sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

20 participants
37472 discussions

[Kamailio-Users] Problems with CDRTool installation!
by Nuno Marques 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi, I'm trying to follow the INSTALL.txt of the CDRTool to accomplish a nice installation of OpenSER 1.3.2 + Mediaproxy + SerMyAdmin + Asterisk + CDRTool + FreeRadius. All went well until i started CDRTool installation... it's a little confusing for a newbie like me but... all the steps of the installation seem to went well. When i go to the browser to look for the CDRTool portal it gives me this error: Database error: pconnect as cdradmin to sipdb failed. Session halted. I thought it was a mysql users problem... so i went to the shell and tried to enter mysql with login and password for cdradmin, and... No problem. It worked fine. Mysql accepted the user login/password. Is there someone who can tell me where can i look for errors... I'm really stuck on this part... Thanks in advance, Nuno

2 9

[Kamailio-Users] draft sip-outbound
by paulo leonardo 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi, I would like to know if kamailio implements draft sip-outbound? Can i use draft sip-outbound? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-15 thanks!

2 1

Re: [Kamailio-Users] kamailio with tls
by Klaus Darilion 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

(cc'ed to the mailinglist) ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co schrieb: > Enable TLS in Kamailio is only for connection between other Kamailio > (SIP Proxy Servers), it doesn't have anything to do with UA, or am I > wrong? . As I understand, you can not implement TLS between UA's and > Kamailio. Of course you can. If the SIP client supports TLS you can also use TLS between UA and Kamailio - no problem. I use it with eyebeam clients and SNOM phones. Also pjsip supports TLS, for example you can test it using QjSimple. http://www.ipcom.at/index.php?id=560 regards klaus > > ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Klaus Darilion > <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> Fecha: Viernes, Octubre 24, 2008 11:04 > am Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] kamailio with tls > >> >> paulo leonardo schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like a litle help :D! >>> >>> I installed kamailio and everything is ok :D! But i want to use >> TLS, but >>> when i setup TLS in kamailio, don't work the REGISTER (i can't >> register >>> my sofphone ...). And i compliled kamilio with TLS!!! when i >> comment the >>> cofigurantion TLS and use port 5060 works! >> >> So, "what" does not work? >> >> - Does Kamailio start (ps -Alf|grep kamailio)? - Does K listen to >> the specified TLS socket (netstat -anp|grep kama)? - which client >> do you use? - is a TCP connection set up? - is a TLS handshake >> happening (ssldump)? - what is in the logfile of Kamailio? ..... >> >> Your error description is to short! >> >> regards klaus >> >> >> >> >>> below is my configuration >>> >>> ----------------------------------------- disable_tls = no listen >>> = tls:192.168.170.101:5061 <http://192.168.170.101:5061> >>> tls_verify_server = 1 tls_verify_client = 1 >>> tls_require_client_certificate = 1 tls_method = TLSv1 >>> tls_certificate = >>> "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls/user/user-cert.pem" tls_private_key >>> = "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls/user/user- >> privkey.pem"> tls_ca_list >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >>> if (!www_authorize("192.168.170.101 <http://192.168.170.101>", >>> "subscriber")) { www_challenge("192.168.170.101 >> <http://192.168.170.101>", "0"); >>> exit; } >>> >>> ---------------------------------------- >>> >>> root@pst:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# ls -R tls/ tls/: ca.conf >>> README request.conf rootCA user user.conf >>> >>> tls/rootCA: cacert.pem certs index.txt private serial >>> >>> tls/rootCA/certs: >>> >>> tls/rootCA/private: cakey.pem >>> >>> tls/user: user-calist.pem user-cert.pem user-cert_req.pem >>> user-privkey.pem >>> >>> >>> thanks!!! >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> ------ >>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing >>> list Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] kamailio with tls
by paulo leonardo 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi, I would like a litle help :D! I installed kamailio and everything is ok :D! But i want to use TLS, but when i setup TLS in kamailio, don't work the REGISTER (i can't register my sofphone ...). And i compliled kamilio with TLS!!! when i comment the cofigurantion TLS and use port 5060 works! below is my configuration ----------------------------------------- disable_tls = no listen = tls:192.168.170.101:5061 tls_verify_server = 1 tls_verify_client = 1 tls_require_client_certificate = 1 tls_method = TLSv1 tls_certificate = "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls/user/user-cert.pem" tls_private_key = "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls/user/user-privkey.pem" tls_ca_list --------------------------------------- if (!www_authorize("192.168.170.101", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("192.168.170.101", "0"); exit; } ---------------------------------------- root@pst:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# ls -R tls/ tls/: ca.conf README request.conf rootCA user user.conf tls/rootCA: cacert.pem certs index.txt private serial tls/rootCA/certs: tls/rootCA/private: cakey.pem tls/user: user-calist.pem user-cert.pem user-cert_req.pem user-privkey.pem thanks!!!

2 1

[Serusers] Asterisk -> SER one way audio call issue
by Thorsten 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi guys does someone have experience about the interaction of asterisk and SER. I have a strange behavior. I terminate a call from an Asterisk to SER and then to a interconnection partner which runs also on asterisk. Whenever I make a call after a long (3-5 mins) idle time I got a one way audio call because the interconnection partner sends it back to SER instead of asterisk. But the call after works like a charm. And this happens all the time. This is my SER config # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=4 debug=2 fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=82.98.89.140:5060 port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/avpops.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/group.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/xlog.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/ser/current/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="ACK") { route(1); break; } if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); break; }; # only forward if from our nat ip if (method=="INVITE" && (src_ip==82.98.89.146 || src_ip==82.98.89.147 || src_ip==82.98.89.129)) { #record_route(); if (uri =~ "sip:[0-9]*@*") { #record_route(); route(3); break; } } else { sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); }; if (method=="CANCEL") { route(1); break; }; if (method=="BYE") { route(1); break; } lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } route[3] { # strip the first 4 characters 1991 #strip(4); #rewritehost("62.134.16.104"); rewritehostport("62.134.16.104:5060"); #t_relay_to_udp("62.134.16.104", "5060"); xlog("L_WARN", "[%Tf]: Call forwarded to BT from: [%fu] to: [%tu] next: [%ds]\r\n"); route(1); break; } The asterisk dialplan looks like this ; route everything to SER exten => _X.,1,Noop(${SIP_HEADER(FROM)}) exten => _X.,n,Set(SIP_CODEC="gsm") exten => _X.,n,Dial(sip/${EXTEN}(a)82.98.89.140) exten => _X.,n,Hangup() The asterisk server has the public IP 82.98.89.146 and SER 82.98.89.140. BT which is our interconnection partner has the IP 62.134.16.104. Could someone help me with this? Thanks Ciao Thorsten Kohlhepp

1 0

[Serusers] registrar: interesting, however rare, bug..
by Alexandre Snarskii 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi! This week we saw interesing problem with one of our clients: initially he was not able to configure his CCME to register on our proxy, so we just added static location serctl ul add ..., that's our classic workaround for CCME and another not-so-smart admins. But when he finally configured registration - things gone nuts: clients asks for registration: Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:29 GMT Timestamp: 1224854189 CSeq: 2905600 REGISTER Contact: <sip:NNNNNNN@AA.BBB.CCC.DD:5060> Expires: 3600 Authorization: Digest .... and ser replies with 200 OK, but with Contact: field filled with his static registration: Contact: <sip:NNNNNNN@AA.BBB.CCC.DD>;q=1;expires=4293498731;received="" As you can see, expires value is 4293498731, which means that it will be valid for about 136 years, just sixteen days short than 2^32 seconds... So, by RFC, client's router should wait for ~100 years before attempting registration refresh :) But CCME, i suppose, thinks different, it just adds received expires value to current time, got uint32 overflow and result is now()-16 days. As a result CCME thinks that registration is always expired and tries to re-register immediately... And does so hundredths times per second, creating unnecessary extra load to our proxy and database backend.... Why that is so: modules/registrar/reply.c calculates expires= as int2str((int)(c->expires - act_time), &len) but, c->expires can be less than act_time, so, result will be negative integer (translated to unsigned int on call to int2str, and this unsigned int will have higher bit set on, so it will be big one). Well, there are check if(VALID_CONTACT(c, act_time)) which filters out most of the cases where с->expires <= act_time, but for 'static' registrations these checks are off: ((c->expires > act_time) || (c->flags & FL_PERMANENT)) is always true in case of 'static' contact because of FL_PERMANENT. For now I fixed it with following patch (not perfect, i suppose, it just uses default_expires value for negative expires time, but it was easy to write and it works for me): --- reply.c.orig Thu Jan 13 11:48:08 2005 +++ reply.c Fri Oct 24 14:08:13 2008 @@ -163,7 +163,11 @@ memcpy(p, EXPIRES_PARAM, EXPIRES_PARAM_LEN); p += EXPIRES_PARAM_LEN; - cp = int2str((int)(c->expires - act_time), &len); + if (c->expires > act_time) { + cp = int2str((int)(c->expires - act_time), &len); + } else { + cp = int2str(default_expires, &len); + } memcpy(p, cp, len); p += len; Environment: ser-0.9.6/i386/FreeBSD (ser-2.0 has the same code, so it may be affected too). The only tuning of usrloc and registrar modules is db_url and dbmode = 2.

1 0

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 68
by Mian M Asif 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Dear Abalashov, What do you mean by "no[t] getting any response? is mean this function is not working please let me know i am doing right or wrong, dear Arif, exit also is not working cheers :). regards, Asif > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Architecture with load-balancing (dispatcher module) > (Ovidiu Sas) > 2. i want to stop second registration request if user already > registered (Mian M Asif) > 3. Re: i want to stop second registration request if user > already registered (Alex Balashov) > 4. Re: i want to stop second registration request if user > already registered (arif.zaman) > 5. Re: Anyone doing CNAM lookups? (Klaus Darilion) > 6. Kamailio v1.4.2 Released (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:49:21 +0500 > From: "Mian M Asif" <asif44pk(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [Kamailio-Users] i want to stop second registration request > if user already registered > To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org > Message-ID: > <b005c33b0810230749v1b00bf9auabb97cfc17e517c6(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi All, > i want to stop second registration request if use already registered i > am using below code but getting no any response. please help me how to > solve this problem. > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > if (registered("location") ) { > xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: lookup(location) Passed\n"); > sl_send_reply("699", "User Not Found"); > return; > } > route(2); > return; > > route[2] { > > # ----------------------------------------------------------------- > # REGISTER Message Handler > # ---------------------------------------------------------------- > xlog("L_NOTICE","Danish: Entering route[2]\n"); > # if (registered("location")) { > # xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: lookup(location) failed\n"); > # sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); > # return; > # }; > > xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: Register message IPsrcaddr [$si], > RecvdIPaddr[$Ri]\n"); > if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("2")) { > xlog("L_NOTICE","Danish: In route[2] Found Nated contact\n"); > setflag(6); > setbflag(6); > # if you want OPTIONS natpings uncomment next > setbflag(7); > fix_nated_register(); > force_rport(); > }; > > sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); > > if (!radius_www_authorize("abc.com")) { > www_challenge("abc.com", "1"); > }; > consume_credentials(); > > if (!save("location")) { > sl_reply_error(); > }; > > } > } > > regards, > Asif > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:51:30 -0400 > From: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] i want to stop second registration > request if user already registered > To: Mian M Asif <asif44pk(a)gmail.com> > Cc: users(a)lists.kamailio.org > Message-ID: <49008F72.1060700(a)evaristesys.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > What do you mean by "no[t] getting any response?" > > Mian M Asif wrote: > >> Hi All, >> i want to stop second registration request if use already registered i >> am using below code but getting no any response. please help me how to >> solve this problem. >> >> if (method=="REGISTER") { >> if (registered("location") ) { >> xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: lookup(location) Passed\n"); >> sl_send_reply("699", "User Not Found"); >> return; >> } >> route(2); >> return; >> >> route[2] { >> >> # ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> # REGISTER Message Handler >> # ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> xlog("L_NOTICE","Danish: Entering route[2]\n"); >> # if (registered("location")) { >> # xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: lookup(location) failed\n"); >> # sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); >> # return; >> # }; >> >> xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: Register message IPsrcaddr [$si], >> RecvdIPaddr[$Ri]\n"); >> if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("2")) { >> xlog("L_NOTICE","Danish: In route[2] Found Nated contact\n"); >> setflag(6); >> setbflag(6); >> # if you want OPTIONS natpings uncomment next >> setbflag(7); >> fix_nated_register(); >> force_rport(); >> }; >> >> sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); >> >> if (!radius_www_authorize("abc.com")) { >> www_challenge("abc.com", "1"); >> }; >> consume_credentials(); >> >> if (!save("location")) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> >> } >> } >> >> regards, >> Asif >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > -- > Alex Balashov > Evariste Systems > Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ > Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 > Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 > Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:59:45 -0700 (PDT) > From: "arif.zaman" <arif.zaman(a)brotecs.com> > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] i want to stop second registration > request if user already registered > To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org > Message-ID: <20132764.post(a)talk.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > Mian M Asif wrote: >> >> if (method=="REGISTER") { >> if (registered("location") ) { >> xlog("L_NOTICE","Asif: lookup(location) Passed\n"); >> sl_send_reply("699", "User Not Found"); >> return; >> } >> > > Use "exit;" instead of "return;". > > Cheers, > ARIF >

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Anyone doing CNAM lookups?
by Brian McCrary 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

I've been using OpenSER 1.0.1 for the past couple of years, but I now need to add CNAM lookups. It looks like the presence module might be what I need, although from the looks if it, it's made to respond to lookups, instead of actually generate a query to another server for a lookup. I'm looking at doing CNAM lookups with Verisign which look to interface with a SUBSCRIBE message, in which in return Verising sends back a NOTIFY message with one of the fields being "calling-name" which has the CNAM info in it. Has anyone been succesful in implementing such a lookup with Verisign or another CNAM database provider? Brian

3 8

[Serusers] SER without any fork(), It is possible?
by Samuel Ayet San Andres 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi all, I´m trying to use SER (SIP Express Router) in a linux enbedded system with uClinux. In my enbedded processor i dont have any MMU so it cant fork(), it uses vfork() that is a cousin of fork but diferent because qhen father vfork a child, stops until the child make execve() or exit. When I run SER on my embedded plataform in a debug mode it shows me: ERROR: main_loop can´t fork(); Then I try to chage all forks for vfork() but it still not working due to the childs never make execve(). And after the explain of the context, here is the question: can I run SER without any child? Can I run SER without making any fork? I mean that only ONE process (witout deamonize) will run alone. I don´t need to manage more than 1 call...I only want to have one process listening to ONE IP. I have try to change the configuration of the ser 'ser.cfg' asi show: fork=no childrens=0 But still without working and i´m not sure if this is the right way to run SER without forking... Thank you for you support. Samuel. --

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] presence network Agent
by suresh tattikota 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi all I am working on Presence network Agent. please let me know any one is working on the same . thank you all suresh

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users