sr-users March 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

78 participants
100 discussions

by Alexandru Covalschi

Is there any way to use selects in KEMI? I understand it's syntax sugar, but maybe there's a workaround. ________________________________ Regards, Alexandru Covalschi VoIP Engineer and System Administrator tel: +380 97 24 75445

5 years, 4 months

it's auth module send clear text password?

by PICCORO McKAY Lenz

if kamailio doe snot use TLS all the mechanish in atuh module are send the pasword nude to the network? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

5 years, 4 months

evapi_async + python3 KEMI

by Alexandru Covalschi

Hello list, I'm trying to use async evapi with app_python3 KEMI, but I don't know how to get t_suspend variables. What am I doing is connecting to evapi via telnet and making a call, which successfully reaches that point: if KSR.evapi.async_relay(str(KSR.pv.get("$T(id_label)"))): KSR.xlog.xinfo("processing suspended in transaction [" + str(KSR.pv.get("$T(id_index)")) + ":" + str(KSR.pv.get("$T(id_label)")) +"]\n"); I have the id_label in the log, but in telnet I have None. How can I get transaction index and label transferred using python3 KEMI? Shall I use KSR.x.modf (in that case I'm losing almost all KEMI benefits)?.. ________________________________ Regards, Alexandru Covalschi VoIP Engineer and System Administrator tel: +380 97 24 75445

5 years, 4 months

Cannot start kamailio with TLS

by Adesh Pandey

Hi Guys, After enabling TLS i am getting following error in Kamailio 5.1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2214]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): load_cert:error:20074002:BIO routines:file_ctrl:system lib /usr/sbin/kamailio[2214]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): load_cert:error:140DC002:SSL routines:use_certificate_chain_file:system lib /usr/sbin/kamailio[2214]: ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:940]: init_mod_child(): error while initializing module tls (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/tls.so) (idx: 0 rank: -127 desc: [main]) My tls.conf is as follows: [server:default] method = TLSv1+ verify_certificate = no require_certificate = no private_key = /etc/kamailio/keys/my.key.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/keys/my.crt.pem #ca_list = /etc/kamailio/tls/cacert.pem #crl = /etc/kamailio/tls/crl.pem # This is the default client domain, settings # in this domain will be used for all outgoing # TLS connections that do not match any other # client domain in this configuration file. # We require that servers present valid certificate. # [client:default] #method = TLSv1 verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes Please hep me to understand and fix the issue.

5 years, 4 months

tm.so --> segfault at 3135352e36 ip 00007f761bb57ed1 sp 00007fff9db8b1c0 error 4 in tm.so

by Abdoul Osséni

Hello, Hello dear list, Today, I have had mutiples crashes. It seems it linked to tm.so module. -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299702272 Feb 25 13:08 core.kamailio.sig11.29204 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 1453023232 Feb 25 13:12 core.kamailio.sig11.29203 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 1416065024 Feb 25 13:12 core.kamailio.sig11.29207 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299681792 Feb 25 13:16 core.kamailio.sig11.19047 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 2108506112 Feb 25 13:20 core.kamailio.sig11.19043 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299689984 Feb 25 13:34 core.kamailio.sig11.19247 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299681792 Feb 25 13:34 core.kamailio.sig11.19246 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299698176 Feb 25 13:35 core.kamailio.sig11.19248 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299689984 Feb 25 13:35 core.kamailio.sig11.19243 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299685888 Feb 25 13:35 core.kamailio.sig11.19244 -rw------- 1 root kamailio 4299689984 Feb 25 13:36 core.kamailio.sig11.19242 root@sbc:/var/cores# gdb /usr/local/sbin/kamailio core.kamailio.sig11.29204 GNU gdb (Debian 7.7.1+dfsg-5) 7.7.1 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from /usr/local/sbin/kamailio...done. [New LWP 29204] warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) Warning: couldn't activate thread debugging using libthread_db: Cannot find new threads: generic error warning: File "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so" auto-loading has been declined by your `auto-load safe-path' set to "$debugdir:$datadir/auto-load". To enable execution of this file add add-auto-load-safe-path /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so line to your configuration file "/root/.gdbinit". To completely disable this security protection add set auto-load safe-path / line to your configuration file "/root/.gdbinit". For more information about this security protection see the "Auto-loading safe path" section in the GDB manual. E.g., run from the shell: info "(gdb)Auto-loading safe path" warning: Unable to find libthread_db matching inferior's thread library, thread debugging will not be available. Warning: couldn't activate thread debugging using libthread_db: Cannot find new threads: generic error warning: File "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so" auto-loading has been declined by your `auto-load safe-path' set to "$debugdir:$datadir/auto-load". warning: Unable to find libthread_db matching inferior's thread library, thread debugging will not be available. Core was generated by `/usr/local/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /usr/local/etc/ka'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f68b9bb4515 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f693ccd5cc8) at t_reply.c:2240 2240 last_uac_status=uac->last_received; (gdb) Any ideas? Regards Abdoul

5 years, 4 months

crash at 480 reply to INVITE

by Juha Heinanen

Kamailio 5.2 crashed when it received 480 reply to INVITE. Below is backtrace from the core file. The crash happens in t_reply.c on the last line of this block: uac=&t->uac[branch]; LM_DBG("org. status uas=%d, uac[%d]=%d local=%d is_invite=%d)\n", t->uas.status, branch, uac->last_received, is_local(t), is_invite(t)); last_uac_status=uac->last_received; Earlier it was checked that the transaction was found. Its uac[0] seems to be broken. -- Juha ----------------------------------------- Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0_ 0x00007f1073e234c3 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f1076b605f0) at t_reply.c:2240 2240_ _ _ t_reply.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0_ 0x00007f1073e234c3 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f1076b605f0) at t_reply.c:2240 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ msg_status = 480 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ last_uac_status = 1590315756 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ack = 0x50550c4 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x50550c4> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ack_len = 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ branch = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ reply_status = 29 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ onreply_route = 9941216 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ cancel_data = {cancel_bitmap = 0, reason = {cause = 0, u = {text = {s = 0x0, len = 1590087991}, e2e_cancel = 0x0, packed_hdrs = {s = 0x0, len = 1590087991}}}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ uac = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t = 0x7f105dfe6480 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ lack_dst = {send_sock = 0x555b5f02720f <buf+431>, to = {s = {sa_family = 29127, sa_data = "XXX"}, sin = {sin_family = 29127, sin_port = 24322, sin_addr = {s_addr = 21851}, sin_zero = "XXX"}, sin6 = { _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sin6_family = 29127, sin6_port = 24322, sin6_flowinfo = 21851, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "XXX", __u6_addr16 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX}, __u6_addr32 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ XXX}}}, sin6_scope_id = 1980563656}}, id = 32528, proto = 112 'p', send_flags = {f = 30268, blst_imask = 32528}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_user_from = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_user_to = 0xXXX <qm_info+46> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_domain_from = 0xXXX _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_domain_to = 0xXXX _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_uri_from = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_uri_to = 0xXXX _ _ _ _ _ _ _ backup_xavps = 0x45ed834e3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ replies_locked = 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ branch_ret = 1593995512 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ prev_branch = 21851 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ blst_503_timeout = 340003632 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf = 0x7f1076490810 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ onsend_params = {req = 0x7f10763c4898, rpl = 0x7f10763c4888, param = 0x97b5f0, code = 10751248, flags = 0, branch = 0, t_rbuf = 0xaf95c0, dst = 0x7f1076db4fc0 <__syslog>, send_buf = {s = 0x555b5ed834e3 "INFO", len = 134217728}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ctx = {rec_lev = 1593995791, run_flags = 21851, last_retcode = 1593995708, jmp_env = {{__jmpbuf = {48, 139708676767760, 93849330384899, -7479270984431321856, 93850924380609, 139708690288576, 93850921612515, 134217728}, __mask_was_saved = 12582912, __saved_mask = { _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __val = {6, 140720648489936, 139708687844848, 140720648490064, 93850920720905, 93850924380373, 139708676767760, 140720648489904, 139708469727337, 139708679781296, 139708687844848, 139708684105760, 140720648490560, 5888963087, 93849330384896, 11507136}}}}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ bctx = 0x7f10760d0010 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ keng = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "reply_received" #1_ 0x0000555b5eadf4dc in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7f1076b605f0, mode=0) at core/forward.c:747 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ new_buf = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ dst = {send_sock = 0x0, to = {s = {sa_family = 0, sa_data = '\000' <repeats 13 times>}, sin = {sin_family = 0, sin_port = 0, sin_addr = {s_addr = 0}, sin_zero = "XXX"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 0, sin6_port = 0, sin6_flowinfo = 0, sin6_addr = { _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 0}}, id = 0, proto = 0 '\000', send_flags = {f = 0, blst_imask = 0}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ new_len = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r = 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ip = {af = XXX, len = 32528, u = {addrl = {XXX, 95}, addr32 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, 0}, addr16 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX}, addr = "XXX"}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s = 0x7ffc14440c68 "" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ len = 32764 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "do_forward_reply" #2_ 0x0000555b5eae12f9 in forward_reply (msg=0x7f1076b605f0) at core/forward.c:852 No locals. #3_ 0x0000555b5eb5b679 in receive_msg ( _ _ _ buf=0x555b5f027060 <buf> "SIP/2.0 480 Request Terminated\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX;branch=z9hG4bKe951.40cf95b28fe54d0cbda88a8fa4c91d48.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK04B95fa49ac99a7fa91\r\nTo: <sip:XXX"..., len=431, _ _ _ rcv_info=0x7ffc14440ff0) at core/receive.c:433 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ msg = 0x7f1076b605f0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ctx = {rec_lev = 0, run_flags = 0, last_retcode = 1, jmp_env = {{__jmpbuf = {139708690288576, 9004276570109933907, 93850921612515, 134217728, 12582912, 6, 9004276570114128211, 3007006209029601619}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = {__val = {0, 0, 0, 1, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 139708266465728, 0, 0, 4634971920, 139708266465728, 140720648490768, 93850918093314, 120, 93850918093450, 139708680838560, 139708680838560, 140720648490832}}}}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ bctx = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ret = 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ stats_on = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tvb = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tve = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tz = {tz_minuteswest = 0, tz_dsttime = 0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ diff = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ inb = {s = 0x555b5f027060 <buf> "SIP/2.0 480 Request Terminated\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX;branch=z9hG4bKe951.40cf95b28fe54d0cbda88a8fa4c91d48.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK04B95fa49ac99a7fa91\r\nTo: <sip:XXX"..., len = 431} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ netinfo = {data = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, rcv = 0x0, dst = 0x0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ keng = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ evp = {data = 0x7ffc14440df0, rcv = 0x7ffc14440ff0, dst = 0x0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ cidlockidx = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ cidlockset = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ errsipmsg = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "receive_msg" #4_ 0x0000555b5ea30dc4 in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:541 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ len = 431 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ buf = "SIP/2.0 480 Request Terminated\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX;branch=z9hG4bKe951.40cf95b28fe54d0cbda88a8fa4c91d48.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK04B95fa49ac99a7fa91\r\nTo: <sip:XXX"... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tmp = 0x8000000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x8000000> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ from = 0x7f10764b1da0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fromlen = 16 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ri = {src_ip = {af = 2, len = 4, u = {addrl = {XXX, XXX}, addr32 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX}, addr16 = {XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX, XXX}, addr = "XXX"}}, dst_ip = { _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ af = 2, len = 4, u = {addrl = {XXX, 0}, addr32 = {XXX, 0, 0, 0}, addr16 = {XXX, XXX, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, addr = "XXX", '\000' <repeats 11 times>}}, src_port = 5060, dst_port = 5060, proto_reserved1 = 0, proto_reserved2 = 0, src_su = {s = { _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sa_family = 2, sa_data = "XXX"}, sin = {sin_family = 2, sin_port = 50195, sin_addr = {s_addr = XXX}, sin_zero = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 2, sin6_port = 50195, sin6_flowinfo = 1345864889, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 0}}, bind_address = 0xXXX, proto = 1 '\001'} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ evp = {data = 0x0, rcv = 0x0, dst = 0x0} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ printbuf = "XXX"... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i = 1981052368 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ j = 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "udp_rcv_loop" #5_ 0x0000555b5e9c8e32 in main_loop () at main.c:1645 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i = 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ pid = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ si = 0x7f1076130940 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ si_desc = "udp receiver child=4 sock=XXX:5060XXX" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ nrprocs = 8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ woneinit = 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "main_loop" #6_ 0x0000555b5e9d0fdd in main (argc=17, argv=0x7ffc14441698) at main.c:2675 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ cfg_stream = 0x555b5fe5c010 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c = -1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tmp = 0x7ffc14442f30 "" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tmp_len = 340006256 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ port = 32764 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ proto = 340006352 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ options = 0x555b5ed33020 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ret = -1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ seed = 1181662442 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rfd = 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ debug_save = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ debug_flag = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ dont_fork_cnt = 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n_lst = 0x0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p = 0xffffffff <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffff> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ st = {st_dev = 19, st_ino = 17502, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 115, st_gid = 123, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1547850959, tv_nsec = 183989794}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1547851014, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tv_nsec = 719730801}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1547851014, tv_nsec = 955611149}, __glibc_reserved = {0, 0, 0}} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __func__ = "main"

5 years, 4 months

http_event have errors with exec_avp

by logosvlad＠gmail.com

Hi there! we have an issue, and it's similar to reported in this thread: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/exec-warning-td165448.html We use kamailio 5.0.6. When we call route from http_event by url reguest (code is below) event_route[xhttp:request] { set_reply_close(); set_reply_no_connect(); if ($(hu{url.path}) ==”update”) { route(DO_SMTH); xhttp_reply("200", "OK”, "", ""); } route[DO_SMTH] { exec_avp(“/usr/bin/who”,”$avp(s:user_)”); } we got errors exec like these: Mar 1 10:51:05 test kamailio[21035]: WARNING: exec [exec_hf.c:464]: append_fixed_vars(): uri not parsed Mar 1 10:51:05 test kamailio[21035]: WARNING: exec [exec_hf.c:482]: append_fixed_vars(): orig URI not parsed Mar 1 10:51:05 test kamailio[21035]: ERROR: exec [../../core/char_msg_val.h:51]: char_msg_val(): can't calculate char_value due to a parsing error Mar 1 10:51:05 test kamailio[21035]: WARNING: exec [exec_hf.c:492]: append_fixed_vars(): no tid can be determined Mar 1 10:51:05 test kamailio[21035]: ERROR: exec [exec_hf.c:504]: append_fixed_vars(): no to-tag But when we call route(DO_SMTH) from request_route - there are no such errors We think that it is something related to the nature of event_routes, anything can be done with this? Should I create an issue on github? thanks for insights and ideas

5 years, 4 months

Re: [SR-Users] How to Absorb First Leg Re-Invites when no Response from Second Leg Invites

by JR Richardson

Yes, retransmissions of initial INVITE from Carrier. Makes perfect sense, I understand now. Thanks Gentlemen! JR Reinvites are in-dialog requests; they would only be sent within the context of an established dialog (2xx response, end-to-end ACK, the whole works). Perhaps what you are referring to is not reinvites but retransmissions of the initial INVITE? If so, have a look at this option: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.2.x/modules/tm.html#tm.p.cancel_b_method in concert with something like this: failure_route[...] { if(t_is_canceled()) exit; # The scenario you're after. if(t_branch_timeout()) { t_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); exit; } } -- Alex

5 years, 4 months

Is there a option to execute multiple command via JSONRPC or XMLRPC

by Vimalesh S

Hi, I am looking for a option to execute multiple command via JSONRPCS or XMLRPC. To avoid multiple tCP connections . eg: I have multiple kamailio load balancer server running, need to update the dispatcher record in a single command. Regards, Vimalesh S

5 years, 4 months

How to Absorb First Leg Re-Invites when no Response from Second Leg Invites

by JR Richardson

Hi All, My mind is not right on this one, need a pointer. Here is the simple scenario: Carrier><kamailio proxy><end device The end device is a static IP, the proxy dips database and knows where to send numbers destined for the end device, but if there is no response from the end device (it's off-line), how do I time-out the transaction and send a 503 'Service Unavailable' back to the first leg for the carrier to stop re-invites? I assume I need a new [FAIL_TWO] route that handles this event. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses Chasing the Azeotrope

5 years, 4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2019