sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
37511 discussions

[Users] Cannot start openser 1.1
by Papadopoulos Georgios 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

hello, After using OpenSer 1.0 successfully for about a year, I am trying to migrate to 1.1. My configuration has not changed (except for changes in the avp functions due to the new syntax). However I cannot get the process started. Below you can see the output that I am getting. It seems like some poll function is missing. Any help will be very welcome. Thank you. George Papadopoulos # uname -a Linux Fury 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #1 Fri Sep 15 16:47:15 EEST 2006 sparc64 sun4u TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird) GNU/Linux # 0(17608) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 172.31.100.6 0(17608) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 172.31.100.7 0(17608) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 172.31.100.6 0(17608) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 172.31.100.7 Listening on udp: 172.31.100.5 [172.31.100.5]:5060 udp: 172.31.100.6 [172.31.100.6]:5060 udp: 172.31.100.7 [172.31.100.7]:5060 tcp: 172.31.100.5 [172.31.100.5]:5060 tcp: 172.31.100.6 [172.31.100.6]:5060 tcp: 172.31.100.7 [172.31.100.7]:5060 Aliases: tcp: Fury:5060 tcp: Fury.acn.gr:5060 udp: Fury:5060 udp: Fury.acn.gr:5060 *: sip.altecnet.gr:* *: altecnet.gr:* 0(17608) init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(0) INFO: statistics manager successfully initialized 0(0) StateLess module - initializing 0(0) TM - initializing... Fury sbin # 0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing 0(0) TextOPS - initializing 0(0) AVPops - initializing 0(0) permissions - initializing 0(0) WARNING: File not found: /usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow 0(0) Default allow file (/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow) not found => empty rule set 0(0) WARNING: File not found: /usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny 0(0) Default deny file (/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny) not found => empty rule set 0(0) AUTH module - initializing 0(0) AUTH_DB module - initializing 0(0) subst_parser: WARNING: \* unknown escape in /(.*)/$avp(s:prefix)$avp(s:destname)\*\!\^$avp(s:destdomain)/ 0(0) subst_parser: WARNING: \! unknown escape in /(.*)/$avp(s:prefix)$avp(s:destname)\*\!\^$avp(s:destdomain)/ 0(0) subst_parser: WARNING: \^ unknown escape in /(.*)/$avp(s:prefix)$avp(s:destname)\*\!\^$avp(s:destdomain)/ 0(0) INFO:textops:hname_fixup: using hdr type (31) instead of <Remote-Party-ID> 0(0) INFO:textops:hname_fixup: using hdr type (31) instead of <Remote-Party-ID> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 118784 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 237568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 118784 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 237568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 118784 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 237568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 118784 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 237568 1(17622) INFO: fifo process starting: 17622 15(17649) ERROR: init_epoll: epoll_create: Function not implemented [90] 15(17649) ERROR: init_io_wait: epoll init failed 15(17649) ERROR: tcp_receive_loop: exiting...16(17650) ERROR: init_epoll: epoll_create: Function not implemented [90] 16(17650) ERROR: init_io_wait: epoll init failed 16(17650) ERROR: tcp_receive_loop: exiting...17(17651) ERROR: init_epoll: epoll_create: Function not implemented [90] 17(17651) ERROR: init_io_wait: epoll init failed 17(17651) ERROR: tcp_receive_loop: exiting...18(17652) ERROR: init_epoll: epoll_create: Function not implemented [90] 18(17652) ERROR: init_io_wait: epoll init failed 18(17652) ERROR: tcp_main_loop: exiting... 0(17610) child process 17649 exited normally, status=255 0(17610) child process 17650 exited normally, status=255 0(17610) child process 17651 exited normally, status=255 0(17610) child process 17652 exited normally, status=255 0(17610) INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD 1(17622) INFO: signal 15 received 2(17623) INFO: signal 15 received 3(17624) INFO: signal 15 received 4(17625) INFO: signal 15 received 14(17648) INFO: signal 15 received 13(17642) INFO: signal 15 received 12(17641) INFO: signal 15 received 11(17640) INFO: signal 15 received 10(17639) INFO: signal 15 received 9(17638) INFO: signal 15 received 8(17632) INFO: signal 15 received 7(17631) INFO: signal 15 received 6(17630) INFO: signal 15 received 5(17629) INFO: signal 15 received Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

Re: [Users] uri:host
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

On 09/19/06 23:21, Ramin Dousti wrote: > Thanks, Daniel. > > So according to the document forward_<proto>(host:port) becomes > foward(proto:host:port). > > But how should I then create a string which replaces the argument of > forward_tcp(uri:host): uri:host, uri:port have been eliminated, because when you give no parameter to forward(), same behavior happen. You can play with rewriteuri() or setdsturi() to make combinations of how to forward the request (or you can use avp_pushto() to achive similar results but with more flexible parameters). Cheers, Daniel > > forward("tcp:" . uri:host . ":5060"); > > with . being the concatenation function. > > Ramin > > On 9/19/06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> there was a change in the format of forwarding functions (core and tm), >> please see: >> >> http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=migrating_openser_v1.0.x_to_v1.1.x >> >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >

1 0

[Users] SER/OpenSER beer meeting in Oslo..
by Helge Waastad 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

I belive I'll make it... And my goal for that evening will be to see if SER-beer tastes as good as OpenSER-beer :-)....and off cource how many instances you can run...... before U're out of memory ;-) br hw -- Helge Waastad Senior Engineer Systemavdelingen Smartnet

2 1

[Serusers] Registrations behind NAT problem.
by Andrey Kuprianov 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

Hi, Im facing some weird problem, when users register from behind NAT. Let me try to break it down. First of all, Im using ser 0.9.6 and my configuration file is almost identical to that of mediaproxy+nat config file from getting started bundle. I have asked my friends and colleagues to test my SIP-based application behind NAT with their ADSL modems and strange thing happens: 1. While one guy (say user1) has ADSL modem, which gives him address of 192.168.0.3, he can register w/o problem. Contact header <sip:user1@192.168.0.3:5060;transport=udp>;q=1.0 is sent in REGISTER request, and received back with 200 OK as <sip:user1@192.168.0.3:5060;transport=udp>;q=1.0;expires=3600;received="sip:61.47.x.x:5060" (i have put "x" by myself) 2. Another guy (user2) has ADSL modem connected to a wireless access point. The application sends in Contact: <sip:surat@10.0.0.12:5060;transport=udp>;q=1.0 but gets back in 200 OK (attention !!!): <sip:surat@124.120.x.x:41854;transport=udp>;q=1;expires=3600;received="sip:124.120.x.x:43041" It gets Contact with a public IP back, which is not the case with user1. How come? I *wonder* why this is happening... Some kind of weird NAT? I'd really appreciate if anyone can shed some light on this issue. Bests, Andrey.

2 4

[Serusers] set_timer caller
by Gildo J. Caceres 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

Hi all, I have this message during SER runtime. 10(17177) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf73f01b8 7(17171) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf6186090 10(17177) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf694a60c 3(17163) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf6fe9ecc 2(17161) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf79f50c0 8(17173) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf767ed08 8(17173) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf7482294 3(17163) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf75b56c8 7(17171) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf704f65c 4(17165) WARNING: set_timer called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0xf6862054 Somebody knows what means? -- Gildo Caceres

3 5

[Users] lcr gw strip and prefix
by Alan Crosswell 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

Does anybody have samples of using LCR strip and prefix? I've tried configuring it for an ITSP that wants US numbers to be 10-digits and international calls to be prefixed with 011. I keep these numbers in E.164 format, so, for example: +12128543754 should have the ruri rewritten to: 2128543754 and +44123456789 should become 01144123456789 Here are relevant portions of my lcr tables: lcr routes +--------------+----------+--------+----------+ | prefix | from_uri | grp_id | priority | +--------------+----------+--------+----------+ | +1__________ | % | 5 | 10 | | +1__________ | % | 7 | 20 | | +__ | % | 8 | 20 | | +__ | % | 6 | 10 | lcr gateways (edited to fit and hide details:-) +-----------+---------+------+-----+-----+--------+-------+--------+ | gw_name | ip | port | uri_| tran| grp_id | strip | prefix | +-----------+---------+------------+-----+--------+-------+--------+ | prov1-us | x.x.x.x | 5060 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | | | prov1-int | x.x.x.x | 5060 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 011 | | voip1-int | y.y.y.y | 5060 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 011 | | voip1-us | y.y.y.y | 5060 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | | openser.cfg snippet (our internal dialplan has 93 for outside line): xlog("L_INFO","route[4]: SIP-to-PSTN call from <$fu> to <$tu> routed\n"); if (uri=~"^sip:931") { subst_user('/^931/+1/'); # rewrite to E.164 subst('/^(To:[^0-9]*)931(.*)$/\1+1\2/'); # rewrite to E.164 } if (uri=~"^sip:93011") { subst_user('/^93011/+/'); # rewrite to E.164 subst('/^(To:[^0-9]*)93011(.*)$/\1+\2/'); # rewrite to E.164 } xlog("L_INFO","route[4]: SIP-to-PSTN r-uri is now <$ru>\n"); # rewrite callee's 5-digit extensions to +121285..... if !((isflagset(6) && !isflagset(4)) || isflagset(5)) { subst('/^(From:.*<sip:)([134][0-9]{4}@)/\1+121285\2/'); subst('/^(Remote-Party-ID:.*<sip:)([134][0-9]{4}@)/\1+121285\2/'); } t_on_failure("4"); # if gateway unavail go to 4 if (!next_gw()) { sl_send_reply("503", "Service not available - No gateways"); return; }; xlog("L_INFO","route[4]: SIP-to-PSTN after next_gw() r-uri is now <$ru>\n"); # Cookbook does a forward. I think we do a stateful t_relay which will handle # e.g. TCP/UDP or v6->v4 conversion as needed. if (isflagset(18)) { #call fwd enabled append_branch(); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; xlog("L_INFO","Fell through route[4]: $si: $rm From <$fu> To <$tu>\n"); } # end of route[4] The observed behavior is that the host part gets rewritten correctly (to x.x.x.x) but the user part does not get stripped and/or prefixed. Any help would be appreciated. /a

3 4

[Serusers] Ser STARTED, but doesn't answer to any message
by Bouslov Boris 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

Hello all, SER is started fine, but it looks like it doesn't react to any message arrived to it. When the SER started the debug information has following message : 0(0) DEBUG: FIFO created @ /tmp/ser_fifo 0(0) DEBUG: fifo /tmp/ser_fifo opened, mode=432 0(0) init_unixsock_socket: No unix domain socket will be opened Please advice what can be the reason for such behaviour? Thanks Boris, Best regards, Boris Bouslov. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

1 0

[Users] uri:host
by Ramin Dousti 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

Hi, I just upgraded from v1.0.0 to v1.1.0 and my old config file seem to have problems, namely, the line: ... forward_tc(uri:host); ... gives a syntax error. I tried to read the release notes but couldn't find anything indicading any change. Thanks in advance, -- Ramin

2 1

[Users] Callerid Rewrite
by Zac Amsler 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

Hi all! Noob question that needs advanced help. One of my providers will reject calls if valid US callerid is not presented to them. I need to find a way to have openSER rewrite bad callerid info. ( If the user sends valid callerID I would like to preserver that) To keep it simple.. I would want to rewrite any callerid that is less than 10 digits. Could someone point me in the right directions? TIA! Cheers, -- Zac Amsler, Network Operations NetIQ Systems, LLC www.netiqsys.net <http://www.netiqsys.net>

3 3

[Serusers] msilo problems...Anyone, please help!!
by Meidiana Ten 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

Halo, guys... thanx for the time to read this mail I really need help to solve msilo problems... I have setup SER server in order to use msilo to deliver offline voice message, it works. But I really don't know how to add msilo parameter and the logics in my ser.cfg. Last, how to test whether the msilo module is working or not? Please give me solutions from this problem. I will very thank you because my last project in university is about to meet deadline... Regards, Meidiana Ten --------------------------------- Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users