sr-users August 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

73 participants
114 discussions

by Asgaroth

Hi All, Quick question with regards the lua_run function in app_lua module. The documentation for v5.0.x states: "Execute the Lua function 'func' giving params as parameters. There can be up to 3 string parameters. The function must exist in the script loaded at startup via parameter 'load'. Parameters can be strings with pseudo-variables that are evaluated at runtime." Does this mean that lua_run can only have 3 parameters, or, does it mean that the function within the lua script can have up to 3 parameters? I have a function within lua that currently needs 3 parameters, so I'm hoping I can do the following: lua_run("some_function", "param_1", "param_2", "param_3") However, I'm not sure, from the documentation, if I can do this. On a side note, but related, can I pass defined variables/constants as parameters to lua_run too, for example, something like: #!define VAR_1 1234 #!define VAR_2 hello lua_run("some_function", "$rd", VAR_1, VAR_2) Some clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for reading.

5 years, 8 months

Lua KEMI crash

by Ivaylo Markov

Hello, I have Kamailio 5.1.4 (from deb.kamailio.org) running on a Debian 9 AMD64 VM with 1 CPU and 1G of RAM on ESXi. For KEMI I am using the liblua5.1-0:amd64 package, version 5.1.5-8.1+b2. The configuration is rather simple - dispatcher module reading the gateways from a file and forwarding everything to them based on a custom variable. There are 2 gateways in the file being pinged with OPTIONS packets every 10 seconds. Only a single SIP user is connecting to the machine (besides the occasional scanner). I can post the config if necessary, but I don't think that is the issue (see below). The crash has happened twice already - once on 2018-08-07 19:45 and 2018-08-08 14:33 EEST. You can find an excerpt from the Kamailio debug log at https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/bvyUMj3s5g2CcBN3JSBt5A/raw. As you can see, it crashes when trying to run the Lua route on an incoming packet. I am assuming the problem is this: Aug 8 14:33:14 lb-dev1 kamailio[13209]: *** Error in `/usr/sbin/kamailio': realloc(): invalid next size: 0x00005573dbff1ef0 *** However, I could not find any (direct) `realloc()` calls in the source for app_lua, so maybe this is an issue somehwere in liblua... Thoughts? Ivaylo

5 years, 8 months

USRLOC db_mode=4 and server_id

by Darren Williams

I am currently using multiple instances of Kamailio with a common database and using the usrloc module with db_mode=4 and server_id to filter the contacts that get loaded at startup on each server. The problem I seem to have is that using the RPC call ul.add there I cannot see any parameter to send to specify the server_id. The server_id that the contact is given is 0. If I manually go into the db and modify the server_id everything works as expected. I think I must be missing something somehwere as I'mn sure you shouldn't need to do this. Can anyone help please. Thanks Daz

5 years, 8 months

Kamailio TLS + letsencrypt

by Amar Tinawi

Hello i'm wondering if i can generate tls certificate for kamailio using letsencrypt with test domain name, in testing enviroment following this post : https://www.fredposner.com/1836/kamailio-tls-and-letsencrypt/ got an error by letsecrypt because of checking of the domain name authority and no certificate was generated. Regards

5 years, 8 months

mysql version

by Wilkins, Steve

Hello All, When Kamailio installs, it installs mysql 8.0. I would like it to install mysql 5.7. Is there a way to force this? Thank you

5 years, 8 months

MYSQL and various

by Laura

Dear list, on my kamailio 4.4.7 i use interactions with MYSQL. For example .. i use it for some black list control and other like this.. sql_query("cb", "select id from blacklist where cli='$var(g2)' and (ippeer = '$si' or ippeer = 'ALL')", "rabl"); if($dbr(rabl=>rows)>0){ sql_result_free("rabl"); sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden blacklist"); exit; } sql_result_free("rabl"); I was wonder what was the best method to prevent the query going on if mysql don't respond for high load or other situation.. If Mysql is not able to reply to the query tight now the call continue over the configuration... what is the best way to prevent this and for examples drop it with a standard SIP 503 error. I have search on docs.. but i haven't found any valid way. Thanks Laura

5 years, 8 months

problem with rewriteuri

by Eric Hosch

If I manually pass a string value to rewriteuri it works, but if I pass the same string from a database value it doesn't: if ($dbr(ra=>[0,4]) == "callfwd_noanswer") { $ does not work --> rewriteuri("$dbr(ra=>[0,6])"); works --> rewriteuri("sip:someone@somewhere"); append_branch(); route(0); Eric Hosch Chief Engineer KLBK-TV | KAMC-TV 7403 S. University Ave. Lubbock, TX 79423 O * 806.748.2208<tel:806.748.2208> F * 806.748.2269<tel:806.748.2269> ehosch(a)klbk13.tv<mailto:ehosch@klbk13.tv> www.everythinglubbock.com<http://www.everythinglubbock.com/> [Nexstar Media Group, Inc. | everythinglubbock.com | KLBK-TV | KAMC-TV] Nexstar Media Group, Inc. provides services for KAMC-TV and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. through an Outsourcing Agreement. KLBK and KAMC do not discriminate in advertising contracts on the basis of race, ethnicity or gender and further requires that in the performance of all KLBK/KAMC advertising agreements. KLBK/KAMC requires that each party not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of NexstarMedia Group, Inc., are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed and/or as indicated in the applicable file. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.

5 years, 8 months

Nat issue

by eyas barhouk

hello dears when i'm using kamailio 5.2 as IMS i'm facing the following NAT issue : * when p-cscf handle a call from user1 to user2 that pre-registered on private address "192.X.X.X" (on another LAN) the user can't receive the invite message . in another word: proxy ip : 10.192.X.X user1 ip : 10.X.X.X user2 ip : 192.X.X.X the call scenario : user1 ---invite----> user2 (not arrived) * when p-cscf handle a call from user2 that pre-registered on private IP "192.X.X.X" (on another LAN) to user1 the user receive the invite message . the call scenario : user2 ---invite----> user1 (arrived) * when both of the user on different LANs the message 200 OK doesn't arrive to proxy :\ so based on that does any one has an experiment with NAT handling & nathelper module and how to configure it on P-cscf . thanks in advance

5 years, 8 months

Ratio between cores ram and kamailio limits

by Renato Gallo

Hello, We're here to ask you what's the ratio between cpu cores/ghz, ram and how many contemporary calls kamailio can manage before it maxes out its capabilities and crash. Kind Regards Renato Gallo System Engineer sede legale e operativa: Via San brunone, 13 - 20156 - Milano (MI) Tel. +39 02 - 87049490 Fax +39 02 - 48677349 Mobile. +39 342 - 6350524 Wi | FreeNumbers: https://freenumbers.way-interactive.com Wi | SMS: https://sms.way-interactive.com Wi | Voip: https://voip.way-interactive.com Asterweb: http://www.asterweb.org Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio e negli eventuali allegati sono riservate e per uso esclusivo del destinatario. Persone diverse dallo stesso non possono copiare o distribuire il messaggio a terzi. Chiunque riceva questo messaggio per errore è pregato di distruggerlo e di informare immediatamente [ mailto:info@sigmaware.it | info@ ] asterweb.org

5 years, 8 months

UDP workers block when one or more rtpengine instances go offline

by Sebastian Damm

Hi, we run multiple rtpengine servers to share the load. Whenever we need to take an rtpengine server offline, we used to just block the control port via iptables, then no new calls ended up on this instance of rtpengine. This worked pretty well in Kamailio 4.4.5. However, since Kamailio 5.0, and the problem persists with 5.1.4, Kamailio hangs almost immediately after we block the control port traffic. In the log file there are almost no packets processed except every few seconds, which looks like a timeout thing. Did we configure anything wrong there? Or is the "dead rtpengine detection" just broken? Our configuration: loadmodule "rtpengine.so" modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_disable_tout", 120) modparam("rtpengine", "setid_avp", "$avp(rtpsetid)") modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_sock", "0 == udp:1.2.3.4:9001=2 udp:1.2.3.5:9001=2 udp:1.2.3.6:9001=2") modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_sock", "1 == udp:2.3.4.5:9001=2") Any help appreciated. Regards, Sebastian

5 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2018