sr-users June 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

48 participants
60 discussions

Via header force change protocol to TLS?
by Anthony Alba 30 May '24

30 May '24

I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead. (With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP transport). BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.

4 10

Dialog and DMQ on restart
by Björn Klasen 25 Mar '24

25 Mar '24

Hi everybody, I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems. When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc. But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty. Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set? BR, Björn -- Björn Klasen, Specialist TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP) Projensdorfer Straße 324 24106 Kiel Germany T +49 431/ 530530 F +49 431/ 7097-555 mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de http://www.tng.de Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg, Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428

4 9

Is Min-SE check broken?
by harneet singh 31 May '23

31 May '23

Hi All, I am facing an issue in understanding how the min_se should be working in kamailio. As per the SST documentation, it seems like if the min_se is configured as 500, then any value of Session-Expires OR MIN-SE if lower than 500, can be responded to by a 422. However, I strangely see the reverse happening. To investigate further, I looked in to the ki_sst_check_min() code in the master, and these seems like a potential issue. Ref Code: Inside ki_sst_check_min(), there is an if condition like below: if (sst_min_se < MIN(minse, se.interval)) { However, shouldn't it be the other way around? ie if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { because we need to send 422 if the received value(in INVITE etc) is smaller than the sst configure min_se value? I also found a different documentation, at https://git.sgu.ru/oldssu/ex-opensips/blob/cb9df8d59dbb254a9d862569fd5d11f6… where the check is as below? if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { Can someone confirm if this is broken, or my understanding is incorrect? Regards, Harneet -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK
by Daniel Tryba 02 May '23

02 May '23

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: > Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find > callid-totag (from the response). > > I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves > different. Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted to topos-redis.

5 19

Possibility of mirroring the rpm/deb.kamailio.org repos efficiently via rsync?
by Malte Schmidt 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

Hello, is there an rsync endpoint available or is there a possiblity of setting this up? Creating a mirror via HTTP is a rather quick and dirty solution and while the deb-repo can be mirrored using debmirror, the rpm repo is hard to sync to a non-CentOS-based machine due to missing dependencies such as yum and reposync in latest Debian-based systems. Would be great to get some input in regards to this topic. Cheers

3 3

Fwd: Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)?
by George Diamantopoulos 19 Jan '22

19 Jan '22

Forwarding my reply to the list, using gmail's reply button set Henning as the sole recipient :-\ ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 02:25 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> Hello Henning, Thanks for your reply. Here's what has come up after a few hours: shm55: https://pastebin.com/h9JCePmc shm54: https://pastebin.com/Nx5xEEnA It seems to me htable is the culprit? Are you seeing anything different? 54 has been running for 77020 seconds, 55 for 28521 (significantly less). I'm going to turn it off until we figure something out... BR, George On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 18:17, Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Good observation. Please run the memory statistics CLI commands to get > more hints about the module that might cause it (as per below link). Then > please report more details. If you can point to a particular module, you > can also open an issue on our tracker. > > > > https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *George > Diamantopoulos > *Sent:* Friday, June 25, 2021 4:53 PM > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> > *Subject:* [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm still investigating the (most likely non-kamailio-related) memory leak > of my previous message to the list, there have been no developments so far. > I'll update if anything changes. > > > > This concerns a new finding which seems to affect kamailio 5.5.x. I have > two kamailio instances receiving the same traffic via round-robin. I > upgraded only one of them to 5.5.1 and left the other to 5.4.6 as I feared > of any issues arising. I was lucky to do so, because with identical > configuration, 5.5.x seems to run out of SHM very quickly. Here are links > to graphs produced by our monitoring system: > > > > Old kamailio (no memory leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVBiD.png > > New kamailio (possible leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVS9N.png > > > > The configuration uses mtree, htable, vars and vns extensively. Has anyone > come across anything similar? Let me know if I can provide any further > information to help disect this. Thanks! > > > > BR, > > George >

2 8

ENV Values in cfg
by H Yavari 06 Dec '21

06 Dec '21

Hi to all, Is it possible to set modules parameters with env values? I know that in routes we can use $env(NAME), but what about for other parameters? for example setting DB address in K8s cluster ENV values. Regards,Hossein

2 1

update max_while_loops in config
by Juha Heinanen 08 Oct '21

08 Oct '21

It is possible to update value of max_while_loops dynamically in config file? For example, there could be a need to increase the max in some while loop, but after the loop is done, decrease it again for other loops. There exists an rpc command to do that, but I haven't found how to do it in config file. I tried @cfg_seti.core.max_while_loops = 200; but got syntax error. -- Juha

3 6

manually append_branch to lookup result
by David Villasmil 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hello guys, I'm trying to dynamically add a branch after doing lookup. The user is found, but in some cases I need to add a branch and do parallel forking. So i'm basically doing: route[LOCATION] { if (!lookup("location")) { .... } if (something) { route(BRANCH_TO_EXTRA); } route(RELAY); } route[BRANCH_TO_EXTRA] { $fs = MY_SOCKET; append_branch("sip:$tU@" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_port)); return; } For some reason only the branch appended is being used (I have append_branches=1) Ideas? David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 5

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
by Huber Andreas 03 Sep '21

03 Sep '21

Hi, We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon. Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate ! Thanks, Andreas From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. Regards, Federico On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote: Hello, We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE. We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect. The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch. But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something? Kind Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2021