sr-users April 2014

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

100 participants
171 discussions

Kamailio and FHoSS integration
by Andrea Meroni 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hi all, i am testing a very basic IMS core Kamailio-based using as HSS FHoSS. However, while using SIPp to stress the system, i noticed that the VM hosting the FHoSS is overloaded (even with 2 registration scenarios per second), in particular using top i was able to see that the java process used almost 200% of the CPU (i run the VM using qemu with options -m 1024 -smp 4). Is it normal or have i misconfigured something? Someone else has the same problem? Andrea

4 7

$(hdr(name)[N]) question
by Juha Heinanen 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

wiki was this related to $(hdr(name)[N]): If [N] is omitted then the body of the first header is printed. The first header is got when N=0, for the second N=1, a.s.o. In case of a comma-separated multi-body headers, it returns all the bodies, comma-separated. i don't understand the last sentence. how can i get all bodies of all headers of name=x as a comma separated list? -- juha

2 8

jsSIP client disconnects after a while when using Kamailio websocket
by Alex Villacís Lasso 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

I am having this issue when using kamailio-4.1.2 (after patching the segfault bug). The kamailio is configurated as a frontend for asterisk. When using UDP for SIP, this works correctly. However, I am now setting up websockets (no TLS yet), and I am getting a disconnect after an interval. I am getting this on the logs: Apr 11 16:19:41 elx3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[4814]: WARNING: websocket [ws_frame.c:868]: ws_keepalive(): forcibly closing connection Tweaking with keepalive_mechanism=1 and keepalive_timeout does not change the situation, and does not even modify the interval before the disconnection. Is this keepalive something that should be visible on a SIP trace? I am only seeing REGISTER and its response from the jsSIP trace. I do not want to have to disable keepalives just to work around this issue.

2 1

480 Temporarily Unavailable
by David Giannetto 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

I get this error "480 Temporarily Unavailable" Every time I dial 206-456-1041 this is the information I have entered in the the filds: line 1 Username: optimized72 <optimized72(a)iptel.org> Password: Freek101@ Proxy: iptel.org -- *l <http://LEDSLEDSLEDS.COM>edslesdlesd.com <http://edslesdlesd.com>* David Giannetto VOIP COM 915 235 47 86 105 E San Antonio Ave Suit 303 El Paso, Texas, 79901 VOIP COM 625 106 6388 Lerdo y 19 # 986 CD. Cuauhtemoc, Chih.

2 1

Translate calling/called party based on username to telephone number base id.
by Helena Garcia-Nieto 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hi all. I want to thank you all for the great info and help that you provide in this mailing list. I am just starting to work with kamailio and still learning. I would like some help to point me on the right direction on our new challenge: We have a kamailio server acting basically as location server and call proxy. We are connected to a PSTN gw to reach the outside world. It is working fine but now the client requested some changes that may imply we work with username base subscribers (user1. Characters based) at kamailio side but we still need to convert these usernames to numbers when sending the call to the PSTN gw. Username-number should be fix and can be stored in a table on the db. We would need to lookup userpart of all the header (from, to, contact.) and substitute incoming username with the peer number for calls from the app to pstn. And translate numbers to usernames on the calls from pstn to the apps. I am reading uac module and the sqlops module to search in the db before the substitution but I am not sure if that is the best approach to the problem. Could anyone point me in the right direction or suggest a better way to do that? Have anyone already implemented this type of modifications? I am a bit worried for the dialog consistency although I've read the uac module should take care of it Thanks in advanced Helena From: Helena Garcia-Nieto [mailto:helena.gnieto@morodo.co.uk] Sent: martes, 10 de diciembre de 2013 16:19 To: 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' Cc: helena.gnieto(a)morodo.co.uk Subject: 500 I'm terribly sorry error Hello, Thanks in advanced for the help. I am almost new with kamailio and still struggling through silly problems so please forgive me if the solution is so obvious. I have a network like Xlitle -- Kamailio -- GW The GW is more or less out of my reach for changing the behaivour. As devices I have xlitle Kamailio is on version 4.0.2 I've changed only few things from the default config file. Add mysql support, auth, userlocdb, pstngw. For this part, gw routing , I've defined gw ip and port inside the PSTN definition like: #!ifdef WITH_PSTN # PSTN GW Routing # # - pstn.gw_ip: valid IP or hostname as string value, example: # pstn.gw_ip = "10.0.0.101" desc "My PSTN GW Address" # # - by default is empty to avoid misrouting pstn.gw_ip = "" desc "PSTN GW Address" pstn.gw_port = "" desc "PSTN GW Port" iskratel.gw_ip = "10.XX.XX.XX" iskratel.gw_port = "5060" #!endif I route the calls with: route(ISKRATEL); And defined a routing function route[ISKRATEL] { #!ifdef WITH_PSTN # check if ISKRATEL GW IP is defined if (strempty($sel(cfg_get.iskratel.gw_ip))) { xlog("SCRIPT: PSTN rotuing enabled but iskratel.gw_ip not defined\n"); return; } # only local users allowed to call if(from_uri!=myself) { sl_send_reply("403", "Not Allowed"); exit; } if (strempty($sel(cfg_get.iskratel.gw_port))) { $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.iskratel.gw_ip); } else { $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.iskratel.gw_ip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.iskratel.gw_port); } # Add profix to ISKRATEL: A99901 subst_uri('/^sip:(.*)/sip:A99901\1/i'); # add A99901 route(RELAY); exit; #!endif return; } I can see that the code goes all the way to the route(relay) but all I can see is the 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) and a second response 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/TM) I've tried defining the IP as the given pstn.gw_ip and route(pstn) without changing anything on the pst default routing but the response of the server is the same. I cannot see any special error on the logs. I have the exact same config for this part, in another test server and the calls go to the gw without reporting any error. I'll appreciate any help from you! Thanks in advanced for your time Helena

2 1

test if record_route() has been called already?
by Juha Heinanen 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

is there any means to test if record_route() has been called already on the request? if it is called more than once, error message is issued. -- juha

2 1

Processing on Invite Packet
by aawaise 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hello, On arrival of INVITE packet to the Kamailio server, which module is used to take in response to Invite packet. Other than record_route, which records the route. And what to do if we want to add some actions in response to INVITE packet. Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Processing-on-Invite-Packet-tp12709… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

DRouting, routeid is not triggered
by Maciej Bylica 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hello, I am working on version: kamailio 4.1.2 (x86_64/linux) and heaving troubles with drouting module. The problem i am facing is that kamailio cannot enter routeid that is provided inside dr_rule table. My last try was to use standard script file with placing following data before t_relay if (!do_routing("10")) { sl_send_reply("403", "No route for You"); exit; } additionaly i have added route definition route[1] { xlog("L_INFO","[INFO] Default route --- fn-$fn, fu-$fu, fU-$fU, ru-$ru, rU-$rU, sp-$sp, si-$si, tu-$tu, tU-$tU"); uac_replace_from("sip:$fU@10.10.10.5"); } My DB contains following data: +--------+---------+--------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+ | ruleid | groupid | prefix | timerec | priority | routeid | gwlist | description | +--------+---------+--------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+ | 1 | 10 | 43 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | test rule | +--------+---------+--------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+ +------+------+---------------+-------+------------+-------+-------------+ | gwid | type | address | strip | pri_prefix | attrs | description | +------+------+---------------+-------+------------+-------+-------------+ | 1 | 10 | 10.10.10.9 | 0 | NULL | NULL | FirstGW | +------+------+---------------+-------+------------+-------+-------------+ The result is that script is omitting route[1] without any purpose (xlog is not shown, $fU is not modified). Could somebody help me to understand whats going on? Thanks in advanced, Mac

2 8

avpops question...
by arun Jayaprakash 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hello, I have a piece of code as follows: $avp(callfwdcount) = 0; $avp(dnumber) = $rU; $var(found) = 0; while($avp(callfwdcount) < 3) { if (avp_db_load("$avp(dnumber)", "$avp(callfwd_permanent)")) { ..... $avp(dst_number) = $avp(callfwd_permanent); # SET THE CALL FORWARD TO NUMBER .... } Now this works if this is a single domain set up. I am running a multidomain set up and need to check the domain part to ( $rd ) and if there is match in the database with $rU and $rd then the forward to number needs to be set. Can someone let me know how this can be done? Thank you, Arun

2 2

Dialog module and confirmed-unacked dialogs
by Alex Balashov 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hi, I am wondering if perhaps we ought to do something with regard to specific handling of confirmed-nonacked dialogs (CONFIRMED_NA state in dlg_hash.h) in the dialog module. These are dialogs where a 2xx reply is sent to the opening INVITE transaction, but no end-to-end ACK is seen[1] by Kamailio and thus the dialog is not recorded as transitioning to CONFIRMED state. This can happen for a variety of reasons, but the most common scenario I run into is the CANCEL-200 OK race, where the caller cancels the call just as the callee answers it, near-simultaneously. The 200 OK hasn't gotten back to the caller yet, so when it receives it, it has no effect, because from the caller's point of view, the dialog has already been CANCEL'd. Meanwhile, the CANCEL has no effect on the callee end either, since, from its point of view, the dialog has already transitioned into confirmed state. The problem I am running into a lot is that these dialogs stay tracked up until the dialog timeout period, which can be several hours away. In high-volume environments, they can clog up concurrent channel counts. The receiving UAS has, of course, disposed of these dialogs long ago, after 64*T1, but they remain "stuck" in Kamailio. I know that RFC 3261 Section 13.3.1.4 ("The INVITE is Accepted") says: If the server retransmits the 2xx response for 64*T1 seconds without receiving an ACK, the dialog is confirmed, but the session SHOULD be terminated. This is accomplished with a BYE, as described in Section 15. Now, I know that "SHOULD" != "MUST", and I would imagine that this is probably the main reason why the dialog module does not time out such dialogs according to the same timers as the callee UA might. Nevertheless, they present a problem. Right now, I deal with it by using a script that combs 'kamctl fifo dlg_list' for dialogs in 'state:: 3' for more than X seconds and manually ends them. But, when there's a problem that one runs into nearly ubiquitously in all deployments with nontrivial deployments, it seems to me it's time to consider an additional 'dialog' modparam or something of that ilk that can provide an expedited timeout for nonacked dialogs. I would be happy to write such a patch. The reason I am bringing it up to the community is because I am uncertain as to whether this might have any unforeseen consequences, or whether it's been discussed in various dialog_ng discussions in the past that I have not carefully monitored. Thanks! -- Alex (With apologies for cross-posting.) [1] Or correctly associated based on tight matching. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2014