sr-users June 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

82 participants
135 discussions

404 Not found error when login Siremis-4.2.0

by Chathura Senanayake

Hello, I need a help with siremis-4.2.0. I have installed Kamailio-4.3 and have it running. Then I installed Siremis-4.2.0. When I try to login to the Siremis by using login name "admin" and password "admin", it shows a 404 Not found error message as follow. Not Found The requested URL /siremis/system/general_default was not found on this server. ------------------------------ *Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Server at 172.16.2.9 Port 80* I have run the #a2enmod > rewrite and Restart the apache2. But the problem is still not solved. Please let me know how to resolve this. *Chathura Senanayake* Associate Software Engineer (DA) hSenid Mobile Solutions *Head Office* (Singapore)*P*: +65 65 332 140*M*: *F*: +65 62 910 023 *R&D* (Sri Lanka)*P*: +94 11 268 3751*M*: +94 71 757 9646*F*: +94 11 268 3951 <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/> <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/hSenidMobileSolutions> <https://twitter.com/hSenidMobile> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/hsenid-mobile-solutions-pvt-ltd> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/116242841237814090103/posts> <http://www.youtube.com/user/hSenidmobile>*www.hSenidMobile.com* <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/>

8 years, 11 months

Kamailio number of matches of specific character in a string

by Ali Taher

Hello, I just need to count the number of a specific character in a string. For example I want to count the number of "a" in the following string : "bbbaddaa34" I searched among transformations but didn't find such tool. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Ali

8 years, 11 months

using uac_replace_from( )

by Al S

Hi, I am trying to change only the "display name" of the FROM header using uac_replace_from().However, the value is not being changed (see below) request_route { .... xlog ("L_INFO", "fu=$fu"); uac_replace_from("pbx", ""); xlog ("L_INFO", "fu=$fu"); # authentication route(AUTH); ....} Am I missing anything? Any help in this regard would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,Al

8 years, 11 months

Re: [SR-Users] loose_route to find transport=tcp

by Ryan Kendrick

After enabling and deciphering debugging it appears there may be a bug. I also reviewed https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5658#section-6 I cross-referenced my pcap to ensure I was looking at the reINVITE and see: Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:785]: after_loose(): *Topmost route URI: 'sip:xx.xxx.x.xx;lr;r2=on;ftag=a30a720a;did=b75.65a1;nat=yes' is me* Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [xx.xxx.x.xx] == [xx.xxx.x.xx] Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5061 Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [xx.xxx.x.xx] == [xx.xxx.x.xx] Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5070 (advertise 0) matches port 5061 Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [xx.xxx.x.xx] == [xx.xxx.x.xx] Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5090 (advertise 0) matches port 5061 Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [xx.xxx.x.xx] == [xx.xxx.x.xx] Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061 (advertise 0) matches port 5061 Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:181]: find_next_route(): *No next Route HF found* Jun 16 15:01:29 xxxxxxxxxxxxx /usr/sbin/kamailio[643]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:847]: after_loose(): no next URI found There is definitely another Route header immediately below the one found above, but find_next_route() doesn't find it . I added my own debugging to loose.c and if ((_m->last_header->type!=HDR_ROUTE_T) || (_m->last_header==*_hdr)) { LM_DBG("No next Route HF found\n"); LM_DBG("_m->last_header->type: %d\n", _m->last_header->type); return 1; } logs find_next_route(): _m->last_header->type: 12 which is HDR_CONTENTLENGTH_T which is indeed the LAST header in the message. We have done very little work in the Kamailio source...just some database escaping in odbc for things to work properly with our database engine...but unless I'm missing something isn't it very wrong to be looking at the last header right here? I may attempt to figure out the message and/or hdr_field data structures and change it. It may also be that the issue doesn't occur when find_next_route is called with a valid _hdr which does seem to search for the "next" one vs going straight to the final header in the entire message. If this is getting overly complicated for this mailing list please let me know... Ryan On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Kendrick <kendrick.ryan.c(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > We are using Kamailio 4.2.5 as a registrar and proxy between many > dispersed end-users of a soft phone app and our calling platform / switch. > > Until now we have used udp exclusively but are trying to introduce tcp > between end-users and Kamailio, leaving udp between Kam and our > switch...while maintaining the ability for some end-users to use udp to Kam. > > With some simple address checks I am able to always send to our switch > over udp. If all end-users used tcp I could send everything else tcp, but I > need to maintain udp support. > > The specific problem I am having is on a reINVITE such as this one from > our platform to the a-leg: > > INVITE sip:xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:42679;user=phone SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK218cc8e12ll5035f67INV6a67885312aad > Max-Forwards: 35 > Route: <sip:xxxxxxxxxxx;lr;r2=on;ftag=daba971c;did=b57.4872;nat=yes> > Route: > <sip:xxxxxxxxxxx:5070;transport=tcp;lr;r2=on;ftag=daba971c;did=b57.4872;nat=yes> > Contact: <sip:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060> > To: "xxxxxx"<sip:xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5070>;tag=daba971c > From: <sip:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > :5070>;tag=6a678853-co76461-INS002 > Call-ID: MDI4ZmFjNmZhN2Y1NWE2ZTViNTkyZGUwNWE2YzUzYmU > CSeq: 7646101 INVITE > Allow: > INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REFER,OPTIONS,NOTIFY,SUBSCRIBE,PRACK,INFO,UPDATE > Content-Type: application/sdp > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:10:18 GMT > User-Agent: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Content-Length: 262 > > As you might notice, we have rr:enable_double_rr set: > > *There are some situations when the server needs to insert two > Record-Route header fields instead of one. For example when using two > disconnected networks or doing cross-protocol forwarding from UDP->TCP. > This parameter enables inserting of 2 Record-Routes. The server will later > remove both of them. * > > and I believe it is necessary to keep this way. Without it Kamailio > doesn't even see the reINVITE...the switch probably tries tcp and that's > not setup between the two. > > The invite above is sent to the a-leg over udp but I would expect and need > it to be tcp in this case. The reINVITE is part of an existing dialog. We > call loose_route() followed by some simple bflag setting and flag checking, > t_on_reply(), ... then t_relay(). > > I do have a functional workaround but would prefer to avoid such manual > handling by utilizing built-in functionality properly. > > # > # relay the message > # > if(route(TEST_TOGW)) { > if (!t_relay_to_udp()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > } > else { > if ($(hdr(Route)[-1]) =~ "tcp") { > if(!t_relay_to_tcp()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > } > else if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > } > > I'm not 100% sure how reliable or fast this will be, but it does work so > far in my simple tests. > > Is loose_route supposed to see and use the transport=tcp but isn't for > some reason? It seems like the right thing to do to me. If not, is there > anything else I can/should be doing in the tm and/or rr modules to make > Kamailio realize it needs to send this message over TCP? If not in those > two modules is there some recommended way perhaps via registrar or usrloc > etc. to make Kamailio remember/store when a user is connected via TCP and > be able to do a quick lookup before sending to them? Anything else I'm > missing or not thinking of? > > Please let me know if I can further explain and rest assured any > assistance will be much appreciated!!! >

8 years, 11 months

Performance Tests/Hard Recommendations kamailio 4.2 -200CPS

by Jonathan Hunter

Hi Guys, Has anyone recently performed tests on kamailio 4.2 running up to 200 CPS? It would be great to know the hardware requirements for this setup. Thanks Jon

8 years, 11 months

siptrace: how to log sent ACK within dialog

by Seudin Kasumovic

Hi, TM forward ACK statelessly (see log below), so there is no call of installed callback on TMCB_REQUEST_(IN)SENT in siptrace module, so I can't see way how to log ACK sent packet. Any work around to get sent ACK logged? DEBUG: sl [sl_funcs.c:388]: sl_filter_ACK(): DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! DEBUG: <script>: 408:172.16.23.130:5060 <-- 198.51.100.137:52150 ACK sip:8807@127.0.0.1:5080;transport=udp DEBUG: <script>: 425: start trace ACK DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:1865]: pipport2su(): the port string is 52150 DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:1865]: pipport2su(): the port string is 5060 DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:1677]: trace_send_hep_duplicate(): setting up the socket_info DEBUG: <script>: 542: WITHINDLG: loose_route set du='sip:172.16.23.130:5070 ;lr;ftag=1029663405' DEBUG: <script>: 369: RELAY ACK sip:8807@127.0.0.1:5080;transport=udp [4194308] DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1312]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=4 , global msg id=3 , T on entrance=0xffffffff DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34522, isACK=1 DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: *RFC3261 transaction matching failed* DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:279]: t_relay_to(): SER: forwarding ACK statelessly DEBUG: <script>: 821:172.16.23.130:5060 --> 172.16.23.130:5070 ACK sip:8807@127.0.0.1:5080;transport=udp Regards, Seudin Kasumovic

8 years, 11 months

Getting 407 response when calling out (on bulk registration)

by Al S

Hi, A bulk registration has been added to the "location" table:*************************** 1. row *************************** id: 113 ruid: uloc-55808d5a-33bc-1 username: pbx domain: NULL contact: sip:pbx@10.10.10.157:5060;bnc received: NULL path: NULL expires: 2015-06-17 10:08:42 q: -1.00 callid: 1-15061(a)10.10.10.157 cseq: 2last_modified: 2015-06-17 09:08:42 flags: 0 cflags: 0 user_agent: SIPp/Win32 socket: udp:10.10.10.160:5060 methods: NULL instance: NULL reg_id: 01 row in set (0.00 sec) An outgoing call (SIPOUT) is made from a 10-digit number of the pbx: Request-Line: INVITE sip:9191111111@example.net:5060 SIP/2.0From: sipp <sip:8181111111@home.net>;tag=1To: <sip:9191111111@example.net:5060>Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="pbx",realm="myhome.net",uri="sip:10.10.10.160:5060",nonce="???",response="??",algorithm=MD5 Even though I changed the value of $fU to "pbx", Kamailio does not authenticate the username and response with a 407 "Proxy Auth Required" response: route[AUTH] {... if (is_method("REGISTER") || from_uri==myself) { # authenticate requests $var(fU) = $fU; $fU = "pbx"; if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "1")) { auth_challenge("$fd", "0"); exit; } # user authenticated - remove auth header if(!is_method("REGISTER|PUBLISH")) consume_credentials(); } ... $fU = $var(fU); #!endif return;} Is this the correct approach to process outgoing call for bulk registration username?Any help in this regard would be greatly appreciated Thanks,Al

8 years, 11 months

kamailio sending 408 request time out

by Priyaranjan Nayak

Hi All, I am using kamailio-4.2.5 for testing setup. After starting the kamailio I am getting below message /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -N 20 -m 512 -M 8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -E loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(24471) WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1392]: fix_hostname(): could not rev. resolve 192.168.1.118 0(24471) WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1392]: fix_hostname(): could not rev. resolve 192.168.1.118 Listening on udp: 192.168.1.118:4060 tcp: 192.168.1.118:4060 Aliases: 0(24471) INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:4748]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(24473) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob 0(24473) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(24473) INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 0(24473) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:175]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(24473) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:225]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 8(24481) INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:225]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) Once I sent the request to kamailio server, I am not getting 408 request time out from kamailio and getting below log 12(24485) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) 12(24485) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading 9(24482) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) 9(24482) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading 12(24485) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) 12(24485) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading 10(24483) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:299]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer (104) 10(24483) ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1326]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading 13(24486) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4162]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): connect 192.168.1.114:61945 failed 13(24486) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4162]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): connect 192.168.1.114:19129 failed 13(24486) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4162]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): connect 192.168.1.114:6050 failed Could you please give me any idea how to resolve this issue ? Thanks Priyaranjan

8 years, 11 months

http_query failed to perform curl (28) errors

by Armen Babikyan

Hello, I am running across the same issue as described here: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-February/086796.html Was there a resolution to this issue? I come across this issue fairly regularly. Unlike the OP, however, I do not have any luck by retrying my query: when I place my http_query within a while loop and keep 1-second delays between calls, all consistently fail with error 28. After long pauses, http_query()s start to work as expected. I think that previous thread mentions DNS as a possible culprit. Is http_query using libcurl's preferred resolver, or is it using Kamailio's built-in DNS cache? I really doubt my local resolver is cause of the issue here. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks! Armen

8 years, 11 months

Not found error when Siremis login

by Chathura Senanayake

Hello, I need a help with siremis-4.2.0. When I try to login the the Siremis, it shows a 404 Not found error message as follow. Not Found The requested URL /siremis/system/general_default was not found on this server. ------------------------------ *Chathura Senanayake* Associate Software Engineer (DA) hSenid Mobile Solutions *Head Office* (Singapore)*P*: +65 65 332 140*M*: *F*: +65 62 910 023 *R&D* (Sri Lanka)*P*: +94 11 268 3751*M*: +94 71 757 9646*F*: +94 11 268 3951 <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/> <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/hSenidMobileSolutions> <https://twitter.com/hSenidMobile> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/hsenid-mobile-solutions-pvt-ltd> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/116242841237814090103/posts> <http://www.youtube.com/user/hSenidmobile>*www.hSenidMobile.com* <http://www.hsenidmobile.com/>

8 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2015