Hey all,
I have a pretty general SIP question that I'm hoping some of you can
shed some light on. I hope this ok for the list.
I am setting up a SIP proxy with Kamailio. The backend server
(Asterisk in my case) requires authentication. Is it standard/best
practice to require a proxy to authenticate to a backend server for
INVITEs?
I am already registering, with authentication, on behalf of the
client, i.e, the client registers to the proxy, then the proxy
registers to the backend server, all with authentication. I was
hoping not to have to do this on INVITEs, but if I don't I'm left with
the following:
client proxy backend
| -------INVITE-------> | |
| <--------407--------- | |
| ---------ACK--------> | |
| ----INVITE(auth)----> | |
| <--------100--------- | |
| | -------INVITE-------> |
| | <--------401--------- |
| | ---------ACK--------> |
| <--------401--------- | |
| ---------ACK--------> | |
| ----INVITE(auth)----> | |
| <--------100--------- | |
| | ----INVITE(auth)----> |
| | <--------100--------- |
| | <---------OK--------- |
| <---------OK--------- | |
| ---------ACK--------> | |
| | ---------ACK--------> |
It works, but, it's terrible...
Before I try to make it work differently, what do you all think it should do?
Marc
The new build system for Debian and Ubuntu packages is now in place.
This service is kindly sponsored by SipWise [0] thanks to Andreas
Granig [1]. Sipwise is providing the hosting and man power to create
and manage this new system.
deb.kamailio.org is based on jenkins-debian-glue[2] project running on
AWS EC2 environment thanks to Michael Prokop [3] and myself. All the
needed files, scripts and info to reproduce this system is kept public
at [4].
In [5] is described all the repositories available.
* nightly builds are been built if a change is detected in the branch,
once by night.
- kamailiodev-nightly
branch:
- 'master'
distributions: jessie, wheezy, squeeze, precise
- kamailio41-nightly
branch:
- '4.1'
distributions: jessie, wheezy, squeeze, precise
- kamailio40-nightly
branch:
- '4.0'
distributions: lenny, squeeze, wheezy, lucid, precise
- kamailio33-nightly
branch:
- '3.3'
distributions: lenny, squeeze, wheezy, lucid, precise
* tags are been built if a new tag is detected once by night.
- kamailio41
branch:
- '*/tags/4.1*'
distributions: jessie, wheezy, squeeze, precise
- kamailio40
branch:
- '*/tags/4.0*'
distributions: lenny, squeeze, wheezy, lucid, precise
- kamailio33
branch:
- '*/tags/3.3*'
distributions: lenny, squeeze, wheezy, lucid, precise
Now there is no 4.1.1 package built so the default kamailio repository
is pointing to a empty repository. As soon as we release 4.1.2 this
will be fixed.
Regards,
Victor Seva ( kamailio admin hat on )
[0] http://www.sipwise.com/
[1] http://www.kamailio.org/w/andreas-granig/
[2] https://github.com/mika/jenkins-debian-glue
[3] http://michael-prokop.at/
[4] https://github.com/sipwise/kamailio-deb-jenkins
[5] http://deb.kamailio.org/index.html
You can executed any SQL statements you want through 'sqlops', including invocation of stored procedures.
Our Kamailio-based Class 4 routing/trunking product is built almost entirely on Postgres stored procedures. We have dozens of them.
As to whether they are "really needed", I don't know how to answer that. :-) In our case, we decided they were really needed because they offer the opportunity to execute complex business logic beyond what Kamailio's relatively primitive route scripting language can offer, while eliminating unnecessary back-and-forth data interchange between Kamailio and the database. Stored procedures and triggers also execute in a transactional manner, which is additionally beneficial.
Shankar <shankar.rk(a)plintron.com> wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>
>
>Does Kamailio support invoking stored procedures instead of sending
>plain DB
>queries already?
>
>
>
>We have been asked to migrate to stored procedures. I am trying to
>estimate
>the effort involved in migrating Kamailio code to support stored
>procedure.
>
>
>
>Other question that comes to my mind is whether stored procedures are
>really
>needed in Kamailio. Can someone please clarify?
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Shankar
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0671
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com
Hello All,
Does Kamailio support invoking stored procedures instead of sending plain DB
queries already?
We have been asked to migrate to stored procedures. I am trying to estimate
the effort involved in migrating Kamailio code to support stored procedure.
Other question that comes to my mind is whether stored procedures are really
needed in Kamailio. Can someone please clarify?
Regards,
Shankar
I have a Kamailio server setup which is registers to a back end server on
behalf of endpoints. The endpoints can register to Kamailio but Kamailio
is failing to register to the server when I put a NAT device in front of
it. Without the NAT device it works fine.
The problem is the 401 that comes back seems to be ignored by Kamailio. I
have a failure route setup to auth, but it is never hit. I see the 401 in
onrely_route, but not the failure_route. I'm assuming it's a NAT issue
because removing the device fixes the issue.
Anyone have any ideas?
The 401 being ignored:
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.10.11;branch=z9hG4bKe5d6.178378f7.0;received=198.XXX.XXX.XXX
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:12354
;rport=6545;received=198.XXX.YYY.YYY;branch=z9hG4bK-1879-1-3
From: <sip:sip7878_spqa@64.YYY.YYY.YYY>;tag=1
To: <sip:sip7878_spqa@64.YYY.YYY.YYY>;tag=as00e32130
Call-ID: 1-1879(a)127.0.0.1
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
User-Agent: CoreDialPBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO
Supported: replaces
WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm="fe-c7c5-9o.domain.com",
nonce="151e4f60"
Content-Length: 0
Thanks,
Marc
Hi all!
Please give expanded tips about usrloc preload(). What exactly it
doing?
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
modparam("usrloc", "preload", "location")
This case kamailio load from db on startup and operate in memory after?
--
WBR, Victor
JID: coyote(a)bks.tv
JID: coyote(a)bryansktel.ru
I use FREE operation system: 3.12.9-calculate GNU/Linux
Goor morning community,
I received a notification that the repositories for Ubuntu Precise are
not available anymore.
/W: Failed to fetch
//http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio/dists/precise/Release.gpg// Could//
//not connect to deb.kamailio.org:80 (87.106.140.63). - connect
(110: Connection timed out)//
/ /
//W: Failed to fetch
//http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio/dists/precise/main/source/Sources////
//Unable to connect to deb.kamailio.org:http://
/ /
//W: Failed to fetch//
/
/http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages// Unable
to//
//connect to deb.kamailio.org:http://
/ /
//W: Failed to fetch//
/
/http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en_US// Unable
to//
//connect to deb.kamailio.org:http://
/ /
//W: Failed to fetch//
/
/http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en// Unable
to//
//connect to deb.kamailio.org:http://
/
After I tried manually to fetch new updates I got a connection and
downloaded some data but then the connection timed out.
Is this just a temporary probleme and are there any fallback mirrors?
Thanks in advance
Josef Stautner
Hello,
I need to add a Path header to the current request so the save method of registrar module will save the location with the path value to the db.
I made the necessary settings for the registrar module but I couldn't be able to add the header. Neither "append_hf" nor "add_path" of path module works since they don't add the header to the currently processing request. $hdr pseudovariable is readonly so I couldn't modify it as well.
What can I do to make this happen?
Also the reason I need this is to let people registered to different registrars to be able to call each other via their current tls connections to their respective registrars.
Thanks In Advance.
