sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

18 participants
37469 discussions

[Kamailio-Users] reducing T1 timer per route
by Juan Perez 16 Apr '09

16 Apr '09

hello I am using lcr and have 3 gws that I send the calls to, so far I am handling error responses using "on_failure_route" and calling the next_gw function and it is working fine. But in cases when 1 of those gws is disconnnected or super busy and a 100 Trying is not received in the first 3 - 5 seconds I would like to drop that call and use the next_gw. Right now I have to wait until all retries fail to try the next gw, but that happens after 64*T1 = 32 seconds. How can I accomplish that? cheers jp

3 4

[Kamailio-Users] starting kamailio using kamailio binary
by Juan Perez 16 Apr '09

16 Apr '09

hello when using kamctl to start/stop kamailio it also provides a lot more "functions" like "kamctl lcr show", "kamctl ul show", etc. If I start kamailio using kamailio -f "path to my config" etc how can I have the same functionalities? regards jp

5 7

mailing list description
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 16 Apr '09

16 Apr '09

SIP Router Project - Users mailing list

1 0

[Serusers] new installation
by Leon Li 16 Apr '09

16 Apr '09

Hi, I need to install SER for my company, which is pretty new for me. If we only need it for SIP registrar and proxy, do I need install any dependencies? And is there a list to explain what each dependency does? If I install the basic without dependencies, can I add them later and how? Thanks Leon

2 4

[Serusers] (no subject)
by Cristina Martínez Jimenez 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

which are the system requirements for SER? thanks, Cristina Martínez _________________________________________________________________ ¿Quieres crear tus propios emoticonos gratis? Descubre cómo hacerlo en el Club Oficial de Messenger http://vivelive.com/ilovemessenger/

2 1

[Serusers] Connect SER with a SOFTSWITCH
by hanane zahidi 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

Hi All ; i need to connect SER with a softswitch but i found nothing in google. please if someone has some interesting links. give them to me thank you best regards

7 7

[Kamailio-Users] 513 Message too big
by Joao Gomes Pereira 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

Hello to all I have Asterisk forwarding calls through Kamailio. If calls are placed by an Asterisk extension (like X-Lite) everything works fine. ( ex: X-Lite -> Asterisk -> Kamailio ) If calls are placed through a Cisco Router (connected to Asterisk) Kamailio answers: "513 Message too big" ( ex: Cisco VoIP client -> Cisco Router -> Asterisk -> Kamailio ) Also, the destination phone rings, but the calling party is disconnected because of this 513 message. This message if probably being originated here: if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; }; What could be the problem? Is the problem in Kamailio configuration or Asterisk configuration? And why does the call works when placed by an Asterisk extension, but doesn't work when placed by an Asterisk connected equipment? Thanks Regards Joao Pereira -- StarTel - A Rede Livre Joao Gomes Pereira www.startel.pt +351 304500650 sip: gomespereira(a)startel.pt

12 35

Re: [Kamailio-Users] ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply
by Ovidiu Sas 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

Please open a bug with respect to this issue. This error should end up in the error_route. Try to run tcpdump with buffer rotation and see if you can spot the bogus reply. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: > OK, the error has occurred again today, and the error_route didn't > catch the condition. Any other ideas? > > thanks, > Geoff > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Ovidiu, >> Thanks for your continued input. I currently have the error_route >> block configured with some logging. I am hoping this will be >> sufficient to capture the condition. The error hasn't happened today, >> traffic has been very light as it is Eastern and Passover, and I >> suppose people have better things to do than be on the phone :) >> >> If I get the log message and nothing from error_route, I will >> definitely do a tcpdump of the SIP port and try to correlate the >> timing. >> >> thanks! >> Geoff >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> wrote: >>> Hello Geoffrey, >>> >>> With tcpdump, you can capture data in buffers and rotate the buffers >>> and keep only the latest 2-3 buffers (check the man page). >>> As soon as the error arise, you stop the traffic and your bogus >>> message should be in your last buffer. >>> Just an idea ... >>> >>> Also, if your cps is not very high, you can print the callid of each >>> request/reply, and when the error arise, you can correlate it with the >>> callid. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ovidiu Sas >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Ovidiu, >>>> Thank you for your pointer. I could capture all the SIP traffic, but >>>> it would be a LOT of data to sift through. This machine processes >>>> hundreds of thousands of calls per day. I have tried the error_route >>>> handler to see if it shows up there... fingers crossed. I was unaware >>>> of that handler before now. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the info! >>>> Geoff >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> wrote: >>>>> How often do you get this error? >>>>> IIRC, last time when I got this type of error it was related to a >>>>> missing Via header into a SIP reply. >>>>> Can you capture/sniff the traffic and check if all the received >>>>> replies are sane (via header is present)? >>>>> >>>>> Another idea would be to capture the bogus message into the error_route: >>>>> http://www.kamailio.net/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#error_route >>>>> and then print the message via $mb: >>>>> http://www.kamailio.net/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:1.5.x#sip_message… >>>>> >>>>> I haven't checked the code to see if this type of error will end up in >>>>> the error_route, but is it worth a try. >>>>> If it's not caught, please open a bug, because it should be. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ovidiu Sas >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Tried adding that log into my onreply_route[1] block, but it didn't >>>>>> work. I can't seem to figure out I can possibly capture the SIP >>>>>> message which is generating this error. Any help would be much >>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Perhaps I should clarify what I am looking for a bit. I am guessing >>>>>>> based on the log "no via found in reply" that I would need to check >>>>>>> for this condition in my onreply_route[1] block. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Based on my knowledge of SIP, all reply responses are REQUIRED to have >>>>>>> a VIA header to ensure the response traverses the same path as the >>>>>>> request... correct? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would the following effectively deal with this condition, or would >>>>>>> sending a 500 error in response to a reply cause problems down stream? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> onreply_route[1]{ >>>>>>> if(!is_present_hf("Via")){ >>>>>>> sl_reply_error("500","No Via found in response."); >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for anyone's assistance. >>>>>>> Geoff >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> I am seeing the following message repeatedly in my log file. I am >>>>>>>> guessing I have a server or servers misbehaving. Where might I be >>>>>>>> able to check for this error condition and log appropriately? I have >>>>>>>> attached my current configuration file for reference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Geoff >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:40 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15487]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:42 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15490]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:46 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15490]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:50 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15507]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:54 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15497]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:45:58 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15491]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:46:02 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15490]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:46:06 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15485]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:46 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15485]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:47 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15486]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:48 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15507]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:50 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15503]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:54 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15492]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:47:58 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15485]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:48:02 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15490]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:48:06 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15491]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> Apr 10 11:48:10 atl-sipgateway2 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[15492]: >>>>>>>> ERROR:core:receive_msg: no via found in reply >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list >>>>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] Carrierroute and or LCR
by Stagg Shelton 14 Apr '09

14 Apr '09

I am preparing to add a new upstream SIP provider to my network, and now have a requirement to route based on the number that the user is calling. From what I have read it appears that LCR is the better method for doing this. I have one small issue in that I have a few customers who switch through my network in order to get to a specific carrier. Currently I am using carrierroute with all of my customers in order to support the ones that need to switch to specific carriers, and everyone else takes the default carrierroute. Can carrierroute and LCR be used together? If so can you give me a few pointers so that I can get a lab system working. If not can you suggest whether or not carrierroute could or should be used to route based on rate center. The rate center list from my new carrier is about 31,000 rows. If carrier route cannot or should not be used for this purpose, can you recommend a way that LCR can be used, and still have a few customers switch out to a specific carrier regardless of the number dialed? Thank You Stagg Shelton

3 2

[Kamailio-Users] FW: LCR
by Carlos A. Alvarez 14 Apr '09

14 Apr '09

-----Original Message----- From: Carlos A. Alvarez Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:32 AM To: 'tushar(a)eurus.net' Subject: RE: [Kamailio-Users] LCR I have a similar problem, with lcr and mysql modules. I am running lenny. The deb packages install fine. Bet when compiling the lcr and mysql are excluded. I do have installed all the dev libraries. Any ideas? -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of tushar(a)eurus.net Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:06 AM To: juha heinanen; tushar(a)eurus.net; users(a)lists.kamailio.org Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] LCR Thanks Jaha, but I dont think they have added LCR in excluded list, I myself complied the ver, I also tried to complied just the lcr module but no use. I wanted to know if anyone else is able to make it work? What make file you are using for Kamailio ? Tushar Original Message: ----------------- From: jh(a)tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:55:12 +0300 To: tushar(a)eurus.net, users(a)lists.kamailio.org Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] LCR tushar(a)eurus.net writes: > Recently i installed Kamailio 1.5 everything working fine except the LCR > module, found theer was no lcr.so module file in the module file. if you compiled yourself, make sura that lcr module is not excluded. it uses pcre library and the may have been added to some exclude list. i'm not using standard kamailio makefile myself and don't know the details. -- juha -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE - Free email based on Microsoft(r) Exchange technology - http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users(a)lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.11.54/2056 - Release Date: 04/14/09 06:17:00

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users