sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

4 participants
37456 discussions

[Serusers] SIPSAK error in username
by "tzieleniewski" 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

Hi! I was testing my ser proxy with sipsak and i found one error. invoking sipsak with the following command: # sipsak -IU -vvv -s sip:sipsak@scscf.ims.touk.pl -l 5061 -H 192.168.0.138 -e 1 -S -a sipsak sipsak inserts an extratrailing zero in the username this is both in the to and from headers as well in the authentication header. U 2006/12/18 12:52:48.594546 192.168.0.138:5061 -> 192.168.0.74:5060 REGISTER sip:scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0. Authorization: Digest username="sipsak0", uri="sip:scscf.ims.touk.pl", algorithm=MD5, realm="scscf.ims.touk.pl", nonce="4586820caf30028588ff88825a90f86abbdb598d", response="66968ba65014ad848a3fbe0cc9331daf". Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK.5fcbc0b0;rport;alias. From: sip:sipsak0@scscf.ims.touk.pl;tag=391d3b1a. To: sip:sipsak0@scscf.ims.touk.pl. Call-ID: 958216986(a)192.168.0.138. CSeq: 2 REGISTER. Content-Length: 0. Max-Forwards: 70. User-Agent: sipsak 0.9.6. Expires: 15. Contact: sip:sipsak0@192.168.0.138:5061. Ive put the whole log in the attached file. Bests Tomasz

2 1

[Users] The usrloc table, Oracle, and Asterisk
by Juan Carlos Castro y Castro 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

I'm working on an Asterisk+OpenSER setup and I am in the process of implementing the following: registration has to be handled by OpenSER, but it has to be recognized by Asterisk. For that purpose, OpenSER is authenticating against Asterisk's "sipfriends" realtime table. That works OK. But OpenSER should also update fields "ipaddr", "port", and "regseconds" in the same table, or else Asterisk won't be able to direct calls to the logged SIP phones. I'm thinking of implementing an Oracle trigger (or rather asking the Oracle DBA to do that) so all updates/inserts into the location table will cause updates in sipfriends. As far as I know, I need to take the IP and port from the "contact" field of the location table. Or should I use the "received" field? In my tests, the "received" field gets set to NULL, although "contact" has the info I need. Can I use the data from "contact" always? For the regseconds field, I'll just have to make a conversion from the local time format (used by the "expires" field of location) to the unix timestamp format (used by "regseconds" in Asterisk). Oh, by the way, this is the location table definition that worked OK with Oracle. I had to ask for a login trigger so the date fields would accept the 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS' format. Also, Oracle refuses to accept an empty string as a non-null value. CREATE TABLE location ( username varchar2(64) DEFAULT '', domain varchar2(128) DEFAULT 'vono.net.br', contact varchar2(255) DEFAULT '', received varchar2(255) DEFAULT '', path varchar2(255) DEFAULT '', expires date DEFAULT '2020-05-28 21:32:15' NOT NULL, q decimal(10,2) DEFAULT 1.0 NOT NULL, callid varchar2(255) DEFAULT 'Default-Call-ID' NOT NULL, cseq int DEFAULT 42 NOT NULL, last_modified date DEFAULT '1900-01-01 00:00' NOT NULL, flags int DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL, user_agent varchar2(255) DEFAULT '', socket varchar2(128) DEFAULT '', methods int DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(username, domain, contact) );

7 24

[Users] Is there any module for P&IM?
by Danilo Vilela Dantas 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

Hi all, Congratulations! I use Openser. I have got a question. Has it Instant Messaging? It works like IM? Is there any module for P&IM? Thanks! Danilo

3 2

[Users] calculating phplib_id
by Bill Neely 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

Can anybody explain to me how to calculate phplib_id? I have been aboe to calculate ha1 and ha1b, but don't see any instructions on calculating the phplib_id. --

2 1

[Users] OpenSER
by Danilo Vilela Dantas 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

Hi all What is version OpenSER for the module IMC? Can it use in the OpenSER 1.0.1? And when will be ready the version 1.2.0? Delay? When time delay? Danilo

2 1

Re: [Serusers] branch parameter
by Tuffy Dhawan 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

www.adoreinfotech.com is offering a Softphone based on Microsoft RTC/1.2 which is not generating branch parameter while sending INVITE but call is still going through. How is branch parameter used as per RFC 3261. >From: "Pat Wang" <wangyu39(a)hotmail.com> >To: "Kapil Dhawan" <digitaltuffy(a)hotmail.com>,<serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] branch parameter >Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:17:26 -0000 > >branch in Via header is a MUST have parameter by RFC 3261. > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Kapil Dhawan" ><digitaltuffy(a)hotmail.com> >To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> >Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:05 PM >Subject: [Serusers] branch parameter > > >>Whats the importance of branch parameter. I am using RTC/1.2 library and >>its not generating branch parameter. >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Tried the new MSN Messenger? Its cool! Download now. >>http://messenger.msn.com/Download/Default.aspx?mkt=en-in >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > _________________________________________________________________ Stay in tune with the latest styles! Check out the happening fashion trends on 'Wardrobe watch'. Only on MSN Lifestyle http://content.msn.co.in/Lifestyle/Moreonlifestyle/LifeStyle_091006_0551.htm

2 1

[Serusers] Denial-of_service
by Tuffy Dhawan 18 Dec '06

18 Dec '06

How do you prevent Denial-Of-service in case of a stateful Proxy. _________________________________________________________________ Catch all the cricketing action right here. Live score, match reports, photos et al. http://content.msn.co.in/Sports/Cricket/Default.aspx

1 0

[Serusers] Request Response Query
by Kapil Dhawan 17 Dec '06

17 Dec '06

As per RFC 3261, SIP Trapezoid UAC1 - INVITE - UAS1 UAS1 - INVITE - UAS2 UAS1 - 100 Trying - UAC1 But i tried to check logs in SER which shows UAC1 - INVITE - UAS1 UAS1 - 100 Trying - UAC1 UAS1 - INVITE - UAS2 Why is it different. _________________________________________________________________ Mega Fare sale on domestic airlines. Call 1-800-11-8747 now! http://india.makemytrip.com/?Camp=MSN&attrib=Dec/Tag/Mega

1 0

Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs - t_lookup_request and t_check_trans
by Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya 16 Dec '06

16 Dec '06

quite quite positive. the reason i am so certain is that there is only *one* place in my entire config file that i actually do a t_relay() (or equivalent). I isolated all the code into route[1], to ease maintainability of my (admittedly complex) config file. In route[1], the relevant section is pretty damn close to if (!t_relay()) { if (!is_method("ACK")) { sl_reply_error(); } } fwiw, its 1.1.0 (latest cvs version thereof) cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu < bogdan(a)voice-system.ro > To: mahesh(a)aptela.com Cc: Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at >, users < users(a)openser.org > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:39:04 PM GMT-0600 Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs - t_lookup_request and t_check_trans Hi Mahesh, I do not think you need t_check_tran() as t_relay() automatically absorbs the retransmissions. are you sure you are not calling t_relay() twice for the same requests? or calling a tm function (t_newtran) before the t_relay ?? regards, bogdan Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote: >Well, i read the documentation again, and found t_lookup_request, and t_check_trans. >Question 1 - t_lookup_request() creates the transaction if it doesn't exist, correct? However, t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, correct? > >Question 2 - Assuming that t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, then is the following correct? > >Currently I do the following (after stripping out a bunch of stuff) > >if (!t_relay()) { > if (!is_method("ACK")) { > sl_reply_error(); > } >} > >should this, instead, actually look like the following? >if (is_method("INVITE")) { > if (if !t_check_tran()) { > t_relay(); > } >} else if (!is_method("ACK")) { > sl_reply_error(); >} > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at > >To: mahesh(a)aptela.com >Cc: users < users(a)openser.org > >Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:06:01 AM GMT-0600 >Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs > >Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote: > > >>We're seeing sporadic situations where fones >>a) send an INVITE >>b) ignore the 100-Trying response, and instead >>c) send another INVITE with the same sequence number. >> >>The question is, What should happen here? >> >> > >If the message is completely identical then it is a retransmission. >Retransmissions should be detected by tm module (e.g. t_relay()) and >absorbed, > >regards >klaus > > > > >>Currently, we send back a 500 response (server error). >>Is this correct? (i think not, cause it invariably causes the fone to go fast busy). >>Is this some other response that should occur? >> >>poring over 3261 resulted in a headache, and no additional clarity... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >> Users(a)openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > > > -- ******************************************* Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100 CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com "Aptela: How Business Answers The Call" ******************************************* -- ******************************************* Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100 CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com "Aptela: How Business Answers The Call" *******************************************

1 0

Re: usrloc loading (was Re: [Serusers] Re: Fw: [Users] TM : retransmission timers
by Jiri Kuthan 16 Dec '06

16 Dec '06

Thanks, how could I have missed that! Is what it does it loads usrloc table piece-wise? And if so, why does it do only for mysql? And also, it is saying that old version would have increased memory consumption with TCP/TLS -- does it mean that it does not increase with the new version? -jiri At 14:32 30/11/2006, Ovidiu Sas wrote: >Maybe you are looking for this one: >http://www.openser.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=48&Itemid=9 > > >Regards, >Ovidiu Sas > >On 11/30/06, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote: >>At 12:53 22/11/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote: >>>I know that OpenSER loads (only?) faster. >> >>Can folks share with me what the fast-usrloc-loading feature is about? >>I was not successful finding it out. >> >>Thanks! >> >>-jiri >> >> >>-- >>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>Users(a)openser.org >>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >-- >Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

10 18

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users