sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

45 participants
37551 discussions

[Users] MESSAGE problem
by Darko 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi, I am trying to set up message handling for offline users. Storing seems to work ok - message is in database and all fields seems to be correct. Dumping doesn't work - it is called like in examples - just after save function in part handling REGISTER message but no packets at all is delivered to registering UA (seen by ethereal), except ones need for register. part of debug log for handling one message (11th in the database): 14(15501) DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x4068410c next=(nil) 14(15501) DEBUG: final_response_handler:stop retr. and send CANCEL (0x40683fe0) 14(15501) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=0, new_code=408 14(15501) DEBUG:tm:local_reply: branch=0, save=0, winner=0 14(15501) DEBUG:tm:local_reply: local transaction completed 14(15501) DBG: trans=0x40683fe0, callback type 256, id 0 entered 14(15501) MSILO:m_tm_callback: completed with status 408 [mid: 1080573260/11] 14(15501) MSILO:m_tm_callback: message <11> was not sent successfully 14(15501) MSILO: msg_list_set_flag: mid:11 fl:8 14(15501) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x40684028 14(15501) DEBUG: final_response_handler : done TIA, Darko

2 2

RE: [Users] clustering
by Douglas Garstang 15 May '06

15 May '06

I thought that was already done? I remember asking this several weeks back, and was told that t_replicate() would support multiple destinations in the next release. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:25 PM > To: Douglas Garstang > Cc: Edson; unplug; users(a)openser.org > Subject: Re: [Users] clustering > > > yes, that's right - I will take a look to see how difficult > is to change > t_replicate() to be able to sent to more destinations in parallel. > > regards, > bogdan > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > >Then, if system N fails, all systems >N also fail. That's > not very redundant. > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Edson [mailto:4lists@gmail.com] > >>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:01 AM > >>To: Douglas Garstang; 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'; 'unplug' > >>Cc: users(a)openser.org > >>Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > >> > >> > >>Create a 'chain' of t_replicate (1->2->3->...->n). Than You > >>can have 'n' > >>Proxies in the 'cluster'... > >> > >>Edson. > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: users-bounces(a)openser.org > >>> > >>> > >>[mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On > >> > >> > >>>Behalf Of Douglas Garstang > >>>Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de maio de 2006 11:49 > >>>To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu; unplug > >>>Cc: users(a)openser.org > >>>Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > >>> > >>>Yes, but t_replicate() only allows you to replicate to ONE > >>> > >>> > >>other OpenSER > >> > >> > >>>system. Two OpenSER systems is not a redundant configuration - 3 is > >>>redundant. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:28 AM > >>>>To: unplug > >>>>Cc: users(a)openser.org > >>>>Subject: Re: [Users] clustering > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>try yo google on the mailing list - the topic was often > >>>>debated. search > >>>>also for t_replicate() and replication. > >>>> > >>>>regards, > >>>>bogdan > >>>> > >>>>unplug wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>How to do the clustering of openser? Any reference? > >>>>> > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>Users mailing list > >>>>>Users(a)openser.org > >>>>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Users mailing list > >>>>Users(a)openser.org > >>>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Users mailing list > >>>Users(a)openser.org > >>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > >

2 1

Re: [Users] Stateful Transfers
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi, in this case you will to use an algorithm that uses some information that is common to the original call and the new call. If you are not able to link the calls (logically) you will not be able to send them to same destination. regards, bogdan Douglas Garstang wrote: >We're using algorithm 0, which hashes over the callid, but that doesn't help. >The polycom phones send a new invite with a NEW callid when you hit transfer. > >Doug. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:01 PM >>To: Douglas Garstang >>Cc: users(a)openser.org >>Subject: Re: [Users] Stateful Transfers >> >> >>Hi, >> >>what dispatching algorithm are you using? >> >>regards, >>bogdan >> >>Douglas Garstang wrote: >> >> >> >>>I got a big problem here that I don't know how to fix. >>> >>>An OpenSER system forwards calls from phones to Asterisk >>> >>> >>boxes. Up until now we had been using the dispatcher to >>evenly distribute calls to the Asterisk boxes. However, when >>someone transfers a call, using the dispatcher, the call can >>go to a different Asterisk box, which breaks the transfer. >> >> >>>I need to find some way to make OpenSER route transfers to >>> >>> >>the same Asterisk system. I'm not sure how to do this. If >>there was some way to, upon an INVITE, check and see if there >>was already a call in progress for that user and then send it >>to the same Asterisk system. Would stateful processing help >>in this way? Can stateful processing 'remember' that there's >>a call already in progress like this, or does the stateful >>simply relate to stateful processing of a single call from >>INVITE to OK/ACK? >> >> >>>Doug. >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Users mailing list >>>Users(a)openser.org >>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >

1 0

[Users] How to check RPID in Header
by martin＠campus-merseburg.de 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi, how can i check the RPID in the header for the flag "privacy=full"? i tried it with textops, but it didnt work. any other ideas? bye, martin

4 6

RE: [Serusers] PA error sending notifies
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi Samuel, I have the same problem with notification and other presence messages with you. Can you tell me which Linux distribution you are using Ser on ? Also please include version numbers for libraries that are required by Ser. I am trying to find similarities between yours and my ser server. Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of samuel Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:28 PM To: Vaclav Kubart Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error sending notifies First of all, I have to thank you for the time you spent writing the handbook, it's really really helpfull....I wish all SER related parts had this docs.. I'll try to get familiar with the code of the notifications and I'll try to find something....which I don't thing so :P. I'll also merge the two functionalities (proxy + presence) in a unique config file to see if it works. I hope I can provide more info these following days. About the missing things in the presence handbook, probably the most important is the new xcap module because in the sample config files it's missing. Another thing is that in the XCAP structure description, the im-rules directory is missing, which might lead to misunderstandings. I downloaded the structure from the iptel's ftp and inside the im-rules there were several files corresponding to presence-rules which should be either removed or updated with the im-rules namespaces and removing the whitelist. Thanks, Samuel. 2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org>: > Hi, > this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to simulate > it on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know. > :-) > > Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence > handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever ideas > are welcome... > > Vaclav > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence staff > > and I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to the > > presence handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little bit of > > code review..:P > > > > I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server" > > (both with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have an > > issue when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY requests. > > Below there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP a.b.c.d I've > > got the two instances): > > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created > > 3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac: > > next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on> > > 3(30682) t_uac: no socket found > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7 > > 3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification > > (-7) > > > > This problem appears in other places, not only in the notifications > > for winfo so probably there's somthing in the selection of the > > outgoing socket directing to the local IP. > > > > >From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack for the "SIMPLE" > > messages with record route....maybe adding the port in the record > > route should help? > > > > > > Samuel. > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010A0602/07074E00/02014D05/622…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

[Users] How many SER and asterisk servers does FWD users.
by Rodney G. McDuff 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi All Just out of curiosity does anyone have a guestimate of how many SER and Asterisk servers FWD uses to provision their +500K customers? -- Dr. Rodney G. McDuff |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam Manager, Strategic Technologies Group| Ex luce ad tenebras Information Technology Services | The University of Queensland | EMAIL: mcduff(a)its.uq.edu.au | TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220 |

5 5

[Serusers] One way Voice using SER
by ram 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi I have installed SER and running But i have problem with One way Voice I have DID from provider routed to SER I have registered iam able to login and able to make calls out when i make calls out, i dont have any problem of voice But when some one call to my DID, the Phone rings when i talk from behind NAT, other side not able to hear But iam able to hear other side of the Voice My setup looks like this Phone-Sipura------NAT SERVER------SER------Sipura--Phone help will be apprciated ram

2 2

[Serusers] required type multipart/related not in Accept headers
by samuel 15 May '06

15 May '06

More about PA... I have created the resource list for the user's contact list and I am sending a SUBSCRIBE to it with Req-URI sam-list(a)test.mydomain.com. Unfortunately I've got next ERROR in the log: 5(30685) list named default 5(30685) XCAP uri 'http://localhost/xcap/resource-lists/users/sam/resource-list.xml' 5(30685) parse_headers: flags=21 5(30685) ERROR: rls_handler.c:201: required type multipart/related not in Accept headers Is there some config issue either in my eyeBeam or in the SER that is causing this problem? Any comment is really wellcome!! Samuel.

2 1

[Users] (open)serpgctl
by Marco Meinardi 15 May '06

15 May '06

Dear all, in the last version of OpenSER 1.0.1 I found the utility serpgctl (located in openser-1.0.1/modules/postgres), which should replace openserctl for usage with PostgreSQL. However, this utility is not up to date with latest fifo commands and it differs quite much from openserctl. Does anyone have an up-to-date openserctl for using with PostgreSQL? Thanks in advance, regards. -- Marco Meinardi <m.meinardi(a)reteitaly.com> ReteItaly S.r.l. www.reteitaly.com _____________________________________________ C.so Svizzera, 185 - 10149 Torino - Italy Tel. +39 011 7767694 - Mobile +39 335 7878604 Fax +39 011 746179 _____________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] (no subject)
by rekik refka 15 May '06

15 May '06

hello, I'm seaching to develop a service with SER but t don't know a way to do it. Can you help me. thank you in advance.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users