sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

10 participants
37461 discussions

Re: [Serusers] Variables in the Log command
by Jiri Kuthan 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

use xlog module for formattable logging. -jiri At 21:44 05/03/2008, Davis, Al wrote: >Content-Language: en-US >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_000_8F86FF097D265D4EB4D9D2F29DB00AA83F9797253DEXVMBX0152exc_" > > >Is there a way to output variables such as SIP_SRCIP and SIP_RURI to /var/log/messages using the log command? >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

[Serusers] Variables in the Log command
by Davis, Al 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Is there a way to output variables such as SIP_SRCIP and SIP_RURI to /var/log/messages using the log command?

1 0

Re: [Serusers] [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl")
by Stefan Sayer 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hello, Raphael Coeffic wrote: > Hi Srinivas, > > this is a very good question you are bringing! I forgot to describe these > aspects. So i will try to describe the experience we gathered in the last > weeks. > > binrpcctrl: > - increases signaling performance (100% according to Stefan's measurements) this is not correct, its much more: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/semsdev/2008-January/002015.html The relation is about 750 cps vs 80 cps, which is ~ 9 times performance increase. > - increases flexibility (all the informations passed between SER and SEMS are > configurable). > > sipctrl: > - increases signaling performance (80% against binrpcctrl according to > Stefan's measurements) I don't know where this figure comes from, it is as well much more (I said this: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/semsdev/2008-February/002221.html , 1000 cps on lo on a laptop, versus a quad xeon over lan). > - reduces configuration and run-time complexity > > Concerning the stability, it is clear that the next weeks as well as the > community will show us what those new control plug-in are worth. From my > knowledge i would say that we are close to completion for both new plug-ins. you can help by trying out your application with the new plugins and report any possible issues. > > Dropping the support does not mean that we will remove it from SVN, that just > means that future version should not use it. Existing installations are not > concerned by those measures. i.e. i would say it should be part of 1.0 release, but marked as deprecated. After that release I would move for removing it, in favor of more flexibility that new control plugins provide. Stefan > > Cheers > Raphael. > > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 15:08, Srinivas Kotamarti wrote: >> Hi Raphael, >> What are the advantages of binrpcctrl and sipctrl over the unixsockctrl? >> >> Has enough testing done on them? We are currently using SEMS with SER0.9.6 >> (with unixsockctrl) and it is working OK for us. IF we move to the >> binrpcctrl or sipctrl would we get a better performance? >> >> Thanks >> >> --Srinivas >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sems-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:sems-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On >> Behalf Of Raphael Coeffic Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:00 AM >> To: sems(a)lists.iptel.org >> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> Subject: [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl") >> >> >> Hi *! >> >> with the emergence of the binary RPC interface for SER2 ("binrcpctrl" >> plug-in), and SEMS' own sip stack ("sipctrl" plug-in), Stefan and I believe >> that the unix socket control interface is defeated. >> >> That's why we would like to know who is in favor of dropping support for >> the unix socket interface. >> >> Cheers and happy polling! >> >> Stefan & Raphael. >> _______________________________________________ >> Sems mailing list >> Sems(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems > -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services stefan.sayer(a)iptego.com www.iptego.com iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] Openser HA
by Cosimo Fadda 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi, I want to setup two openser in a HA enviroment; So, correct me if I'm wrong, I need three IP addresses, one for each box and a shared one, My question is, I have to set the advertised_address= <shared-IP> in both openser servers? Thanks in advance, Cosimo Fadda *Ing. Cosimo Fadda System Engineer Klarya s.r.l.* ____

3 5

Re: [Serusers] [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl")
by Srinivas Kotamarti 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi Raphael, What are the advantages of binrpcctrl and sipctrl over the unixsockctrl? Has enough testing done on them? We are currently using SEMS with SER0.9.6 (with unixsockctrl) and it is working OK for us. IF we move to the binrpcctrl or sipctrl would we get a better performance? Thanks --Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: sems-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:sems-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Raphael Coeffic Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:00 AM To: sems(a)lists.iptel.org Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl") Hi *! with the emergence of the binary RPC interface for SER2 ("binrcpctrl" plug-in), and SEMS' own sip stack ("sipctrl" plug-in), Stefan and I believe that the unix socket control interface is defeated. That's why we would like to know who is in favor of dropping support for the unix socket interface. Cheers and happy polling! Stefan & Raphael. _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list Sems(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Why every body return "404 Not Found" instead of "480 Not Available"?
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi, after a large discussion in sip-implementros maillist I realize that a proxy/location server shouldn't reply "404" if a callee DOES exist but it's not registered in that moment. In fact: 480 Temporarily Unavailable [...] This status is also returned by a redirect or proxy server that recognizes the user identified by the Request-URI, but does not currently have a valid forwarding location for that user. 404 Not Found The server has definitive information that the user does not exist at the domain specified in the Request-URI. [...] Why then every body suggest to reply "404 Not Found" when "lookup(location)" returns -1? For example, the "registrar" module doc suggests it: Example 1-22. lookup usage lookup("location"); switch ($?) { case -1: case -3: sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: sl_send_reply("405", "Not Found"); exit; }; Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

3 5

[Serusers] natural_event
by Pezhman Lali 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi Dear I have a problem, with my ser 0.9.6 server, as a sip server. the following results are with grandstream 487 or 287. about 30% of customers, can install the sip phone very easy with the first configuration. about 25%, can register after changing adsl router, or sip phone's configuration, about 15%, can register with another sip phones, like linksys, or. ... and about 30% can not using sip services. is it a natural event???? do u have any idea ???? best Pezhman ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

1 0

[Serusers] Installing serweb
by Adeyeye O. Michael 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi, With the recent development in PEAR Network, where XML_RPC isn't available any longer, has anyone been able to install serweb recently? I can't get XML_RPC package which is one of the requirements to get SERWEB running. Where I was able to get the raw files from PEAR but not ABLE to run "pear install XML_RPC", i can't make install and the likes. Hence, i doubt if XML_RPC will be successfully installed into my PEAR. Any help!! Mike.

2 1

[Serusers] meet at IETF and/or VoN
by Jiri Kuthan 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

FYI: I'm at the IETF meeting in the week of March/10th and at VoN in the week of March/17th. Drop me a note if you would like to meet whether for some SER/SIP related discussion or just a beer chat :-) -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

[Serusers] AVP/SELECT type / length in ser.cfg?
by Mike Trest - Personal 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

Hi, How can I reference the type and length attributes of a variable ( @set or $avp) ? ? ? ..mike..

4 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users