also, if my understanding is correct, if I start Kamailio with the init script I should not start kamailio with kamctl, in that case how do I run the kamctl commands, for eg like kamctl ul show ? Thanks for the help. Arun

3 4

Re: [SR-Users] issue with usr_loc db_mode
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello, can you enable query log in mysql and verify if they happen in such case? I checked and for db_mode=1, it should immediately do the query. For db_mode=3, th queries are done on time. Also, is there any other application that could potentially delete records? Because after the first registration of a phone (which does an INSERT), there will be UPDATE queries, and if the record is not there, there is nothing to update. Look at usrloc module parameters, there are some parameters to try to do insert if the update doesn't affect records, you can try with this one to see if there is a difference. Cheers, Daniel On 08/05/14 18:20, Henry Fernandes wrote: > There are no errors in the log about this. > > Yesterday, I tried db_mode=2 (with default 'timer_interval' of 60 seconds) and it's better now, although still not working properly. There are still some records that are not in the 'location' table in the database. > > For example, I have a phone that has a registration expirations are set to 1 hour (3600 seconds). Currently, this record is not in the database however "kamctl ul show" shows the following: > > AOR:: phoneUsername > Contact:: sip:phoneUsername@a.b.c.d:62544 Q= > Expires:: 3123 > Callid:: f1e0aa72-eb0d28e2-c3737132(a)10.1.0.14 > Cseq:: 52 > User-agent:: PolycomVVX-VVX_500-UA/4.1.6.4835 > State:: CS_SYNC > Flags:: 0 > Cflag:: 0 > Socket:: udp:a.b.c.d:5060 > Methods:: 8159 > Ruid:: uloc-536a9e57-3137-2 > Reg-Id:: 0 > > In other words, it's been more than 60 seconds but the database is not up to date. This is similar to what I see with db_mode=1. In that case, the database is often missing more than 50% of the registered phones. > > Here are the parameters I'm using for the USRLOC module. > > modparam("usrloc", "db_url", WRITE_DBURL) > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) > modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 0) > > -H > > > On 2014-05-08, at 1:00 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> any db_mode>0 in 3.3 is safe for not losing registrations upon kamailio restart (e.g., db_mode=2 writes to db on time and at shutdown, so nothing is lost as well). db_mode=1 should do that in realtime, indeed. >> >> I'm not aware of any issue with db_mode=1, being used in quite some deployments. Can you check the syslog to see if there is any error reported there? >> >> If you use mysql, then you can enable logging the queries and then check if for each registration there is a mysql query to insert/update/delete a record. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 08/05/14 00:08, Henry Fernandes wrote: >>> I'm using Kamailio 3.3 and the USRLOC module to track registrations. I have set "db_mode" to 1 because I want to store all registration info to the database and I want the database to be up to date (in case I need to restart Kamailio). >>> >>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work as I expect. When I query the database, it has far fewer entries in the "location" table than are registered to Kamailio (which I find with a "kamctl ul show"). Also, when I restart Kamailio, I lose some of the registrations for my phones. >>> >>> Am I misunderstanding the behaviour for db_mode=1? Isn't it supposed to keep the database up to date? >>> -H >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

What do next?
by Jaafar Hamza 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hi, I am a student in Programming, I develop for project of the end of study a sip phone(Swing application). I use Sip Jain api. I installed kamailio in Ubuntu Server 14.04 using this command : apt-get install kamailio*. Now, I don't know what to do to configure this server like a registrar and I would like use the presence module. Please help me, I need it. Thanks Hamza Jaafar

2 1

sip trunk help
by Joli Martinez 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello, I am new to Kamailio. I need to get a SIP trunk registered to Kamailio. Can someone explain how to set this up. Thanks

3 3

issue with usr_loc db_mode
by Henry Fernandes 08 May '14

08 May '14

I'm using Kamailio 3.3 and the USRLOC module to track registrations. I have set "db_mode" to 1 because I want to store all registration info to the database and I want the database to be up to date (in case I need to restart Kamailio). Unfortunately, this doesn't work as I expect. When I query the database, it has far fewer entries in the "location" table than are registered to Kamailio (which I find with a "kamctl ul show"). Also, when I restart Kamailio, I lose some of the registrations for my phones. Am I misunderstanding the behaviour for db_mode=1? Isn't it supposed to keep the database up to date? -H

3 3

n00b question -- RADIUS authentication.
by Måns Nilsson 08 May '14

08 May '14

[first post to list] Greetings, I'm in the process of getting a Kamailio 3.3.2 installation authenticating its SIP accounts against a RADIUS database. There are -- at the moment -- no plans to do any fancy accounting nor any authorisation beyond simple authentication. I've set up and tested a FreeRadius 2.2.3_1 server on a dedicated server. After a fairly steep learning curve involving RADIUS dictionaries I've come so far that kamailio sends out a RADIUS Access-Request message that is received by FreeRadius, processed, and returned to Kamailio which promptly ignores it and continues to send 401 to the client; the SIP message exchange with the client being: (some identifing info has been redacted) > REGISTER sip:my.domain SIP/2.0 < SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.25.191.24:41688;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-eac09e6c626d4c4d-1---d8754z-;rport=41688 > REGISTER sip:my.domain SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.25.191.24:41688;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-4f25c643f4b93465-1---d8754z-;rport < SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.25.191.24:41688;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-4f25c643f4b93465-1---d8754z-;rport=41688 The RADIUS exchange: 10:07:10.861063 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 14964, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 270) 10.24.194.198.63712 > 10.24.194.196.1812: [udp sum ok] RADIUS, length: 242 Access Request (1), id: 0x05, Authenticator: 4215e95809551826eda76972be4106c4 Username Attribute (1), length: 18, Value: mtu-06(a)my.domain 0x0000: 6d74 752d 3036 4069 706b 2e73 722e 7365 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 10, Value: 0x0000: 0a08 6d74 752d 3036 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 13, Value: 0x0000: 010b 6970 6b2e 7372 2e73 65 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 36, Value: 0x0000: 0222 5532 6448 326c 4e6e 5271 3677 4353 0x0010: 6463 6775 5056 3050 516e 3936 324d 5635 0x0020: 6d34 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 17, Value: 0x0000: 040f 7369 703a 6970 6b2e 7372 2e73 65 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 12, Value: 0x0000: 030a 5245 4749 5354 4552 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 8, Value: 0x0000: 0506 6175 7468 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 12, Value: 0x0000: 090a 3030 3030 3030 3031 Unknown Attribute (207), length: 36, Value: 0x0000: 0822 3933 3832 3333 3333 3530 3162 3238 0x0010: 6439 3236 3739 3863 3964 3038 6539 3134 0x0020: 3733 Unknown Attribute (206), length: 34, Value: 0x0000: 3538 3665 3336 3763 3230 3163 3137 6438 0x0010: 6261 3265 3830 3533 3763 6433 3562 3761 Service Type Attribute (6), length: 6, Value: #15 0x0000: 0000 000f Unknown Attribute (208), length: 8, Value: 0x0000: 6d74 752d 3036 NAS Port Attribute (5), length: 6, Value: 5060 0x0000: 0000 13c4 NAS IP Address Attribute (4), length: 6, Value: 10.24.194.198 0x0000: c079 c2c6 10:07:10.863964 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 28916, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 48) 10.24.194.196.1812 > 10.24.194.198.63712: [bad udp cksum 0x06ac -> 0x44c0!] RADIUS, length: 20 Access Accept (2), id: 0x05, Authenticator: 8f07de871a066aacfbe822e20a9b96c1 The RADIUS part of the Kamailio config is: if (is_method("REGISTER") || from_uri==myself) #if (is_method("REGISTER") ) { # authenticate requests xlog("L_INFO", "authenticate [$fd]\n"); ### RADIUS ### if (!radius_www_authorize("my.domain")) { $var(ret) = $rc; xlog("L_INFO", "response code: [$var(ret)]\n"); switch ($var(ret)) { case -7: send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error"); exit; case -1: send_reply("400", "Bad Request"); exit; default: }; if (defined($avp(digest_challenge)) && ($avp(digest_challenge) != "")) { append_to_reply("$avp(digest_challenge)"); }; send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); exit; }; # user authenticated - remove auth header if(!is_method("REGISTER|PUBLISH")) consume_credentials(); } Any clues? What is missing from my narrative? -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 Actually, what I'd like is a little toy spaceship!!

2 3

kamctl online and ul show are empty!
by 5060 08 May '14

08 May '14

Hello: after i starting kamailio for while, the system shows: 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [mi_parser.c:84]: end of fifo input tree 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:507]: done parsing the mi tree 1(1464) DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:327]: Binding '102',' sip:102@192.168.1.105:5060' has expired 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [mi_parser.c:84]: end of fifo input tree 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:507]: done parsing the mi tree 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [mi_parser.c:84]: end of fifo input tree 3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:507]: done parsing the mi tree ---------------------------------------------------------------------- kamctl online and ul show are empty. how can i adjust the time to resolve the problem? thanks!

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] UPDATE --- Can "presence" module handle publish reqs with several dialog entries? + Problem SOLUTION
by Klaus Feichtinger 08 May '14

08 May '14

Pls find attached the patch for version 4.1.3. The three lines of code are equal for all affected version (incl. 3.2.4, 3.3.5, 4.0.6 and 4.1.3). regards, Klaus > Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> hat am 7. Mai 2014 um 15:45 > geschrieben: > > Hello, > > can you send the patch to be reviewed? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 07/05/14 13:15, Klaus Feichtinger wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > I think we´ve found the reason, why this problem occurs! > > > > The problem is caused in the "agregate_xmls" function in file > > "notify_body.c" of the "presence_dialoginfo" module: > > > > /* loop over all bodies and create the aggregated body */ > > for(i=0; i<j; i++) > > { > > /* LM_DBG("[n]=%d, [i]=%d, [j]=%d xml_array[i]=%p\n", n, i, j, > > xml_array[j] ); */ > > p_root= xmlDocGetRootElement(xml_array[i]); > > if(p_root ==NULL) { > > LM_ERR("while geting the xml_tree root element\n"); > > goto error; > > } > > if (p_root->children) { > > for (node = p_root->children; node; node = node->next) { > > if (node->type == XML_ELEMENT_NODE) { > > LM_DBG("node type: Element, name: %s\n", > > node->name); > > /* we do not copy the node, but unlink it and then > > add it ot the new node > > * this destroys the original document but we do > > not need it anyway. > > * using "copy" instead of "unlink" would also copy > > the namespace which > > * would then be declared redundant (libxml > > unfortunately can not remove > > * namespaces) > > */ > > if (!force_single_dialog || (j==1)) { > > xmlUnlinkNode(node); > > if(xmlAddChild(root_node, node)== NULL) { > > LM_ERR("while adding child\n"); > > goto error; > > } > > > > It seems to be not the best idea to "unlink" the XML node (= > > "xmlUnlinkNode(node);"), as then no "node->next" is available any more. > > Therefore, this loop will _always_ stop after one dialog entry and ignore > > any additional one! > > > > But we "solved" the problem in this way that the loop will not directly > > use "node->next", but a variable, which is set within the loop. It looks > > like this: > > xmlNodePtr next_node = NULL; > > [...] > > if (p_root->children) { > > for (node = p_root->children; node; node = next_node) { > > next_node = node->next; > > if (node->type == XML_ELEMENT_NODE) { > > [...] > > > > This solution has been tested with 2 and 3 dialog entries in a single > > PUBLISH request and it is working fine. We should discuss if this is a > > problem that should be solved generally or if it is a "private" problem in > > our use case. > > > > What do you mean? > > > > regards, > > Klaus > > > > > > >

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users