sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

4 participants
37456 discussions

[Users] Openser + postgres not starting
by Knight Tiger 23 Mar '07

23 Mar '07

Hi I have installed Openser v 1.2 no tls. I have Postgres version 8.0.7. I tried openser start [root@openser /usr/local/lib]# openser start ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) [root@openser /usr/local/lib]# openser -c 0(29611) ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/openser/modules/postgres.so>: /usr/local/lib/openser/modules/postgres.so: Undefined symbol "PQescapeStringConn" 0(29611) parse error (41,13-14): failed to load module ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) 0(29611) INFO:mi_fifo:mi_destroy:memory for the child's mi_fifo_pid was not allocated -> nothing to destroy I then ran openserctl moni cycle #1, if constant make sure server lives My openser.cfg file # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) children=4 # Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode #fork=no #log_stderror=yes # port=5060 # uncomment the following lines for TLS support #disable_tls = 0 #listen = tls:your_IP:5061 #tls_verify_server = 1 #tls_verify_client = 1 #tls_require_client_certificate = 0 #tls_method = TLSv1 #tls_certificate = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-cert.pem" #tls_private_key = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-privkey.pem" #tls_ca_list = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-calist.pem" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- #set module path mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/" # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "mysql.so" loadmodule "postgres.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "auth.so" #loadmodule "auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- mi_fifo params -- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo") # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) ...... .... I checked for the PQescapeStringConn and found this www.mail-archive.com/devel@openser.org.msg05182.html but I could not make anything out of it I dont want authentication just yet. Can anyone tell me what is wrong ? Thanks in advance Caugar

3 3

[Users] an example of xcap_table entry?
by jh＠tutpro.com 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

is there somewhere an example off xcap_table entry that would show who is allowed to subscribe the presence of an AoR? -- juha

3 2

[Users] OpenSER performance tests
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi everybody, based on the newly 1.2.0 OpenSER release, we ran some tests in order to give some realistic numbers about the performances of OpenSER. I think it is a very useful information for our community or other interested people. For more, please refer to the news bulletin: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/News/NewsItem/OpenSER-1.2.0---Perfomance-Te… or directly to the tests results web page: http://www.openser.org/docs/openser-performance-tests/ regards, bogdan

6 11

[Serusers] ACK for non-2XX not record-routed
by Emmanuel Hislen 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi, I've been using SER (0.9.6) as a Proxy doing Loose Routing between 2 endpoints. If I place a call I can see how the ACK for the 2XX response to the INVITE is properly handled (Route header removed, Record-Route inserted). Now with the call still up, I do a re-INVITE which is rejected with a 415. The re-INVITE request sent by UAC contained a Route header, as it was an in-dialog request in a record-routed dialog. Now as per RFC3261 section 17.1.1.3: If the INVITE request whose response is being acknowledged had Route header fields, those header fields MUST appear in the ACK. This is to ensure that the ACK can be routed properly through any downstream stateless proxies. My UAC complied with the above, but SER seemed to choke on this: whereas the ACK for 2XX was successfully routed by SER in the original INVITE, the ACK for non-2XX (looking exactly the same: same Request URI, same IP destination, same Route header, ... different Via branch of course) is not handled properly: yes the ACK reaches UAS but it still has the Route header in it, and no Record-Route was added. And I'm guessing that if there had been another proxy in the Route Set on the way to the UAS it would have been bypassed. SER traces for ACK-2XX: > 0(13574) ===> Loose Routing logic... > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=-1 > 0(13574) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=89 , global msg id=88 , T on entrance=0xffffffff > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=-1 > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=60 > 0(13574) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=41794, isACK=1 > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=28 > 0(13574) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: e2e proxy ACK found > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=4 > 0(13574) DEBUG: totag for e2e ACK found: 0 > 0(13574) SER: forwarding ACK statelessly SER traces for ACK-non-2XX: > 0(13574) ===> Loose Routing logic... > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=-1 > 0(13574) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=92 , global msg id=91 , T on entrance=0xffffffff > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=-1 > 0(13574) parse_headers: flags=60 > 0(13574) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=41807, isACK=1 > 0(13574) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=007d7195499e33a1 > 0(13574) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0xb616ae48) > 0(13574) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset > 0(13574) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0xb616ae90 > 0(13574) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) > 0(13574) receive_msg: cleaning up This doesn't seem right, am I missing something here? Thanks, Emmanuel.

3 5

Re: [Users] To: header in e.164 format - adding a plus
by Daryl Sanders 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

I'd love to use uac_replace_to(), but to my knowledge it does not exist. I read through the UAC module docs and there is no mention of it. Any other posibilities? If I were to use subst(), can it be applied it in such a way that it does not cause problems with the dialog? - Daryl On 3/21/07, Alan Crosswell <alan(a)columbia.edu> wrote: > Let me guess -- Level 3? They're the only ones that make that bogus > requirement AFAIK. And, the subst() is of course wrong, you need to do > uac_replace_to() or break the dialog otherwise.... > /a > > Daryl Sanders wrote: > > One of my providers requires the To: header to be in e.164 format with > > a "+" in front of it. Since there is no uac_replace_to() function yet, > > what are my options for adding this plus symbol? > > > > Before anyone suggests it... I cannot just use another provider. I > > must find a solution to add the plus symbol. > > > > Thanks, > > Daryl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >

3 3

[Users] SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY problem
by Vadim Berezniker 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

The setup is: Polycom 601 => OpenSER => Asterisk The SUBSCRIBE from the phone reaches asterisk just fine and the OK is returned properly to the phone. The NOTIFY messages don't get to the phone, however. SER sends it to the requested URI (which is phone@ser), which ends up being relayed back to Asterisk.

1 1

[Users] parameter of route(n)
by jh＠tutpro.com 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

is it so that currently parameter n of call route(n) needs to be an integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible? -- juha

4 8

[Users] dispatcher, failure route and force_send_socket problem
by Klaus Darilion 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi! Once again I have a problem with force_send_socket and branches in failure route. Scenario: normal route block --> call SIP client after timeout --> failure route in failure route send to gateway via dispatcher module The gateway accepts signaling only from a certain port, thus I have to use force_send_socket. The problem is, that if I call force_send_socket() in failure route, it sets the send_Socket for branches[0]. Thus if I call force_Send_socket before ds_select_domain it sets branches[0], but the sendsocket is not copied into the new branch when ds_select_domain internally calls append_branch. With version 1.1 I can use the ugly workaround to manually call append_branch too, as this copies another branch and also copies the sendsocket. Then I have 2 new branches where branches[1] gets dropped by teh firewall (wrong sendseocket) but branches[2] succeeds. But with version 1.2 the sendsocket is never copied from branches[0] and I can't set it manually for a certain branch. Are there any workarounds (for version 1.1. and 1.2) thanks klaus version 1.1: -- Klaus Darilion nic.at

1 1

[Users] [user] openser TLS and eyebeam
by Bodin Bruno 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

I made certificat, I add user folder to openser ser config (with lines it must) and I add certificat in Internet explorer for client. But eyebeam say certificat failed. Anyone have experience with eyebeam and tls ? thank.

2 1

[Users] OpenSer Asterisk
by Michael Chan 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi, OpenSer Support, I read the OpenSer and Asterisk real time intergation and follow the config instruction but still no result that we can make PSTN call through Asterisk without using the name and PW of OpenSer on the UA Sip Client (X-lite). On the Asterisk side, we assigned a user name and PW to OpenSer, but not sure where we can create script on OpenSer side that allow all calls to Asterisk without using the shared secret name and PW of OpenSer. Please any help will be grateful. MC -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 234 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users