sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
37510 discussions

Releasing v5.6.6
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.6.6 (out of branch 5.6) later this week (likely on Wednesday, July 3, 2024). If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. This is going to be the last release out of branch 5.6 to mark the end of official/packaging maintenance. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 1

Extracting and Handling Via Headers in failure_route
by sadik.oualla.mohamed＠gmail.com 02 Jul '24

02 Jul '24

Hello, I am currently working on a scenario where I need to use Kamailio in the failure_route to process SIP responses, specifically handling negative SIP replies (e.g., 486 Busy Here) that Kamailio may receive. Here is the topology: ##B2BUA (acts as a UAC with the Kamailio, because it sends the INVITE) -> Kamailio -> Callee## In my setup, Kamailio needs to extract all Via headers from the received SIP response in the failure_route, focusing particularly on the bottom Via header (from the B2BUA' UAC part). However, I am encountering difficulties in achieving this. Here is what I have tried so far: 1. To extract the Via headers, I used the following line of code in the failure_route: ```$var(viaHeaderValues) = $T_rpl($hdr(Via));``` However, this only returns the topmost Via header. 2. I attempted to get the first and last Via headers values with: ```$var(viaHeaderValueFirst) = $T_rpl($hdr(Via)[0]); $var(viaHeaderValueLast) = $T_rpl($hdr(Via)[1]);``` Unfortunately, this also only returns the topmost Via header, which contains the address of Kamailio. My goal is to make sure that when Kamailio sends the SIP reply to the UAC with send_reply method on the failure_route, it uses the extracted *Via header* of the incoming SIP response (only the bottom one). Here is an example scenario: - Received SIP Response in kamailio: ``` SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.200.200.4;branch=z9hG4bK9157.090080a91105c0ec6279bb56882d1dc8.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.200.200.3;received=200.200.200.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKF1aaZ7ea7yc2m From: <sip:caller@200.200.200.3>;tag=222222 To: <sip:callee@200.200.200.4:5060>;tag=4545454 Call-ID: 65695DSQ(a)200.200.200.3 CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ``` - Desired SIP Response from kamailio: ``` SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.200.200.3;received=200.200.200.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKF1aaZ7ea7yc2m From: <sip:caller@200.200.200.3>;tag=222222 To: <sip:callee@200.200.200.4:5060>;tag=4545454 Call-ID: 65695DSQ(a)200.200.200.3 CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ``` The current issue is that Kamailio modifies the Via header when sending the reply with send_reply method, resulting in: ``` SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.200.200.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKF1aaZ7ea7yc2m;received=200.200.200.3 From: <sip:caller@200.200.200.3>;tag=222222 To: <sip:callee@200.200.200.4:5060>;tag=4545454 Call-ID: 65695DSQ(a)200.200.200.3 CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ``` Due to this change, the UAC does not correctly react to or understand the SIP response "SIP Reply follows the RFC standards, but my current UAC waits for a Via that looks like Via of the previous SIP messages in the structure of parameters.". It is crucial for the Via header to maintain the same important order such as the branch, received, and rport values as the previous exchanged SIP messages. Could you please provide guidance on how to force Kamailio to send the SIP reply using send_reply method with the extracted bottom Via header from the incoming SIP response? Any advice or examples on handling this situation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and assistance.

1 0

Kamailio v5.7.6 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Jul '24

02 Jul '24

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.7.6 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.7, that includes fixes since the release of v5.7.5. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.7.x. Deployments running previous v5.7.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.7.6. For more details about version 5.7.6 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2024/07/kamailio-v5-7-6-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Note that 5.7.x is currently the previous stable release series, the latest is 5.8.x and v5.8.2 was released on June 12, 2024. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 0

Releasing v5.7.6
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Jul '24

02 Jul '24

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.7.6 (out of branch 5.7) on Tuesday, July 2, 2024. If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 1

SRV in advertise?
by David Villasmil 01 Jul '24

01 Jul '24

Hello guys, I'm trying to use an SRV as an advertised address but kamailio fails to start. Is this not possible? Thanks, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com

4 7

SecSIPID Assistance
by Blake Ivey 01 Jul '24

01 Jul '24

Hi everyone. Wanting to see if someone could point me in the right direction. Still very knew to Kamailio but I am beginning to understand it better. I'm making an outbound proxy and have everything working well besides stir/shaken. I'm looking at the module page and have went back and forth with chatGPT and can't seem to figure this part out. I keep getting errors on the modparam lines. Obviously this is a self signed cert because I'm just testing. I am able to reach and download the cert from the Web server. Thank you for any assistance. # SECSIPID for Stir/Shaken modparam("secsipid", "private_key", "/etc/kamailio/secsipid/private.key") modparam("secsipid", "certificate", "/etc/kamailio/secsipid/cert.crt") modparam("secsipid", "authority_cert", "/etc/kamailio/secsipid/ca.crt") modparam("secsipid", "expire", 600) modparam("secsipid", "timeout", 2) route[STIRSHAKEN] { if (is_method("INVITE")) { if (!secsipid_add_identity("$fU", "$rU", "A", "", " http://myIPaddress.com/stir_shaken_cert.crt <http://myipaddress.com/stir_shaken_cert.crt>", "/etc/kamailio/secsipid/private.key")) { xlog("L_ERR", "Failed to sign call with ID: $ci - From: $fU\n"); send_reply("500", "Internal Server Error"); exit; } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Successfully signed call with ID: $ci - From: $fU\n"); } } # Relay the call after signing route(RELAY); }

3 8

removing Via Header with received=
by mosbah abdelkader 30 Jun '24

30 Jun '24

Hello All, I am trying to build a simple proxy that forwards SIP requests to a remote portaone server. But, kamailio is adding a Via header with received=@IP to replies got from portaone. How to disable this behavior as Asterisk (client in my setup) is not accepting this header. Thank you.

1 0

misctest module not found in kamailio debian packages
by Patrick Karton 29 Jun '24

29 Jun '24

Hello, how do i get misctest module in debian packages ? it seems not included in a package. is compilation the only way to get it ? im using kamailio 5.7.5 on debian (bullseye) 11.8 version: kamailio 5.7.5 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 Thanks.

1 0

Ubuntu 24.04 Packages for Kamailio 5.8 on deb.kamailio.org
by Xenofon Karamanos 28 Jun '24

28 Jun '24

Any news on regarding the availability and status of Kamailio packages for Ubuntu 24.04 on the official Kamailio repository at deb.kamailio.org. Are there any plans to support this version of Ubuntu with updated packages? If so, is there an estimated timeline for when these packages might become available? Thanks, Xenofon ________________________________ From: Xenofon Karamanos via sr-dev <sr-dev(a)lists.kamailio.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 11:51 To: sr-dev(a)lists.kamailio.org Cc: Xenofon Karamanos <xk(a)gilawa.com> Subject: [sr-dev] Ubuntu 24.04 Packages for Kamailio 5.8 on deb.kamailio.org Hey everybody, While attempting to use the official Ubuntu package for Kamailio version 5.7.4 on Ubunut 24.04, we encountered an issue where TLS functionality does not seem to work as expected but 5.8 branch does. Given this, I am inquiring about the availability and status of Kamailio packages for Ubuntu 24.04 on the official Kamailio repository at deb.kamailio.org. Are there any plans to support this version of Ubuntu with updated packages? If so, is there an estimated timeline for when these packages might become available? Thank you in advance for your assistance. Best regards, Xenofon

1 0

replies using the wrong protocol
by sarah.martin＠nextiva.com 27 Jun '24

27 Jun '24

I am extremely new at this, but trying to set up TLS with a carrier. TLS connection is good, Invite goes out, we get the 100 and the 200, but subsequent messages (ACK and BYE) are being sent with UDP and I cannot figure out how to get them to maintain the TLS transport. Any suggestions? I think this is the section I'm looking for. # Manage incoming replies in transaction context onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] { xdbg("incoming reply\n"); if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") { route(NATMANAGE); } if (has_body("application/sdp")) { xdbg("rtpengine_manage loop-protect MANAGE_REPLY"); #rtpengine_manage("loop-protect"); } }

6 21

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users