sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

19 participants
37571 discussions

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Siremis Accounting
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hello, please use public mailing list for such questions. Direct messages get long delayed or lost in most of the cases. Mailing list has plenty of developers and community users that can help you faster. Besides that, new people can benefit of older discussions. On 2/11/10 2:14 AM, Kris Amy wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > It would seem to me that the stored procedure on > http://siremis.asipto.com/install-accounting/ is for PostgreSQL. I'm > going to try and getting it working with MySQL. it is for mysql. Cheers, Daniel > > Just thougth you may want to update the page. > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla eLearning class for Kamailio 3.0.0 * http://www.asipto.com/

4 3

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Siptrace and Kamailio 3.0.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

On 2/11/10 11:16 AM, Kris Amy wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > ok, then the only point in mod_init of siptrace that causes > initialization error without printing a log message is when you > haven't set the trace_flag parameter: > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/siptrace.html#id2520001 > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > Hi Daniel, > > That fixed it. > > Perhaps there is a bug in that it's not picking up the default of 0? in the sources the default is -1, which means disabled -- docs needs to be updated. Thanks for pointing, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla eLearning class for Kamailio 3.0.0 *http://www.asipto.com/

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] SDP IP address not rewritten
by Vikram Ragukumar 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hello, I am running Kamailio version 1.5 and rtpproxy version 1.2. I have enabled NAT support in Kamailio.cfg. I have a UA behind NAT (UA IP:192.168.2.101), and the UA registers with an Asterisk server (Public IP) through an outbound proxy running Kamailio and rtpproxy with Public IP. Registration succeeds, however when making an outbound call from the UA to a cellphone, there is only one sided voice. This is happening because Asterisk is addressing rtp streams to the UA's local IP address instead of its PublicIP:port. Why is the IP address not being rewritten in the SDP ? Is there an alternate way of invoking rtpproxy (with flags) such that the IP address in the SDP is rewritten ? Thanks and Regards, Vikram. PS : Below is the main routing section of my kamailio.cfg route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } # NAT detection route(4); if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(1); # do accounting ... setflag(3); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(1); } else { if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(2); exit; } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { # non loose-route, but stateful ACK; must be an ACK after a 487 or e.g. 404 from upstream server t_relay(); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard.\n"); exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) t_relay(); exit; } t_check_trans(); # record routing if (!is_method("REGISTER|MESSAGE")) record_route(); # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(1); # do accounting } if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); } # requests for my domain if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) route(2); if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if (isflagset(5)) { setbflag(6); # setbflag(7); } if (!save("location")) sl_reply_error(); exit; } if ($rU==NULL) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } # apply DB based aliases (uncomment to enable) ##alias_db_lookup("dbaliases"); if (!lookup("location")) { switch ($retcode) { case -1: case -3: t_newtran(); t_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: sl_send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also setflag(2); route(1); } route[1] { if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(6); } if (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) { route(5); } /* example how to enable some additional event routes */ if (is_method("INVITE")) { #t_on_branch("1"); t_on_reply("1"); t_on_failure("1"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Presence route /* uncomment the whole following route for enabling presence server */ route[2] { # if presence enabled, this part will not be executed if (is_method("PUBLISH") || $rU==null) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not here"); exit; } return; } # Caller NAT detection route /* uncomment the whole following route for enabling Caller NAT Detection */ route[4]{ force_rport(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (method=="REGISTER") { fix_nated_register(); } else { fix_nated_contact(); setflag(6);#VR } setflag(5); } return; } # RTPProxy control /* uncomment the whole following route for enabling RTPProxy Control */ route[5] { if (is_method("BYE")) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } else if (is_method("INVITE")){ force_rtp_proxy(); } if (!has_totag()) add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); return; } branch_route[1] { xdbg("new branch at $ru\n"); } onreply_route[1] { xdbg("incoming reply\n"); if ((isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) && status=~"(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])") { force_rtp_proxy(); } if (isbflagset(6)) { fix_nated_contact(); } } failure_route[1] { if (is_method("INVITE") && (isbflagset(6) || isflagset(5))) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } if (t_was_cancelled()) { exit; } }

2 4

[Kamailio-Users] [kamailio-users] Method NOTIFY not supported ...
by Chandrakant Solanki 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hi below line is in my configuration... loadmodule "pua.so" modparam("pua", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailio:kamailio@172.16.0.10:3306/kamailio") modparam("pua", "db_table", "pua") ---- ---- if(is_method("NOTIFY") && src_ip==172.16.0.15) { xlog("L_INFO", "NOTIFY Method found\n"); if(!t_relay()){ sl_reply_error(); } } ---- ---- I found following error in log... Feb 10 15:14:40 kamailio_1 /sbin/kamailio[5597]: Method not supported - M=NOTIFY RURI=sip:172.16.0.15 F=sip:2222222@pbxusers.net<sip%3A2222222(a)pbxusers.net>T=sip:172.16.0.15 IP=172.18.100.89 ID= 17dd4bb9-81d132a0(a)172.18.100.89 -- Regards, Chandrakant Solanki

2 7

[Kamailio-Users] Fwd: Siptrace and Kamailio 3.0.0
by Kris Amy 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kris Amy <kris(a)amy.id.au> Date: 2010/2/11 Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Siptrace and Kamailio 3.0.0 To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com > wrote: > Hello, > > ok, then the only point in mod_init of siptrace that causes initialization > error without printing a log message is when you haven't set the trace_flag > parameter: > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/siptrace.html#id2520001 > > Cheers, > Daniel >

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Siptrace and Kamailio 3.0.0
by Kris Amy 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hi, Just wondering if anyone is using Siptrace with Kamailio 3.0.0. The module fails to load and I have no idea why (or how to get more information than from debug = 99). 0(13453) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:871]: DEBUG: init_mod: siptrace 0(13453) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:874]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module siptrace ERROR: error while initializing modules Cheers, Kris

2 4

[Kamailio-Users] kamailio crashes during connection attempt
by Dmitri 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hello list, I have fresh installation of Debian Squeeze on X86_64. I downloaded source tarball http://www.kamailio.org/pub/kamailio/latest/src/kamailio-3.0.0_src.tar.gz and did 'make deb' there. So, I got following debian packages: kamailio_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-berkeley-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-carrierroute-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-cpl-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-ldap-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-memcached-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-mysql-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-nth_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-perl-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-postgres-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-presence-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-purple-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-radius-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-snmpstats-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-tls-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-unixodbc-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-utils-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-xmlrpc-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb kamailio-xmpp-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb I installed packages: kamailio_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-mysql-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-presence-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb, kamailio-xmlrpc-modules_3.0.0_amd64.deb Created database, changed passwords for openser and openserro users in MySQL as well as in kamailio config files, enabled MySQL. DUMP_CORE=yes in /etc/default/kamailio, also added '-w /var/run/kamailio' to options. Created test user with kamctl. Started kamailio with init script: /etc/init.d/kamailio start: Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio kamailio: INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:4150]: init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: locks array size 512 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:166]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 124928 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:217]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:166]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 124928 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:217]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:166]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 124928 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:217]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Feb 7 22:05:10 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2695]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:224]: io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) Then I tried to connect to kamailio server with softphone Zoiper, and kamailio crashes immediately: Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2700]: : <core> [pass_fd.c:283]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 21 Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio kernel: [ 1051.407643] kamailio[2689]: segfault at c2 ip 00007fa8b5947b19 sp 00007fff48ff9700 error 4 in tm.so[7fa8b5917000+72000] Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:722]: child process 2689 exited by a signal 11 Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:725]: core was not generated Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: INFO: <core> [main.c:737]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2691]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2699]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2698]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2687]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2697]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2690]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2696]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2688]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2695]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2680]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2694]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2693]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2692]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2686]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2685]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2681]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2684]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2682]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2700]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2683]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: INFO: signal 15 received Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[2678]: ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:379]: ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/ser_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) Feb 7 22:05:20 kamailio kernel: [ 1051.432646] kamailio[2678]: segfault at 12 ip 00007fa8b592ae43 sp 00007fff48ff9f40 error 4 in tm.so[7fa8b5917000+72000] For unknown reason core was not generated. Any ideas ? Many thanks in advance, Dmitri

5 35

[Kamailio-Users] save() function
by Kris Amy 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hi All, It was to my understanding that this function was part of the core and thus didn't come from a module. The relevant code snippet is if(!save("location")) { xlog("L_ERR", "Saving contact failed - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); sl_reply_error(); exit; } The error I'm getting is.. 0(20467) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:516]: find_export_record: <save> not found 0(20467) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:516]: find_export_record: <save> not found 0(20467) : <core> [cfg.y:3329]: parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 656, column 21: unknown command, missing loadmodule? Cheers, Kris

2 2

[Kamailio-Users] Carrierroute issue
by michel freiha 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hi all, I'm using carrierroute module and ie seems that it's not working well...Suppose I have 2 entries in carrierroute table...Entry 1 with scan prefix 00 and prob 0 and a second entry with scan prefix 00 and prob=1...As soon as i make a call, this call will be forwarded to the entry with prob 0 because i guess it appears before the one with prob 1 in the table... When starting Kamailio I got the below: Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 1, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: domain 0 not found, add it Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree default has 1 trees Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] DBG:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree 0Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: created route tree: 0, with id 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix , prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 011, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 00, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 111, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 00, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix , prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 011, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix 011, prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix , prob -14931260.000000 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found domain 0 Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route, now adding Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no backed up rules It seems that kamailio is not reading probability entry in carrier route table Please find below carrierroute table structure: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `carrierroute` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `carrier` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `domain` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '', `scan_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '', `flags` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `mask` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `prob` float NOT NULL default '0', `strip` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `rewrite_host` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '', `rewrite_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '', `rewrite_suffix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '', `description` varchar(255) default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=23 ; Can someone help me to find this issue? Regards

5 13

[Kamailio-Users] check_user_blacklist function
by Antonio Reale 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hi all, the function check_user_blacklist in kamailio 1.4 returns -1 (FALSE based on the doc) "if a match is found and it is not set to whitelist", otherwise it returns 1 (TRUE). So the function returns the same value if a match is found and is set to whitelist and if there are no matches. I need to differentiate the two situations. The userblacklist module in kamailio 3.0 has a new function "check_user_whitelist" that can solve my problem, but at this time I can't upgrade. I solved the problem, changing only the return value in case of whitelisted entry (userblacklist.c file), but I don't know if it is a safe (and suffice) modification. Below the piece of code in the userblacklist.c: if (dt_longest_match(dt_root, ptr, &whitelist) >= 0) { if (whitelist) { /* LM_ERR("whitelisted"); */ return 2; /* found, but is whitelisted */ <===== CHANGED HERE. IT WAS return 1 } } else { /* LM_ERR("not found"); */ return 1; /* not found is ok */ } Thanks. Regards. -- Antonio

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users