sr-users March 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

101 participants
132 discussions

avpops and mongo problem
by hdssdsdsdsfsdf hdssdsdsdsfsdf 22 Mar '18

22 Mar '18

Hi all, I have kamailio setup that uses a mongo cluster, and everything works fine. Only I have problems with the avpops module. The avp_db_load fails with "field [attribute] not found in result iterator", even if the attribute field is present in the object in mongo. Does anybody know what could be going wrong? Thanks in advance, and kind regards, =============================================================================== kamailio.cfg: ... # ---- avpops params ---- modparam("avpops", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("avpops", "avp_table", "usr_preferences") ... xlog("trying avp_db_load\n"); if (avp_db_load("$fu/username", "$avp(s:attributevalue)")) { xlog("if succeeded\n"); } xlog("if not succeeded\n"); ... =============================================================================== mongo: rs:SECONDARY> db.usr_preferences.find({"username":"1234567890"}) { "_id" : ObjectId("5ab22a5b384cd2aa0d4cf403"), "attribute" : "attributevalue", "username" : "1234567890", "domain" : null, "value" : "750", "uuid" : "", "type" : 0 } =============================================================================== syslog: ... Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: <script>: trying avp_db_load Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:851]: db_mongodb_query(): query to collection [usr_preferences] Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:885]: db_mongodb_query(): query filter: { "username" : "1234567890", "attribute" : "attributevalue" } Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:904]: db_mongodb_query(): columns filter: { "value" : 1, "attribute" : 1, "type" : 1 } Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:116]: db_new_result(): allocate 56 bytes for result set at 0x7f43b613c480 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:349]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): 3 columns returned from the query Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:154]: db_allocate_columns(): allocate 24 bytes for result names at 0x7f43b613c318 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:165]: db_allocate_columns(): allocate 12 bytes for result types at 0x7f43b614d888 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:377]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): Found a field[0] named: value Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:396]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[0] at 0x7f43b614d9b8 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:431]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): use DB1_STRING result type Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:460]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): RES_NAMES(0x7f43b614d9b8)[0]=[value] (2) Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:377]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): Found a field[1] named: attribute Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:381]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): field [attribute] not found in result iterator Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:739]: db_mongodb_store_result(): failed to set the columns Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:918]: db_mongodb_query(): failed to store result Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:927]: db_mongodb_query(): failed to do the query Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:79]: db_free_columns(): freeing 3 columns Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[0] at 0x7f43b614d9b8 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:92]: db_free_columns(): freeing result names at 0x7f43b613c318 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:97]: db_free_columns(): freeing result types at 0x7f43b614d888 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:134]: db_free_result(): freeing result set at 0x7f43b613c480 Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: avpops [avpops_impl.c:381]: ops_dbload_avps(): db_load failed Mar 21 17:15:16 ccccc /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2544]: ERROR: <script>: if not succeeded ... ===============================================================================

3 3

drouting & rd
by Jean Cérien 22 Mar '18

22 Mar '18

Hello I have setup 2 gateways in my dr_rules: 5,6 - so the 2nd one is tried if the first fails. The second one requires credentials. When the first one fails: I execute the following code: failure_route[ROUTEFAIL] { if ( t_check_status("[345][0-9][0-9]") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied() )) { t_on_failure("ROUTEFAIL"); if (use_next_gw()) { xlog("L_INFO","failure_route(ROUTEFAIL) @@ routing to: rd: $rd, ru:$ru, t_relay"); t_relay(); exit; } then in the same ROUTEFAIL (before this code), I have if (t_check_status("401|407")) { xlog("L_INFO","failure_route(ROUTEFAIL) @@ call to uac_auth(), $si rd: $rd\n"); ..... So, when the first gateway replies with a 404, it executes correctly the first block, finds the second gw and I see in the log that rd is set to its address. Yet, when the 2nd gw replies with 401, rd is set to the very first gw. However, the pcap traces confirm it is indeed the second that replies this. If this behaviour is correct, I cant seem to find the source IP of the gateway that replied to me, to retrieve credentials from the db. version: kamailio 5.0.5 / 5.0.6 (tested on both) Thank you for your help J

2 1

XMLRPC with params
by David Villasmil 22 Mar '18

22 Mar '18

Hello guys, I'm trying to call an xmlrpc method with parameters like: <?xml version="1.0"?> <methodCall> <methodName>dispatcher.set_state</methodName> <params> <param> <value><string>state:i</string></value> </param> <param> <value><string>group:1</string></value> </param> <param> <value><string>sip:1.2.3.4:5060</string></value> </param> </params> </methodCall> I'm getting back "Invalid Parameters". I can't find any documentation as to _how_ to call it with parameters. Can anyone help? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ

2 2

(no subject)
by hdssdsdsdsfsdf hdssdsdsdsfsdf 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

1 0

Problems with dispatcher reload
by Arik Halperin 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

Hello, I’ve installed kamailio 5.1 but when I run: kamctl dispatcher reload I get: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Method Not Found" }, "id": 31222 } How do I fix this? Thanks, Arik Halperin

4 6

How does Kamailio decide which msg to store when receiving it double from 2 servers?
by Zigelman, Amit 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

I am using Captagent on 2 sip servers communicating with each other. Both Captagents then route the SIP traffic to the same Kamailio. Therefore, if I understand, Kamailio will get every msg between them twice. Once from server A and once from server B. Let's say that each of them has a different capturing code (100 for server A and 200 for server B) How will the data look in the DB? Will it hold both entries pretty much the same with a difference is some fields such as the capture node? Thanks a lot, Amit -- *Amit Zigelman* | *Software Developer* Mobile (+972) 54-570-9129 <+972%254-570-9129> | amit.zigelman(a)vonage.com

2 1

authenticating to mongodb fails
by hdssdsdsdsfsdf hdssdsdsdsfsdf 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

When I connect using mongo, the credentials work: $ mongo kamailio -u "kam" -p "kam" MongoDB shell version v3.4.9 connecting to: mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/kamailio MongoDB server version: 3.4.9 > db.subscriber.find() { "_id" : ObjectI ... But when I use the following DBURL in kamailio.cfg, kamailio fails to even login to mongo: #!define DBURL "mongodb://kam:kam@localhost/kamailio" If I disable mongodb authentication, kamailio starts up just fine again. Any idea what's going wrong here?

3 10

NATDETECT Flag 16
by Duarte Rocha 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

Greetings, I have a doubt about the flag 16 used in nat_uac_test() belonging to the module NATDETECT. In the documentation, the following is stated : *16* - Test if the source port is different from the port in the “Via” header I have some situations that I receive a request from port 5060 and the Via Header contains no port. I think it probably assumes that it is the default port. Will this situation trigger the "16" flag ? Thanks in advance, Cheers

2 2

S-CSCF can not allocate memory
by tyd 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

Hello, I haved install debian 8 and kamailio 4.4.7 for IMS testing. After registering 10000 users, SIPp generates CPS 25 SIP INVITE message and BYE message after 100 seconds. After about 240000 calls, there are "cannot allocate memory" messgae on S-CSCF. The command of S-CSCF is "kamailio -m 512 -f /etc/scscf/kamailio.cfg" The parameter mem_join=1 is included in kamailio.cfg. I have modified the share memory to 1024 and 2048, but the result is the same, just increasing the pass calls. Would you please tell me how to solve the memory problem? Thanks. Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16483]: ERROR: <core> [sip_msg_clone.c:981]: msg_lump_cloner(): cannot allocate memory Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16483]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1656]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failed to save the message lumps Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16483]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:545]: _reply_light(): ERROR: _reply_light: cannot allocate shmem buffer Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16483]: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1489]: t_unref(): ERROR: t_unref: generation of a delayed stateful reply failed Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16446]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1893]: relay_reply(): ERROR: relay_reply: cannot alloc reply shmem Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16446]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:545]: _reply_light(): ERROR: _reply_light: cannot allocate shmem buffer Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16435]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:316]: update_totag_set(): ERROR: update_totag_set: no memory Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16406]: ERROR: ims_dialog [dlg_profile.c:472]: set_dlg_profile(): no more shm memory Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16406]: ERROR: ims_dialog [ims_dialog.c:619]: w_set_dlg_profile(): failed to set profile Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16406]: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1289]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: out of mem: Mar 21 12:25:03 Kamailio440 kamailio[16406]: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1429]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed root@Kamailio440:~# kamcmd tm.stats { current: 69 waiting: 0 total: 991300 total_local: 0 rpl_received: 2183891 rpl_generated: 20232 rpl_sent: 1475856 6xx: 0 5xx: 2704 4xx: 10124 3xx: 0 2xx: 978329 created: 991300 freed: 991231 delayed_free: 0 } root@Kamailio440:~# kamctl stats shmem shmem:fragments = 1630 shmem:free_size = 4303040 shmem:max_used_size = 536870912 shmem:real_used_size = 532567872 shmem:total_size = 536870912 shmem:used_size = 415668000

1 0

execute only on INITIAL INVITE
by David Villasmil 20 Mar '18

20 Mar '18

Hello guys, I want to execute an sql only for INITIAL INVITEs, I'm trying like: #!ifdef WITH_DID_VALIDATE if(!has_totag()) { sql_query("acd", "select * from did_numbers where didNumber = '$tU' and active = 'Y'", "ra"); xlog("L_ERR", "[REQUEST_ROUTE] number of rows in table domain: $dbr(ra=>rows)\n"); if( $dbr(ra=>rows)==0 ) { xlog("L_ERR", "[REQUEST_ROUTE] DID Number validation returned [$dbr(ra=>rows)], not responding to this request\n"); exit; } sql_result_free("ra"); } #!endif But, say I remove the DID from the allowed list while a call is going on. Then responses to the allowed INVITE would not be processed. How would I limit that to ONLY the INITIAL INVITE? Should I use has_totag? Thanks! David Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ

3 4

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2018