sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

19 participants
37571 discussions

[Serusers] LDAP authentication (without Radius)
by Felipe Louback 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

I'm working in a VoIP solution here in my university and we have a wide LDAP base and I am thinking about using it for I found on the internet Ldap/Ldaps modules for SER (http://www.ethworld.ethz.ch/technologies/sipeth/ser_modules/ldaps), but I am afraid that I could only use them for lookups and not direct authentication. I guess I could use radius for authentication but I dont know if installing a radius server "just" for this would be worth the effort. Does anyone know if there is a way to authenticate users in a LDAP server without using Radius? I mean, could I use SER directly with LDAP without using RADIUS? Regards, Felipe -- Master Student - Electrical Engineering Department Computer Engineering and Telecommunications Research Group Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brazil "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16

4 6

[Users] openser 1.0.0 packages generation
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hello everybody, I would like to ask all of you that have access to different OS distributions to help with package generation. Please reply (personally if you prefer better this way) with OS name, version and architecture. We are looking mainly for common used distributions: Debian - testing (the other two are accounted already) Redhat Suse Open/NetBSD (FreeBSD accounted) SUN/Solaris Gentoo ... We will help as much as possible with guidelines. We would require tomorrow an early compiling on all available systems to fix eventual warnings. Cheers, Daniel

4 10

[Serusers] SER consultant wanted
by Kevin 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

I am looking for a consultant to help with a SER development project. - Kevin

1 0

[Serusers] are voicemail and msilo module the same?
by Meidiana Ten 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hi there, i'm new here and need help to fix my problem. I have final project that is configuring msilo module in SER 0.9.1. But i'm new in Linux and don't have any idea bout it. i want to ask if: 1. voicemail and msilo module the same? 2. how can i make the very first step? umm..begin from the installation of modules that i need to configure msilo module i'm blank...please someone help me.. thanx.. Yours, Meidiana email add : gotcha_em(a)yahoo.com Indonesia

1 0

[Serusers] IAS and SER
by Andrej Sirk 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hello, is there somebody who made an working authentication with SER and Microsoft's IAS.

1 0

Re: RE : [Serusers] OpenSER infrastructure dimensioning
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

The mailing list has no archive, it is created specially in such way. See: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-September/000941.html Daniel On 10/27/05 17:11, Olivier Taylor wrote: > The Business Archives > > No messages have been posted to this list yet, so the archives are currently > empty. You can get more information about this list. > > Olivier > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] De la > part de Daniel-Constantin Mierla > Envoyé : jeudi 27 octobre 2005 16:03 > À : Vanlandschoote Michel > Cc : serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Objet : Re: [Serusers] OpenSER infrastructure dimensioning > > > Hello, > > On 10/27/05 16:13, Vanlandschoote Michel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we are considering OpenSER for offering free SIP-based voice, video >> and IM services and I am trying to get an idea of the project cost. >> >> The components we need are: >> - SIP stateful proxy + registrar server >> - location & presence server >> - simple2jabber >> - media proxy for symmetrical NAT traversal >> - (perhaps I forgot something here?) >> We'll rely on external gateways for PSTN access so that is not to be >> taken in consideration here. >> >> Now can somebody give me an indication on the server park >> dimensioning? In other words, how many SIP servers, media proxies, ... >> would I need per 10000 subscribers? >> > a computer as you described below is more than necessary. The bottle > neck could be the bandwidth if you proxy the media stream through the server > >> >> The server platform could be e.g.: >> - operating system: Linux >> - hardware: HP ProLiant DL380 Generation 3 (single CPU with 1GB RAM) >> but of course any equivalent would do as well. >> >> I also have a second question: which organisations in Europe offer >> commercial support for OpenSER? >> > The openser project is the result of many contributions, its public > activity and development is guided by business independence. For such > requirements and questions, the project provides a mailing list > business(a)openser.org, where the contributors and independent consultants > are ready to take your request: > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/business > > > Daniel > > > >> >> Hope this forum is the right place for this kind of questions... I >> really appreciate your input, >> >> Michel >> >> ************************************************************* >> >> Dit e-mail bericht inclusief eventuele ingesloten bestanden kan >> informatie bevatten die vertrouwelijk is en/of beschermd door >> intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd >> voor de geadresseerde(n). Elk gebruik van de informatie vervat in dit >> bericht (waaronder de volledige of gedeeltelijke reproductie of >> verspreiding onder elke vorm) door andere personen dan de >> geadresseerde(n) is verboden. Indien u dit bericht per vergissing >> heeft ontvangen, gelieve de afzender hiervan te verwittigen en dit >> bericht te verwijderen. >> >> This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which >> is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and >> are intended for the sole use of the addressees. Any use of the >> information contained herein (including but not limited to total or >> partial reproduction or distribution in any form) by other persons >> than the addressees is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in >> error, please notify the sender and delete its contents. >> >> ************************************************************* >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >

1 0

[Serusers] variables with avp_check
by Joao Pereira 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hello, I want to use variables in ser.cfg and I m trying to use avpops for it # first by giving the variable "var" the value "internal" # string mysar = internal; avp_write("internal", "s:myvar"); # and checking this variable later: # if (myvar = internal) if (avp_check("s:myvar", "eq/internal/i")){ But this never enters in this if, can someone tell me the way to do it? Or where is some documentation about avpops (iptel.org/ser doesnt have). Thanks Joao Pereira

1 0

[Serusers] OpenSER infrastructure dimensioning
by Vanlandschoote Michel 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hi, we are considering OpenSER for offering free SIP-based voice, video and IM services and I am trying to get an idea of the project cost. The components we need are: - SIP stateful proxy + registrar server - location & presence server - simple2jabber - media proxy for symmetrical NAT traversal - (perhaps I forgot something here?) We'll rely on external gateways for PSTN access so that is not to be taken in consideration here. Now can somebody give me an indication on the server park dimensioning? In other words, how many SIP servers, media proxies, ... would I need per 10000 subscribers? The server platform could be e.g.: - operating system: Linux - hardware: HP ProLiant DL380 Generation 3 (single CPU with 1GB RAM) but of course any equivalent would do as well. I also have a second question: which organisations in Europe offer commercial support for OpenSER? Hope this forum is the right place for this kind of questions... I really appreciate your input, Michel ************************************************************* Dit e-mail bericht inclusief eventuele ingesloten bestanden kan informatie bevatten die vertrouwelijk is en/of beschermd door intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Elk gebruik van de informatie vervat in dit bericht (waaronder de volledige of gedeeltelijke reproductie of verspreiding onder elke vorm) door andere personen dan de geadresseerde(n) is verboden. Indien u dit bericht per vergissing heeft ontvangen, gelieve de afzender hiervan te verwittigen en dit bericht te verwijderen. This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the addressees. Any use of the information contained herein (including but not limited to total or partial reproduction or distribution in any form) by other persons than the addressees is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete its contents. *************************************************************

3 2

[Serusers] Curious interop bug.
by David Gilbert 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

For those of you who want to follow along, the packet dump in question is at http://strike.dclg.ca/~dgilbert/22-3-filtered ... it's a pcap format file. I'm using a 0.9.4 copy of ser, compiled by hand on debian stable. Only the core portion of ser is being used, and I have simple config file (attached). So, roughly, a call comes in level3, they make it SIP and forward it to my SER on port 5070. SER turns around and forwarded it to asterisk on port 5060 of the same machine and then asterisk forwards it on to a linksys ATA. In short, the problem is that level3 abuses the RFC by sending from a port and expecting you to reply on another port (specified in the Contact: header). This goes almost right except for level3's equally literal read of the Contact header that SER sends. Packet Sip Command Contact ====== =========== ======= level3:38999 ser:5070 INVITE sip:+1416...@<level3 ip>:5060 ser:5070 level3:38999 100 Trying sip:+1866...@<ser ip> (ser invites asterisk, not in dump) asterisk:5060 ata:5060 INVITE sip:+1416...@<asterisk ip> ata:5060 asterisk:5060 100 Trying None ata:5060 asterisk:5060 180 Ringing None (asterisk relays 180 to ser, not in dump) ser:5070 level3:38999 180 Ringing sip:+1866...@<ser ip> ata:5060 asterisk:5060 200 OK sip:604...@<ata ip>:5060 asterisk:5060 ata:5060 ACK sip:+1416...@<asterisk ip> (asterisk relays 200 OK to ser, not in dump) ser:5070 level3:5060 200 OK sip:+1866...@<ser ip> level3:5060 ser:5060 !?! ACK sip:+1866...@<level3 ip>:5060 Now... the problem is that each time ser repsonds, the contact line should be appended with ":5070" and it is not. Therefore, being the literal people they are, level3 repsonds to port 5060 with their ACK. This means that the ACK goes directly to asterisk rather than to SER and it means that when the call ends, the BYE notification from asterisk goes directly to the wrong port at level3. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave(a)daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================

3 2

re:[Users] SIP clients and DNS SRV
by Zen Kato 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hi, If we set 'Use DNS SRV: Yes' and 5 minutes REGISTRATION interval on BT101(1.0.7.11) and GXP2000(1.0.1.9),these UACs can successfully Re-REGISTER and INVITE other UACs on time period B, which comes after ser1 stops, every UACs changed their target from first DNS SRV(sip1) to second DNS SRV(sip2). But during time period A if caller is not Re-REGISTERed on sip2, when he dials some number, there is 'no tone(white tone?)' this means the server is down. If the caller's phone is Re-REGISTERed on sip2 and callee's is not yet Re-REGISTERed on sip2 in the time period A, the caller's phone displays "404 not found". So, this is first 5 minutes out of service probabilty time. After the operator of servers room knew that sip1 went down and sip2 is take care of sip calls, he tries to repair sip1 and restarts 'ser(openser)' on sip1. But all INVITEs are handled on sip2 now. BT101s and GXP2000s never automatically go back to sip1. So, the operator must stop sip2 untill all REGISTERs move from sip2 to sip1. This is the second 5 minutes out of service probability time. So, (5+5)minutes out of service probability time exist. If we set 60 minutes(default) for REGISTRATION interval, and all Re-REGISTERs happen on 50 minutes after sip1 down, (50+50)minutes out of service probabilty becomes high. stop ser1 stop ser2 | | V V ....|<-- 5 min-->|<--sip2-->|<-- 5min -->|<--sip1--.....-> |service stop|service |service stop|service | |continue | |continue time|<----A----->|<---B---->|<----C----->|<----D---.....-> Do we need another backup method like Linux-HA if UACs(ONE outgoing line only devices) don't support DNS SRV? Regards, Zen ------------ quote from Daniel's question ----------- Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel at voice-system.ro Wed Oct 26 16:46:32 CEST 2005 I do not get the question regarding the out of service interval when the client does not support srv. How you computed the 5+5 interval? ----------------------------------------------------

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users