Hi,
When receive a Re-INVITE with new Media IP and PORT, kamailio keeps
sending RTP to the old IP PORT. Seems kamailio not update info to the
rtpproxy.
Saludos,
ALVARO ARAOS MÉNDEZ
Director de Tecnología en FONOIP
+56 2 2947 9000
alvaro(a)fonoip.com | www.fonoip.com [1]
Moisés Chacón 46, El Monte, RM
Links:
------
[1] http://www.fonoip.com
Hello!
I'm trying to process PUBLISH on Kamailio (v. 5.2.1) but constantly getting
"500 Server Internal Error" responce.
For packet body:
*Messages-Waiting: yes*
*Message-Account: sip:100-test@172.16.30.151 <sip%3A100-test(a)172.16.30.151>*
*Voice-Message: 1/2*
... debug output is:
*kamailio: 2(27127) DEBUG: presence [event_list.c:348]: search_event():
start event= [message-summary/6]*
*kamailio: 2(27127) DEBUG: presence [publish.c:351]:
ki_handle_publish_uri(): SIP-If-Match header not found*
*kamailio: 2(27127) DEBUG: presence [presentity.c:88]: generate_ETag():
etag= a.1548164100.27127.7.0 / 22*
*kamailio: 2(27127) DEBUG: presence [publish.c:360]:
ki_handle_publish_uri(): new etag = a.1548164100.27127.7.0*
*kamailio: 2(27127) DEBUG: presence [publish.c:385]:
ki_handle_publish_uri(): Expires header found, value= 16*
*kamailio: 2(27127) ERROR: presence_mwi [add_events.c:110]:
mwi_publ_handl(): check of body <Messages-Waiting: yes*
*kamailio: Message-Account: sip:100-test@172.16.30.151
<sip%3A100-test(a)172.16.30.151>*
*kamailio: Voice-Message: 1/2*
*kamailio: > failed at character number 22*
*kamailio: 2(27127) ERROR: presence [publish.c:480]:
ki_handle_publish_uri(): in event specific publish handling*
I'm not sure, but it appears to me that check in line 95 from
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/5.2/src/modules/presence_mwi/add_…
is not passing. I was trying to add "\n" and "\r" to the end of each string
but I always had failure on character number 22.
Does anyone know how exactly PUBLISH packet body should look like?
Thanks a lot!
Hi all,
We are using kamailio 5.1.6, configured as P-CSCF, facing following problem. Please refer to the attached tshark trace, too.
If during call setup (by simulated UAs) at the terminating P-CSCF the simulated PCRF rejects the Diameter AAR message (frame 46/47 at the attached trace), then the kamailio P-CSCF runs into a questionable behaviour.
By calling the Rx_AAR() function in configuration, the processing of the 200 OK (frame 45) is suspended (by the ims_qos module) and then resumed with the receipt of the AAA message (frame 47).
Now the ims_dialog module is called with the dlg_terminate("all", "reason") function, but the 200 OK has not yet been sent. The ims_dialog sends CANCEL downstream and 488 upstream. However, the 200 OK is sent additionally. We would rather have expected the ims_dialog module should send BYE in both directions.
When we respond the CANCEL with 481 Call/Transaction does not exist (which we MUST according to RFC 3261), then we would expect the ims_dialog module at least now to react with BYE in both directions.
Could you help? What's our misunderstanding? How could we proceed to get this issue fixed?
Kind regards
Christoph
____
Christoph VALENTIN
Software Developer | R&D
Core / SIP Core
P +43 50 811 3785 | M +43 664 628 3785
christoph.valentin(a)kapsch.net<mailto:christoph.valentin@kapsch.net>
Kapsch CarrierCom AG | Lehrbachgasse 11 | 1120 Vienna | Austria
Company Register at: Commercial Court Vienna FN 223804 z | Registered Office Vienna | www.kapsch.net<http://www.kapsch.net/>
[Kapsch Logo]<https://www.kapsch.net/>
The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The person who receives this message and who is not the addressee, one of his employees or an agent entitled to hand it over to the addressee, is informed that he may not use, disclose or reproduce the contents thereof, and is kindly asked to notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.
Hello.
Have anyone tried to use pua.publish to send MWI notification? Can it
work at all?
I'm sending request through jsonrpc server, but it is not dispatched by
handle_publish.
Thank you,
Kirill
Greetings,
Is there a limitation to the number of Gateways probed by Dispatcher?
I have several gateways configured to be probed, but the OPTIONS is only
sent to the first 16? Is there a configuration regarding this?
Thanks in advance,
Duarte Rocha
Hi,
I have been testing one Kamailio v5.1.6 instance with one rtpengine
instance, using sipp playing media files at 40 cps (-r 40) with up to 1600
concurrent calls. During the load tests if rtpengine is pkill'ed/restarted
a few times Kamailio would crash. It is quite repeatable and every time the
backtrace from gdb points to the same place as shown below.
However the same tests on Kamailio v5.0.7 with the same cfg files and the
same rtpengine instance did not cause any crash.
Here’s what I got from gdb backtrace for v5.1.6 using a dbg build: 2 core
dump files:
1. UDP receiver processes 14483
{{{
[New LWP 14483]
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid
-f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00007fadfa824d8e in t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7fadf4207730,
new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd5038fce4,
should_relay=0x7ffd5038fce0, cancel_data=0x7ffd5038fed0,
reply=0x7fadfb545210) at t_reply.c:1282
1282 t_reply.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007fadfa824d8e in t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7fadf4207730,
new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd5038fce4,
should_relay=0x7ffd5038fce0, cancel_data=0x7ffd5038fed0,
reply=0x7fadfb545210) at t_reply.c:1282
#1 0x00007fadfa829577 in relay_reply (t=0x7fadf4207730,
p_msg=0x7fadfb545210, branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_data=0x7ffd5038fed0,
do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1786
#2 0x00007fadfa82f54c in reply_received (p_msg=0x7fadfb545210) at
t_reply.c:2537
#3 0x000000000054624b in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7fadfb545210, mode=0) at
core/forward.c:747
#4 0x0000000000547e4c in forward_reply (msg=0x7fadfb545210) at
core/forward.c:852
#5 0x000000000058e186 in receive_msg (
buf=0xa595a0 <buf> "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.70.102;branch=z9hG4bKa042.afac8eb973f1dfad7a549af0ab1a8ccc.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.60.80:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3750-978-0\r\nFrom: sipp <
sip:Customer68@192.168.60.8"..., len=888, rcv_info=0x7ffd50390480) at
core/receive.c:364
#6 0x00000000004af6b1 in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:554
#7 0x00000000004246ac in main_loop () at main.c:1619
#8 0x000000000042bd5c in main (argc=13, argv=0x7ffd50390b38) at main.c:2638
}}}
2. Main process 14468
{{{
[New LWP 14468]
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid
-f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 0x00007fadfbc77428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54
54 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007fadfbc77428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54
#1 0x00007fadfbc7902a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2 0x000000000041a029 in sig_alarm_abort (signo=14) at main.c:646
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:37
#5 0x00007fadf354e67d in futex_get (lock=0x7fadf3e94e50) at
../../core/parser/../mem/../futexlock.h:121
#6 0x00007fadf3561113 in mod_destroy () at rtpengine.c:1810
#7 0x000000000055132b in destroy_modules () at core/sr_module.c:832
#8 0x0000000000418c9f in cleanup (show_status=1) at main.c:521
#9 0x000000000041a313 in shutdown_children (sig=15, show_status=1) at
main.c:663
#10 0x000000000041cfa5 in handle_sigs () at main.c:768
#11 0x0000000000425fb5 in main_loop () at main.c:1752
#12 0x000000000042bd5c in main (argc=13, argv=0x7ffd50390b38) at main.c:2638
}}}
The parameters for rtpengine:
{{{
loadmodule "rtpengine.so"
modparam("rtpengine", "db_url",
"text:///usr/share/kamailio/dbtext/kamailio")
modparam("rtpengine", "hash_table_size", 4)
modparam("rtpengine", "setid_default", 1)
modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_disable_tout", 20)
modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_retr", 1)
modparam("rtpengine", "setid_avp", "$avp(setid)")
modparam("rtpengine", "rtp_inst_pvar", "$avp(rtpInstance)")
modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_tout_ms", 1000)
modparam("rtpengine", "read_sdp_pv", "$var(sdpToRtpengine)")
modparam("rtpengine", "write_sdp_pv", "$var(sdpFromRtpengine)")
}}}
I'm using a simplified kamailio.cfg from installation, and here are calls
to rtpengine:
{{{
...
route[INVITE]
{
$var(sdpToRtpengine) = $rb;
$var(ret) = rtpengine_manage("direction=dirty direction=clean
ICE=remove");
xlog("L_INFO", "$ci INVITE: rtpengine chosen: $avp(rtpInstance)");
remove_body();
replace_body(".*", $var(sdpFromRtpengine));
t_on_reply("RESPONSE");
route(RELAY);
}
onreply_route[RESPONSE]
{
$var(sdpToRtpengine) = $rb;
$var(ret) = rtpengine_manage("direction=clean direction=dirty
ICE=remove");
remove_body();
replace_body(".*", $var(sdpFromRtpengine));
xlog("L_INFO", "$ci RESPONSE: $rm - $rs $rr, cseq=$cs, by
[$hdr(Server)], from $si:$sp");
}
...
}}}
When rtpengine is down for a couple of seconds, there were a lot of SIP
retransmissions and timeouts. Doing a netstat and I can see Kamailio’s
receive buffer is quite filled up.
Please let me know if more information is needed. Thank you!
Cheers,
Yufei
Hi,
I want to check additional param in Auth module. For. ex., other than
username and secret , i want to validate user by its email address. How can
i do that?
Regards,
Prabhat Kumar
Hello,
Does any one know, how to send a NOTIFY message to a special UA?
Why I need to do this? I’m using kamailio integration with Yealink IP Phone. Yealink IP Phone can perform some specified action immediately by accepting a SIP NOTIFY message with the “Event: ACTION-URI” header.
I want to use RPC or HTTP or NSQ or some other interface trigger kamailio ROUTE make a NOTIFY message and send it to a special Yealink IP Phone.
Thanks!
Regards,
CuiGang
cuigang0120(a)aliyun.com
