sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37519 discussions

Edge proxy / Registrar Script
by Infinicalls Infinicalls 21 Oct '16

21 Oct '16

Hi, I am trying to get a simple Edge Proxy - Registrar setup working behind NAT. Initially I tried various scripts - including the one mentioned in the Oubound page and Peter Dunkley' example - but got some errors related to PATH. Can somebody give me a working script of both proxy and registrar? Any help would be gladly appreciated. regards Ganesh Kumar -- --- http://www.infinicalls.com

2 2

Basic TM suspend question
by Alex Balashov 21 Oct '16

21 Oct '16

Hi, If a transaction is currently t_suspended() and has not been t_continued(), will t_check_trans() still find that transaction for retransmission-dampening purposes, e.g. if a retransmission of the same request as the original one is received? Thanks, -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 (direct) / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

2 3

Postgres: Exclusive Transaction Locks vs. Vacuumer
by Stefan Kohlhauser 21 Oct '16

21 Oct '16

Hey everyone! We noticed that under high load of registrations and using the pua module we can reach a state where the PUA table bloats our Postgres to several GB. However, a SELECT on pua only shows a few hundred entries. The other half million or so entries are obsoleted but not cleaned up. The reason for this seems to be that the autovacuumer of the Postgres can't get to work because the PUA table is almost permanently locked. Our Postgres logs are full with errors about the autovacuumer being canceled because it couldn't get to work. Looking at modules/db_postgres/km_dbase.c::db_postgres_start_transaction() I noticed that there are two locking modes used: str lock_write_end_str = str_init(" IN EXCLUSIVE MODE"); str lock_full_end_str = str_init(" IN ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE"); According to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/explicit-locking.html these modes mean forbidding everything else except reads and forbidding everything else. However, according to this documentation ROW EXCLUSIVE is the standard lock for entry altering operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE). And this would still allow the autovacuumer to do its job. Is there a specific reason why these more restricting locking modes are used instead of ROW EXCLUSIVE? Thanks. Best regards, Stefan

2 1

TCP FIN after 10 minutes
by gmele 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hello, we have deployed a Kamailio acting as SIP proxy on a RHEL 7.2 machine. Clients (mainly mobile phones) connects to the proxy using a TLS protected TCP connection. In the kamailio config, we've set : #!ifdef WITH_TLS enable_tls=yes tcp_async=yes tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_crlf_ping = yes #!endif Our problem is that, even if we set the tcp_connection_lifetime to > 1 hour, the tcp connection is closed after 10 minutes: on tcp dumps, we see clearly the TCP FIN sent by machine hosting the kamailio proxy... Setting parameters tcp_keepidle/keepintlv/keepcnt in the kamailio config didn't change the behavior. We also set TCP keepalived at system level, but without result... This TCP closure is causing us lot of problems when calls between 2 UAs last more than 10 minutes because the REINVITE or BYE messages are lost. Also, closing the TCP connection will wake up the mobile app and make it resend a REGISTER, thing we absolutely want to avoid. Is there a parameter we can use to avoid this closure? I had a look in previous posts, found people with the same problem as mine, but no real solution... Thx for your help. Giovanni -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/TCP-FIN-after-10-minutes-tp152646.h… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] help with NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hello Everyone, This message as continue conversation from http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-March/087557.html. That my previous post about it. I never was be be able forward NOTIFY from asterisk to client through kamailio. Right now in use asterisk 14 pjsip. Any help thank you. volga629 From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2016 18:36:52 Subject: [SR-Users] help with NOTIFY Hello Everyone, I am trying forward NOTIFY to client. My setup is PBX Server ---- local lan ---kamailio ---- internet ---- client The problem with whole setup that kamailio is not forwarding NOTIFY to client. Here are log. U 2016/10/19 14:23:29.581609 10.18.130.50:5160 -> 10.18.130.46:5060 NOTIFY sip:10101@10.18.130.46:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.50:5160;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjONocd4FvI5LkOmSR6ZCA5Z1f7SYDb3Ty. From: <sip:8101@networklab.ca>;tag=ziApds23FQsPL2zd6q8pCUlwW.jwa6mK. To: "Slava" <sip:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=734f813f. Contact: <sip:10.18.130.50:5160>. Call-ID: A0bJWg8v0nGmtUmiHzUixQ... CSeq: 18547 NOTIFY. Route: <sip:kamailio_local_ip:5060;lr;r2=on;ftag=734f813f>. Route: <sip:kamailio_public_ip:5081;transport=tls;lr;r2=on;ftag=734f813f>. Event: presence. Subscription-State: active;expires=413. Allow-Events: message-summary, presence, dialog, refer. Max-Forwards: 70. User-Agent: FPBX-13.0.188.9(14.0.2). Content-Type: application/pidf+xml. Content-Length: 579. . <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <presence entity="sip:8101@10.18.130.50:5160" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person"> <note>On the phone</note> <tuple id="8101"> <status> <basic>closed</basic> </status> <contact priority="1">"Slava" <sip:10101@networklab.ca></contact> </tuple> <pp:person> <status> <ep:activities>ep:busy</ep:activities> </status> </pp:person> </presence> U 2016/10/19 14:23:32.045388 10.18.130.46:5060 -> 10.18.130.50:5160 SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.50:5160;rport=5160;branch=z9hG4bKPju05rMNlzhfukLvaq4ELmq.QI4GBqDN-m;received=10.18.130.50. From: <sip:8101@networklab.ca>;tag=Yzy2m6O2AFT6rGSDBmo6PjcGaCWT1i5H. To: "Slava" <sip:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=ad5a945e. Call-ID: 2pq5iebmtLdB_OsMUs3EOg... CSeq: 14623 NOTIFY. Server: kamailio (4.3.4 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Any help thank you. volga629 _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

sipml5 fail invite kamailio ims web sockets
by Serhat Guler 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Dear all, I can register the sipml5 client to my kamailio IMS setup successfully, but when I try to make a call the invite fails with "478 Unresolvable destination". From the wireshark trace file I think the PCSCF on the terminating side cannot resolve the destination. After the invite request fails the caller re-registers to the networkj automatically. The wireshark file is attached. The registration process happens successfully but all of the nodes give some errors: 10(3773) INFO: <script>: [REGISTER] from [sip:alice@net1.test] to [sip:alice@net1.test] 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=425 a=25 n=xlog 10(3773) ERROR: <script>: REGISTER (sip:alice@net1.test (192.168.0.10:14115) to sip:alice@net1.test, 25c80750-d52d-30c8-d373-c0136401a927) 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=437 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=437 a=5 n=route 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=627 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=622 a=25 n=mf_process_maxfwd_header 10(3773) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <59840> <REGISTER> 10(3773) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 10(3773) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 70 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=633 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=627 a=26 n=sanity_check 10(3773) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header 10(3773) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:248]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 1 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=639 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=633 a=24 n=has_totag 10(3773) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag 10(3773) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:412]: run_select(): Calling SELECT 0xb6e5fe40 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=645 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=639 a=25 n=is_method 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=649 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=645 a=24 n=t_lookup_request 10(3773) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=1 T start=0xffffffff 10(3773) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=21728, isACK=0 10(3773) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 10(3773) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 10(3773) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=2 T end=(nil) 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=652 a=16 n=if 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=649 a=25 n=is_method 10(3773) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REQINIT] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg] l=650 a=26 n=send_reply 10(3773) DEBUG: sl [sl.c:280]: send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl) 10(3773) DEBUG: websocket [ws_conn.c:429]: wsconn_get(): wsconn_get for id [2] 10(3773) DEBUG: websocket [ws_conn.c:437]: wsconn_get(): wsconn_get returns wsc [0xb2329228] refcnt [2] 10(3773) DEBUG: websocket [ws_frame.c:751]: ws_frame_transmit(): Tx message: The SCSCF says (while inviting): 0(3582) ERROR: dialog_ng [dlg_handlers.c:196]: populate_leg_info(): bad sip message or missing Contact hdr 0(3582) ERROR: dialog_ng [dlg_handlers.c:453]: dlg_onreply(): could not add further info to the dlg out Making calls between 2 IMS clients(boghe) is possible. Would appreciate any help (I can share the cfg files if needed). Cheers, Serhat

2 3

Kamailio script config - Generate Documentation
by José Seabra 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hello there, I'm sending this email in order to know if anyone had work or has any idea how we can generate Documentation from kamailio script using Comments? This would be great because we could write comments explaining the Route method during script development and use it to generate documentation about our kamailio script, saving time and leave our deployment documented. Thank you -- Best Regards José Seabra

3 5

Regarding pua_reginfo, server_address
by Ram Anji 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hi All, I am configured kamailio to handle reg info event subscriptions, My server is running if i configure the following parameter. #kamailio local ip is 192.168.20.20 *modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:reginfo@192.168.20.20 <sip%3Areginfo(a)192.168.20.20>")* If i am not configured the above server address, i am getting bad configuration Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: auth [auth_mod.c:333]: mod_init(): auth: qop set, but nonce-count (nc_enabled) support disabled Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /etc/kamailio/permissions.allow Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:607]: mod_init(): default allow file (/etc/kamailio/permissions.al... rule set Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /etc/kamailio/permissions.deny Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:616]: mod_init(): default deny file (/etc/kamailio/permissions.den... rule set *Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: ERROR: pua_reginfo [pua_reginfo.c:105]: mod_init(): server_address parameter not set* *Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:944]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module pua_reginfo (/usr/lib/...ginfo.so)* Oct 18 11:31:36 arm /usr/sbin/kamailio[2787]: INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized Oct 18 11:31:36 arm kamailio[2771]: already running ... failed! Oct 18 11:31:36 arm kamailio[2771]: . Oct 18 11:31:36 arm systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start the Kamailio SIP proxy server. Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. I want to know what is the significance of this parameter and find no where this value is used. Thanks in advance. Regards, Raman

2 1

RTPProxy
by Rodrigo Moreira 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hi, What is difference between modules rtpproxy and rtpengine? Best regards. -- Rodrigo M. (37) 9132-4539 (34) 9889-3069 rodrigo.moreira2007

5 12

memory is not freed in system, while kamailio's statistic shows OK
by Vasiliy Ganchev 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Hi folk! Have a production server - used as webrtc to sip proxy - it is built on kamailio v 4.4.2 - Server handles connections from ~4000 incoming SIP trunks (transport=TLS). Kamailio provides auth for this trunks. - Kamailio receives also connections from Webrtc app. Calls from Webrtc routed to one of the 4000 sip trunks. Server is running on Debian GNU/Linux 7 The number of calls on the system is small. Most of the load is generated by registration/re-registrations of SIP trunks The problem is following: - output of kamcmd core.shmmem and kamcmd pkg.stats shows constant using of memory - output of htop shows constantly increasing memory usage, e.g. after one week working: PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command ..... 6013 kamailio 20 0 744M 134M 130M S 0.0 3.6 2:28.80 /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -m 512 -M 32 -u kamailio -g kamailio 6002 kamailio 20 0 744M 134M 130M S 0.0 3.6 2:30.93 /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -m 512 -M 32 -u kamailio -g kamailio 6012 kamailio 20 0 744M 134M 130M S 0.0 3.5 2:35.00 /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -m 512 -M 32 -u kamailio -g kamailio 5991 kamailio 20 0 744M 133M 129M S 0.0 3.5 2:05.88 /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -m 512 -M 32 -u kamailio -g kamailio 6018 kamailio 20 0 744M 133M 129M S 0.0 3.5 2:31.90 /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -m 512 -M 32 -u kamailio -g kamailio ..... Despite running with: PKG_MEMORY=32, Amount of used memory per process is higher. Finishes all with monit killing kamailio, because of memory usage more than allowed studied this tutorial: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory but did not find a way how to dig up the problem's root. Tried also to reproduce the issue in lab environment (having clone of production server). Generated load with incoming registration using PJSIP, but with no success - memory usage is constant. kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.4.2 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 4.7.2 Any suggestion/idea how to troubleshoot deeper would be highly apprecieted Cheers! -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/memory-is-not-freed-in-system-while… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users