sr-users August 2014

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

73 participants
130 discussions

UAC "credential" username, password and realm from DB

by Yuriy Gorlichenko

Hello. I suceesfully authenticate some accounts of providers from UAc using DB. When I try to Call to any provider it responds me 407 or 401 reply. To Send to It new INVITE with auth Creditans I use UAC_AUTH() with configured modparams: modparam("uac","credential","username:domain:password") modparam("uac","auth_realm_avp","$avp(i:10)") modparam("uac","auth_username_avp","$avp(i:11)") modparam("uac","auth_password_avp","$avp(i:12)") I think that avp`s used to get varibles from DB, but at test it is not write. So my question- how to get this varibles from DB (uacreg table) Thanks

9 years, 8 months

407 response from provider as failure route

by Yuriy Gorlichenko

Hi, I want to realise scheme: Asterisk->Kamailo->provider I register providers accounts at Kamailio using UAC module. When Generates call form Asterisk through Kamailio to provider, provider sends back 407 response. This reponse mut be handled by KAmailio through failure_route using uac_auth(). I try to catch this response at onreply_route by status and route this response to failure route (t_in_failure("MY_FAILURE_ROUTE"))but Kamailio ignores t_on_failure and forvard this pacjet to asterisk. So My question is: How to handle this response at kamailio and not forward to asterisk? This is invite that forwards to provider: INVITE sip:11234567890@my.provider.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:my.kamailio.com:5068;nat=yes;ftag=as57a2d34c;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.kamailio.com:5068 ;branch=z9hG4bK8544.480e25d0e6a328f5f455233d808cda80.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.6:50600;branch=z9hG4bK778521b0;rport=50600 Max-Forwards: 70 From: "John" <sip:my_provider_acc@my.provider.com:50600>;tag=as57a2d34c To: <sip:11234567890@my.provider.com:5068> Contact:<my_provider_acc@my.kamailio.com:5068> Call-ID: 3d8d6c357d69cdd51633b1c125729f44@10.0.1.6:50600 CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 12.4.0 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:18:52 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 540 v=0 o=root 1941643043 1941643043 IN my.kamailio.com s=Asterisk PBX 12.4.0 c=IN IP4 my.kamailio.com t=0 0 a=ice-lite m=audio 30108 RTP/AVP 0 3 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=maxptime:150 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30109 a=ice-ufrag:jOv9GFqq a=ice-pwd:wuXGbJ3ZI7MfwM6kwto78s8reEyU a=candidate:lzqT8la5i9wkzQzB 1 UDP 2130706431 my.kamailio.com 30108 typ host a=candidate:lzqT8la5i9wkzQzB 2 UDP 2130706430 my.kamailio.com 30109 typ host

9 years, 8 months

Does rtpengine properly handle FQDN in SDP Origin?

by Anthony Messina

I've begun playing with rtpengine (git e0957d1) a little and in my testing: CSipSimple <-> Kamailio/rtpengine <-> Asterisk 12/13 I see the following error when parsing SDP from the Asterisk side, possibly related to the use of the FQDN in the Origin: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:44407: answer - { "sdp": "v=0 o=- 3617462201 3617462204 IN IP4 hostname.example.com s=Asterisk <snip> Error parsing SDP at offset 5: Error parsing o= line Protocol error in packet from 127.0.0.1:44407: Failed to parse SDP [d3:sdp353:v=0 o=- 3617462201 3617462204 IN IP4 hostname.example.com s=Asterisk <snip> It was brought up here, https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23994 and it appears that a FQDN should be supported in the SDP Origin. Is this the case, or might it be something else? -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

9 years, 8 months

event_route xhttp:request

by Kamrul Khan

i am trying to connect to my kamailio through websocket. I added the below code in my config file: event_route[xhttp:request] { xlog("websocket connection request"); set_reply_close(); set_reply_no_connect(); if (ws_handle_handshake()) { exit; } xhttp_reply("404", "Not found", "", "");} However, when I try to connect from my web phone, It shows : Aug 15 15:22:31 ubuntu /usr/local/kamailio-devel//sbin/kamailio[17202]: WARNING: xhttp [xhttp_mod.c:133]: mod_init(): event_route[xhttp:request] is empty Can someone please tell me what wrong im doing ?

9 years, 8 months

rtpengine symmetric RTP behavior

by Narsay, Deep

Hello, Is there any way rtpengine can be configured to use same UDP port to receive and transmit RTP packets? The set up I'm trying is SIP_Client --> Kamailio/rtpengine --> Freeswitch Internet Internet LAN LAN 192.168.1.10 I tried *rtpengine_offer * in kamailio.cfg, but rtpengine seems to always use different ports to Tx/Rx the packets. (Causing Freeswitch to auto adjust its ports, which mutes the audio channel one way). *rtpengine_offer("force symmetric media-address=192.168.1.10 replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove");* *Thank you,* * - Deep N*

9 years, 8 months

automatic string to int conversion for rtpengine flags failed

by Olli Heiskanen

Hello, As outcome to my earlier sdp/rtp challenges I've upgraded my Asterisk version to 11.11.0 and still use a realtime integration with Kamailio. Now I face a somewhat different problem. With my setup I also changed from jssip client to a sip.js client in my websocket implementation. I cloned the latest rtpengine from git today. I had to revert my Asterisk settings a bit, Asterisk was taking over with sdp handling, I don't know if this is relevant but that's why I got calls seemingly working before. When getting the 488 Not Acceptable, I arm a branch route and call rtpengine_offer there. When trying to call rtpengine_offer, I get the following log: (first I print the rtpengine_offer_flags to make sure what is passed to the function. Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 kamailio[32178]: INFO: <script>: MANAGE_RTPENGINE_BRANCH: rtpengine_offer_flags = rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 kamailio[32178]: WARNING: <core> [rvalue.c:1016]: rval_get_int(): automatic string to int conversion for "rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP" failed Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 kamailio[32178]: WARNING: <core> [rvalue.c:1920]: rval_expr_eval_int(): rval expression conversion to int failed (1128,32-1128,32) Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 rtpengine[32159]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:44292: delete - { "call-id": "k7bft3u75p5e42ib039r", "received-from": [ "IP4", "client_public_address" ], "from-tag": "74dovi97bi", "command": "delete" } Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 rtpengine[32159]: [k7bft3u75p5e42ib039r] Call-ID to delete not found Aug 15 15:04:16 u363id562 rtpengine[32159]: Returning to SIP proxy: d7:warning38:Call-ID not found or tags didn't match6:result2:oke After this I see another 488 and the loop swirls on until Kamailio runs out of forking capacity. Can You guys explain why is this happening? I set the variable like this: $avp(rtpengine_offer_flags) = "rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP"; cheers, Olli

9 years, 8 months

Kamailio 4.1.(5-3) Dialog Module can't create hash if 2 same Invite comes.

by Yasin Caner

Hello i realize that if two same Invite comes to kamailio sequentially for a call, dialog module cannot create hash data and dont'give any error about it. After get ACK or BYE for this call , it gives warning like 'unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'f3f1.0524' [7999:16976]' . So i cannot get any data call is hook up from dialog event_route. For prepaid account system , dialog module is weak or i made some mistakes. is there any better solution for accounting for high volume calls. I just need that call is hook up and closed or failed. which module is best option for it? (IMS ,SEAS, RADIUS) Thanks

9 years, 8 months

XMLRPC problem

by Kelvin Chua

i am currently having problems on xmlrpc i am using node-xmlrpc and it fails when htable.dump returns more than 1 row. i raised this issue on the node-xmlrpc group and this is the explanation i got. Each <value> node inside <param> is supposed to only have one child node, so this looks like an invalid response. The<value> should (probably, i don't know your use case) contain an <array> with <data> wrapped around the structs. Seehttp://xmlrpc.scripting.com/spec.html does this mean kamailio is not following standards? here is the working response: <methodResponse> <params> <param> <value><struct><member><name>entry</name><value><int>6</int></value></member><member><name>size</name><value><int>1</int></value></member><member><name>slot</name><value><struct><member><name>item</name><value><struct><member><name>name</name><value><string>4::num</string></value></member><member><name>value</name><value><int>1</int></value></member></struct></value></member></struct></value></member></struct> </value> </param> </params> </methodResponse> here is the non-working response: <methodResponse> <params> <param> <value><struct><member><name>entry</name><value><int>6</int></value></member><member><name>size</name><value><int>1</int></value></member><member><name>slot</name><value><struct><member><name>item</name><value><struct><member><name>name</name><value><string>4::num</string></value></member><member><name>value</name><value><int>1</int></value></member></struct></value></member></struct></value></member></struct> <struct><member><name>entry</name><value><int>11</int></value></member><member><name>size</name><value><int>1</int></value></member><member><name>slot</name><value><struct><member><name>item</name><value><struct><member><name>name</name><value><string>3::num</string></value></member><member><name>value</name><value><int>1</int></value></member></struct></value></member></struct></value></member></struct> </value> </param> </params> </methodResponse> Kelvin Chua

9 years, 8 months

uac module - remote registration updates

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, lately I pushed several commits to enhance the handling of remote registrations with uac module. Among them: - uac.reg_info - rpc command to get the details of a remote registration record using filter on uuid, local/remote/auth username - uac.reg_enable and uac.reg_disable - rpc commands to enable/disable registration of a record from memory at runtime, without restarting kamailio - uac.reg_reload - rpc command to reload remote registration records from database (avoid restarting when adding new records in database) - uac.reg_refresh - rpc command to load a record from database based on l_uuid. If record is already in memory, then the password field is updated, otherwise a new full record is added in memory I barely had resources to test it properly, therefore I am asking people using this feature to give it a try and report the issues -- you have to use the git master branch. You can read more details about the new features in the readme of the uac module: - http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/uac.html Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA

9 years, 8 months

Show domain name of particular online user in logs

by aawaise

Hello, I want to show the domain name of a callee (by which it is registered to the domain at the time of incoming invite packet) in the logs. I have tried adding a few lines to usrloc module. But didnot work. I am using LM_DBG command to show the domain name in the logs. How can I add some variable which holds the domain name and then print it in logs using LM_DBG or LM_ERR command ?? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Show-domain-name-of-particular-onli… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

9 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2014