sr-users October 2022

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

48 participants
48 discussions

Via header force change protocol to TLS?

by Anthony Alba

I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead. (With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP transport). BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.

6 months

Dialog and DMQ on restart

by Björn Klasen

Hi everybody, I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems. When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc. But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty. Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set? BR, Björn -- Björn Klasen, Specialist TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP) Projensdorfer Straße 324 24106 Kiel Germany T +49 431/ 530530 F +49 431/ 7097-555 mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de http://www.tng.de Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg, Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428

8 months, 1 week

Is Min-SE check broken?

by harneet singh

Hi All, I am facing an issue in understanding how the min_se should be working in kamailio. As per the SST documentation, it seems like if the min_se is configured as 500, then any value of Session-Expires OR MIN-SE if lower than 500, can be responded to by a 422. However, I strangely see the reverse happening. To investigate further, I looked in to the ki_sst_check_min() code in the master, and these seems like a potential issue. Ref Code: Inside ki_sst_check_min(), there is an if condition like below: if (sst_min_se < MIN(minse, se.interval)) { However, shouldn't it be the other way around? ie if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { because we need to send 422 if the received value(in INVITE etc) is smaller than the sst configure min_se value? I also found a different documentation, at https://git.sgu.ru/oldssu/ex-opensips/blob/cb9df8d59dbb254a9d862569fd5d11f6… where the check is as below? if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { Can someone confirm if this is broken, or my understanding is incorrect? Regards, Harneet -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

1 year, 6 months

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK

by Daniel Tryba

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: > Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find > callid-totag (from the response). > > I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves > different. Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted to topos-redis.

1 year, 7 months

enable topology hiding on one side or dynamic ip in topoh module Contact and Via Header

by Patrick Karton

Hello , im using kamailio with two interfaces external and internal. i need a way either to : * enable topoh hiding only when outgoing interface is external ( mask contact and Via ip only when ougoing interface is external * or if it is not possible to enable it only in one direction.i want to know how to configure dynamic(for example in xavp or avp) ip to put in Contact and Via when topoh is enabled. i see that the 'mask_ip' parameter of topoh module is a string. so we can not set a dynamic value here unfortunately. Thanks

1 year, 9 months

kamcmd autocompletion

by Antoine DEBARRE

Hi, I just installed kamailio v5.5 via deb.kamailio.org packages (debian 11). Seems that kamcmd autocompletion doesn't work at all. It is OK for v5.4 via official debian packages (packages.debian.org/bullseye/kamailio) Best regards, -- <https://app.livestorm.co/comdata-group/metaverse-what-will-cx-look-like-in-…>

2 years

Create new listener on the fly

by H Yavari

Hi Kamailio community, I am running an IPsec server beside Kamailio, so I am interested to know if there is any method to create a SIP listener on a specific port on the fly. I mean, when I create the IPsec SAs through the IPsec server, I ask Kamailio to create a listener/handler for that port too.This case might be very rare, but it is always good to hear community ideas. Thank you. Regards,Hossein

2 years

About the Presence service 401 issue

by SparkleZou

Hi Sir/Madam, I'm trying to set up the presence service according to the manual http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k31-made-simple Also refer to the doc https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/xcap_server.html Seems the Kamailio cfg fine. but when to get the xcap data, get the 401 response. Please see the attached log. Is there any more should be configured? Thanks! BR, Sparkle Zou

2 years

Kill child process created by app_python module

by Marat Gareev

Hello! I'm trying to use app_python module to perform periodic actions. This is a simple python code def _update(): while True: _action() time.sleep(60) class noop_handler: def child_init(self, rank): return 0 def ksr_request_route(self, msg): return 1 def mod_init(): # signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, signal.default_int_handler) proc = multiprocessing.Process(target=_update) # proc.daemon = True proc.start() ksr.notice('Forked process {} to update\n'.format(proc.pid)) return noop_handler() After killing kamailio processes with SIGTERM signal (killall kamailio) I see zombie process. And if I try to process the signal in daemon mode (see the comments in the snippet above), I get critical errors in the logs and still see processes: 0(37001) NOTICE: <core> [core/kemi.c:124]: sr_kemi_core_notice(): Forked process 37002 to update 1(37003) ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:464]: udp_rcv_loop(): recvfrom:[4] Interrupted system call Process Process-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/multiprocessing/process.py", line 258, in _bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/multiprocessing/process.py", line 114, in run self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) File "/tmp/script.py", line 155, in _update time.sleep(period) KeyboardInterrupt 0(37001) ALERT: <core> [main.c:774]: handle_sigs(): child process 37002 exited normally, status=1 0(37001) INFO: <core> [main.c:802]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 1(37003) ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:464]: udp_rcv_loop(): recvfrom:[4] Interrupted system call 8(37014) CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 4 1(37003) ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:464]: udp_rcv_loop(): recvfrom:[4] Interrupted system call So, how I can kill child process by SIGTERM signal?

2 years

Pipelimit needs restart to reload values

by Duarte Rocha

Greetings, I've been using the pipelimit module and the pl_check function to control users rates in my proxy. if (!pl_check("$var(UserID)", "TAILDROP", "$var(UserRate)")) { pl_drop(); exit; } In this case $var(UserID) is the pipe and $var(UserRate) is the maximum rate. The value of the rate is retrieved on every call via query to a DB. If I change the UserRate value to 0 CPS on the DB calls are not rejected unless they go over 1 CPS. However, if I restart Kamailio all calls are correctly rejected. Why does this happen? Can I change this behaviour? Cheers, Duarte

2 years

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2022