Hi,
I would like to append a header to a 'winning' negative reply in
failure_route and let the Kamailio do the default action (state fully
forward the winning reply).
When I use append_to_reply("Foo: bar\r\n"); and then call exit; in
failure_route nothing is appended.
When I use same append_to_reply then t_relay("505","Error"); and exit; the
header is appended.
When I use append and t_reply with dialog modul turned on I got a bug I'm
solving here '[SR-Users] t_reply in failure route with dialog module'.
So my question is how to put a header into a reply when I don't want to
alter its code or text?
I'm using Kamilio 4.0.4 on Debian 7.1
Thanks for an answer
Efelin
Hi All,
I have build Kamailio 4.0.1 from source in CentOS 5.8(i386
architecture).I followed all instructions from
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/4.0.x/git.(Though Modules_k directory
is not generated).I then edit kamailio.config file for websocket support as
described in webocket.cfg file in exmples directory.But while starting
kamailio it gives following error
ERROR: load_module: could not open module : libunistring.so.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
0(30270) : [cfg.y:3567]: parse error in config file
/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 318, column 12-57: failed to
load module
I checked websocket.so file in the specified directory and it is
already there.Can you please help me what's wrong with it?
please help.
Rupayan Dutta
Hello,
First, i have 7 years experience with Asterisk, but I started a project
with Kamailio, forgive me in advance if I say silly things...! ;-)
I set up a classic Asterisk / Kamailio configuration:
sip phones -> kamailio -> asterisk -> sip trunks/pstn.
When a call comes from the PSTN side, if I configure Asterisk as follows:
[012345678]
type = friend
username = 012345678
secret = xxxxxxx
host = dynamic
fromdomain = sip.mydomain.com
fromuser = 012345678
Standard mode:
exten => 012345678, 1, Dial(SIP/012345678) -> The call is redirected on the
phone by Kamailio ! :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trunk mode:
[mytrunk]
type = friend
username = mytrunkUser
secret = xxxxxxx
host = dynamic
fromdomain = sip.mydomain.com
fromuser = mytrunkUser
exten => 012345678, 1, Dial(SIP/mytrunk/012345678) -> The call is rejected
by Kamailio....
exten => 012345679, 1, Dial(SIP/mytrunk/012345679) -> The call is rejected
by Kamailio ....
My question is how to allow the routing of multiple numbers (trunk mode) in
a SIP account with Kamailio?
Best regards,
Mickael
Hello,
I have configured the SNMPstats module fine in my machine because I get the
SNMP information with the new KAMAILIO MIBS but I don't understand why the
value of kamailio dialogs is always 0:
KAMAILIO-MIB::kamailioCurNumDialogs.0 = Gauge32: 0
KAMAILIO-MIB::kamailioCurNumDialogsInProgress.0 = Gauge32: 0
KAMAILIO-MIB::kamailioCurNumDialogsInSetup.0 = Gauge32: 0
KAMAILIO-MIB::kamailioTotalNumFailedDialogSetups.0 = Counter32: 0
However I can see the transactions:
KAMAILIO-SIP-COMMON-MIB::kamailioSIPSummaryTotalTransactions.0 = Counter32:
54797
Should I configure an specific parametr of the SNMPstats module?
Regards,
Hello everyone,
My name is Bruno, I'm a student from Portugal studying IMS at the moment. I've been following tutorials online, trying to get Kamailio to work as an IMS core - I'm pretty much a newbie in this field.
Unfortunantly I've been getting several errors and I can't seem to properly configure everything. I was wondering if there is a All-in-One VM that can be downloaded, with Kamailio ready to be used as an IMS core?
Thanks in advance. Best regards,
Bruno C.
Hi all,
I need to modify the host part of a contact header. I'm trying
something like:
route {
.....
if (remove_hf("Contact")){
if
(insert_hf("Contact: rn", "Contact"))
xlog("Contact modified");
}
if (!t_relay("YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY","5060")) {
sl_reply_error();
}
......
}
When i look SIP DUMP on YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY side i see older
Contact field.
I try subst_hf with regexp, subst and simply remove
Contact, all this does not work.
What i am doing wrong?
--
С
уважением Зуев Михаил
I'm trying to set up kamailio dispatcher to distribute calls to 2 asterisk
servers. So far, the failover case seems ok, but I cannot get the
dispatcher to distribute load. All calls are going to the last destination
entry in the dispatcher table even if I have set the maxload attributes.
I'm using algorithm 10 for load distribution. The number of calls sent to
one asterisk is well above the maxload. Hope someone more experienced in
dispatcher can review my config and give me some recommendations. Thanks in
advance.
Here is the content of dispatcher table in postgresql db.
select * from dispatcher;
id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs
| description
----+-------+--------------------+-------+----------+---------------------------+-------------
1 | 1 | sip:10.0.1.31:5061 | 0 | 0 |
duid=asterisk1;maxload=25 | Asterisk1
2 | 1 | sip:10.0.1.33:5061 | 0 | 0 |
duid=asterisk2;maxload=25 | Asterisk2
(2 rows)
Here are the dispatcher sections in kamailio.cfg.
# ----- dispatcher params -----
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBASTURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1).
# If flag 2 is set, then failover support is enabled.
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
# the last address in destination set is used as a final option to send the
request to
modparam("dispatcher", "use_default", 1)
# load balancing fail over
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(dsdst)")
modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(dsgrp)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(dscnt)")
modparam("dispatcher", "dstid_avp", "$avp(dsdstid)")
modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_avp", "$avp(dsattrs)")
# PVs for hashing
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$fU@$ci")
# PVs to store results when calling ds_is_from_list
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_pvname", "$var(setid)")
modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_pvname", "$var(attrs)")
# method to probe the gateways
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:dispatcher@localhost")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 30)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshhold", 10)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;code=488;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
# size of hash table storing data for call load dispatching, power of two
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 10)
# expiration time in seconds to remove the load on a destination if no BYE
was received
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_expire", 3600)
# expiration time in seconds to remove the load on a destination if no 200
OK for INVITE was received
# and state updated with ds_load_update
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_check_interval", 30)
#!endif
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (has_totag()) {
# sequential request withing a dialog should
# take the path determined by record-routing
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
if(is_method("BYE|CANCEL") && ds_is_from_list("1", "3"))
ds_load_update();
#!endif
......
}
}
route[FROMASTERISK] {
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
if(ds_is_from_list("1", "3")) {
xlog("L_DBG","$rm from $fU@$si:$sp: Call from Asterisk cluster\n");
return 1;
}
return -1;
#!else
if ($si==$sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindip)) {
return 1;
}
return -1;
#!endif
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
xdbg("incoming reply\n");
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
if(is_method("INVITE") && ds_is_from_list("1", "3")) {
if(status=~"2[0-9][0-9]") {
ds_load_update();
}
else if(status=~"[3-7][0-9][0-9]") {
ds_load_unset();
}
}
#!endif
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]")
route(NATMANAGE);
}
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] {
if (t_is_canceled()) {
exit;
}
# next DST - only for 500 or local timeout
if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) {
# mark the destination Inactive and Probing
ds_mark_dst("IP");
# select the new destination
if(ds_next_dst()) {
t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
else {
# last available node failed to reply, no other
destinations available
send_reply("404", "No destination");
exit;
}
}
}
#!endif
route[TOASTERISK] {
#!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER
# ds_mark_dst("IP");
# Call load distribution
if(!ds_select_dst("1", "10")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "Service Unavailable");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fU@$si:$sp: No destinations available for $rd\n");
exit;
}
xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du>\n");
t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH");
#!else
$du = "sip:" + $sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindip) + ":"
+ $sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindport);
#!endif
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
# Dispatcher detects a destination goes down
event_route[dispatcher:dst-down] {
xlog("L_ERR", "Destination down: $rm $ru ($du)\n");
}
# Dispatcher detects a destination comes up
event_route[dispatcher:dst-up] {
xlog("L_ERR", "Destination up: $rm $ru\n");
}
Hello,
This is question on PBX behavior, what is the right thing to do, and how do
PBX's generally behave.
If a user on a phone, dials a number, which happens to be configured on the
same phone system (for example another tenant), there are two options:
1. The PBX notices this, and directly connects the phone to the DID on
that system (breaking separation of tenants)
2. The PBX sends the call out on the SIP trunk, and the provider-routing
sends the call back as an incoming call.
What are the pros and cons of each option from the SIP provider point of
view?
How do PBX's generally behave?
Thanks,
Antonio
PS: I reposted, because the original question was apparently not phrased in
a clear way.
Hi All,
I need one IPSec supported opensource SIP server for testing my sip client
endpoint.Could you please tell me which SIP server supporting IPSec ?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks
Priyaranjan
For immediate release:
ATLANTA, GA (1 April 2015)--Evariste Systems LLC, an Atlanta-based software
vendor specialising in Kamailio-based service delivery solutions for the
VoIP ITSP market, is pleased to announce that it, in collaboration with
Red Hat Software and Ringfree Communications, has finalised the
absorption of the Kamailio SIP Server into the 'systemd' system management
platform for Linux. The new component shall be called 'systemd-rtc-server',
or 'Systemd Real-Time Communication Server'.
Alex Balashov, principal of Evariste and leader of the tri-vendor
collaboration effort, will officially announce the handover of the reigns
of the Kamailio project to the personal leadership of Lennart Poettering
at the upcoming Systemd Real Time Communications World conference, to be
held in Berlin on 27-29 May of this year.
John Knight, Director of GNOME 3 Integration and part-time usability
consultant at Ringfree Communications, based in Hendersonville, North
Carolina,was quick to summarise the triumphs of the long-standing
integration effort.
Remarked Knight:
"The industry has recognised for years that a SIP proxy is a basic building
block in the 'init' subsystem of any Linux host. In this age of multimedia
communication with voice and video, it was a travesty that systemd handled
time synchronisation, network configuration, login management, logging,
and console, but not SIP message routing."
Sean McCord, a veteran partner at Atlanta-based integrator CyCORE & Docker,
was quick to concur:
"SIP calls are much easier to troubleshoot with binary logs. Combined
with packet captures of TLS-encrypted WebRTC calls, systemd-journald
is the ultimate call setup troubleshooting methodology of the responsive,
kinetic enterprise."
To support the integration of Kamailio into the ecosystem of every major
Linux distribution, Evariste has released new 'dbus_api' and 'pulseaudio'
modules for the project.
Balashov stated, "We fully expect to use the D-Bus API to achieve
gnome-session integration with systemd-rtc-server-usrloc, but we aren't
going to leave Windows users behind; KamailioSvcHost.exe will support
Domain Controller policies for G.722 in Active Directory forests."
Despite an aggressive delivery timeline by the tri-vendor consortium behind
systemd-rtc-server, industry commentators have widely lambasted the fact
that it took so long for Kamailio to become integrated into systemd. Fred
Posner, solutions architect at The Palner Group in Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
recently wrote in a widely-publicised blog post:
"sr-dev have been keeping their heads in the sand for too long. For years
now, it has been completely obvious and self-evident to anyone with half
a brain that all kinds of VoIP software should be included in systemd.
It's a basic building block of the whole OS, having absorbed functionality
previously provided by all kinds of packages like util-linux and
wireless-tools."
John Knight of Ringfree accepted the criticism readily, but advocated a
forward-thinking orientation focused on breaking with the uncertainty of
the past:
"In the absence of a SIP component for routing calls to the PSTN, some
people thought, 'systemd has no clear direction apart from the whims of its
developers, and is a perpetually moving goal post.' Well, a SIP server
should
put an end to that whole discussion; that's exactly what was missing,
and now
that we have systemd-rtc-server, we've eliminated all doubts about the
coherence, conceptual integrity and finality of systemd."
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/