Hi,
Here is the setup I have configured.
--Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer
-- Three freeswitch works as the media server.
-- They follow common MySQL database.
Regular call flow
User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B.
Everything works fine as long as all users are registered and making call
with single Kamailio. Now the problem starts when we distribute users on
more than one kamailio.
Let us take the case.
UserA -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K1)
UserB -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K2)
Now User A initiates a call.. It will follow the same path
User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B.
Since User B is registered with K2. K1 being a public server won't be able
to initiate any call to User B because there is no TCP connection
established with it.
Can anybody shade some light on this?
Thanks,
Here is is the relevant section of kamailio.cfg
$var(tempfU) = $fU;
#!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH
if((!is_method("REGISTER")) && allow_source_address() && $au == "")
{
# Loading $fU from database using IP
sql_pvquery("elxpbx", "SELECT name FROM sip WHERE host = '$si'
AND sippasswd IS NULL", "$var(tempfU)");
# source IP allowed
return;
}
The problem is that when host= somefqdn.com the above will fail since
$si will always be an IP address as far as I can tell. More often than
not host= is a fqdn and requiring it to always be an IP address is not
an option. Converting it to IP before storing it in the DB is also not
an option because it needs to be able to work of the IP address changes.
So how can the above be done to accomodate the possibility that host=
somefqdn.com or an IP address. Preferably in such a way that it can
scale to hundreds/thousands of rows in the database without slowing
things down or crashing.
Hello Daniel,
Where possible find updated version of options for textops.
[sr_module.c:701]: find_mod_export_record(): find_export_record: <remove_hf_value> not found
Specially Record-Route manipulation.
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>
To: miconda(a)gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE.
http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
can you get the sip traffic from the network (from the first subscribe of this presence dialog)? It will help to see the Route set.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/15 00:36, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match
http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ?
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>
To: miconda(a)gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them.
If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Here fresh paste
http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/
I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Everyone,
Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client
http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/
I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with
rr_advertise_address ?
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
I have in configuration in WITHINDLG
if (is_method("NOTIFY")) {
record_route();
}
and in NATDETECT
if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) {
set_contact_alias();
}
Slava.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello Everyone,
I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value
And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG);
route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] {
# Getting record routes
if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) {
if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) {
xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])");
xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n");
remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]");
}
}
return;
}
Any help Thank you,
Slava.
Hello Daniel,
Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match
http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ?
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>
To: miconda(a)gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them.
If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Here fresh paste
http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/
I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Everyone,
Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client
http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/
I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with
rr_advertise_address ?
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
I have in configuration in WITHINDLG
if (is_method("NOTIFY")) {
record_route();
}
and in NATDETECT
if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) {
set_contact_alias();
}
Slava.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
I am also not at all an expert in GPL licencing or IP, but would like to
add that any customisation you make specifically for the purpose of
interacting with a billing server or other external application is
likely to take the form of a Kamailio module, rather than modifications
to the existing Kamailio modules, the Kamailio core, or any other part
of the stock code tree.
As far as I know, under the GPL--broadly speaking, for I certainly don't
know or remember the specifics--modules get different treatment than
modifications per se.
As far sa I know, if you can stick your code into [a] completely
self-contained module(s) (and given what you've said about what
specifically you want to accomplish, it seems to me that you absolutely
can) that interact(s) with Kamailio using its module APIs and requires
no modifications to Kamailio itself, it's not subject to the same
licence constraints as modifications per se.
Please do not take my advice as stated, and consult a competent
software/IP attorney.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North
Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Hello:
How to install kamailio-4.2.3 in debian Wheezy?
I need the procedure!!!!
we can install P-CSCF, I-CSCF, S-CSCF and HSS on separate servers?
Best regards,
YANKO MARIN MURO
---
This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gateway 5.6.28/RELEASE running at host imx3.etecsa.cu
Visit our web-site: <http://www.kaspersky.com>, <http://www.viruslist.com>
Hi All,
Im trying to load up module 'mi_xmlrpc.so' into my v4.2.1 Kamailio. It
compiles nicely but when I try to load the module in config and restart
kamailio it gives following error(s)
0(30917) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:597]: load_module(): could not open
module </usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so>:
/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so: undefined symbol:
xmlrpc_strsol
0(30917) : <core> [cfg.y:3436]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file
/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 329, column 12-25: failed to
load module
0(30917) ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:166]: set_mod_param_regex(): No module
matching <mi_xmlrpc> found
Now, I've done some searching around and it seems like pre-req library
version mismatch thing..
Do you guys have any solution to this.
My end objective is to be able to send MI commands to my Kamailio server(s)
via web-Interface. Any recommendations, examples are welcome.
Best Regards,
Sammy.
