sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

36 participants
37510 discussions

Updated: Online devel meeting on matrix - 15:00 UTC, Dec 9, 2024
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hello, we should consider an online devel meeting sometime soon to summarize what was done at (and still needs to be done after) devel meeting in Dusseldorf and plan a bit the targets for next major release 6.0. If considered useful, I propose Dec 9, 2024 (Monday) at 15:00UTC (16:00 Berlin/Paris/Madrid/Rome), but we can also look for other dates as well. Topics to be discussed can be added at: - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio-wiki/blob/main/docs/devel/irc-meetings… Pull requests can be made by users without git access. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 2

WS and rtpengine_manage
by Knserbrave 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hi Kamailio Community, When testing rtpengine_manage and websockets, I noticed that if the rtpengine table in the database is not used, a new websocket is created for every call for a given dialog. That is, when an INVITE is received, an offer is sent to rtpengine. When the 200 OK or 18[3|0] is received, an answer is sent. However, the WS identifier often changes and as a result the request is not sent over the same websocket. This is problematic particularly when using FQDNs in the Kamailio configuration. When a load balancer is used between Kamailio and rtpengine, the answer may arrive at a different rtpengine in the cluster. After tracing through the source, I could not find a configuration parameter or set of triggers that I could manipulate to fix this. It leads me to believe it is only possible to reuse the websocket when the rtpengine table is used. Does anybody have more experience than I in this area that may be able to point me in the right direction, making load balancers for rtpengine_manage calls possible?

3 2

Potential Bug in Kamailio: Base64 Decode Transformation Not Working in Lua but Works in kamailio.cfg
by Dirk Brouwers | CM.com 28 Nov '24

28 Nov '24

Dear Kamailio Developers, I am writing to report a potential bug in Kamailio's handling of base64 decoding when using the Lua scripting interface (app_lua). It appears that base64 decoding behaves inconsistently between Lua scripts and kamailio.cfg. When using `$(var(encoded_json){s.decode.base64t})` in kamailio.cfg, where $var(encoded_json) contains the encoded base64 string: `eyJmb28iOiJiYXIifQ` it decodes to the correct `{"foo":"bar"}`. But when using the same transformation in Lua `KSR.xlog.xinfo("Decoded in Lua: ".. KSR.pv.get("$(var(encoded_json){s.decode.base64t})"))` it logs a corrupted encoded base64 string: `Decoded in Lua: ..]..#035z{b.?...#036..-....` Thank you in advance for looking into this issue. Please let me know if you need additional details or test cases. Kind regards, Dbrcm

3 4

"Intermittent Issue: Kamailio Presence Server Not Generating NOTIFY Packets"
by satyaprakash ch 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

Hi We have FreeSWITCH and Kamailio presence servers set up. FreeSWITCH sends XML RPC messages to the Kamailio presence servers for PUBLISH operations, and we receive 200 OK responses in return. These responses include the SIP-ETag and Expires headers. However, the Kamailio presence server is not consistently generating NOTIFY packets. This issue seems to occur randomly. Can you please suggest this for presence servers. Thank you in advance.

1 0

record_route() adds empty route header if enable_double_rr is 1
by Benoit Panizzon 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

Hi Gang How is record_route() determining if it needs to add two RR Header? Kamailio 5.8.4 I'm attempting to perform route header hiding by by rebuilding some of the topos functionality with perl. So towards the CPE I'm removing all existing RR header and want to replace them with one header containing an attribute which the CPE is then sending back and allows me to restore the Route header. But I came across an issue which an empty RR header being created with this (simplified) script: modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 1) perl_exec("hide_route"); # Stores Route-Set and sets $avp(rrattr) as id remove_hf("Record-Route"); msg_apply_changes(); loose_route(); # Required for record_route()? add_rr_param(";rr=$avp(rrattr)"); # Add Param to identify saved route set record_route(); I end up with: Record-Route: <sip:;r2=on;lr;rr=id007> Record-Route: <sip:157.161.x.x;r2=on;lr;rr=id007> The first header missing the IP address, the message being dropped by the CPE There is no transport change. If I set enable_double_rr to 0 only the 2nd RR header is created and this works as expected but I am not sure if some situations would need double RR. What causes the double RR to be created in my case? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

2 1

app_perl add/remove HF?
by Benoît Panizzon 22 Nov '24

22 Nov '24

Hi List I'm looking into the perl module. Am I right, that I can not add or remove HF from an app_perl subroutine? I would need to pass an AVP from perl to tell Kamailio what to do? Goal is an attempt to re-build part of the topos functionality in perl but only handling RR and Route Header only on one leg, not on both. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 0

tcp_accept_haproxy option
by Wolter Eldering 22 Nov '24

22 Nov '24

Hi, I noticed that if I enable tcp_accept_haproxy kamailio still can accept connections without the PROXY-protocol header. The documentation on the wiki has the following note: "Please note that enabling this option will reject any inbound TCP connection that does not conform to the PROXY-protocol spec." https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#tcp_accept_haproxy This could be true up until a specific version of kamalio but from 5.7.4+ this limitation is seems to be removed. Enabling tcp_accept_haproxy is breaking the outbound/rr module because it con’t find the socket based on the address and port from the flow token. The flow tokens created by a REGISTER on a connection without a PROXY header can be used. Flow tokens created from a connection with PROXY-protocol header will fail with "cannot find socket from flow-token” once loose_route is invoked. loose.c:561 /* First, force the local socket */ si = find_si(&rcv->dst_ip, rcv->dst_port, rcv->proto); if(si) set_force_socket(_m, si); else { LM_INFO("cannot find socket from flow-token\n"); return -1; } I’m not sure if the address and/or port values stored in the flow token are incorrect or the problem lies in the matiching in find_is(…). Wolter

1 0

RTC DevRoom at FOSDEM 2025
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 21 Nov '24

21 Nov '24

Hello, FOSDEM'25 will host again a RTC DevRoom during the afternoon of February 1, 2025 (Saturday) -- more details and the call for presentation can be read at: - https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2024q4/003584.html I am not sure if I can participate (chances are more towards no, than to yes), but if anyone considers to go to the event, it will be good to submit a proposal to cover a bit Kamailio as well (it doesn't have to be entirely about Kamailio). Note that FOSDEM imposes a strict deadline this time for submissions (Dec 1, 2024), thus is no much time left. Should anyone in these groups plans to submit a proposal, let us know, so the others have an idea about it. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 0

TM-Module, ignoring
by Christian Berger 19 Nov '24

19 Nov '24

Hi, we would like to replicate a SIP-message ("REGISTER" in our case) to a set of nodes for further asynchronous processing. The message is already processed on the local Kamailio. We thought about using the tm-module in conjunction with the dispatcher module so we can reliably forward the message. This seems to work, however we get a new problem: Kamailio forwards the response it gets from those nodes. When we drop the response in the reply_route, it gets dropped before TM can see it. When we drop the response in the on_reply_route, it still will be forwarded. (adding or removing a header here works, however) $du is set to $null. Is there any clean way to suppress that response being forwarded back to the original requester? Best regards Christian Berger -- Christian Berger - berger(a)sipgate.de Telefon: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-0 Telefax: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-22 sipgate GmbH - Gladbacher Str. 74 - 40219 Düsseldorf HRB Düsseldorf 39841 - Geschäftsführer: Thilo Salmon, Tim Mois Steuernummer: 106/5724/7147, Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE219349391 www.sipgate.de - www.sipgate.co.uk

2 2

Not able to use SRTP - from client to proxy
by Sajid Khan 18 Nov '24

18 Nov '24

Im using the module RTPengine. im having issues when ever i try to do a call using SRTP im using microsip i have checked the SDP everything ok. But when ever i place the call it gets rejected. if i disable SRTP then the calls work if (!rtpengine_offer("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVP RTP/AVP")) { I only need to encrypt client -> proxy from proxy -> asterisk should be plain rtp i hope someone can help me out thank you. The log in rtpengine shows this [1731055305.417896] ERR: [2a721ebf2c73414ab8e739d7bde912f9//1 port 14124]: [srtp] SRTP output wanted, but no crypto suite was negotiated

4 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users