sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

43 participants
37549 discussions

[Users] OpenSER-1.2.0 and SEMS
by raviprakash sunkara 10 May '07

10 May '07

Hello Users Todays onwards I'm Started integrating SEMS. Previously I'm using the Asterisk + openSER1.2 .For a small change , I shifted into the SEMS for voicemail By this url ( http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-September/000844.html) i found t_write_reg that is not in OpenSER tm modules , I found t_write_fifo/unix How I can do the voicemail or announcement with OpenSER + SEMS Any one give me ant hints Regardinng this points -- Thanks &Regards Ravi Prakash Sunkara

3 3

[Users] Integration to openser with midia server
by Danilo 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi all, I am using OpenSER 1.2.0. I am going to install media proxy, How does it work? How the Openser knows and obtains to monitor the flow and to set in motion the midia server? Danilo Inovax Engenharia de Sistemas Ltda. Rio de Janeiro - RJ / Brazil

2 1

[Users] TLS configuration in Fedora Core 5
by Han Gu 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi all, I am trying to configure my openSER with TLS support and get the following error message: May 7 15:44:39 tiger openser: WARNING:init_tls: disabling compression due ZLIB problems May 7 15:44:39 tiger openser: ERRRO:init_tls: null openssl compression methods Anyone could give me a hint of what is going wrong with my settings? Thank you so much for the help. Regards. Han

3 3

[Users] Sending Voicemail to Asterisk
by Bill Neely 09 May '07

09 May '07

I am having a problem forwarding calls to asterisk for voice mail handling. What I am trying to do: When a call times out for no answer, change the address of the call by prepending 777 to the extension number. Then forward the call to asterisk, where the 777 prefix tells asterisk that it just sends this call to voicemail. Here is my openser.cfg file: ... modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 20) ... route[1] { # # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # # even for UDP2TCP t_on_failure("2"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } failure_route[2] { if ( t_check_status("408")) if the call fails for timeout, send me a message and go to route(3) { xlog("L_ERR","rrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeecalling froute2 <$rm><$ru>\n"); route(3); exit; } exit; } route[3] { rewrite the uri to prepend 777 if (subst_uri('/^sip:([0-9]+)@(.*)$/sip:777\1@\2/i')) { rewritehostport("66.xxx.20.50:5060"); the asterisk box append_branch(); xlog("L_ERR","3333333333333333333333333333333333333333after substr <$rm><$ru>\n"); if (!t_relay("udp:66.xxx.20.50:5060")) { sl_send_reply("500", "Relaying failed"); } } exit; } What happens is that the call gets forwarded to Asterisk, but asterisk does not seem to recognize that the call is destined for 777xxxxxxx, but instead tries to send it to xxxxxxx, which causes the call to be transferred back to openser. This loop goes around and around until I kill it. Here is portion of log file: 1(7856) rrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeecalling froute2 <INVITE><sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7> 1(7856) subst_run: running. r=0 1(7856) subst_run: matched (0, 59): [sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7] 1(7856) textops: subst_uri_f: match - old uri= [sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7], new uri= [sip:7771020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7] 1(7856) ******* setting for branch 0 flags 0 1(7856) 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333after substr <INVITE><sip:7771020101@66.224.20.50:5060;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7> 1(7856) check_via_address(67.188.231.188, 67.188.231.188, 0) 1(7856) DBG:check_against_rule_list: using list dns 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 1(7856) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f4b4b0 (49500000) 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 1(7856) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f4b4e0 (79) 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=1, relay=-1 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:build_local: using FROM=<From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 >, TO=<To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> >, CSEQ_N=<CSeq: 1> 1(7856) DEBUG: cancel_branch: sending cancel... 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 1(7856) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f4b3c0 (49500000) 1(7856) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 1(7856) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f4b3f0 (79) 1(7856) DEBUG: final_response_handler : done 0(7855) udp_rcv_loop: probing packet received from 24.5.58.18 53652 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <407> 0(7855) reason: <Proxy Authentication Required> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5988.480944e.1>; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 234, <received> = <67.102.229.3>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-e004ef19dd229e0e-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <42749>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=as499a9c72 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [52]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34965 label 239374468 branch 1 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f4b0d8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f4b0d8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=180, uac[1]=0 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:build_local: using FROM=<From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 >, TO=<To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=as499a9c72 >, CSEQ_N=<CSeq: 1> 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=180, new_code=407 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_pick_branch: picked branch 1, code 407 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=1, save=0, relay=1 0(7855) old size: 631, new size: 549 0(7855) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:125, new: 43, rest: 506 msg= SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 67.188.231.188:42749;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-e004ef19dd229e0e-1--d87543-;rport=42749 From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=as499a9c72 Call-ID: YjgxM2RlZmM4MjRhMDYxN2YwYjI2MDdmZWZjMGY4NTY. CSeq: 1 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Contact: <sip:7771020101@66.224.20.50> Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="sip.xantek.cc", nonce="1aebadb3" Content-Length: 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f4b220 (49500000) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f4b250 (79) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: sent buf=0x62deb0: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0x801f4aea0: SIP/2.0 4 0(7855) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <200> 0(7855) reason: <OK> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5988.480944e.0>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=03422a48 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <CANCEL> 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34965 label 239374468 branch 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f4b0d8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f4b0d8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=407, uac[0]=408 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: reply to local CANCEL processed 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <487> 0(7855) reason: <Request Terminated> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5988.480944e.0>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-e004ef19dd229e0e-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <42749>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=03422a48 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34965 label 239374468 branch 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f4b0d8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f4b0d8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=407, uac[0]=408 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:build_local: using FROM=<From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 >, TO=<To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=03422a48 >, CSEQ_N=<CSeq: 1> 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=407, new_code=487 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Request: 0(7855) method: <ACK> 0(7855) uri: <sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-e004ef19dd229e0e-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(7855) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=100 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=as499a9c72 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [52]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <ACK> 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(7855) found end of header 0(7855) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found! 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=045b4172 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"Xantek"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=200 0(7855) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(7855) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) lookup(): '1020101' Not found in usrloc 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7' 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) DEBUG: t_newtran: T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=78 0(7855) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34965, isACK=1 0(7855) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=-d87543-e004ef19dd229e0e-1--d87543- 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x801f4b0d8) 0(7855) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x801f4b158 (54) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Request: 0(7855) method: <INVITE> 0(7855) uri: <sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=100 0(7855) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=10 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=10 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> ] 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=045b4172 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"Xantek"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=200 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE> 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=476 0(7855) found end of header 0(7855) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(7855) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) lookup(): '1020101' Not found in usrloc 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7' 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) DEBUG: t_newtran: T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=78 0(7855) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34962, isACK=0 0(7855) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) check_via_address(67.188.231.188, 67.188.231.188, 0) 0(7855) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: reply sent out. buf=0x62dcf8: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x801f4e420: SIP/2.0 1 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: finished 0(7855) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(7855) check_via_address(67.188.231.188, 67.188.231.188, 0) 0(7855) DBG:check_against_rule_list: using list dns 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f550c8 (49600000) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f550f8 (79) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction fwd'ed 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f4b4b0 next=0x801f4b3c0, timeout=49500000 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f4b3c0 next=0x801f4b220, timeout=49500000 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f4b220 next=0x0, timeout=49500000 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <180> 0(7855) reason: <Ringing> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK2988.3de53f62.0>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <42749>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=2a63bc63 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34962 label 653483731 branch 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f54ea8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f54ea8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=100, new_code=180 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 0(7855) old size: 554, new size: 493 0(7855) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:82, new: 21, rest: 472 msg= SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 67.188.231.188:42749;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543-;rport=42749 Record-Route: <sip:67.102.229.3;lr;ftag=045b4172> Contact: <sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7> To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=2a63bc63 From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 Call-ID: YjgxM2RlZmM4MjRhMDYxN2YwYjI2MDdmZWZjMGY4NTY. CSeq: 2 INVITE User-Agent: eyeBeam release 1009l stamp 37966 Content-Length: 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: sent buf=0x62d678: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x801f4e420: SIP/2.0 1 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 20 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[1]: 0x801f550f8 (69) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f550c8 next=0x0, timeout=49600000 0(7855) SIP Request: 0(7855) method: <CANCEL> 0(7855) uri: <sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=100 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=10 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> ] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <CANCEL> 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(7855) found end of header 0(7855) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found! 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=045b4172 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"Xantek"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=200 0(7855) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(7855) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) lookup(): '1020101' Not found in usrloc 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7' 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) DEBUG: t_newtran: T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=78 0(7855) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34962, isACK=0 0(7855) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookupOriginalT: searching on hash entry 34962 0(7855) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543- 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookupOriginalT: canceled transaction found (0x801f54ea8)! 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookupOriginalT completed 0(7855) check_via_address(67.188.231.188, 67.188.231.188, 0) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f583f8 (50600000) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f58428 (80) 0(7855) DEBUG: e2e_cancel: e2e cancel proceeding 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) check_via_address(67.188.231.188, 67.188.231.188, 0) 0(7855) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: reply sent out. buf=0x62dcf8: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x801f57da0: SIP/2.0 2 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: finished 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction fwd'ed 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <200> 0(7855) reason: <OK> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK2988.3de53f62.0>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <42749>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=2a63bc63 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <CANCEL> 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34962 label 653483731 branch 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f581d8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f581d8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=200, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=200, new_code=200 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x801f58258 (55) 0(7855) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Reply (status): 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) status: <487> 0(7855) reason: <Request Terminated> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK2988.3de53f62.0>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) DEBUG:forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=22 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <42749>; state=16 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=2a63bc63 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 34962 label 653483731 branch 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x801f54ea8)! 0(7855) DEBUG: t_check: end=0x801f54ea8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:reply_received: org. status uas=180, uac[0]=180 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=8 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:build_local: using FROM=<From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 >, TO=<To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=2a63bc63 >, CSEQ_N=<CSeq: 2> 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=180, new_code=487 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:t_pick_branch: picked branch 0, code 487 0(7855) DEBUG:t_check_status: checked status is <487> 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 0(7855) old size: 442, new size: 381 0(7855) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:93, new: 32, rest: 349 msg= SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 67.188.231.188:42749;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543-;rport=42749 To: "1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=2a63bc63 From: "Xantek"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>;tag=045b4172 Call-ID: YjgxM2RlZmM4MjRhMDYxN2YwYjI2MDdmZWZjMGY4NTY. CSeq: 2 INVITE User-Agent: eyeBeam release 1009l stamp 37966 Content-Length: 0 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x801f54ff0 (50700000) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x801f55020 (80) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: sent buf=0x62dcf8: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0x801f546f8: SIP/2.0 4 0(7855) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(7855) SIP Request: 0(7855) method: <ACK> 0(7855) uri: <sip:1020101@67.102.229.3> 0(7855) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=2 0(7855) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543->; state=6 0(7855) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(7855) end of header reached, state=5 0(7855) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(7855) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(7855) After parse_msg... 0(7855) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(7855) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=100 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=2a63bc63 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"1020101"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [50]; uri=[sip:1020101@67.102.229.3] 0(7855) DEBUG: to body ["1020101"<sip:1020101@67.102.229.3>] 0(7855) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <ACK> 0(7855) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(7855) found end of header 0(7855) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found! 0(7855) DEBUG: add_param: tag=045b4172 0(7855) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29 0(7855) DBUG:parse_to: display={"Xantek"}, ruri={sip:1020101@67.102.229.3} 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=200 0(7855) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(7855) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) lookup(): '1020101' Not found in usrloc 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [67.102.229.3] == [67.102.229.3] 0(7855) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(7855) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:1020101@67.188.231.188:42749;rinstance=1e89b57f830c50f7' 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) DEBUG: t_newtran: T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff 0(7855) parse_headers: flags=78 0(7855) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34962, isACK=1 0(7855) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=-d87543-c535a22e8d568d14-1--d87543- 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:REF_UNSAFE: after is 1 0(7855) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x801f54ea8) 0(7855) DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 0(7855) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x801f54f28 (55) 0(7855) DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0 0(7855) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list 0x0 0(7855) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f583f8 next=0x0, timeout=50600000 1(7856) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x801f54ff0 next=0x0, timeout=50700000 ^C 0(7855) INT received, program terminates 0(7855) INFO: signal 2 received 0(7855) Memory status (pkg): 0(7855) fm_status (0x615be0): 0(7855) heap size= 1048576 0(7855) used= 56472, used+overhead=95544, free=953032 0(7855) max used (+overhead)= 95544 Anybody see what I an doing wrong? -- Bill Neely Xantek, Inc. 1-866-553-3833 1-702-874-3833

1 0

[Users] How to get the most stable 1.2.x release sources?
by Anatoly Pidruchny 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi, all, I could not find a good explanation of the releasing policy for OpenSER. I mean, 1.2.0 was released on March 12, 2007. I know that the future release is 1.3.0. But is there going to be 1.2.1 ever released? There were many bugs fixed in 1.2.x since 1.2.0 was released. I think I read a developer's reply that the best and most stable OpenSER 1.2.x release sources can only be downloaded from the SVN 1.2 branch. Is this true? And what is the trunk version in SVN? Is it only for the next release (1.3.0) and changes to the trunk do not go to 1.2.x branch automatically? The download page (http://www.openser.org/mos/view/Download/) unfortunately does not tell that to get the most stable 1.2.x release one has to use SVN Download. I think most of the OpenSER users just download the released 1.2.0 sources. By the way, looks like the so called "daily" SVN snapshots have not been posted since April 23. Is this a known problem? Thanks, Anatoly.

4 5

[Serusers] ser_ctl
by Tuan Nguyen 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi, Can someone tell me what does is mean this error: tuandat@ubuntu:~/serctl$ ./ser_ctl domain add iptel.org ser_ctl: No module named MySQLdb: ImportError I have already create mysql database ser with ser_mysql.sh script. I can show tables of ser database but I can't add domain. thanks for response Tuan.

3 2

Re: [Serusers] Which version of SER to use?
by Greger V. Teigre 09 May '07

09 May '07

:-) Spend 30 minutes on SER 2.0; it's easier than you think. etc/ser.cfg is a decent config. g-) Eneref wrote: > If I actually knew anything about how all the new stuff worked, I'd be > happy to help. ;) Sort of a chicken and egg problem. > > Unfortunately, as late, in my copious free time (*cough*), I haven't > had the time to delve into the SER 2.0 stuff and actually figure out > for myself how it all meshes together. > > N. > > > Greger V. Teigre wrote: >> heh heh, as iptel.org is an open-source project, we need a sponsor to >> pay for a technical writer if we want one. Iptego did that for SEMS >> documentation, but we don't have a documentation sponsor for SER. I'm >> afraid paid beer does not bring us far... >> >> So, we will have to cope with the volunteers we have. An advanced >> user, like you, is as good a writer as anyone, so if you want to put >> your keyboard fingers where your mouth is ;-), you are very welcome >> to sign up as a volunteer on either of our three current >> documentation efforts: >> 1. Migration guide (editor: Simon Miles) >> 2. Reference guide (editor: yours truly) >> 3. SER - Getting Started (editor: ?) >> >> I'm in the process of coordinating the table of contents with Simon, >> but here's an attempted outline: >> http://www.iptel.org/suggestion_for_outline_of_new_ser_reference_manual >> >> Feel free to sign up for any chapter or maybe editor of the Getting >> Started guide?! >> g-) >> >> SIP wrote: >>> Oh don't worry. I won't take it the wrong way. I'll be the first to >>> tell you that the documentation for SER is pretty close to >>> unusable. But unfortunately, that's the way most open source >>> projects are. You have all these coding geniuses building them, and >>> all these systems geniuses testing them... and not a single one of >>> them remembers how to convey information to the rest of us. ;) >>> >>> What the project lacks is a full-time technical writer -- someone >>> whose job it is is to corner the developers and ask them what all of >>> this stuff means (in intricate detail) and not let them go until >>> they've fully explained all of it. Then he/she can take that >>> information and translate it into something human beings can >>> understand. >>> >>> This is one reason why good technical writers are expensive, and the >>> primary reason that most companies and projects 'make do' with >>> whatever they can find. >>> >>> If you know any good technical writers who might be willing to fly >>> off to Europe and ply some of the SER team with beer enough to get >>> them talking, we could most certainly use it. I'll pay for the beer. ;) >>> >>> N. >>> >>> >>> lists(a)infoway.net wrote: >>>> Excellent news. Thanks for the feedback. Overall, and please don't >>>> take this negatively, I think documentation for SER is difficult >>>> for beginners, so if we have to go through the learning curve >>>> anyway, we might as well do it in the newer version. >>>> >>>> Thanks again >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 8, 2007 5:04 pm, SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com> said: >>>> >>>> >>>>> For all intents and purposes, SER 2.0 (the new one) is ready for use. >>>>> The only thing it's really waiting on to be 'stable' is some better >>>>> documentation. However, it's best, if you're just getting >>>>> started, to >>>>> deploy with the new version and maybe muddle your way through a bit >>>>> until documentation is complete. >>>>> >>>>> N. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> lists(a)infoway.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We are planning on deploying a couple of SER servers and >>>>>> integrate them with >>>>>> either SEMS or Asterisk for voicemail. However, we are a bit >>>>>> confused as to which >>>>>> version of SER to go with? From what we can tell, the latest >>>>>> stable version is >>>>>> 0.9.6. However, we know of the new 0.10.X version. Reading up on >>>>>> the site, there >>>>>> is some documentation that explains a little bit of the >>>>>> differences and/or >>>>>> migration recommendations/steps. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, in an effort to keep life as simple as possible, which >>>>>> version should we work >>>>>> with? We are afraid that if we go through a learning cycle with >>>>>> 0.9.6 we're going >>>>>> to "suffer" when migrating to the new version, either because of >>>>>> the learning >>>>>> curve or because of a potential painful migration process. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any recommendations? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Serusers mailing list >>>>>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> > >

1 0

[Serusers] authentication
by Stefan Ljung (TN/EAB) 09 May '07

09 May '07

Im on ser 0.9.6. Om looking for a simple way to configure my SER to check that all INVITEs coming in on a specific IP interface are coming from clients that have a valid registration. I know about the ip.src check but how to do lookups with From: URIs in the registrar is beyond me. /Stefan

2 1

[Serusers] registrar module in ser rel 2_0_0 - errors in setting parameters
by tzieleniewski 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi, I am configuring registrar module and I get the following errors: 0(29188) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <desc_time_order> not found in module <registrar> 0(29188) parse error (88,19-20): Can't set module parameter when I try to set such module parameters: modparam("registrar", "desc_time_order", 1) modparam("registrar", "retry_after", 30) Are they still supported? Maybe under different name? Cheers Tomasz

2 1

[Serusers] tls module documentation not available
by tzieleniewski 09 May '07

09 May '07

Hi, The tls module documentation is unavailable page - http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/modules/tls. is it temporary?? Cheers Tomasz

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users