sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

19 participants
37529 discussions

[Users] Sip Message
by Howard Tang 15 Dec '06

15 Dec '06

Hi, Can someone tell me how i can see the SIP message going through in openser please? I want to debug why openser return "Address Incomplete". Regards, Howard

4 3

[Serusers] click2dial issue
by hiSIPatH 15 Dec '06

15 Dec '06

Hi all, i am trying to use click 2 dial in phonebook (serweb). But unfortunately i am not able to get this to work. I always get the following error in the popup window: 407 Proxy Authentication Required The sip trace gives the following ( i have sniffed eth0 and lo) on the eth0 (with public ip@ the dns query and response) No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 16 3.618415 89.xxx.xxx.218 89.xxx.xxx.129 DNS Standard query SRV _sip._udp.yyyy.zzz No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 17 3.618868 89.xxx.xxx.129 89.xxx.xxx.218 DNS Standard query response SRV 200 0 5060 proxy.yyyy.zzz on my loopback interface No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 1 0.000000 89.xxx.xxx.218 89.xxx.xxx.218 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:firstname.lastname@yyyy.zzz, with session description No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 2 0.000251 89.xxx.xxx.218 89.xxx.xxx.218 SIP Status: 407 Proxy Authentication Required No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 3 0.000332 89.xxx.xxx.218 89.xxx.xxx.218 SIP Request: ACK sip:firstname.lastname@yyyy.zzz i can see several INVITE-407-ACK but no INVITE with proxy-authorization from controller(a)yyyy.zzz have i forgotten to configure something. thx in advance

2 2

[Serusers] transfer to a speeddial number
by jorain 15 Dec '06

15 Dec '06

Hi all, How to get the referred-by value from sip message header? I need it to transfer the call by dialing speeddial number which was stored in speeddial table. Because it will take the original caller (first caller) as the username instead of the second party who did the transfer. For example, speeddial table: ----------------------------------------------------------- username sd_number new_uri 55555555 123 55555550(a)205.5.5.5 33333333 123 33333330(a)205.5.5.5 When i call from 33333333 to 55555555, then 55555555 transfer the call to 123, by right it will call 55555550(a)205.5.5.5 , but now my system call 33333330(a)205.5.5.5 How can i solve it? Thanks. Regards, jorain

1 0

[Serusers] SER + Asterisk - Help needed please
by Mr Raams 15 Dec '06

15 Dec '06

Hello All, I am having problems with my SER + Asterisk combination. I have SER and Asterisk working well on their own, however my issue is as follows. I have asterisk running in realtime with a users table of values accountcode & secret for its authentication. I have the SER subscriber table as normal. I want to have the same SIPID in both tables and the secret=password. However when I register to SER as the SIPID and with the password register is ok, local calls are ok, but when I call asterisk it wont go, it times out after some time. -Note: This is with the password set in the asterisk table as secret (remember this works fine if i register direct to asterisk) The funny part is if I remove the secret (password) from the asterisk account, leaving only the accountcode, but leave the username & password in SER the PSTN call works fine. SER passes the call to Asterisk, and Asterisk will terminate the call. I really need SER to pass the correct authentication details on to Asterisk. I have attached the ser.cfg for you to view and comment. Thank you, Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

[Serusers] click to dial
by jorain 15 Dec '06

15 Dec '06

Hi all, Is it possible to enable the conference using click-to-dial script? Thanks Regards, jorain

1 0

[Users] Duplicate INVITEs
by Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya 14 Dec '06

14 Dec '06

We're seeing sporadic situations where fones a) send an INVITE b) ignore the 100-Trying response, and instead c) send another INVITE with the same sequence number. The question is, What should happen here? Currently, we send back a 500 response (server error). Is this correct? (i think not, cause it invariably causes the fone to go fast busy). Is this some other response that should occur? poring over 3261 resulted in a headache, and no additional clarity... -- ******************************************* Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100 CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com "Aptela: How Business Answers The Call" *******************************************

3 4

[Users] Call based log
by ibrahim tunali 14 Dec '06

14 Dec '06

Hi everone, I want to trace previous or completed SIP dialogs so i need to keep log every sip activate to separate log files which name is <sip_callid>.log . Do you suggest any how to or tool for this issue. Best regards, ibrahim tunali

4 3

[Users] DNS queries and TLS
by Papadopoulos Georgios 14 Dec '06

14 Dec '06

Hello, I am having some performance issues with Openser and I tend to believe they are related with DNS. So I am trying to figure out when and why Openser is doing DNS queries. Doing ngrep on port 53 I realized that right before sending out the "100 trying -- your call is important to us" message, Openser is doing a reverse DNS lookup for the IP where the INVITE came from. So the sequence is something like: client Openser DNS |---INVITE------------------------>| |<---407 Proxy Auth Reqd---| |---ACK--------------------------->| |---INVITE------------------------>| |---client IP?-------->| |<-------------------------| |<--------------------100 trying---| I am using Openser-1.1.0-notls and in my script I have dns=no rev_dns=no So first question is whether this DNS query is necessary and how I could avoid it. What is furthermore confusing is that I have a test system with the same Openser version and same script, where this DNS query is not happening. Looking into the production system I found the following: ser2:/usr/local/openser-1.1.0-notls/sbin# ldd openser linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x55571000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0x55574000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x55587000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x55555000) whereas the test system shows: sertest:/usr/local/openser-1.1.0-notls/sbin# ldd openser libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x7002c000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x70040000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x70064000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x70000000) So the two systems link to different libresolv.so libraries. Is the tls/libresolve.so that is responsible for the DNS query? Given that in both cases I am using the notls version of Openser 1.1, why is there a difference between the two? thank you for any help George Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

[Users] Request for Discussion: MI and FIFO
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 14 Dec '06

14 Dec '06

Hi everybody, with the adding of asynchronous reply feature in MI and MI_FIFO implementation, the transition to MI was completed - all former FIFO functions (old implementation) were ported to MI. Also all FIFO capabilities were also ported to the new MI_FIFO module. so, currently there are two FIFO implementations: - the old one, directly in core. - the new one, based on MI interface. the old implementation is obsolete (all external management will be done via MI) , so, at some point, it will be removed from OpenSER in order to maintain consistency and avoid confusion between the two implementations (as they are equivalent from user point of view - at the moment, at least). my question is when to drop the old implementation? my personal preference will be do doing ASAP as : 1) no functionality is lost 2) avoid confusion among users and the explanation overhead 3) it will force the testing of the new FIFO and MI implementation, which will shorter the way to a stable form. I would like to know also some other opinions. regards, bogdan

4 4

[Serusers] send IM before operation in next shell script ends...
by Webnutzer 14 Dec '06

14 Dec '06

Hi ! I have an if block in my ser.cfg. in this block at first I send an IM with an "thanks for input", after that a shell script should start with some operations. SER sends the IM, but after the operations in shell script ends... How can I send the IM , before the shell script with operations finishs or SER start with operations in the shell script ? here is the code: if (method == "Message" && search("[a-zA-Z0-9/.+ ]{1,}-*,[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,}")) { sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); exec_msg("cd /etc/ser/;sh zweiteEingabe"); # send the thanks... log(1, "zweiter Schritt\n"); exec_msg("cd /root/workspace/Check_Name/bin/;sh Check_Name_Start.sh"); # other operations log(1, "Daten uebergabe\n"); break; }; Thanks ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users