sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37453 discussions

Re: [Kamailio-Users] project foundation
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hello, On 08/12/08 16:39, Adam Linford wrote: > Good stuff! > > I think that, for the most part, the business and technical facets of > the organisation should remain fairly distinct. The board needs > representation with regards to technical direction (and should have > this input from the organisations official 'members' under my > understanding of the current proposal), but its purpose should be to > keep developers free to code, and users free to use, safe in the > knowledge that resources will be made available (where neccessary) for > the project to achieve its objectives (both long and short term). yes, there are going to be no restrictions in usage or coding, but have an organization with legal framework behind that can take care of trademarks, manage resources and administration of the project. > > We could make non-executive positions on the board available. A good suggestion. > These should be unbiased people.. perhaps invite some big names in the > SIP field, that can provide an independent review of the boards > activities, as well as assisting the board in its role. This is a > tried and tested directorial structure that would also appeal to the > corporate world, which in turn might make it easier to achieve > corporate sponsorship/contributions/membership (as well as adoption of > the software in industry!). > > I don't think an executive committee is needed within the board.. the > board itself should suffice. If it doesn't, we don't have the right > board. I would suggest keeping the main board size small (5-8) to > keep it agile whilst maintaining good representation of members I think would be good to have some clear positions so people should know who to address to when comes to dealing with the foundation. Also, by this, people can allocate the proper time in their schedule for the tasks. We may avoid in this way some members expecting the others to do some work. > > Election rules need discussing.. duration of term for board and also > the achievement of 'member' status.. we dont want potential developers > discouraged from working with us in the traditional open source model > because they would have too much responsibility placed on them to be > 'active members'. Being an active member is just free will. But we want to avoid being a member with voting right just by paying some money. That meber should show interest and contribute to the project in a positive manner. Indeed, this needs to be addressed. > > Frequency of meetings etc are all relatively easy decisions that can > be deferred to the board once i elected. Yes, I believe the same. Cheers, Daniel > > Cheers, > Adam > > On 12 Aug 2008, at 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I think it is the time to move forward with project management >> structure. During last days there were talks and discussions on the >> lists, the solution to make the project independent and long term >> trustable is to create a foundation. >> >> We made a draft of purpose and organization structure and we want to get >> your comments. >> >> http://www.kamailio.net/dokuwiki/doku.php/admin:foundation-draft >> >> For the statute we are looking at similar cases of foundations around >> open source projects. Considering the developer population and >> contributors, I find as good and reliable place to register the >> foundation to be Germany. >> >> There is still long way to go and a lot to discuss: >> >> * >> >> membership fees >> >> * >> >> how one can become a full member (associate member can be anyone >> that is friend of the project and pays the membership fee) >> >> * >> >> how a member loses the board or full member rights >> >> * >> >> how the board is supervised >> >> o >> >> when and how the reports of the board are presented >> >> o >> >> when and how the general assembly meeting takes place >> >> o >> >> how the reports are approved by full members >> >> * >> >> how to change the statute over time >> >> ... and perhaps more, but if we start and put some effort we can have it >> ready in reasonable time, avoiding trust and reliability issues in long >> term. >> >> Let's have debates here and contribute the results to the wiki. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://www.asipto.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] branch_route not always called
by Alex Hermann 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hello again, The uac_replace_from issue led me to another problem. The branch_route is not always called even though I set it using t_on_branch everytime from REQUEST_ROUTE and FAILURE_ROUTE. The failing scenario is as follows: The call is routed to 2 domains (A,B) each with 2 SRV records (1,2). t_on_branch relay domainA branch domainA-1 - timeout branch domainA-2 - 480 failure route append_branch t_on_branch relay domainB branch domainB-1 - timeout branch domainB-2 - 200 OK ==> this branch doesn't call the branch_route Any idea's ? -- Greetings, Alex Hermann

2 3

[Serusers] problem error SER
by Bimantara Jayadiputro 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

hello sir i'm bimbim, student from indonesia now i'm trying to finish my final project my final project is about SER i have trouble with that when i start /etc/init.d/ser start there is an error with assigning addres below is the configuration of my ser ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ cnc9@cnc9-desktop:/var/run/ser$ sudo /etc/init.d/ser start Starting ser: serListening on udp: 10.14.200.95 [10.14.200.95]:5060 udp: 2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:1 [2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:1]:5060 udp: sip4.sipv6.net [10.14.200.101]:5060 udp: sip6.sipv6.net [2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:2]:5060 tcp: 10.14.200.95 [10.14.200.95]:5060 tcp: 2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:1 [2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:1]:5060 tcp: sip4.sipv6.net [10.14.200.101]:5060 tcp: sip6.sipv6.net [2001:660:4701:1:0:0:0:2]:5060 Aliases: tcp: localhost:5060 tcp: cnc9-desktop.local:5060 udp: localhost:5060 udp: cnc9-desktop.local:5060 stateless - initializing 0(0) . cnc9@cnc9-desktop:/var/run/ser$ Maxfwd module- initializing textops - initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 109568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 219136 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 109568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 219136 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 109568 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 219136 * 0(0) ERROR: udp_init: bind(6, 0x80f8d7c, 16) on 10.14.200.101: Cannot assign requested address* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ i also attached my ser.cfg i hope you can help me resolve this problem thank you

3 2

[Kamailio-Users] uac_replace_from and lumps again
by Alex Hermann 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hello, i'm still fighting with the very annoying lump model that OpenSER uses. I need to send out INVITE's with different From headers in a failover situation. More specifically I need to send out each step -original request and failure_routes- with a different From header. If any request forks (parallel or serial due to DNS SRV or registered contacts), it needs to keep current (same) the replacement From on all branches. I tried the following: try 1: REQUEST_ROUTE: uac_replace_from(a) t_relay(); FAILURE_ROUTE: append_branch() uac_replace_from(b) t_relay() the second uac_replace_from always produces garbage in the From try 2: REQUEST_ROUTE: t_newtran() uac_replace_from(a) t_relay(); FAILURE_ROUTE: append_branch() uac_replace_from(b) t_relay() Now the second uac_replace_from is correct, but when the first t_relay() does dns based failover, the original from is used for the second branch instead of the replacement. If the response code is locally generated 408, the second uac_replace_from produces garabage too. Is someone aware of a working solution for this (very common) situation? -- Greetings, Alex Hermann

4 5

[Kamailio-Users] Need Help Configuring OpenSer with OpenXCAP
by Noble Antony T 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hi, I could configure Openser as RLS, and installed OpenXCAP. I wanted to use OpenXCAP with EyeBeam Client. (version 1.5.10.2 build 33793) OpenXCAP is giving the following error. Invalid Document Selector xcap-root(a)192.168.176.150/pres-rules/users/user1/presrules (the Document Selector context must be 'users' or 'global': 'pres-rules') Invalid Document Selector xcap-root(a)192.168.176.150/resource-lists/users/user1/resource-list.xml (the Document Selector context must be 'users' or 'global': 'resource-lists') Invalid Document Selector xcap-root(a)192.168.176.150/pres-rules/users/user1/presrules (the Document Selector context must be 'users' or 'global': 'pres-rules') Invalid Document Selector xcap-root(a)192.168.176.150/resource-lists/users/user1/resource-list.xml (the Document Selector context must be 'users' or 'global': 'resource-lists') UE is getting 404 Error. It seems the OpenXCAP is expecting 'users' or 'global' instead of 'resource-lists'. Can somebody please point out, if I am missing something..? I am attaching my Config Files along with this. Somebody please help me... -- Thanks & Regards, Noble Antony Thattil.

1 1

[Kamailio-Users] fr_inv_timer increased to 120 secs
by Kaeman Chris 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hello, What are the problems in production that can be encountered if the fr_inv_timer is increased from 30-45 secs to 120 secs for a sip-sip call? Anyone have found any issues? Thanks! KC --------------------------------- Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now

5 7

Re: [Kamailio-Users] ERROR:presence:mod_init: 1Wrong version v-1 for table <presentity>, need v2
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Hello, On 08/12/08 10:30, mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your prompt reply.The output of "show create > table version" is as follows > > +---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | Table | Create Table | > +---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | version | CREATE TABLE `version` ( > `table_name` varchar(32) NOT NULL, > `table_version` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0' > ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 | > +---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > 1 row in set (0.03 sec) > > Kindly guide me on this. the table structure is ok. Could you make sure the mysql module is compiled again if you updated libraries or so. I was pointed that there was a change in naming the INT type in mysql libraries -- maybe others on the list can jump quicker here with a yes or no. Cheers, Daniel > > Thank you, > > > Regards, > Mahesh Peddi > Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. > Cell: +91 9765775176 > IP-Phone Ext. - 764 > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > <miconda(a)gmail.com> > To: <mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com> > Cc: <users(a)lists.kamailio.org> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 9:41 PM > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] ERROR:presence:mod_init: 1Wrong version > v-1 for table <presentity>, need v2 > > >> Hello, >> >> please post the output of: >> >> show create table version >> >> in the mysql client. The errors shows some issue with the column type. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 08/11/08 17:12, mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am working on Openser 1.3.2 version with no_tls support. >>> When i include >>> "modparam("presence", >>> "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser")" >>> >>> for the presence and run openserctl moni i am getting the error as >>> >>> ERROR: Error opening OpenSER's FIFO /tmp/openser_fifo >>> ERROR: Make sure you have the line 'modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", >>> "/tmp/openser_fifo")' in your config >>> ERROR: and also have loaded the mi_fifo module. >>> >>> And the errors in /var/log/messages >>> >>> Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:table_version: >>> invalid type (2) or nul (0) version columns for presentity >>> Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:presence:mod_init: 1Wrong >>> version v-1 for table <presentity>, need v2 >>> Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to >>> initialize module presence >>> Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: ERROR:core:main: error while >>> initializing modules >>> Aug 10 09:37:41 rhel4 openser[5530]: NOTICE:presence:destroy: >>> destroy module ... >>> Aug 10 10:01:01 rhel4 crond(pam_unix)[5552]: session opened for user >>> root by (uid=0) >>> Aug 10 10:01:01 rhel4 crond(pam_unix)[5552]: session closed for user >>> root >>> >>> And when i check in the data base its showing the version as >>> >>> mysql> select * from version where table_name="presentity" ; >>> +------------+---------------+ >>> | table_name | table_version | >>> +------------+---------------+ >>> | presentity | 2 | >>> +------------+---------------+ >>> 1 row in set (0.00 sec) >>> >>> Please help me how to resolve this. >>> And as mention in the forums i modify the res.c as below shows even >>> i am facing the same error. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Index: >>> modules/mysql/res.c===================================================================--- >>> >>> modules/mysql/res.c (revision 4448)+++ modules/mysql/res.c (working >>> copy)@@ -103,7 +103,10 @@ break; default:- RES_TYPES(_r)[i] = >>> DB_STRING;+ LM_WARN("unhandled data type column (%.*s) type id (%d), >>> "+ "use DB_STRING as default\n", RES_NAMES(_r)[col]->len,+ >>> RES_NAMES(_r)[col]->s, fields[col].type);+ RES_TYPES(_r)[col] = >>> DB_STRING; break; } >>> }--------------------------------------------------------------------------------I >>> am enclosing my "openser.cfg" and "openserctlrc"Regards,Mahesh >>> PeddiInfospectrum India Pvt. Ltd.Cell: +91 9765775176IP-Phone Ext. >>> - 764 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://www.asipto.com >> >> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

2 1

Re: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name
by Helmut Kuper 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Klaus, Of course I agree. It's a matter of time to know what Kamailio stand for. I think Apache is a nicer name than Kamailio, but anyway: I agree the name is mainly a question of personal taste and currently I don't like that taste - nevertheless, I think the name should be changed to a more handy one, just to round up the whole product. And sure: The name won't stop telcos from using the Software rather that project structure, roadmap and quality. regards and peace Helmut Klaus Darilion schrieb: | Helmut Kuper wrote: |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Hm, |> |> well, maybe I have to make it a bit more clear what I meant. Kamailio is |> pronounceable in german, but it is not easy in terms of smoothyness - |> like openser was or freeswitch is ... |> |> KAMAILIO hmmm no, not with the best will in the world: I have problems |> with it to say it without explaining what that name points to. I think |> it is not a good name to inspire confidence. Maybe it needs a slogan to |> explain a bit more :D | | IMO this is all a matter of time. Would you think that Apache is a web | server and Eclipse is an IDE and Asterisk is an IP PBX? Me not. But now, | if you tell one of these names to an IT guy they know what you are | talking about. Thus, in my opinion, we just need some trust in the | product - I do not believe the argument that telcos will use open source | only if the name indicates open/free/SIP.... Nobody uses a product just | because of its name. | | But I have to accept that others don't like name ...:-( | | regards | klaus | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkihQDkACgkQ4tZeNddg3dwrJgCdENGNK/PAid+ftRtvgUFyP9hY ZXAAoJ5ErmBLbKuxTRvp6WmWzudI1BS9 =cyPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Identifying branch in ONREPLY-ROUTE?
by Alex Balashov 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

What is the simplest way to identify the branch (by branch index) to which a reply belongs in an ONREPLY-ROUTE? I have parallel forking with my registrar and do passive call statekeeping. The problem is that it must be branch-aware; I need to know if, for example, I got a successful provisional reply on one branch of the call and a failure on the other, and deal with those separately. Right now my statekeeping information is keyed by Call-ID, but since that persists across two branches, obviously some sort of branch-identifying information has to be present. I've tried setting a persistent variable to the value of $T_branch_idx inside a BRANCH-ROUTE, but in ONREPLY-ROUTE that just shows up with the most recent branch index, regardless of which branch the reply actually came in on. I'm probably missing something quite obvious here, so I ask - how do I incorporate some form of branch awareness into ONREPLY-ROUTEs? I really do not care what form that is - be it branch index, or some other built-in value, as long as it is consistent. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

4 11

Re: [Kamailio-Users] simple question: log 180, 200 responses
by Alex Balashov 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

Ali Soltani wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for the response. > > I tried to use onreply_route block in the main route as well as in > route1 as follow but still can not log response messages (180, 200, ..) > > route > { > t_on_reply("1"); > ... > } > > route[1] > { > if (is_method("INVITE")) > { > t_on_reply("1"); > } > ... > } > > onreply_route[1] > { > xlog("(onreplyroute1) usr=$ru method=$rm request_port=$rp > received_port=$Rp original port=$op destination_port=$dp src_port=$sp"); > } You can only have one reply route per request. If you specify multiple ones, only the last one will take effect. The problem in this case is that route[1] will never be called. Here's what you want: route { if(is_method("INVITE")) t_on_reply("1"); } onreply_route[1] { ... } -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users