sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37453 discussions

[Kamailio-Users] free_fixup_function
by Julien mangeard 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

In the 1.4 release notes, I have read that: => new free fixup functions - making safer to use some functions exported by modules in embedded languages such as Perl I don't find any reference to "free_fixup_function" in the Perl module source code. Are you sure that this feature works for Perl module? Someone work on it? Best Regards, -- Julien Mangeard

5 8

[Serusers] Fw: 20080812 - Need help with configuring SER as a call forwarder server
by Morteza Alizadeh 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Dear Sir/Madam, My previous email has been held by your system due to its large volume. I removed the log file from it and resend it again. If you think, that logs of the SER would help you, please provide me the way to send it as well. Your help is much appreciated. --- Sincerely yours, Morteza Alizadeh Design Engineer Cell Phone: +60 (12)-319-7439 Email: malizadeh(a)emerj.com Morteza.Alizadeh(a)gmail.com Skype: mortezaalizadeh Block D-17-6, Gurney Height Condominium, Jalan Bukit Keramat, 54000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Morteza Alizadeh <malizadeh(a)e-merj.com> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Cc: vazirif(a)e-merj.com Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:09:35 AM Subject: 20080812 - Need help with configuring SER as a call forwarder server Dear Sir/Madam, I am trying to use and configure your SER in a manner to let us forward our landline calls to the public sip.broadvoice.com gateway. Unfortunately, I am completely mixed up with the way it should be setup. There are some questions that I would be really appreciated if you can answer them or forward it to a right person. Please consider that I have already fully configured your SER to handle internal IP call between SIP clients and also I tested the SER with the SIP clients which are behind NAT demonstrate its NAT module works fine. Here is my current setup parameter to access landline call: * SER IP address: 207.34.42.53 * SER domain: ubuntu-serv.emerj.net * SIP gateway: sip.broadvoice.com * Internal user ID: 10002 * BroadVoice contact: 7184122016 * Number wants to access through SER: 9178462343 What I have in my MySQL server is as follow: * Domain ubuntu-serv.emerj.net in table 'domain'. * User 10002 registered with domain ubuntu-serv.emerj.net in table 'subscriber'. The password for this account is the normal password I set for it in database. * User 7184122016 registered with domain sip.broadvoice.com in table 'subscriber'. The password for this account is the password has been given by BroadVoice to us. * Defined a record in table 'usr_preferences' contains the following information: +------+------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------------------+------+--------------------------------------------+ | uuid | username | domain | attribute | value | type | modified | +------+------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------------------+------+--------------------------------------------+ | | 9178462343 | | callfwd | sip:7184122016@sip.broadvoice.com | 0 | 2008-08-11 10:00:29 | +------+------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------------------+------+--------------------------------------------+ This is the information I am using for my call forwarding purpose. Whenever the user tries to dial 9178462343, this record blindly forward it to the BroadVoice.com. Here are my questions: 1. I monitored and captured the packet between SIP, SER and BroadVoice. For the normal call directly from SIP to BroadVoice and also between SIP client and SER, a kind of SIP REGISTER message is sent at initial time and it seems that all the rest messages is based on the session value that is initially exchanged. When I try to use my SER as a call forwarding server, and when my SIP client tries to dial, SER doesn't send REGISTER message for account to 7184122016 to the BroadVoice. I want to know whether it is possible for SER to do this REGISTER before sending INVITE message for 9178462343 or not. 1. Is the call forwarding is the correct solution for this issue or not? Maybe there are some other things that I am not aware of them due to I am really new to SER environment. 1. I also saw that SER doesn't overwrite the values of Contact, To, and From in the INVITE message properly and everything is sent to the BroadVoice with the values of the ubuntu-serv.emerj.net as a domain and also initial SIP contact that all of them are unknown for BroadVoice gateway. How should I tell SER to overwrite this values and keeps the track of the changes? I also attached my both ser.cfg and the logs of the SER with my email. I would be really appreciated if you assist me resolving this issue and helping me with any document or sample ser.cfg file showing me how to realize the idea. I am looking forward to you response. --- Sincerely yours, Morteza Alizadeh Design Engineer Cell Phone: +60 (12)-319-7439 Email: malizadeh(a)emerj.com Morteza.Alizadeh(a)gmail.com Skype: mortezaalizadeh Block D-17-6, Gurney Height Condominium, Jalan Bukit Keramat, 54000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] A function to add uri/header parameters
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi, for now, the "normal" way to detect if an in-dialog request/response beyonds to a natted dialog is by adding a uri parameter ("nat=yes") in the "Contact" header of the first request and response and macthing that parameter in the RURI of subsequent in-dialog requests. Typically this is done in this way: search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes'); Well, this mechanims (that is part of official OpenSer courses) is very RCF3261 non compliant: 1) In SIP a header field name is case insensitive but the above function wouldn't match a "CONTACT" of "contact" header names (even if they are 100% valid). 2) "Contact" header can appear abbreviated as "m" (or "M") but the above doesn't match it. 3) 1.1.1. Known Limitations search ignores folded lines. For example, search("(From|f):.*@foo.bar") doesn't match the following From header field: From: medabeda <sip:medameda@foo.bar>;tag=1234 A solution for points 1 and 2 could be using "subst" with insensitive flag enabled, but it could be very anti-friendly. So I wonder: wouldn't be useful a good funtion to add/read/remove header and uri parameters (in any header or uri) being RFC 3261 compliant (this is: case insensitive and allowing header name abbreviations)? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

2 4

[Kamailio-Users] ISN routing
by Krunal Patel 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi, I would like to implement isn routing in openser. I am new to isn routing. Please help me if anybody of you have idea about isn routing. Thanking in advance - Krunal Patel

3 2

[Kamailio-Users] ERROR:presence:mod_init: 1Wrong version v-1 for table <presentity>, need v2
by mahesh.peddi＠info-spectrum.com 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi All, I am working on Openser 1.3.2 version with no_tls support. When i include "modparam("presence", "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser")" for the presence and run openserctl moni i am getting the error as ERROR: Error opening OpenSER's FIFO /tmp/openser_fifo ERROR: Make sure you have the line 'modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo")' in your config ERROR: and also have loaded the mi_fifo module. And the errors in /var/log/messages Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:table_version: invalid type (2) or nul (0) version columns for presentity Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:presence:mod_init: 1Wrong version v-1 for table <presentity>, need v2 Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module presence Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:main: error while initializing modules Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: NOTICE:presence:destroy: destroy module ... Aug 10 10:01:01 rhel4 crond(pam_unix)[5552]: session opened for user root by (uid=0) Aug 10 10:01:01 rhel4 crond(pam_unix)[5552]: session closed for user root And when i check in the data base its showing the version as mysql> select * from version where table_name="presentity" ; +------------+---------------+ | table_name | table_version | +------------+---------------+ | presentity | 2 | +------------+---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) Please help me how to resolve this. And as mention in the forums i modify the res.c as below shows even i am facing the same error. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Index: modules/mysql/res.c===================================================================--- modules/mysql/res.c (revision 4448)+++ modules/mysql/res.c (working copy)@@ -103,7 +103,10 @@ break; default:- RES_TYPES(_r)[i] = DB_STRING;+ LM_WARN("unhandled data type column (%.*s) type id (%d), "+ "use DB_STRING as default\n", RES_NAMES(_r)[col]->len,+ RES_NAMES(_r)[col]->s, fields[col].type);+ RES_TYPES(_r)[col] = DB_STRING; break; } }--------------------------------------------------------------------------------I am enclosing my "openser.cfg" and "openserctlrc"Regards,Mahesh PeddiInfospectrum India Pvt. Ltd.Cell: +91 9765775176IP-Phone Ext. - 764

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] naming of open source projects
by Klaus Darilion 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi! I really do not understand why so many people think that the name should include the word "open" or should somehow include parts of the protocol (SIP) or its usage (server, proxy ...). If I take a look at very successful open source projects they do not follow this, e.g. Apache, Eclipse, Pidgin, Wireshark, Asterisk, Tomcat, Boost ... regards Klaus

3 2

Re: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name
by luzango mfupe 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

"Free to Talk" Not bad at all i bet most of us here would prefer an English name!!! Why Kamailio is bad??? relax guys u will be able to pronounce it well soon... My choice iiis numberrr 2. On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:31 PM, <users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Send Users mailing list submissions to > users(a)lists.kamailio.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name (Klaus Darilion) > 2. Re: poll: project name (Yazid Hadj Said) > 3. Re: poll: project name (Ardjan Zwartjes) > 4. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name (David Villasmil) > 5. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name ( I?aki Baz Castillo ) > 6. Re: poll: project name (Carsten Bock) > 7. Re: poll: project name (Alex Balashov) > 8. Re: poll: project name (Johansson Olle E) > 9. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name (David Villasmil) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:39:29 +0200 > From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name > To: miconda(a)gmail.com > Cc: users <users(a)lists.kamailio.net>, devel <devel(a)lists.kamailio.net> > Message-ID: <48A024F1.5030105(a)pernau.at> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > speaking as user: > 1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it. > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb: > > Hello everybody, > > > > some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would > > like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get > > us to a decision. Here is the question: > > > > Do you like the name "Kamailio"? > > 1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it. > > 2) It is OK. > > 3) I do not mind the name at all > > 4) I do not like it > > 5) I hate the name and we should change it > > > > There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and > > decision. Just vote by option. > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > > PS. for those interested... > > > > As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board > > was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily > > find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed > > about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old > > name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred > > by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what > > should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the > > discussion about the new name with two main direction, something > > similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new, > > to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding > > possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the > > start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have > > opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the > > 28th of July. > > > > All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No > > change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with > > kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported > > to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was > > about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being > > practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to > > do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all > > agreed with the new name. > > > > As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no > > change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the > > knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when > > majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were > > pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:52:02 +0200 > From: "Yazid Hadj Said" <yazid.hadjsaid(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name > To: users(a)lists.kamailio.net > Message-ID: > <8dfa8c1a0808110452w274cb206te3160cbe4dd8fd2(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi all, > > > >Do you like the name "Kamailio"? > >1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it. > >2) It is OK. > >3) I do not mind the name at all > >4) I do not like it > >5) I hate the name and we should change it > > I do not like it. > I think that at least the word "Open" must be included in the new name > > > Regards > Yazid >

1 0

Re: [Kamailio-Users] simple question: log 180, 200 responses
by Yazid Hadj Said 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi Ali, I think that you must call : if(status=="180") { xlog("this is a 180 Ringing reply"); }; if(status=="200") { xlog("this is a 200 OK reply"); }; in the onreply_route, note in tne route function

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] simple question: log 180, 200 responses
by Ali Soltani 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi, I am using openSER as a simple sip proxy for calls between two sip end-points. By snooping the traffic I can verify that the openSER proxies ALL sip messages/responses but non of the following log statements do not log the response messages (180, 200). Am I missing anything. route { xlog("(route) usr=$ru method=$rm request_port=$rp received_port=$Rp original port=$op destination_port=$dp src_port=$sp"); xlog("(route) reply_status=$rs"); if(status=="180") { xlog("this is a 180 Ringing reply"); }; if(status=="200") { xlog("this is a 200 OK reply"); }; ..... } Thanks,

2 1

Re: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name
by Yazid Hadj Said 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Hi all, >Do you like the name "Kamailio"? >1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it. >2) It is OK. >3) I do not mind the name at all >4) I do not like it >5) I hate the name and we should change it I do not like it. I think that at least the word "Open" must be included in the new name Regards Yazid

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users