sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

4 participants
37456 discussions

[Users] openser[3844]: ERROR:tm:write_to_unixsock: writev failed: Message too long
by laurent schweizer 15 Apr '07

15 Apr '07

Hi with openser 1.1.1 I have this error Apr 15 10:27:18 byll4 openser[3844]: ERROR: tsend_datagram_ev: failed to send: (90) Message too long Apr 15 10:27:18 byll4 openser[3844]: ERROR:tm:write_to_unixsock: writev failed: Message too long Apr 15 10:27:18 byll4 openser[3844]: ERROR:tm:t_write_unix: write_to_unixsock failed Laurent # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes # yes log_stderror=no #yes # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 unix_sock="/tmp/ser_sock" listen=udp:195.129.125.57:5060 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "modules/sl/sl.so" loadmodule "modules/tm/tm.so" loadmodule "modules/rr/rr.so" loadmodule "modules/maxfwd/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "modules/textops/textops.so" #loadmodule "modules/avp/avp.so" loadmodule "modules/avpops/avpops.so" loadmodule "modules/xlog/xlog.so" #loadmodule "avpops.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- modparam("xlog", "buf_size", 8192) # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam( "avpops", "avp_aliases", "billing_data=i:67" ) modparam("tm", "pass_provisional_replies", 1) # appends for INVITE to voicemail modparam("tm", "tw_append", "billing_headers: ua=$hdr(User-Agent)") #modparam("tm", "tw_append", "billing_headers: ua=$hdr(User-Agent) ;pbilling=$avp(i:67);x-billingId=$hdr(x-billingId);remote-party-id=$hdr(Remote-Party-ID)") modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 200) # appends for dtmf per INFO #modparam( "tm", "tw_append", # "info_append: ctlength=$hdr(Content-Length); cttype=$hdr(Content-Type); msg=$msg(body)") # main routing logic route{ xlog("L_ERR", "time [%Tf] method <%rm> r-uri <%ru> 2nd via <%{via[1]}>\n"); # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); return; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); return; }; if (method != "ACK" && method != "INVITE" && method != "BYE" && method != "CANCEL" && method != "INFO" ){ log("unsupported method\n"); sl_send_reply("500","unsupported method"); return; } sl_send_reply("100", " trying "); # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); log("step 1\n"); xlog("L_ERR", "step 1\n"); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { log("loose route\n"); xlog("L_ERR", "loose route\n"); append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } return; }; xlog("L_ERR", "step t_newtran\n"); # make transaction # if (method != "ACK") { if (!t_newtran()){ log("could not create transaction\n"); xlog("L_ERR", "could not create transaction \n"); sl_send_reply("500","could not create transaction"); return; } #} log("SIP message \n"); xlog("L_ERR", "step 2\n"); # actively absorb ACKs if (method == "ACK") { log("ACK ... \n"); xlog("L_ERR", "ACK ...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } #t_relay(); # break; } # pass INFO to SEMS # if (method=="INFO") { # if(!t_write_unix("/tmp/sems_sock","sems/info_append")){ # log("could not contact sems\n"); # t_reply("500","could not contact media server"); # } # } if (uri =~ "sip:.*@") { xlog("L_ERR", "to sems\n"); # if (method=="INVITE") # { # avp_write("$hdr[x-billingId]","$billing_data"); #} if (!t_write_unix("/tmp/sems_sock","billing/billing_headers")){ log("could not contact media server\n"); t_reply("500","could not contact media server"); return; } return; } t_reply("404","Not found in ser .... 1");

2 1

[Users] using LCR problem
by Jayesh Nambiar 15 Apr '07

15 Apr '07

Hi everyone, I am using the LCR module with almost 45000 rows in the LCR table. My server processes a huge call volumes. I thought everything was working fine but I started getting complains of very low connects. Then I observed that Openser was taking time to process calls and when I just unloaded the LCR module from the script, everything worked fine and openser could process all calls properly. I had made the following changes in the config.h and lcr_mod.c file: Shared memory = 256 PKG_Memory = 4*1024*1024 MAX_NO_LCRS=50000 I really need the functionality of LCR in my script for cost efficiency purposes. The server also has 4GB of memory but something in Openser seems to be wrong !!! I also upgraded from OSer 1.1.1 to 1.2 but still same problem :( Can someone please help me out with this? Thanks, w/regards, Jayesh Send a FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger. Get it now at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/

2 1

[Serusers] Respond to INVITE message for SER
by Goh, Tee-Yong 14 Apr '07

14 Apr '07

Dear all, May i seek your advice. My INVITE message sending to the SER is not successful with error "Status: 500". The SER does not respond back a 200 OK back to the client. Please kindly advice if anyone of you have the solution or encounter such problem before? Thanks. Regards, Howard This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer

4 5

RE: [Serusers] SIP SER
by Goh, Tee-Yong 14 Apr '07

14 Apr '07

Hi Karim, Yes you are right. Please advice. Thank you. Regards, Howard -----Original Message----- From: karim basraoui [mailto:basraouik@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:01 PM To: Goh, Tee-Yong Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP SER So if i understand, when a clint registers, SER will automatically send invites to the other clients and make connections with them? 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong < <mailto:gohty@m1.com.sg> gohty(a)m1.com.sg>: Dear Karim, Thank you for your reply. Yes you are right. I have having difficulty searching for this for past 2 months. Yes. Here is what i want. Once i receive the REGISTER messages, my SER will send out "INVITE" message to my other clients. This is what i am intended to do. However, i could not search for the right coding inside the ser-0.9.6. Please advice and apologies if any inconvenience caused for you. Thanks. Regards, Howard -----Original Message----- From: karim basraoui [mailto: basraouik(a)gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 7:18 PM To: Goh, Tee-Yong Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP SER Hi, Do you want to make changes on SER behaviour when it receives REGISTER messages. If it's the case you can make a condition in the "ser.cfg" file, in the bloc "route{ ... }". for example: route { if (method == "REGISTER") { #what you want to do}; } 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong < gohty(a)m1.com.sg <mailto:gohty@m1.com.sg> >: Hi, May i know from the SER-0.9.6, where can i look for and make changes for the SER when receiving "REGISTER" message and responsing " 200 OK" back to the corresponding node or clients? Would appreciate your assistance and advice as soon as possible as i have difficultly locating the coding. Please advice where i can find the script to edit the above mentioned messages. Apologies for the inconvenience caused. Thank you. Regards, Howard _____ This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer <http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer> _____ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- BASRAOUI Karim www.basraouik.afrikart.net _____ This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer <http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer> _____ -- BASRAOUI Karim www.basraouik.afrikart.net This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer

4 5

[Users] SEMS: ivr API
by Helmut Kuper 14 Apr '07

14 Apr '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have some trouble to get redirect.py running as an ivr module, cause ivr module's api has changed. Unfortunately I wasn#t able to find any new documentaion about sems' ivr except some hints that documentation isn't actual. Does anybody has the documented ivr API of sems 0.10? Thanks in advance Helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGH4QM4tZeNddg3dwRAhycAJ97h/WkjOGAmzr/KbmSnB0QNs8DngCfboEN +qKBWEbg95HlLMq55hPhbEE= =jMhC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Serusers] SER, SEMS voicemail and
by Meidiana Ten 13 Apr '07

13 Apr '07

Hi there, I'm sorry for bothering all this time with same questions I still can't solve the problem because nobody reply it. I really don't have any idea about how SEMS works. I setup eyebeam to forward call to voicemail number which is 115@domain for more info, the voicemail address was one of the user in subscriber/aliases table of SER that I added. When the call forwarded, SER have to check to usrloc for the address. It automatically appear that User not found on the softphone. Will it be any way that I don't have to create the address for voicemail address but SER can forward the call for SEMS? Or maybe my softphone forward call setting isn't right?Btw, I'm using eyebeam. I hope that someone reply for my mail this time. I'm sorry if my english is bad. Regards, Meidiana --------------------------------- Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.

2 4

[Users] NEW FEATURE: support for multiple RTPproxies
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 13 Apr '07

13 Apr '07

Hi, thanks to Ancuta Onofrei, a new member of Voice System's team, NATHELPER module now supports multiple rtpproxies - actually you can define multiple sets of rtpproxies - nathelper performs load-balancing over a set and the user can select the set. For more details, see: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/devel/nathelper.html#AEN76 The definition of the rtpproxy socket was extended to allow definition of multiple sets. See: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/devel/nathelper.html#AEN140 Also, a new function was added to set from script what set of rtpproxies is to be used. See: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/devel/nathelper.html#AEN298 Example: # multiple sets of multiple rtproxies modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "1 == udp:localhost:12221 udp:localhost:12222") modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "2 == udp:localhost:12225") ..... set_rtp_proxy_set("2"); force_rtp_proxy(); ..... regards, bogdan

1 0

[Users] Module tm, function t_lookup_request
by Wolfgang Hottgenroth 13 Apr '07

13 Apr '07

Hi, what happens to the t_lookup_request function of the tm module in the 1.2.0 release? I was using this function in my openser script and no it disappears. Although the underlying t_check function still exists. What is the reason? Thanks, Wolfgang

2 6

[Users] Why do not have 407 Proxy Authentication Required
by Mike Lee 13 Apr '07

13 Apr '07

Dear friends: I have installed openser-1.1.0-tls version, and it works fine with mysql, the sip flow is below: UA OpenSER invite----------------> <----------------100 trying <----------------101 dialog establishement <----------------180 ringing ..... My question is, why not have the 407 Proxy Authentication Required in the per call, see my openser.cfg file: # # $Id: openser.cfg,v 1.6 2006/02/15 18:23:46 bogdan_iancu Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/openser_fifo" # # uncomment the following lines for TLS support #disable_tls = 0 #listen = tls:your_IP:5061 #tls_verify = 1 #tls_require_certificate = 0 #tls_method = TLSv1 #tls_certificate = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-cert.pem" #tls_private_key = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-privkey.pem" #tls_ca_list = "/usr/local/etc/openser/tls/user/user-calist.pem" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); # if you have some interdomain connections via TLS #if(uri=~"@tls_domain1.net") { # t_relay("tls:domain1.net"); # exit; #} else if(uri=~"@tls_domain2.net") { # t_relay("tls:domain2.net"); # exit; #} route(1); }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("localhost", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("localhost", "0"); exit; }; save("location"); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); }; route(1); } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } ============================ thanks. Mike --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

3 2

[Serusers] using SER
by gabrielyans 13 Apr '07

13 Apr '07

Hi I was looking for a softswitch and found that SER could be usefull for what I am going to implement. I want to have a Signalling GW (I think it will be SER) who will receive calls and then direct them according to his routing table. SER will transfer calls to Asterisk, and then Asterisk (together with A2billing) will make the accounting for that call. Is it the right choise to use SER? Actually, I cannot find any forum concerning SER to check if there are already someone who is using SER as I am planning to use. Also, concerning WEB interface - it seams that SERWeb gives only user-management interface and not administrator interface - am I right? Please advise. gabrielyans

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users