sr-users June 2017

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

79 participants
122 discussions

Kamailio IMS NAT issue: PRACK/ACK RURI changing in P-CSCF
by Mojtaba 22 Jun '17

22 Jun '17

Is it not better to use SEMS as SBC in the front of your network? And all P/S/I/CSCF have the private IP address. Thanks --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

2 4

cpl.load
by frédéric Gaisnon 21 Jun '17

21 Jun '17

Hi, In latest kamailio version "cpl.load" command is obsolete. What is the procedure to import CPL into mysql database? Regards, Frédéric Gaisnon

2 1

maybe found a bug in TM module - how to proceed?
by Valentin Christoph 21 Jun '17

21 Jun '17

Hi all, I am using kamailio 4.4.5 in an IMS setup as S-CSCF. I have got problems when trying to deliver an INVITE request to a distinct PSI at an AS. I receive the SIP response "555 AS Contacting Failed - iFC terminated dialog". I collected tshark traces and synchronously WITH_DEBUG kamailio logs. I think, I have found the root cause in the source code of the TM module and would like to issue an official bug report. How to proceed? All the Best Christoph The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The person who receives this message and who is not the addressee, one of his employees or an agent entitled to hand it over to the addressee, is informed that he may not use, disclose or reproduce the contents thereof, and is kindly asked to notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.

2 2

SIP-Trunk Kamailio and Asterisk
by Володимир Іванець 21 Jun '17

21 Jun '17

Hello everyone, I'm doing some custom Kamailio configuration to achieve few things but seem to be stuck with SIP trunks. I'm currently using Kamailio 4.4.5 and here is what I have at the moment: *1.* Asterisk 11.25.1 servers behing Kamailio using RealTime for SIP peers. *2.* Route that checks if packet was sent from one of configured SIP trunks. This part works correctly: *route[FROMPSTN] {* * xlog("== FROMPSTN ==\n");* * $var(socket) = $si + ":" + $sp;* * xlog("**** $var(socket)\n");* * xlog("**** $(sht(trunks_kamailio=>$var(socket)))\n");* * if ($(sht(trunks_kamailio=>$var(socket))) != $null) {* * xlog("**** From $(sht(trunks_kamailio=>$var(socket))) PSTN\n");* * return 1;* * }* * xlog("**** Not from PSTN\n");* * return -1;* *}* *3.* Here is a fragment that sends INVITE packet to *TOASTERISK* route if it was received from one of trunks. I have 4444444444(a)XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX hardcoded for now, and in my configuration 4444444444 and XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX represent my real caller id number and carrier's IP address: *if(route(FROMPSTN)) {* * uac_replace_from("sip:4444444444@XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX");* * route(TOASTERISK);* *}* *4.* TOASTERISK basically has folloving fragment that load balances traffic between Asterisk nodes: *if(!ds_select_dst("0", "4")) {* * xlog("**** Call was not sent to none of Asterisk hosts\n");* * if(!is_method("REGISTER")) {* * xlog("**** Method is not REGISTER\n");* * send_reply("404", "No destination");* * }* * xlog("**** Dispatcher fail\n");* * exit;* *}* So when I'm making a call to my test number, I can see following incomming packet in Asterisk from Kamailio. From header has correct caller id number and carrier's IP address (192.168.88.5 is Kamailio's internal IP address): [image: Вбудоване зображення 1] And when Asterisk tries to find a maching peer for this incoming call, it is using Kamailio's instead of Carrier's IP address. So it is actually finds one of peers (101-XXXXXXX) that is being authenticated on Kamailio as many others: [image: Вбудоване зображення 2] I'm not sure if Asterisk is just using packet's source IP to lookup for corresponding peer or something else from it's content. I will really appreciate any help on this. Thanks a lot!

1 1

Cannot login Siremis
by Trent 20 Jun '17

20 Jun '17

Hey. Just installed Kamailio onto CentOS 6 using the available YUM repos., and Siremis (v4.4). I seem to be having the same issue as this was reported https://github.com/asipto/siremis/issues/3 I have retried the Siremis install again as suggested, and I still cannot login with the same results that person has: click login and nothing is occurring, except for the text appearing which states "Processing Login." There is no error in the httpd error_log file. Anything else to look for? Thanks!

2 2

Kamilio doesn't start up with pymongo in the Kemi Python script..
by Muhammad Zaka 20 Jun '17

20 Jun '17

Hi all, In kamailio 5.0.1 with kemi interface for python I am trying to use pymongo to import Mongo Client interface for python but the kamailio service fails to start up properly. kamailio-kemi-python.py import sys import struct import Router.Logger as Logger import KSR as KSR from pymongo import MongoClient Case - I : No forking and no children in kamailio.cfg kamailio.cfg fork=no children=0 Kamailio service fails with the following error: - Jun 20 15:12:32 sbc99-kam-dev kamailio: ERROR: app_python [python_support.c:142]: python_handle_exception(): mod_init: Unhandled exception in the Python code:#012Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File "/etc/kamailio/kamailio-kemi-python.py", line 19, in <module>#012 from pymongo import MongoClient#012 File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/__init__.py", line 87, in <module>#012 from pymongo.mongo_client import MongoClient#012 File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/mongo_client.py", line 52, in <module>#012 from pymongo.client_options import ClientOptions#012 File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/client_options.py", line 23, in <module>#012 from pymongo.pool import PoolOptions#012 File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/pool.py", line 121, in <module>#012 ('type', platform.system()),#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/platform.py", line 1333, in system#012 return uname()[0]#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/platform.py", line 1300, in uname#012 processor = _syscmd_uname('-p','')#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/platform.py", line 1035, in _syscmd_uname#012 rc = f.close()#012IOError: [Errno 10] No child processes Case - II : Forking in kamailio.cfg fork=yes children=32 With forking Kamailio service fails with the following error: - Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev kamailio: INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4665]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:197]: jsonrpc_dgram_mod_init(): the socket /var/run/kamailio/kamailio_rpc.sock already exists, trying to delete it... Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:175]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: pike [pike.c:99]: pike_init(): PIKE - initializing Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: pike [ip_tree.c:81]: init_lock_set(): probing 256 set size Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== from Python mod init Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.__init__ Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:153]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:203]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-127) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19708]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(1) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19709]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(2) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19710]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(3) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19711]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(4) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19712]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(5) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19713]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(6) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19714]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(7) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19715]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(8) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19716]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(9) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19717]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(10) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19718]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-1) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19719]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-1) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19720]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-1) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19722]: INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:429]: jsonrpc_dgram_process(): a new child 0/19722 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(0) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19723]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-2) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19723]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:214]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19703]: INFO: <core> [main.c:759]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19709]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19722]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19708]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19723]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19716]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19717]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19715]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19719]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19714]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19720]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19713]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19721]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: INFO: <core> [core/kemi.c:86]: sr_kemi_core_info(): ===== kamailio.child_init(-4) Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19718]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 8 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 9 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 13 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 14 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 16 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 17 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 18 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 20 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 21 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 22 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19710]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19711]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19712]: INFO: <core> [main.c:814]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 25 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 23 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 19 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 10 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 11 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 12 Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Jun 20 15:19:07 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[19724]: ERROR: <core> [core/io_wait.h:1040]: io_wait_loop_epoll(): epoll_wait(5, 0x7efdd80797c0, 0, 5000): Invalid argument [22] Is there any pointers of what am I missing or is it kamailio bug? Many Thanks Regards Muhammad Zaka

1 0

app_lua and sqlops returns error
by Sebastian Damm 20 Jun '17

20 Jun '17

Hi, I'm developing some routing logic with Kamailio 5.0.1 and app_lua. I've integrated my lua script and now I'm trying to use sqlops within the script. I want to use the reconnect stuff of sqlops instead of implementing it by myself. This is what the Kamailio config looks like: [..] loadmodule "db_mysql.so" loadmodule "sqlops.so" loadmodule "app_lua.so" [..] modparam("sqlops", "sqlcon", "ca=>mysql://kamailio:foobar@127.0.0.1/kamailio") modparam("app_lua", "reload", 1) modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/playground.lua") ####### Routing Logic ######## # Main SIP request routing logic request_route { route(everythinginlua); } onreply_route { route(everythinginlua); } route[everythinginlua] { if(!lua_run("handle_packet")) { xlog("L_ERR", "SCRIPT: failed to execute lua function!\n"); } drop; exit; } The lua script looks like this: -- Start of script function handle_packet() sr.log("L_INFO", "Got packet method "..sr.pv.get("$rm")) local status = sr.sqlops.sql_query("ca", "SELECT * FROM table", "fooresult") sr.err("sql query returned status "..status) end -- End of script Now when a packet comes in, I see the following in the log file: Jun 14 11:19:59 busch /usr/sbin/kamailio[13254]: ERROR: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:104]: lua_sr_log(): Got packet method REGISTER Jun 14 11:19:59 busch /usr/sbin/kamailio[13254]: ERROR: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:713]: app_lua_run_ex(): error from Lua: /etc/kamailio/playground.lua:4: attempt to call field 'sql_query' (a nil value) Jun 14 11:19:59 busch /usr/sbin/kamailio[13254]: ERROR: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:726]: app_lua_run_ex(): error executing: handle_packet (err: 2) Jun 14 11:19:59 busch /usr/sbin/kamailio[13254]: ERROR: <script>: SCRIPT: failed to execute lua function! Looks to me as if the functions of sqlops don't get exported to my lua script. According to the documentation, after specifying the "register" modparam, I should be able to access those functions. What am I missing? Thanks in advance Sebastian

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] re.subst does not work with $var?
by Pranathi Venkatayogi 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Any input please? How do I use these methods with $var... I get the same behavior when I use avp_subst as well. From: Pranathi Venkatayogi Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 6:22 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Subject: re.subst does not work with $var? I am trying to replace "domain1" with "domain2" in the msrp(body). Following stmt works where in I specify domain strings as literals. var(modBody) = $(msrp(body){re.subst,/()(domain1)()/domain2/g}); I am having trouble making the same work with $var variables. See below - this code does not do the replacement - $var(domain1) = "()(domain1)()"; $var(domain2) = "domain2"; var(modBody2) = $(msrp(body){re.subst,/$var(domain1)/$var(domain2)/g}); Any clue/ideas or is it by design? Thanks, Pranathi Venkatayogi System Developer II (520) 745-9447 x4466 www.cyracom.com<http://www.cyracom.com/> Join us: [cid:image001.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://www.facebook.com/pages/CyraCom-LLC/134704783312720> [cid:image002.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://twitter.com/cyracom> [cid:image003.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/cyracom> [cid:image004.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.cyracom.com/blog/> [cid:image005.png@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attached content may contain confidential or privileged material delivered for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. The content of this e-mail message, including any attachments, does not comprise a contract or a portion of a contract, and so does not bind CyraCom International, Inc. or any of its agents or subsidiaries. CyraCom, LLC and Voiance Language Services, LLC are wholly owned subsidiaries of CyraCom International, Inc.

1 0

two way routing
by Jean Cérien 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Hello I am looking at the following configuration: 1/ voip providers, with different external sip servers, will send calls to kamailio, that will dispatch them to asterisk servers, with load balancing & failover. The IP of the asterisk servers are known and fixed. 2/ the asterisk servers will also place calls, going through kamailio, that will dispatch them to the voip provider sip servers, based on R-URI / Prefix. I've achieved #1 with dispatcher module, I've seen carrierroute module that can achieve #2, but I dont really grasp how to put the two together. I have the feeling that #1 can also be done with carrierroute, and that I only need to check if the 'from' domain is one my asterisk, and chose a different routing table, but I dont see how to do that is that a valid approch ? where should I look to do that ? thanks J.

3 7

Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket
by Karsten Horsmann 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Hello List, is there any howto about webrtc loadbalance in combination with kamailio and FreeSWITCH? I want to share one WSS address/endpoint to multiple FreeSWITCH backends. Or is there any other best practice? My callflow is mostly that my internal SIP Servers called my registered webrtc clients. Would be nice to get some input. -- Kind Regards *Karsten Horsmann*

5 7

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2017