sr-users November 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

80 participants
123 discussions

Removing transport=TLS from the contact header

by Rizwan Khan

I want to remove the transport=TLS from the contact header. How can I do that inside Kamailio? The flow is an under: Client --------> Kamailio -------------> FS TLS UDP Client <-------- Kamailio <------------- FS TLS UDP FS gets a request on udp but it complains about TLS profile as the contact header has the transport=TLS. Since its receing traffic on UDP, if I only get rid of the value from the Contact Header, it would be great. Thanks, Rizwan Khan

8 years, 10 months

Header field Contact not changed on kamailio 4.2

by Зуев Михаил

Hi all, I need to modify the host part of a contact header. I'm trying something like: route { ..... if (remove_hf("Contact")){ if (insert_hf("Contact: rn", "Contact")) xlog("Contact modified"); } if (!t_relay("YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY","5060")) { sl_reply_error(); } ...... } When i look SIP DUMP on YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY side i see older Contact field. I try subst_hf with regexp, subst and simply remove Contact, all this does not work. What i am doing wrong? -- С уважением Зуев Михаил

8 years, 10 months

Examples

by Ryan Holbein

Hello, I have everything setup and installed... Does anyone have a good link or could tell me the steps of how to connect my trunks to phone provider and then another one would be how to route the calls to the internal PBX system. Thank you

8 years, 10 months

kamailio enabling reply to options

by amar Smart Telecom

Dear All, Could you pls advise: How can we enable 'options' in Kamailio. Other server is sending "options" but our Kamailio is not responding. Thanks.

8 years, 10 months

Re: [SR-Users] Branch & Forking

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, the aggregation of replies for a parallel fork is done automatically and negative responses are absorbed. Can you send a ngrep trace of a call where you found that the negative response of a branch is not absorbed in case a branch answered? Cheers, Daniel On 05/11/15 16:41, Marino Mileti wrote: > I'm playing with branch and i'm using this simple route (copied from kamailio website) > > route { > seturi("sip:a@example.com"); > append_branch("sip:b@example.com"); > append_branch("sip:c@example.com"); > t_relay(); > break; > } > > A B & C rings at the same time. > > If B or C aren't registered, and the caller send a CANCEL, it receives also a 404 messsage because for example B wasn't online. > > Is it possible that Kamailio "absorb" this 404? I don't want that my caller receive it :) > > Marino Maria Mileti > marino.mileti(a)alice.it > > > --- > Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat

8 years, 10 months

Outgoing SIP messages

by Varghese Paul

Hi all, Is it possible to log the outgoing SIP messages relayed from kamailio ? Regards Varghese Paul

8 years, 10 months

Question about siremis

by Bruno Salzano

Hello, i hope not to be OT. However I noticed that latest release is 4.2.0 and that this version is compatible with kamailio 4.2.x. Is it compatible also with 4.3.x? Another question is related to Siremis development: this great webapplication is developed using PHPOpenBiz Framework. From several days the PHPOpenBiz website is down. So will Siremis development continue on PHPOpenBiz? Is there some release schedule? Best Regards Bruno

8 years, 10 months

Preprocessor define puzzle

by Alex Balashov

Hi, I've got: # define WITH_VENDOR_ROUTING_LNPOIP at the top of my config. This is intended to mean that this constant is commented out and disabled ('# define' vs. '#!define'), and tests correctly in a given request route. Later: route[STAGE_3] { ... #!ifdef WITH_VENDOR_ROUTING_LNPOIP xlog("L_INFO", "LNPOIP ENABLED STAGE 3\n"); #!else xlog("L_INFO", "LNPOIP NOT ENABLED STAGE 3\n"); #!endif route(OUTBOUND_VENDOR_SELECT); } This tests correctly: Nov 8 21:17:54 centosity6 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[12296]: INFO: LNPOIP NOT ENABLED STAGE 3 However, in route[OUTBOUND_VENDOR_SELECT]: #!ifdef WITH_VENDOR_ROUTING_LNPOIP xlog("L_INFO", "LNPOIP ENABLED\n"); #!else xlog("L_INFO", "LNPOIP NOT ENABLED\n"); #!endif This prints: Nov 8 21:17:54 centosity6 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[12296]: INFO: LNPOIP ENABLED Nov 8 21:17:54 centosity6 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[12296]: INFO: LNPOIP NOT ENABLED ... which I must admit is quite puzzling. Looks like it's both defined and not defined. Running 4.3:16be09c here. Thanks! -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

8 years, 10 months

Kamailio 4.2.3 generates core dump when using sql_xquery in event_route htable:mod-init

by Jan Hazenberg

Daniel, I'm currently running a kamailio 4.2.3 with htable enabled and i'm trying to load data into a hash table using the "event_route[htable:mod-init]". When i try to execute a sql_xquery kamailio generates a core dump on startup. Example event_route: event_route[htable:mod-init] { sql_xquery("kamailio", "SELECT id,number FROM blacklist_number", "blacklist_number"); } Log output when starting kamailio: 0(16905) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob 0(16905) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(16905) INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 0(16905) INFO: auth [auth_mod.c:350]: mod_init(): auth: qop set, but nonce-count (nc_enabled) support disabled 0(16905) INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: //etc/kamailio/permissions.allow 0(16905) INFO: permissions [permissions.c:608]: mod_init(): default allow file (//etc/kamailio/permissions.allow) not found => empty rule set 0(16905) INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: //etc/kamailio/permissions.deny 0(16905) INFO: permissions [permissions.c:617]: mod_init(): default deny file (//etc/kamailio/permissions.deny) not found => empty rule set 0(16905) INFO: pike [pike.c:115]: pike_init(): PIKE - initializing 0(16905) INFO: pike [ip_tree.c:88]: init_lock_set(): probing 256 set size 0(16905) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:175]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 124928 0(16905) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:225]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 249856 0(16905) INFO: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:1593]: rtpp_test(): rtp proxy <udp:10.1.8.20:22000> found, support for it enabled 0(16905) NOTICE: <script>: Startup event route! Segmentation fault (core dumped) Could this be a bug? Or is there a better way to load data from a custom table into a hashtable on startup. Thanks, Jan Hazenberg

8 years, 10 months

running kamilio on mac

by Stefan Mancunianet

Hi, I’ve installed kamilio on mac, but when trying to run it i get the following error message: [sctp_core.c:75]: sctp_core_check_support(): SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module [sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized Can sctp flag be disabled ? It’s not required for my needs, and from what I found on the web, it’s very tricky to use sctp on Mac. Thanks

8 years, 10 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2015