sr-users June 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

82 participants
135 discussions

Kamailio fails to start if cannot connect to MySQL

by Al S

Hi, We have verified if MySQL server is offline when Kamailio is starting, Kamailio fails to start correctly.Is this a bug? Jun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_my_con.c:109]: driver error: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)Jun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:320]: could not add connection to the poolJun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: usrloc [dlist.c:518]: failed to open database connectionJun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: registrar [reg_mod.c:472]: failed to register domainJun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: <core> [route.c:1216]: fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:858Jun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: <core> [route.c:1216]: fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:861Jun 4 10:53:22 ape /usr/sbin/kamailio[10630]: ERROR: <core> [route.c:1216]: fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:863 We are running kamailio 3.3.7. Thanks,Al

8 years, 11 months

Private IP in SDP packet headers

by Alex

Hello! Please help to fix problem with sdp headers UAC Inet -> (X.X.X.X) Kamailio (192.168.30.250) -> Asterisk (192.168.30.2) When i call from UAC to 9002 i received INVITE/SDP from kamailio SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.52:27080 ;received=10.10.101.50;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-027c786dac17bf68-1---d8754z-;rport=27080 Record-Route: <sip:192.168.30.2;line=sr-mYtaP6eErk-dx6VfrLzfr6BaPGj0OHFfPYd0OHFfPYIQpHmFr9mQPKDEx9VlvZ8QO4ttma**> Record-Route: <sip:X.X.X.X;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=0748d948;nat=yes> From: <sip:user4@X.X.X.X>;tag=0748d948 To: <sip:9002@X.X.X.X>;tag=as3914e1d1 Call-ID: ZWU5YmFiNTNhNmNmYWQzYzhkZWUzZDNjOTU3MDFiNGU. CSeq: 2 INVITE Server: Virtel.net Node2 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Contact: <sip:192.168.30.2;line=sr-mYtaP62ar9nzrg20y6eYPA-LrA-0P6Bax6z*> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 278 v=0 o=root 732368067 732368067 IN IP4 X.X.X.X s=Asterisk PBX 11.17.1 c=IN IP4 X.X.X.X t=0 0 m=audio 15768 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv a=nortpproxy:yes Why Record-Route and Contact fields contain private IP of asterisk ?

8 years, 11 months

How should a PBX behave when a user dials a DID configured for the same or another tenant on that PBX?

by Antonio Gómez Soto

Hello, This is question on PBX behavior, what is the right thing to do, and how do PBX's generally behave. If a user on a phone, dials a number, which happens to be configured on the same phone system (for example another tenant), there are two options: 1. The PBX notices this, and directly connects the phone to the DID on that system 2. The PBX sends the call out on the SIP trunk, and the provider-routing sends the call back as an incoming call. What are the pros and cons of each option? How do PBX's generally behave? Thanks, Antonio

8 years, 11 months

Getting 404 From Kamailio for PRACK

by Austin Einter

Hi All I am trying ti implement a IMS client. For testing I am using Kamailio proxy. During call setup, I get 404 for Prack message. Whats going wrong not able to figure out. Here is the Kamailio log below, can somebody help me too find whats wrong her. *11(25376) DEBUG: sl [sl.c:296]: send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (25376 (11)), reusing fd11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd05390 n=386 fd=511(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 200 OKVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:40611;branch=z9hG4bK1186661565From: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1307796831To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=25fbdd2b0c9b93b0791296269f5ae411.38a0Call-ID: 835380265(a)192.168.1.195 <835380265(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 2 REGISTERContact: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195:40611;transport=tcp>;expires=3600Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa33180, 5, 2, 0x7fe2ebd05390), fd_no=111(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <SUBSCRIBE>11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1577674881>; state=1611(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=511(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=211(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:197]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=1011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [28]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <SUBSCRIBE>11(25376) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 70 11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=133567903511(25376) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2911(25376) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:255]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 111(25376) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=1 T start=(nil)11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34123, isACK=011(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1141]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=2 T end=(nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 506011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 506011(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4090 (advertise 0) matches port 506011(25376) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:203]: lookup_helper(): contact for [linux_ua_1] cannot handle the SIP method11(25376) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:211]: lookup_helper(): 'linux_ua_1' has no valid contact in usrloc11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=2 , global msg id=2 , T on entrance=(nil)11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=34123, isACK=011(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2ebd10e68, callback type 1, id 0 entered11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: c17c6f2bd5d60787072aef8ffcf5bfe611(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=2 T start=0x7fe2ebd10e6811(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1144]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found!11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1653]: cleanup_uac_timers(): DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (25376 (11)), reusing fd11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd05390 n=334 fd=511(25376) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 405 Method Not AllowedVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:40611;branch=z9hG4bK1577674881From: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1335679035To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=ff272440259f71af2c767e7942717037-95d5Call-ID: 1397060040(a)192.168.1.195 <1397060040(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 2 SUBSCRIBEServer: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 011(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:728]: _reply_light(): DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x7fe30fea65c0: SIP/2.0 405 Method N..., shmem=0x7fe2ebd135a8: SIP/2.0 405 Method N11(25376) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:738]: _reply_light(): DEBUG: _reply_light: finished11(25376) DEBUG: sl [sl.c:288]: send_reply(): reply in stateful mode (tm)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)11(25376) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up 9(25374) DEBUG: websocket [ws_conn.c:459]: wsconn_get_list(): wsconn_get_list 9(25374) DEBUG: websocket [ws_conn.c:503]: wsconn_get_list(): wsconn_get_list returns list [(nil)] with [0] members10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 35910(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <INVITE>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1970975121>; state=1610(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:197]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=1010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [28]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE>10(25375) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 70 10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=35910(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=60426366410(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2910(25375) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:255]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 110(25375) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=3 global id=2 T start=0xffffffffffffffff10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=12870, isACK=010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1141]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=3 global id=3 T end=(nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 506010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 506010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4090 (advertise 0) matches port 506010(25375) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:198]: lookup_helper(): contact for [linux_ua_1] found by address10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=3 , global msg id=3 , T on entrance=(nil)10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=12870, isACK=010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2ebd13848, callback type 1, id 0 entered10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: c4c3d26baa62dea619271f186d6344fc10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:347]: t_relay_to(): SER: new INVITE10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (25375 (10)), reusing fd10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd096b0 n=307 fd=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to usVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1970975121From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 2 INVITEServer: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:728]: _reply_light(): DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x7fe30fea6968: SIP/2.0 100 trying -..., shmem=0x7fe2ebd163f0: SIP/2.0 100 trying -10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:738]: _reply_light(): DEBUG: _reply_light: finished10(25375) DEBUG: <script>: new branch [0] to sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195:40611;transport=tcp10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2893]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=2>, rcv proto=210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 192.168.1.19510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 40611, type 210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3453:3998:0, 310(25375) INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:2753]: tcpconn_1st_send(): quick connect for 0x7fe2ebd1703010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7fe2ebd17030, 6, fd 28 from 10 (25375)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9eeee0, 28, 2, 0x7fe2ebd17030), fd_no=1910(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9eeee0, 28, -1, 0x0) fd_no=20 called14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4219]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): tcp: DBG: sending to child, events 114(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3902]: send2child(): selected tcp worker 2 12(25377) for activity on [tcp:192.168.1.195:4060 <http://192.168.1.195:4060>], 0x7fe2ebd1703012(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1554]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7fe2ebd17030, fd=512(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 38812(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:633]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status):12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:635]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:637]: parse_msg(): status: <183>12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:639]: parse_msg(): reason: <Session Progress>12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK6423.c4c3d26baa62dea619271f186d6344fc.0>; state=612(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 236, <i> = <2>; state=1612(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=512(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=212(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...12(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=1 global id=0 T start=0xffffffffffffffff12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1970975121>; state=1612(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=512(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=6212(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:526]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the second via12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=165643220412(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2912(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE>12(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:949]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 12870 label 0 branch 012(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1004]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x7fe2ebd13848)!12(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2ebd13848, callback type 2, id 0 entered12(25377) DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:644]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for t(0x7fe2ebd13848) event type 2, reply code 18312(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1141]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=1 global id=1 T end=0x7fe2ebd1384812(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:2200]: reply_received(): DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=1)12(25377) DEBUG: <script>: incoming reply12(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=18312(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=012(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=38812(25377) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2278]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): old size: 948, new size: 85312(25377) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2296]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:125, new: 30, rest: 823 msg=SIP/2.0 183 Session ProgressVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1970975121Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.195:4060;transport=tcp;lr>From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1656432204Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 2 INVITEContact: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195:40611;transport=TCP>Content-Type: application/sdpUser-Agent: Linux 64 US-UA 1.0.1Require: 100relRSeq: 1Content-Length: 388v=0o=- 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.195s=IMS_Callc=IN IP4 192.168.1.195t=0 0m=audio 21720 RTP/AVP 99 0 8 101 b=AS:64a=curr:qos remote nonea=curr:qos local nonea=des:qos mandatory remote sendrecva=conf:qos remote sendrecva=des:qos mandatory local sendrecva=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000a=fmtp:101 0-15a=rtpmap:99 AMR/8000a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/800012(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2297]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: tcp connection found (0x7fe2ebd096b0), acquiring fd12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2307]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send, c= 0x7fe2ebd096b0, n=1614(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7fe2ebd096b0, 2, fd -1 from 12 (25377)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2337]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: after receive_fd: c= 0x7fe2ebd096b0 n=8 fd=812(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd096b0 n=853 fd=812(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 183 Session ProgressVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1970975121Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.195:4060;transport=tcp;lr>From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1656432204Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 2 INVITEContact: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195:40611;transport=TCP>Content-Type: application/sdpUser-Agent: Linux 64 US-UA 1.0.1Require: 100relRSeq: 1Content-Length: 388v=0o=- 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.195s=IMS_Callc=IN IP4 192.168.1.195t=0 0m=audio 21720 RTP/AVP 99 0 8 101 b=AS:64a=curr:qos remote nonea=curr:qos local nonea=des:qos mandatory remote sendrecva=conf:qos remote sendrecva=des:qos mandatory local sendrecva=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000a=fmtp:101 0-15a=rtpmap:99 AMR/8000a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/800012(25377) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2ebd13848, callback type 512, id 0 entered12(25377) DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:644]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for t(0x7fe2ebd13848) event type 512, reply code 18312(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up12(25377) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa33180, 5, 2, 0x7fe2ebd17030), fd_no=110(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 39210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <PRACK>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195:40611;transport=TCP>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1576634775>; state=1610(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:197]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=165643220410(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2910(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <3> <PRACK>10(25375) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 70 10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=39210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=60426366410(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2910(25375) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:255]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 110(25375) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:106]: has_totag(): totag found10(25375) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:90]: is_preloaded(): is_preloaded: No10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 4061110(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4060 (advertise 0) matches port 4061110(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.195] == [192.168.1.195]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 4090 (advertise 0) matches port 4061110(25375) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:674]: after_strict(): Next hop: 'sip:192.168.1.195:4060;transport=tcp;lr' is loose router10(25375) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:724]: after_strict(): The last route URI: 'sip:192.168.1.195:4060;transport=tcp;lr'10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=4 , global msg id=3 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=12871, isACK=010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2ebd1b780, callback type 1, id 0 entered10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 0dd1edaf37f3874c5176befe76ed5b3e10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2893]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=2>, rcv proto=210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 192.168.1.19510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 4060, type 210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3360:0:0, 410(25375) INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:2753]: tcpconn_1st_send(): quick connect for 0x7fe2ebd1e5c010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 192.168.1.19510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 19785, type 210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3888:3539:528, 510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9eeee0, 29, 2, 0x7fe2ebd228e0), fd_no=1914(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7fe2ebd1e5c0, 6, fd 30 from 10 (25375)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9eeee0, 30, 2, 0x7fe2ebd1e5c0), fd_no=2014(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9eeee0, 29, -1, 0x0) fd_no=21 called14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4219]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): tcp: DBG: sending to child, events 114(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3902]: send2child(): selected tcp worker 3 13(25378) for activity on [tcp:192.168.1.195:4060 <http://192.168.1.195:4060>], 0x7fe2ebd228e013(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1554]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7fe2ebd228e0, fd=513(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 39213(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <PRACK>13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:192.168.1.195:4060;transport=tcp;lr>13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7423.0dd1edaf37f3874c5176befe76ed5b3e.0>; state=613(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 236, <i> = <2>; state=1613(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=513(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=213(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:197]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1576634775>; state=1613(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=513(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=10013(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:526]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the second via13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=165643220413(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2913(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <3> <PRACK>13(25378) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 69 13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=39213(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=60426366413(25378) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2913(25378) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:255]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 113(25378) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:106]: has_totag(): totag found13(25378) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:113]: find_first_route(): No Route headers found13(25378) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:929]: loose_route(): There is no Route HF13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(192.168.1.195, 192.168.1.195, 0)13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (25378 (13)), reusing fd13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd228e0 n=386 fd=514(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9eeee0, 30, -1, 0x0) fd_no=20 called13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 404 Not hereVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:4060;branch=z9hG4bK7423.0dd1edaf37f3874c5176befe76ed5b3e.0;i=2Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1576634775From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1656432204Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 3 PRACKServer: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 014(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4219]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): tcp: DBG: sending to child, events 114(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3898]: send2child(): WARNING: send2child: no free tcp receiver, connection passed to the least busy one (1)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3902]: send2child(): selected tcp worker 0 10(25375) for activity on [tcp:192.168.1.195:4060 <http://192.168.1.195:4060>], 0x7fe2ebd1e5c013(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1554]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7fe2ebd1e5c0, fd=1013(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1362]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: content-length= 013(25378) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:633]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status):13(25378) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:635]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:637]: parse_msg(): status: <404>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:639]: parse_msg(): reason: <Not here>10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7423.0dd1edaf37f3874c5176befe76ed5b3e.0>; state=613(25378) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa33180, 5, 2, 0x7fe2ebd228e0), fd_no=110(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 236, <i> = <2>; state=1610(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:154]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=5 global id=4 T start=0xffffffffffffffff10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1576634775>; state=1610(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=6210(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:526]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the second via10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=165643220410(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=2910(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>] 10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>]10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <3> <PRACK>10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:949]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 12871 label 0 branch 010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1004]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x7fe2ebd1b780)!10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1141]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=5 global id=5 T end=0x7fe2ebd1b78010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:2200]: reply_received(): DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0)10(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=40410(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2278]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): old size: 386, new size: 29110(25375) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2296]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:117, new: 22, rest: 269 msg=SIP/2.0 404 Not hereVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1576634775From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1656432204Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 3 PRACKServer: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 010(25375) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (25375 (10)), reusing fd10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2ebd096b0 n=291 fd=510(25375) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 404 Not hereVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.195:19009;branch=z9hG4bK1576634775From: <sip:linux_ua_0@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_0(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=604263664To: <sip:linux_ua_1@192.168.1.195 <sip%3Alinux_ua_1(a)192.168.1.195>>;tag=1656432204Call-ID: 734015646(a)192.168.1.195 <734015646(a)192.168.1.195>CSeq: 3 PRACKServer: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))Content-Length: 010(25375) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1653]: cleanup_uac_timers(): DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:643]: destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:298]: receive_msg(): receive_msg: cleaning up10(25375) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa33180, 10, 2, 0x7fe2ebd1e5c0), fd_no=214(25379) CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: receive_fd(): EOF on 1314(25379) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3537]: handle_ser_child(): DBG: handle_ser_child: dead child 4, pid 25369 (shutting down?)14(25379) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9eeee0, 13, -1, 0x0) fd_no=19 calledroot@Kamal:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# *

8 years, 11 months

Increase Simultaneous Registration

by Austin Einter

Hi All I am using Kamailio 4.0.4 (x86_64/linux). I wanted to do simultaneous registrations of large number of endpoints. Many times I see only 2048 endpoints registered and for other endpoints Kamailio did not respond for REGISTER message. I am tcp as transport. Now my questions are 1. What are the different configurations available to increase Kamailio performance 2. If I put Kamailio in a Linux 64 Bit, 2GHz, 8GB RAM machine, how much simultaneous and total registrations can be achieved. I have tuned system file FDs, tcp related configurations like ephemeral port range, and other required configurations. I hope there should be some configurations in Kamailio to achieve higher throughput , can somebody help me out. Thanks Austin

8 years, 11 months

Problem with command kamcmd pkg.stats on Kamailio 4.2.5

by Dao Hai Dang

Hi, I need help with kamcmd pkg.stats on Kamailio 4.2.5. When I used this command to check kamailio process, I get an entry with no pid and total_size param. I used kamcmd ps and the process error was MI FIFO. Same thing happened when I added snmpstats module, I get process SNMP AgentX with no pid and total_size param. This didn't happen when I use kamailio 4.1.x . Below are logs : [root@localhost ~]# kamcmd pkg.stats { entry: 0 pid: 1532 rank: 0 used: 376224 free: 3718760 real_used: 475544 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 4 } { entry: 1 pid: 1534 rank: 1 used: 384496 free: 3709368 real_used: 484936 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 22 } { entry: 2 pid: 1535 rank: -1 used: 384552 free: 3710096 real_used: 484208 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 8 } { entry: 3 pid: 1536 rank: -1 used: 384552 free: 3710096 real_used: 484208 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 8 } { entry: 4 pid: 0 rank: 0 used: 393744 free: 3701072 real_used: 493232 total_size: 0 total_frags: 4 } { entry: 5 pid: 1543 rank: -2 used: 383592 free: 3710552 real_used: 483752 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 8 } { entry: 6 pid: 1544 rank: -4 used: 454392 free: 3640424 real_used: 553880 total_size: 4194304 total_frags: 4 } [root@localhost ~]# kamcmd ps 1532 attendant 1534 udp receiver child=0 sock=10.84.11.116:5060 1535 slow timer 1536 timer 1537 MI FIFO 1543 ctl handler 1544 tcp main process Thanks & Regards, Dao Hai Dang -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Solutions & Software Development Center | VNPT Technology A member of VietNam Posts & Telecomunications Group Addr : 124 Hoang Quoc Viet, Ha Noi Mobile : (+84 )912 363 579 - Skype : cnoob89 Office : (+84) 438 36 20 94 - ext 1222

8 years, 11 months

Strange core.tcp_list / tls.list output

by Mikko Lehto

Hi, I noticed thath command core.tcp_list in kamcmd gives output that does not make sense to me: --- kamcmd> core.tcp_list { id: 1 type: TLS state: CONN_OK timeout: 3599 ref_count: 1 src_ip: 192.168.47.132 src_port: 5061 dst_ip: 10.10.235.9 dst_port: 54769 } { id: 2 type: TLS state: CONN_OK timeout: 3599 ref_count: 1 src_ip: 192.168.47.132 src_port: 32854 dst_ip: 10.10.235.9 dst_port: 5041 } --- In my scenario I am connecting via TLS to host 192.168.47.132:5061. And host 192.168.47.132 is connecting to my proxy host 10.10.235.9:5041. pcap verifies this. Also tls.list gives similar output. Values regarding incoming connection (id=2) makes total sense. It seems that values regarding outgoing connection (id=1) have dst_* values swapped with src_* values. To debug, I placed this logging to tcp_main.c: --- $ git diff tcp_main.c diff --git a/tcp_main.c b/tcp_main.c index 5830c8e..3717cf6 100644 --- a/tcp_main.c +++ b/tcp_main.c @@ -1207,6 +1207,7 @@ again: } from=&my_name; /* update from with the real "from" address */ su2ip_addr(&ip, &my_name); + LM_WARN("after getsockname() my_name=%s server=%s ip=%s\n", su2a(&my_name, sizeof(my_name)), su2a(server, sizeof(*server)), ip_addr2a(&ip)); find_socket: #ifdef USE_TLS if (unlikely(type==PROTO_TLS)) @@ -1223,6 +1224,7 @@ find_socket: else *res_si=sendipv6_tcp; } *res_local_addr=*from; + LM_WARN("before return my_name=%s server=%s ip=%s\n", su2a(&my_name, sizeof(my_name)), su2a(server, sizeof(*server)), ip_addr2a(&ip)); return s; error: if (s!=-1) tcp_safe_close(s); --- This gives following output: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1210]: tcp_do_connect(): after getsockname() my_name=192.168.47.132:5061 server=192.168.47.132:5061 ip=10.10.235.9 WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1227]: tcp_do_connect(): before return my_name=192.168.47.132:5061 server=192.168.47.132:5061 ip=10.10.235.9 Are tcp endpoint values really wrong way around or did I undertand something wrong about their meaning? I am running Kamailio 4.2.5 (x86_64/linux) 61d84c-dirty from git. -- Mikko Lehto

8 years, 11 months

Kamailio Contact header read-only

by Ali Taher

Hello, I'm trying to change contact header in SIP response message by stripping first characters (for testing only) as below : $ct = $(ct{s.strip,25}); But I got below error saying that $ct is read-only: 0(15410) : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 575, column 5-7: read only pvar in assignment left side ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) The question is how can I change contact header before it's sending of Kamailio? Thanks Ali

8 years, 11 months

SIP Auth Realm - From domain or Request domain ?

by jay binks

I have a questions in regards to SIP Auth, and specifically how Asterisk 13 with PJSIP appears to send Invites. It seems that the typical Kamailio config sends the SIP auth challenge with the from domain as the auth realm. however in the case of the Asterisk 13 ( PJSIP ) invite, the from domain is an RFC1918 IP address and I would have to use the domain from the request. What im wanting to know is what the consensus is on where the auth realm comes from. does everyone 100% agree that you send auth using the SIP From header, or is this something that some do Request domain ? What im considering doing is to use the from domain, but if from domain = RFC1918 then use request domain. Im just after everyone's opinion on how to best handle this invite, from a auth_challenge perspective. ( not so much if the Asterisk 13 PJSIP module is doing the right or wrong thing ) INVITE sip:555111222333@sip.mytestdomain.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 180.111.222.333:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjafb111a9-aaaf-4c9e-b456-748514855a06 From: <sip:555111222333@172.18.90.1 >;tag=88317259-052b-4997-bd2e-9c8836e27b47 To: <sip:555111222333@sip.netsip.net.au> Contact: <sip:9d43c8df-6378-4266-89c1-0a0bb0e1d0d1@180.111.222.333:5060> Call-ID: b7da52e2-dfd1-434e-a2c2-b28e1683ce0e -- Sincerely Jay

8 years, 11 months

Fwd: Kamailio start failed

by Gopalakrishnan N

Hi, I have added the ASTERISK integration in kamailio.cfg, after adding those, am not able to start kamailio service, its getting failed, attached is the script. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you with regards, Gopalkrishnan N. Mob: +91 99404 91346 VoIP call - sip:saigop@gtalk2voip.com

8 years, 11 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2015