sr-users March 2023

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

47 participants
64 discussions

CANCEL timeout in branch route does not trigger any failure routes

by Richard Chan

Hi Kamailio users How can I get a failure route to trigger in timeout-to-CANCEL in a parallel forking scenario? Parallel forking test scenario 1. one(the main - 0) branch picks up the call 2. 2nd branch sends CANCEL (expecting 487 etc) - but the callee does not send any replies Result: No failure route handlers are called on timeout of this CANCEL - that is kamailio attempts the CANCEL 4 times but neither tm.t_on_failure_route, tm.t_on_branch_failure handlers are called. Any suggestions on how to resolve this? Regards Shih-Ping

1 year

Rancher, AWS, and Elastic IP

by Calvin E.

I'm looking for documentation//howto/advice/best practices for running Kamailio under Kubernetes on AWS via Rancher. Specifically, how to manage the public/Elastic IP. This is a load balancer (dispatcher) scenario with rtpengine for receiving inbound calls from a DID provider, but a similar configuration might be used for clients. I'm open to using an AWS load balancer, and would like to scale with multiple Kamailio pods behind a single public IP. I'd rather use Rancher-managed EC2 than pay extra for EKS, unless EKS can cancel out its own cost. This sounds like it should be a solved problem, just complex. I see blogs and videos out there, but it's not always obvious if their content is current. Anyone want to help me peel this onion? -Calvin

1 year

MongoDB query from Kamailio help needed

by Edo

Help is needed. I know I have seen a similar problem either via email or google search but for the life of me I cannot find it now. I am using: Ubuntu: 5.4.0-144-generic #161-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 3 14:49:04 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Kamailio: version: kamailio 5.3.9 (x86_64/linux) -- This is a dev platform and I can update kamailio if needed. I am trying to query a mongodb collection for the phone number stored under “did” as an integer and make a decision based on the returned result (boolean is sufficient for this decision). I don’t know what I am doing wrong here. Any help will be well appreciated ##### This is the insert statement into the telephone db from a linux script db.c$coll.insertOne({"did":parseInt($(cut -d_ -f 1 <<< $1)), "callDesc":$(cut -d_ -f 1 <<< $1)}))" >> $(cut -d_ -f 1 <<< $1).js did is stored as an integer and the callDesc is stored as presented by $rU { "_id" : ObjectId("641580b4863678d0ba38d69a"), "did" : 1XXXXXXXXXX, "callDesc" : 1XXXXXXXXXXXX } > db.c234.find() { "_id" : ObjectId("641580b4863678d0ba38d69a"), "did" : 2XXXXXXXXXXXX, "callDesc" : 2XXXXXXXXXXXX } > db.c234.find() { "_id" : ObjectId("641580b4863678d0ba38d69a"), "did" : 3XXXXXXXXXXXX, "callDesc" : 3XXXXXXXXXXXX } > Kamailio config: ..... ..... # --- mongodb module loaded 202201082322 loadmodule "ndb_mongodb.so" if (uri==myself) { sl_send_reply("100", "Trying to check if uri is myself $rU $ru"); #return; #Adding this to test connection to mongodb…. This worked and the reply was sent to the endpoint if(*mongodb_cmd_simple*("mongodbsrv1", "telephone", "cXXX”, "{ \"collStats\": \"cXXX\” }", "mgr1")) { sl_send_reply("183", "I got inside this message loop $rU found in mongodb"); xlog("response from mongodb is [[$mongodb(mgr1=>value)]]\n"); } # End of the test #This is to run the actual db query to test if the phone number is in the mongodb…. I am not successful at this query even when the number is known to be in the database if(*mongodb_find_one*("mongodbsrv1", "telephone", "cXXX”, "{\"did\" : \"$rU\" }", "mongoResponse1")) { # Route to confirmed route here -- 202302212032 sl_send_reply("183", "I got inside this mongodb message loop"); route(CONFIRMED_ROUTE); xlog("response from mongodb is [[$mongodb(mongoResponse1=>value)]]\n"); } else { route(UNCONFIRMED_ROUTE); } } #append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(RELAY); #exit; } Please help. -- ----- Ekunwe Tel: 601.497.3932

1 year

Three year old issue with a new CVE vulnerability report being reported

by Olle E. Johansson

Hi Kamailians! A new CVE with a critical severity level was published recently for an almost three year old bug, which was also fixed and released three years ago (CVE-2020-27507). The issue was fixed in Kamailio 5.4.2 and is not present in newer releases. The Kamailio project has unfortunately not been involved in the CVE process or been informed about this old issue being published at this time. We take vulnerability handling seriously and our process is documented at: https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/security/policy/ The latest stable branch is 5.6, with v5.6.4 released out of it. Reference: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-27507 Best regards and thanks for flying Kamailio! The Kamailio dev team through /Olle

1 year

json RPC syntax

by Volker Denneberg

Hello, I am trying to get json RPCs running. simpleequests seem to work, but I can't figure out how to pass parameters. For example curl --header 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary '{"id": 1,"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "ul.db_users" }' http://localhost:8081/RPC/ { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Not enough parameters (table to lookup)" }, "id": 1 } According to http://www.kamailio.org/docs/docbooks/3.2.x/rpc_api/rpc_api.html#rpc.gettin… parameters dont have names and according to http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/usrloc.html#usrloc.r.db_… 1 parameter is required. I guessed adding "params":"location" => no error anymore, but still no result: curl --header 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary '{"id": 1,"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "ul.db_users", "params":"location"}' http://localhost:8081/RPC/ { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { }, "id": 1 } Same result (no error) if I pass "params":"nonsense", so "params" seems to be kind of ignored ... What's the correct json syntax here or in general? Best regards, Volker

1 year

KEMI: app_jsdt_run_ex(): js loading state not initialized (call: ksr_htable_event)

by Ovidiu Sas

Hello all, While using KEMI with app_jsdt I noticed the following possible regression between 5.5 and 5.6. The following config is working ok on 5.5 but throws an error on 5.6: ERROR: app_jsdt [app_jsdt_api.c:555]: app_jsdt_run_ex(): js loading state not initialized (call: ksr_htable_event) kamailio.cfg: debug=2 children=1 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 log_name="k" mpath="/home/osas/src/kamailio/src/modules" loadmodule "htable/htable.so" modparam("htable", "event_callback", "ksr_htable_event") modparam("htable", "event_callback_mode", 1) loadmodule "kemix/kemix.so" loadmodule "app_jsdt/app_jsdt.so" modparam("app_jsdt", "load", "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.js") cfgengine "jsdt" kamailio.js: function ksr_htable_event(evname) { KSR.info("ksr_htable_event(" + evname + ")\n"); } function ksr_request_route() { KSR.x.exit(); } If we load the htable module after app_jsdt, then the error is gone. Is there something new during init in 5.6 that requires specific module loading order? -ovidiu

1 year

Handling branch-level append_hf()

by Alex Balashov

Hi, I’ve got a situation where I catch a 302 redirect in a failure_route (branch #1), and use the Contact to set a custom header (append_hf()). This custom header is utilised on the subsequent branch (branch #2), but if that branch fails (e.g. due to 4xx-5xx response), the custom header is not preserved on subsequent branches (branch #3+). What’s the best way to preserve it across subsequent branches? The documentation for msg_apply_changes() says it cannot be used once the transaction is already created, and in any case, I have other branch-level changes in branch #2 that I _would_ like to revert on subsequent branch attempts (i.e. branch #3). I can certainly devise a transaction-persistent vehicle for this value which can be checked on every branch, but I wondered if there’s an easier and more best-practical way. Thanks! — Alex -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://evaristesys.com Tel: +1-706-510-6800

1 year

No voice for webrtc call

by Arun K R

Hello, I am using kamailio to register the webrtc client and routes the calls to asterisk using pjsip. I am having no voice on both ends. Logs are attached witht this email. Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Received command 'offer' from 10.13.1.127:59841 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: NOTICE: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] Creating new call Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Replying to 'offer' from 10.13.1.127:59841 (elapsed time 0.016067 sec) Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Received command 'answer' from 10.13.1.127:52045 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Replying to 'answer' from 10.13.1.127:52045 (elapsed time 0.000997 sec) Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [ice] ICE negotiated: peer for component 1 is 10.13.1.170:15634 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [ice] ICE negotiated: local interface 10.13.1.127 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: ERR: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] SRTP output wanted, but no crypto suite was negotiated Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Received command 'answer' from 10.13.1.127:52045 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Replying to 'answer' from 10.13.1.127:52045 (elapsed time 0.000786 sec) Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [crypto] DTLS: Peer certificate accepted Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [crypto] DTLS-SRTP successfully negotiated using AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [crypto] DTLS-SRTP successfully negotiated using AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [ice] ICE negotiated: peer for component 1 is 10.13.1.170:15634 Mar 24 13:06:58 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [ice] ICE negotiated: local interface 10.13.1.127 Mar 24 13:07:02 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] Confirmed peer address as 10.13.1.170:15634 Mar 24 13:07:02 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: 10.13.1.170:15634 -> 10.13.1.127:10940 | 10.13.1.127:10960 -> 192.168.30.200:53489 Mar 24 13:07:02 debian rtpengine[7345]: WARNING: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] No support for kernel packet forwarding available (encryption cipher or HMAC not supported by kernel module) Mar 24 13:07:02 debian rtpengine[7345]: NOTICE: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] Setting 'non-forwarding' flag for kernel stream due to lack of sinks Mar 24 13:07:03 debian rtpengine[7345]: ERR: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [rtcp] SRTCP output wanted, but no crypto suite was negotiated Mar 24 13:07:03 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] Removing media stream from kernel: local 10.13.1.127:10940 Mar 24 13:07:03 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: 10.13.1.170:15634 -> 10.13.1.127:10940 | 10.13.1.127:10960 -> 192.168.30.200:53489 Mar 24 13:07:03 debian rtpengine[7345]: WARNING: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57/223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8/1 port 10940]: [core] No support for kernel packet forwarding available (encryption cipher or HMAC not supported by kernel module) Mar 24 13:07:04 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Received command 'delete' from 10.13.1.127:52045 Mar 24 13:07:04 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] Scheduling deletion of call branch '9693uq66f0' (via-branch '') in 30 seconds Mar 24 13:07:04 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] Scheduling deletion of call branch '223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8' (via-branch '') in 30 seconds Mar 24 13:07:04 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] Scheduling deletion of entire call in 30 seconds Mar 24 13:07:04 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [control] Replying to 'delete' from 10.13.1.127:52045 (elapsed time 0.001463 sec) Mar 24 13:07:17 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13362]: INFO: <script>: 10.13.1.170 authentication bypassed for sip:developer@10.13.1.127 Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] Final packet stats: Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- Tag '9693uq66f0', created 0:36 ago for branch '' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- subscribed to '223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- subscription for '223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] ------ Media #1 (audio over UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF) using unknown codec Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --------- Port 10.13.1.127:10960 <> 192.168.30.200:53489, SSRC 0, in 0 p, 0 b, 292 e, 36 ts, out 0 p, 0 b, 0 e Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- Tag '223df8fa-8106-48af-844f-33f97530a0d8', created 0:36 ago for branch '' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- subscribed to '9693uq66f0' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --- subscription for '9693uq66f0' Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] ------ Media #1 (audio over UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF) using opus/48000/2 Mar 24 13:07:34 debian rtpengine[7345]: INFO: [8asmubtpv46ac7nrfk57]: [core] --------- Port 10.13.1.127:10940 <> 10.13.1.170:15634, SSRC 1ada0b2b, in 292 p, 40137 b, 1 e, 30 ts, out 2 p, 1449 b, 0 e

1 year

different sip response on database (mysql) timeout

by Leon de Rooij

Hi, I need to use a database that may sometimes timeout and I'd like to give a conditional sip response based on whether there was a timeout or not. I'm using sqlops with mysql modules. Does anyone know if that's possible ? Thanks, Leon

1 year

Route: comma separated HOP list

by Benoît Panizzon

Hi List Cisco-SPA112 does reply to an invite containing Record-Route header with one Route: Header containing a comma separated list of those hops. It looks like kamailio fails to parse them and correctly route for example an ACK to a 200 OK. Is this a known issue? Is there a solution? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 year

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2023