sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37549 discussions

Kamailio-4.1.6 IMS Setup - Registration Issue
by Kamal Palei 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Dear All I have setup a Kamailio proxy for testing IMS call flows. I have configured as per help provided. On registration, I get 483 response from server. When I searched it in google and help, it was suggested to set the alias name properly. I set the alias name properly. Still I get 483 from Kamailio (used as IMS server) Can somebody help me with what are the possible reasons for this. Thanks kamal

2 3

textopsx issue when modifying same header several times
by Andrew Pogrebennyk 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Hi, we are filtering some method names from the Allow header with kamailio 4.1: depending in the configuration: if (hf_value_exists("Allow", "INFO")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Remove INFO from Allow\n"); exclude_hf_value("Allow", "INFO"); } if (hf_value_exists("Allow", "REFER")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Remove REFER from Allow\n"); exclude_hf_value("Allow", "REFER"); } There is a problem in case multiple rewrites are done on the same header so the resulting message is going to be broken: Input: Allow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, INFO, REFER OUTPUT: Allow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, The trailing comma is not allowed. So we have to use msg_apply_changes(). But kamailio is quite restrictive on where you can call msg_apply_changes(): 1. it must be done before record_route()* and 2. it is not allowed in the branch route. As for me it's valid use case when you need to do some header manipulations only for some of the branches, isn't? *(1) is further aggravated by the fact that the record_route() for loose-routed requests is usually called quite early in the processing pipeline. Imagine kamailio.cfg would look like: request_route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # NAT detection route(NATDETECT); # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } # ---> filter Allow route(FILTER_ALLOW_METHODS); # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); I don't like the idea of changing the message before loose-routing. Taking (1) and (2) into account, would it be possible to a) fix exclude_hf_value to allow to filter multiple values in a single pass and b) allow msg_apply_changes() in branch route without any ill effects on the record-route headers? Please share your ideas. Thanks, Andrew

1 0

XCAP Jitsi
by Abdul Gafar 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

We configure use XCAP in version: kamailio 4.1.6 (x86_64/linux) Error in SIP Client (Jitsi) Resource cannot be read http://192.x.x.x.x:5060/xcap-root/xca-caps/global/index For Null Please Help me , for solve it's solution //Gafar

2 1

Releasing v4.2.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Hello, short note to say that packaging of v4.2.0 will start after 14:00 (Berlin time) -- anyone willing to do changes to branch 4.2 should send a short notice on sr-dev and wait for confirmation to avoid conflicts. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

How to setup stun parameters?
by george wu 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Hi, This document is too simple. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/stun.html How to setup stun parameters? ip/ports? Thanks. George

3 3

Query-for-Dispatcher.list
by Anil Kumar 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

Hello All, Please can anyone give some information regarding dispatcher.list file. I am using LAN network and trying to setup a kamailio-ims server. What is the info I need to configure in dispatcher.list ? I see error while running pcscf module. Thanks

2 1

Checking documentation for v4.2
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

Hello, in preparation for releasing v4.2.0 on Thursday this week, I spent some time today to publish the documentation for v4.2.x series at the usual places on kamailio.org site. I am writing here to ask everyone having some spare time to check through usual places they used in the past to read documentation on kamailio.org and see if something is missing for 4.2.x or something is wrong (e.g., broken or wrong links). Starting points can be: - http://www.kamailio.org/w/documentation/ - http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ Report any finding back to mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 2

rtpengine upgrade fails
by Juha Heinanen 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

just to complete the thread, the dependency problem has been fixed and upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded without issues. -- juha

3 4

Group User Presence
by rastrella 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

Hi guys, I've setup my kamailio more or less with all my needs, thanks to all your helps :) Now I've a question regarding presence. My kamailio manage all sip clients that are presents in my home. When I receive call all my phone rings simultaneously and so on... I would like that I can manage presence status of my home in order that...if some of my phones is "on call" the status of my "group" is "on call". It's something like that my "home" presence status is the AND/OR of all my phones presence status... Is there any way to make this? I think that I've to use PUA module, but the problem is that multiple calls are possible so is there any way to understand from script number of ongoing calls? ----- Marino Mileti -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Group-User-Presence-tp131478.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

No need for Authentication... Why?
by Manuel Camarg 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

Following this asipto guide: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb I've found that no auth is required to create a communication: Invites are sent regardless of a previously done auth with the kam's auth_db I've used this sip checker: http://www.sinologic.net/proyectos/asterisk/checkSecurity/ Result: Uh oh! you allow external calls... Configure better your sip configuration to avoid this calls SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us What is missing in the config file explained in the guide? Manuel

2 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users