sr-users January 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

94 participants
134 discussions

Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode
by Mickael MONSIEUR 02 Dec '15

02 Dec '15

Hello, First, i have 7 years experience with Asterisk, but I started a project with Kamailio, forgive me in advance if I say silly things...! ;-) I set up a classic Asterisk / Kamailio configuration: sip phones -> kamailio -> asterisk -> sip trunks/pstn. When a call comes from the PSTN side, if I configure Asterisk as follows: [012345678] type = friend username = 012345678 secret = xxxxxxx host = dynamic fromdomain = sip.mydomain.com fromuser = 012345678 Standard mode: exten => 012345678, 1, Dial(SIP/012345678) -> The call is redirected on the phone by Kamailio ! :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Trunk mode: [mytrunk] type = friend username = mytrunkUser secret = xxxxxxx host = dynamic fromdomain = sip.mydomain.com fromuser = mytrunkUser exten => 012345678, 1, Dial(SIP/mytrunk/012345678) -> The call is rejected by Kamailio.... exten => 012345679, 1, Dial(SIP/mytrunk/012345679) -> The call is rejected by Kamailio .... My question is how to allow the routing of multiple numbers (trunk mode) in a SIP account with Kamailio? Best regards, Mickael

3 6

Kamailio IMS - VM
by Bruno Cruz 17 Nov '15

17 Nov '15

Hello everyone, My name is Bruno, I'm a student from Portugal studying IMS at the moment. I've been following tutorials online, trying to get Kamailio to work as an IMS core - I'm pretty much a newbie in this field. Unfortunantly I've been getting several errors and I can't seem to properly configure everything. I was wondering if there is a All-in-One VM that can be downloaded, with Kamailio ready to be used as an IMS core? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bruno C.

4 8

[Kamailio-Users] HA+DRBD setup
by Siddhardha Garige 09 Jul '15

09 Jul '15

Hello all, Just wondering if anyone know any tutorial on setting up HA+DRBD solution for kamailio. Especially creating partitions, DRBD devices and mount points. Thanks in advance, -Sid "May the light be with you." ______________________________________________ Siddhardha Garige www.luminepixels.com

11 24

topoh ACK Call-ID mismatch
by Daniel Tryba 23 Apr '15

23 Apr '15

Trying to call a T.38 enabled endpoint B from an endpoint A that doesn't. This results in a "488 Not Acceptable" from A. The kamailio (4.0.3) in between with topoh enabled (with mask_callid set to 1. Kamailio ACKs the 488 to A, but the ACK has the wrong (masked) Call-ID, resulting in the ACK to A being ignored, A keeps sending 488 at intervals before just dropping the call. My understanding is the Call-ID in the ACK has to be the same as the Call-ID from the 488. But instead of sending the unmasked Call-ID used in all other messages between A and Kamailio, the ACK contains the masked Call-ID used in all messagea between A and Kamailio. I can't find a bug report relating to this. Is this a known feature or maybe fixed in newer versions? A->Kamailio SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable here. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 109.235.32.40;branch=z9hG4bKf91a.c6c88747.0;received=109.235.32.40. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.19.162.1;branch=pocos- rS4MusXox1l5QHyNxRy6uAXsEOdsxidSEAktxGZKWgeKCgeS- RrKEAy057Nl9DEpWpefZD6AhGtwWDJjEqeuEAZgZs5iZA7*. From: <sip:+31880100799@sip.pocos.nl:5060>;tag=as3869fe2a. To: "+31880100705" <sip:+31880100705@sip.pocos.nl>;tag=as1b0b8097. Call-ID: 0b5946b977210450571f767a19cd6fa0(a)99sip.pocos.nl. CSeq: 102 INVITE. Kamailio<-A ACK sip:+31880100705@109.235.32.48 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 109.235.32.40;branch=z9hG4bKf91a.c6c88747.0. Max-Forwards: 16. From: <sip:+31880100799@sip.pocos.nl:5060>;tag=as3869fe2a. To: "+31880100705" <sip:+31880100705@sip.pocos.nl>;tag=as1b0b8097. Call-ID: !!:xqXtWRMpZAngEsX3xGMtxGrgxDZgEA9JxR4AzGz8ZRIyWR4sh.yomqlACgxoC8K*. CSeq: 102 ACK. -- Telefoon: 088 0100 700 Sales: sales(a)pocos.nl | Service: servicedesk(a)pocos.nl http://www.pocos.nl/ | Croy 9c, 5653 LC Eindhoven | Kamer van Koophandel 17097024

3 11

Kamailio: MI Command: 'trusted_dump' and 'trusted_reload'
by José Luis Millán 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

Hi, I'm using 'allow_trusted()' from Permissions module without a problem in a Kamailio 4.0 routing logic. It does just work, but the MI command 'trusted_dump' tells me that the module is not in use: ''' server:/home/jmillan# kamctl fifo trusted_dump 500 Trusted-module not in use ''' Doing a 'trusted_reload' does neither make any query to database to retrieve the data. Other MI commands of same module do work correctly. ie: 'address_reload' or 'address_dump' Note: I have tested in a Kamailio 1.5 and the result is the same. Regards. -- José Luis Millán

4 3

Recommendation for toggling MSILO m_store auto-notification reply on/off
by Anthony Messina 02 Apr '15

02 Apr '15

Using Kamailio 4.2-dev and MSILO, is it possible to "toggle" the auto- notification reply MESSAGE using something similar to the following where "$var(msilo_reply)" is emtpy at startup (or are there suggestions for a better method): modparam("msilo", "from_address", "$var(msilo_reply)") ... if(CONDITION WHERE I WANT THE AUTO-REPLY RETURNS POSITIVE) { $var(msilo_reply)="$rU(a)example.net"; } m_store($rU) ... My use case is that I would like the auto-notification reply to occur in some instances, but not others. I also do not want to create a loop where the auto-notification replies are also stored. I was originally using a simple test: if(src_ip!=myself), but I have begun to use the IMC module as well as the EXEC module and these MESSAGEs appear to originate from "myself." Looking at the MSILO documentation I see there is "extra_hdrs(string)," but this appears to be designed to add headers to dumped MESSAGEs. I was hoping there would be a way to add a custom header to the auto-notification, on which I could filter/drop generated replies earlier in the route, but it doesn't appear that this exists. My preference for the best-case scenario would be to control the generation of the auto-notification reply in the first place rather than having to add a control to detect the reply and drop it. Thanks in advance for any recommendations. -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 3

File transferring issue
by Wingsravi R 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Dear Kamailio'ns, I am working on kamailio Server (V 4.0) installed on Ubuntu 12.04 system. Currently i am trying file transfer feature using IMSDroid SIP clients. file transferring is fine between two IMSDroid clients but at the receiving end (file recipient) i cont see the sender identity/ sender name. it is just displaying as 'null' (Screen shot is attached). But the full file is transferring to destination address without any problem. I have configured MSRP module related script in my kamailio configuration file (find the attachment). but i guess it is not invoking anyway when file transferring and the file transferring is negotiating client-to-client basis. And also find Sip capture of file transfer (ngrep based) for better understanding. What could be the problem? Why at the file recipient side it is not displaying sender's identity (instead it is 'null')? how can i resolve this issue? Anyone please help me in resolving this issue. Any help will greatly appreciate. Regards, Ravi.

5 6

Kamailio IMS: can not register
by dfretes＠ing.una.py 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi all. I'm trying to setup Kamailio for IMS server, but I've reached a point where I can not move. Trying to register from the Boghe client, I get these errors from the pcscf: tail -f /var/log/syslog|grep './pcscf' Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=402 a=25 n=xlog Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: <script>: REGISTER (sip:alice@ open-ims.test (192.168.1.105:62044) to sip:alice@open-ims.test, 20236156-7eed-01 e4-daac-5072e67f99e9) Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=414 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=594 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=576 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=584 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=590 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=584 a=24 n=pike_check_req Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=606 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=611 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=606 a=25 n=mf_process_maxfwd_heade r Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=617 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=611 a=26 n=sanity_check Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=623 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=617 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=629 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=623 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=633 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=629 a=24 n=t_lookup_request Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=636 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=633 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=634 a=26 n=send_reply Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=417 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=673 a=55 n=force_rport Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=694 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=675 a=25 n=nat_uac_test Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=679 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=676 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=679 a=39 n=setflag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=687 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=680 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=681 a=24 n=set_contact_alias Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=683 a=26 n=xlog Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=684 a=24 n=nat_keepalive Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=694 a=2 n=return Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=424 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=420 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=458 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=424 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=465 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=458 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=465 a=24 n=t_check_trans Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=472 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=467 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=468 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=812 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=810 a=25 n=is_present_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=811 a=25 n=pcscf_save_pending Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=812 a=25 n=t_on_reply Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=813 a=25 n=t_on_failure Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=861 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=856 a=25 n=is_present_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=860 a=25 n=append_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=872 a=24 n=t_relay Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=873 a=2 n=exit Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=910 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=908 a=25 n=t_check_status Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=909 a=26 n=send_reply All the time, this messages from the scscf: tail -f /var/log/syslog|grep './scscf' Jan 29 23:50:55 kamailioast ./scscf[3874]: INFO: cdp [peermanager.c:278]: peer_timer(): peer_timer(): Peer hss.open-ims.test #011State 6 Jan 29 23:50:55 kamailioast ./scscf[3874]: WARNING: cdp [peermanager.c:313]: peer_timer(): Inactivity on peer [hss.open-ims.test], sending DWR... - if we don't get a reply, the peer will be closed and nothing from the icscf. Thank you very much for any advice, I've run out of ideas.

2 4

Possible memory leak dealing with presence in kamailio
by Nuno Reis 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

Hello all. I'm consistently watching a memory increase in kamailio when dealing with PRESENCE events, namely SIP PUBLISH events. The system eventually hangs running out of memory. This behavior is seen at least in kamailio 4.1 and 4.2. I'm currently using the latest stable 4.2.2. If I disable the SIP PUBLISH handling in kamailio i don't observe the issue anymore but as a side effect I don't have presence (name BLFs) also. What do you think can be the right approach here? Should I open an issue in github for this? Should I run kamailio under valgrind for some time? Are there any other possible debug hints here? Please find attached a code snippet with the presence related parts I'm using right now. Looking forward to hear from you. Best Regards, -- *Nuno Miguel Reis* | *Unified Communication** Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nreis(a)wavecom.pt WAVECOM-Soluções Rádio, S.A. Cacia Park | Rua do Progresso, Lote 15 3800-639 AVEIRO | Portugal T. +351 309 700 225 | F. +351 234 919 191 *GPS <http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=202333747613191340808.0004b4b227a…> | www.wavecom.pt <http://www.wavecom.pt/>** <http://www.wavecom.pt/>* [image: Description: Description: WavecomSignature] <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/wavecom/premios.php> [image: Publicity] <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/mail_eventos.php>

4 13

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

I forgot to precise that I allow only one contact per AOR. modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) save("location", "0x04") From: Mickael Marrache [mailto:mickaelmarrache@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:51 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo Hi, I start with no location nor in Mongo, nor in memory. My UA registers successfully and I can see the location entry in Mongo. Then, I close my UA which unregisters (by setting Expires header to 0). Then, I open the app again and a new registration is made. The entry after first registration. Looks okay. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:55:34Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8809, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip:XXXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp:XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:55:34Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-3378-2", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The same entry after un register (Expires 0). Note that the username field is missing. In any case, I expected the entry to be deleted. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } The entries after second registration. The new entry looks okay. But, the old entry is still here. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb3a7884e581337a25b895"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T09:02:00Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8813, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:02:00Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-337a-1", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The issue is the entry is not deleted after un registering. I precise that registrations are dispatched over multiple registrars with all accesses the same Mongo cluster. Thanks, Mickael

2 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2015