sr-users June 2023

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

28 participants
29 discussions

Getting the name of an already set onreply_route
by Denys Pozniak 14 Oct '24

14 Oct '24

Hello! Is it possible to find out the name of the onreply_route that was set before? Something like this: t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); ... if ( t_is_set("onreply_route") ) { get_onreply_route_name(); ... } -- BR, Denys Pozniak

3 5

Via header force change protocol to TLS?
by Anthony Alba 30 May '24

30 May '24

I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead. (With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP transport). BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.

4 10

Dialog and DMQ on restart
by Björn Klasen 25 Mar '24

25 Mar '24

Hi everybody, I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems. When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc. But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty. Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set? BR, Björn -- Björn Klasen, Specialist TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP) Projensdorfer Straße 324 24106 Kiel Germany T +49 431/ 530530 F +49 431/ 7097-555 mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de http://www.tng.de Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg, Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428

4 9

Several crashs in prepare_new_uac
by Igor Potjevlesch 26 Sep '23

26 Sep '23

Hello! We had several crashs of Kamailio (5.3.4) in the last weeks. Each time, the last logs are: /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[20942]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/forward.c:347]: get_send_socket2(): unsupported proto 0 (*) /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[20966]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/forward.c:347]: get_send_socket2(): unsupported proto 111 (unknown) When we look to the coredump, here below the first traces: (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f70131b3d91 in prepare_new_uac (t=0x7f6fe1d45340, i_req=0x7f7016fbe208, branch=0, uri=0x7fff37142fa0, path=0x7fff37142f80, next_hop=0x7f7016fbe480, fsocket=0x0, snd_flags=..., fproto=0, flags=2, instance=0x7fff37142f70, ruid=0x7fff37142f60, location_ua=0x7fff37142f50) at t_fwd.c:463 #1 0x00007f70131b7c42 in add_uac (t=0x7f6fe1d45340, request=0x7f7016fbe208, uri=0x7f7016fbe480, next_hop=0x7f7016fbe480, path=0x7f7016fbe848, proxy=0x0, fsocket=0x0, snd_flags=..., proto=0, flags=2, instance=0x7f7016fbe858, ruid=0x7f7016fbe870, location_ua=0x7f7016fbe880) at t_fwd.c:805 #2 0x00007f70131bfebd in t_forward_nonack (t=0x7f6fe1d45340, p_msg=0x7f7016fbe208, proxy=0x0, proto=0) at t_fwd.c:1667 #3 0x00007f701316cf44 in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x7f7016fbe208, proxy=0x0, proto=0, replicate=0) at t_funcs.c:332 #4 0x00007f70131a3a11 in _w_t_relay_to (p_msg=0x7f7016fbe208, proxy=0x0, force_proto=0) at tm.c:1689 #5 0x00007f70131a4c51 in w_t_relay (p_msg=0x7f7016fbe208, _foo=0x0, _bar=0x0) at tm.c:1889 #6 0x00000000005a1f57 in do_action (h=0x7fff37143d90, a=0x7f7016bd1b10, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1071 #7 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37143d90, a=0x7f7016bd1b10, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #8 0x00000000005af1df in run_actions_safe (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016bd1b10, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1640 #9 0x000000000066aa50 in rval_get_int (h=0x7fff37146e90, msg=0x7f7016fbe208, i=0x7fff37144238, rv=0x7f7016bd1e60, cache=0x0) at core/rvalue.c:915 #10 0x000000000066f000 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff37146e90, msg=0x7f7016fbe208, res=0x7fff37144238, rve=0x7f7016bd1e58) at core/rvalue.c:1913 #11 0x000000000066f453 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff37146e90, msg=0x7f7016fbe208, res=0x7fff371446ec, rve=0x7f7016bd2588) at core/rvalue.c:1921 #12 0x00000000005a1a1d in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016bd2e08, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1047 #13 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016bcbd20, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #14 0x000000000059e97d in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016ef19b8, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:695 #15 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016e3f578, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #16 0x000000000059e97d in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c220a0, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:695 #17 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c220a0, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #18 0x00000000005aae93 in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c23978, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1207 #19 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c20748, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #20 0x00000000005a1ec6 in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c576a0, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1062 #21 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016c0b770, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #22 0x000000000059e97d in do_action (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016bc9920, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:695 #23 0x00000000005aeb1e in run_actions (h=0x7fff37146e90, a=0x7f7016bb9100, msg=0x7f7016fbe208) at core/action.c:1576 #24 0x00000000005af2a7 in run_top_route (a=0x7f7016bb9100, msg=0x7f7016fbe208, c=0x0) at core/action.c:1661 #25 0x00000000005bcb7a in receive_msg ( buf=0xadbd80 <buf.6971> "INVITE sip:AAAAAAAAAA@W.X.Y.Z SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP W.X.Y.Z;rport;branch=z9hG4bKZD8Za7p2XF7cF\r\nMax-Forwards: 69\r\nFrom: \"AAAAAAAAAA\" sip:AAAAAAAAAA@W.X.Y.Z;tag=aXy4Na2NtvKBK\r\nTo: <"..., len=1011, rcv_info=0x7fff371474c0) at core/receive.c:423 #26 0x0000000000488e7f in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:548 #27 0x000000000042650f in main_loop () at main.c:1673 #28 0x000000000042ec18 in main (argc=7, argv=0x7fff37147c38) at main.c:2802 Is there anything relevant in this to know what's wrong? Regards, Igor. -- Cet e-mail a été vérifié par le logiciel antivirus d'Avast. www.avast.com

3 4

Increase MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT
by Lars Jansson 18 Sep '23

18 Sep '23

Hi, I am building a configuration script where for some traffic flows parallel forking will be needed, and in this case I need to go beyond the default max limit of the max amount of branches. Apart from this specific case the traffic load that kamailio will need to handle is very low, let's say just one second here and there with up to 5 concurrent calls at most. This limit is as far as I understand set here: usr/local/src/kamailio-5.6/kamailio/src/core/config.h And the default limit is: #define MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT 32 /*!< limit of maximum number of branches per transaction */ Here are the questions I have related to this: 1) If I increase the value of this constant in config.h, how high is it reasonable to set this value and still have a stable system? 2) If I increase MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT beyond 32, are there also other parameters that needs to be changed for the system to be able to cope, and if so whichparameters? Regards, Lars

4 9

SL absorbed ACK is counted as dropped by core.drop_requests
by Kaufman 03 Jul '23

03 Jul '23

Just checking to see if this is the designed behavior. The SL module will attempt to match ACKs for stateless replies and handle them (absorb them?). The question I have is that it looks as though this ACK gets counted as dropped by the core.drop_requests from the KEX module. Tested using this config: #!KAMAILIO loadmodule "pv" loadmodule "sl" loadmodule "xlog" loadmodule "kex" loadmodule "corex" loadmodule "ctl" modparam("sl", "bind_tm", 0) route { xinfo("[$ci] $rm Request. Src:[$si:$sp] RURI:[$ru] To:[$tu] From:[$fu]\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); } event_route[sl:filtered-ack] { xnotice("sl:filtered-ack ACK [$ci] to local reply absorbed\n"); } Then validate by kamcmd stats.fetch core:drop_requests Is this the designed and "correct" behavior? Kaufman

3 4

Kamailio v5.7.1 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.7.1 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.7, that includes fixes since the release of v5.7.0. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.7.x. Deployments running previous v5.7.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.7.1. For more details about version 5.7.1 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2023/06/kamailio-v5-7-1-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Forward Registration
by nutxase 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hi All I have setup kamailio using websockets(wss) i am trying to forward any registration that comes to kamailio to go to asterisk, so in theory kamailio is a registration proxy i have set rewritehostport("xxx.xxx.xxx[:5080](http://node3.sipalto.com:5080)"); the registration forwards fine but the contact on asterisk side shows as sip:xxx:kamailioip.xxxx.invalid so therefore asterisk sees the sip peer as offline what am i missing :( Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

1 0

Releasing v5.7.1
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.7.1 (out of branch 5.7) this week (likely on Wednesday or Thursday, Jun 28/29, 2023). If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 1

Matching the From Username in LCR rule table
by harneet singh 27 Jun '23

27 Jun '23

Hi Experts, We wished to used the LCR Module to be able to select the Gateway(s) to send the calls to based on the From(Caller) Username. Based on the LCR Documentation, the usage of other fields like request URI or prefix etc is pretty clear. But for the From Usename I am having certain trouble understanding the same. It refers to some mtree. Excerpt below: "A gateway matches a request if user part of Request-URI matches "prefix", caller URI matches "from_uri" pattern,* caller URI userpart matches mtree with "mt_value"*, and callee URI matches "request_uri" pattern in a tuple that is associated with the gateway." Can someone explain/ share a sample lcr_rule table entries for the From Username that can be matched against the incoming sip message for gw selection? Do we need to manually create an mtree by the name "*lcr*". Asking based on the below section in LCR documentation? Any pointers are highly appreciated. 3.35. mtree (string) Name of mtree to which load_gws() matches caller URI userpart. *Default value is "lcr".* Regards, Harneet Singh -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2023