sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

21 participants
37573 discussions

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

I forgot to precise that I allow only one contact per AOR. modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) save("location", "0x04") From: Mickael Marrache [mailto:mickaelmarrache@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:51 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo Hi, I start with no location nor in Mongo, nor in memory. My UA registers successfully and I can see the location entry in Mongo. Then, I close my UA which unregisters (by setting Expires header to 0). Then, I open the app again and a new registration is made. The entry after first registration. Looks okay. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:55:34Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8809, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip:XXXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp:XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:55:34Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-3378-2", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The same entry after un register (Expires 0). Note that the username field is missing. In any case, I expected the entry to be deleted. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } The entries after second registration. The new entry looks okay. But, the old entry is still here. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb3a7884e581337a25b895"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T09:02:00Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8813, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:02:00Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-337a-1", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The issue is the entry is not deleted after un registering. I precise that registrations are dispatched over multiple registrars with all accesses the same Mongo cluster. Thanks, Mickael

2 7

Kamailio appends firs inserted branch twice
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello I use this version of kamailio kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.0-dev3 (x86_64/linux) 8cdbe7 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8cdbe7 compiled on 17:54:50 Jan 20 2015 with gcc 4.8.2 I hav an issue with append branches to branch route when I need fork call to one endpoint woth different destionations. I use my own algorithm for call to this devices because with lookup("location") I can not use RTPENGINE for different types of endpoints (web endoints and standart UDP endpoints) My alg is here: { sql_query("ca", "select contact from location where username='$tU'", "ra"); xlog("L_INFO","rows: $dbr(ra=>rows) cols: $dbr(ra=>cols)\n"); if($dbr(ra=>rows)>0){ $var(i)=0; while($var(i)<$dbr(ra=>rows)){ xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return contact {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU} at step {$var(i)}\n"); if ($dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO", "This is a Websocket call to endpoint"); sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); $du=$var(recieved); xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}. Destination is {$du}\n"); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "This is a classic UDP call to endpoint"); $var(recieved)=''; sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); xlog("L_INFO", "SQL query return RECIEVED {$var(recieved)}"); if ($var(recieved)==0){ xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is EMPTY"); $du="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is {$var(recieved)}"); $du=$var(recieved); } $var(UDP_contact)="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); xlog("L_INFO","Classic Destination URI is {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU}}. Destination is {$du}\n"); } $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } } else{ exit; } t_on_branch("1"); return; } } } branch_route[1]{ if($du=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("internal extenal force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF"); t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); } else{ xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); } } So as you see I choose array of devices and then set its to branches. At the kamailio console I see output This is output of alg that above. I have 3 devices: 2 websocket devices and 1 udp But when you look at dump where rtpengine make changes with packets you can see that it runs for 4 devices and 1 and 4 devices is the same. You can see start of every branch from words of log "Websocket Branch is" or "UDP Branch is" So this bug gives a mistake because some of hardphones can not handlie double INVITE and kamilio response for this devices cancel with 200 cause because hardphone set 482 reply to kamialio. (you can see it reply at the log) Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: rows: 3 cols: 1 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:5ue13vsh@2t4iielj109h.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {0} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:a7uo9vsq@7c0oo5kvc71e.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {1} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:upsjchv2@5c88tisd29d4.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {2} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Creating new call Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 482 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100

2 3

Setting dialog variable when BYE is received before accounting
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hi, Is there a way to set a dialog variable when a BYE is received so that it can be written in a CDR? I tried as follows but it didn't work: if (loose_route()) { .. if(is_method("BYE")) { if(is_direction("downstream")) { #Call disconnected by caller $dlg_var(dr) = 700; } else { #Call disconnected by callee $dlg_var(dr) = 701; } xlog("Setting disconnect reason to $dlg_var(dr)\n"); } .. exit; } The xlog statement prints: ERROR: <script>: Setting disconnect reason to <null> The doc states: This pseudo-variable will be available only for subsequential requests after doing loose_route(). Thanks, Mickael

2 1

Planing to release Kamailio v4.2.3
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello, I am planning to release a new version from latest stable branch - 4.2. Most likely it will be Tuesday next week (Feb 10). If there is something important to take in consideration for this version, reply to sr-dev mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 4

Facing kamailio issue
by taha zafar 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Dear Kamailo team, I am facing problem in connecting kamailio on TLS, even kamailio is listening perfectly. TLS certificate are also tested. Kindly find attached logs and kamailio configuration file and give me your valuable feedback. *Eocean Pvt. Ltd.* *Taha Zafar* VoIP Engineer Mobile: 03318244432 Disclaimer: This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Eocean (Pvt) Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.

2 1

Parallel call forward
by Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi all, I'm getting crazy trying to setup a kamailio to do a parallel call forward to multiple destinations based on a query to the DB. I do the db query and get the RURI's of the destinations I could forward the call to in parallel, then when I get the resulset I do: [...] $var(cf_idx) = 0; while(is_avp_set("$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0])")) { $ru = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]); # Set the new RURI to call to $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]) = $null; # Setting it to $null pull the value from the stack $(avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)[*]) = $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) * 1000; t_set_fr("$avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)"); $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) = $null; route(ROUTE_ACC_CF); # Do the ACC $(avp(s:acc_state)[*]) = "cfna"; $(avp(s:hih_cause)[*]) = "404"; $var(cf_idx) = $var(cf_idx) + 1; append_branch(); } route(ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP); # Some final task and then t_relay [...] But only the last RURI get called How do I do to accomplish this? ... I need to change the $ru of each new branch, so when request get loop-back to the proxy, it do again all the lookup logic. Best regards

2 6

dmq_t_replicate fails with ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
by Leonardo Arena 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi all, I have three Registrar-only proxies DMQ interconnected [1]. I'm attempting to use a client to register to one of them and replicate REGISTRAR message to the other two. * What it works: - Clients registration to proxy1 - Proxy1 replication of REGISTRAR message to proxy2 * What does not work: - Proxy replication of REGISTRAR message to proxy3 * Error message of proxy1: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1770]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding ERROR: dmq [dmq_funcs.c:410]: cfg_dmq_t_replicate(): error calling t_replicate append_branch() did't help me and a search on the ML either. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! - leonardo [1] #-------------------------------------------------------- # Global Definitions #-------------------------------------------------------- debug = 2 fork = yes log_stderror = no # listen = 0.0.0.0 port = 5060 children = 4 dns = no rev_dns = no use_dns_failover = on dns_srv_lb = yes #dns_try_naptr = no mpath = "/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/" #-------------------------------------------------------- # Modules #-------------------------------------------------------- loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" #loadmodule "db_text.so" loadmodule "db_sqlite.so" loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" loadmodule "memcached.so" loadmodule "dmq.so" loadmodule "corex.so" #-------------------------------------------------------- # Module Configuration #-------------------------------------------------------- modparam ( "usrloc", "db_mode", 0 ) modparam ( "usrloc", "use_domain", 1 ) modparam ( "usrloc", "hash_size", 20 ) #modparam ( "ctl", "binrpc_max_body_size", 10000 ) #modparam ( "ctl", "binrpc_struct_max_body_size", 200 ) #default #modparam ( "db_text", "db_mode", 0 ) modparam ( "auth", "use_domain", 1 ) #modparam ( "auth_db", "db_url", "text:///etc/kamailio/dbtext/" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "db_url", "sqlite:///etc/kamailio/kamailiodb" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "use_domain", 1 ) #use plaintext passwords for testing modparam ( "auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 1 ) modparam ( "auth_db", "version_table", 0 ) modparam ( "auth_db", "password_column", "password" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "load_credentials", "$avp(s:username)=username; $avp(s:domain)=domain;$avp(s:password)=password" ) modparam( "memcached", "servers", "localhost:11211" ) modparam( "dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.0.1:5060" ) modparam( "dmq", "notification_address", "sip:dmq.my.domain.net" ) #modparam( "dmq", "num_threads", 4 ) # modparam( "dmq", "ping_interval", 60 ) #-------------------------------------------------------- # Main Route Block #-------------------------------------------------------- include_file "kamailio-errors.cfg" route { # Uncomment next line if you want to see # each incoming message xlog( "L_INFO", "$rm: $fu -> $ru" ); if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("20")) { route(ERROR_TOO_MANY_HOPS); } if (msg:len > 4096) { route(ERROR_MESSAGE_OVERFLOW); } if ($rm == "REGISTER" ) { if ( dmq_is_from_node() ) { xlog( "L_INFO", "REGISTER from node" ); route(REGISTER); exit; } else { # if we don't have credentials in cache authenticate against DB if ( $mct($tU@$td) == $null ) { if (!www_authenticate("$td", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("$td", "1"); exit; } else { route(REGISTER); xlog( "L_INFO", "Authenticated user $tU for domain $td against DB" ); # store credentials into cache $mct($avp(s:username)@$avp(s:domain)) = $avp(s:password); exit; } } # credentials are in cache, authenticate against it else { if (!pv_www_authenticate("$td", "$mct($tU@$td)", "0")) { # turn last param to "1" if using ha1 passwords # keep a counter of authentication attempts # if above 1 user is denied auth from cache so we discard the cache and force auth from DB at next attempt if ( $mct(count_$tU@$td) ) == $null { $mct(count_$tU@$td) = 1; } else { $mct(count_$tU@$td) = $null; $mct($tU@$td) = $null; xlog( "L_INFO", "Authentication count limit for user $tU for domain $td against cache reached. Cache discarded" ); } www_challenge("$td", "1"); exit; } else { route(REGISTER); $mct( count_$tU@$td ) = $null; xlog( "L_INFO", "Authenticated user $tU for domain $td against cache" ); exit; } } } } if ( $rm == "KDMQ" ) { dmq_handle_message(); } route(ERROR_INVALID_METHOD); } route[REGISTER] { if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); } else { append_branch(); dmq_t_replicate(); } }

3 11

Get the SDP IP in Kamailio
by Sebastian Damm 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi, since we integrated IPv6 into our existing routing logic, in some cases "fix_nated_sdp" gets called for IPv6 calls, too. (Actually, this just happens because of the mistakenly detected NAT.) But that ends up with a an error in the log. ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:1685]: replace_sdp_ip(): not an IPv4 address in 'c=' SDP So I'm looking for a way to exempt IPv6 calls from that. But I can't find a pseudovariable which carries the SDP contact IP. I guess I could take some function from the sdpops module, but is there a more convenient way to get just the contact IP? Best Regards, Sebastian

2 1

Registrar module and ipv6 addresses
by Sergey Okhapkin 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Registrar module save() function stores "received" field in wrong format like sip:2601:3:8805:107:41E6:C7A1:7724:CF01:5062 When lookup() config function is executed for ipv6 client, kamailio log shows error Feb 3 12:07:34 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[16069]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:254]: uri2dst2(): ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: sip:2601:3:8 805:107:41E6:C7A1:7724:CF01:5062 Feb 3 12:07:34 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[16069]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1709]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches Is it kamailio bug or a problem with my config?

4 5

Understanding t_relay
by Ryan Brindley 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hey community, I'm trying to understand t_relay () when a forward times out. This is an abbreviated version of what i have: Request_route { ... Route(do1) } Route [do1] { ... T_on_reply (1reply) T_on_failure (1fail) T_relay () } Reply_route[1reply] { ... If (t_check_status (302)) { Route (do2) } } Failure_route [1fail] { Xlog (dafail1) } Route [do2]{ ... T_on_reply (2reply) T_on_failure (2fail) T_relay () } Reply_route [2reply]{ Xlog (twerked) } Failure_route [2fail]{ Xlog (failured) } The case im currently interested in is when the first relay (do1) returns a 302 and then the second (do2) times out. What happens on the second when it times out, it hits the 1fail failure_route. This messes with my logic as i would've expected (and want to find out how to make it) hit the 2nd failure_route. I also noticed that if i loop and try the do2 again after the first failure it will then hit the 2fail route. Any clarification on this subject would be greatly appreciated, Ryan

2 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users